an academic curriculum. Each level can be compared relatively to a traditional educationsystem. Four levels are maintained to hierarchically structure the contents. The breakdownstructure is organized into modules, lessons, objectives, and frames as illustrated in Figure 3.1.Each project is categorized into modules, where each module is dedicated to only one topic.Each module consists of several individual lessons, and then each lesson is subdivided intoobjectives, which is the basic learning block. Page 7.723.4 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
sub group in the ACOT pilot program population, and there was some concernthat more traditional essay-type assessment would represent a barrier to these students.Our hypothesis was that a knowledge representation task does not require languagefluency and would therefore provide students with an opportunity to renderrepresentation of content knowledge. The data were suggestive enough that we continuedto develop and research knowledge maps as an authentic assessment format [25].With the success of the World Wide Web and related technologies, our attention andefforts turned towards utilizing networked computers and distributed information sourcesto provide rich, integrated learning environments to students that embed assessmentwithin meaningful
byaggressively integrating the fundamentals of design throughout the engineeringtechnology program curriculum. ET 200 course content is conventional and developsbasic skills in the student aimed at reading and interpreting commercial and residentialconstruction drawings. Since the Engineering Technology Program at Penn StateHarrisburg is an upper division program accepting only juniors for initial enrollment, formost students, this is their first engineering course with the potential for a designcomponent. A background scenario for the bridge design exercise was keyed to the blockof instruction being taught at the time to effectively highlight and reinforce course topicstaught during the semester. In particular, this design project involved the
Instructions ofElectric Machinery”. IEEE Transactions On Education, Vol. 38, No.2, May 1995, PP(166-170).[5] M. Lightner and J. Avery “ A paperless Circuits Laboratory: Vision and Reality”. FIE’96proceedings, PP(1186-1190).[6] A. Veglis, C. A. Barbargires and A. Pombortsis “ An Interactive Laboratory Exercise forTeaching Computer Science Students Network Performance Evaluation Using MathCad andMathconnex”. 29th ASEE, IEEE frontiers in Education conference, pp. 13b3-16 November 10-13, 1999.[7] J. E. Froyd and B. J. Winkel “A New Integrated First-Year Core Curriculum In Engineering,Mathematics And Science: A Proposal”. IEEE, AES, Frontiers in Education ConferenceProceedings, pp. 92- 97, 1998.[8] G. Karady and K. A. Nigim, “Improve learning efficiency by
Session 2793 Project Falcon Base: A Freshman Introduction to Engineering Using Problem Based Learning A. George Havener, D. Neal Barlow Department of Aeronautics United States Air Force AcademyAbstractThis paper is a summary report on an experimental freshman-engineering course conducted atthe United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) during the period August 1996 – May 1999.The purpose of the course, Engr 110Z, Project Falcon Base: An Introduction to Engineering,was to develop foundation skills in problem
levels of theireducation and from various disciplines on campus have directly participated in the process ofcreating a noise abatement wall from recycled tire bales. As we write this report we summarizethe progress of the various teams and reflect on the value of the project to their overall learningobjectives. Two questions evolve from this project that focus our discussion on the relationshipbetween an authentic engineering design and the mission of the engineering design stem at CSM: Ø How does this project represent an authentic engineering design experience for engineering students? Ø What value does an authentic engineering design experience offer to engineering students and design courses
key subsystems to tackle in the future, we are on a path to improving the undergraduateexperience of space.REFERENCES: [1] Myre, D. D. and Bruninga, R. E., “United States Naval Academy Space Systems Laboratory Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 1999 [2] Hall, C. D., “Laboratory Instruction in Undergraduate Astronautics,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 1999 [3] Chesley, B. C. and Caylor, M. J., “Developing an Integrated Curriculum for Small Satellite Engineering,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 1999 [4] Inman, D. J., “Engineering Vibrations, Second Ed.,” Prentice-Hall, 2001 [5] Humble, R., U.S. Air Force Academy, conversations and notes taken on visit to USAFA, Feb. 8, 2002 [6
instructive fortheir future? In many introductory courses teaching practical tools can be risky. The fear is tohave obsolete tools by the time the students graduate. Consequently, in many schools during thelast few decades of the 20th century, the emphasis has been on mathematical and scientificconcepts. Such an approach would build a good foundation for the future classes. It would alsobe a fundamental concept that will remain the same by the time the students graduate. Finally,with that approach from the first class the serious and intellectually capable students would beencouraged to stay with the program and the rest to change fields. In fact, this approach soundsattractive to many of my colleagues, especially those who are focusing on having
. Thefounding faculty, in the summers of 1991 and 1992, established the curricular goals andfundamental structure for “an integrated academic program to address the challenges oftechnological change and the changing global economy.” Fundamental guiding principles thatwere identified at that time were: · To integrate engineering and management knowledge in order to provide students with a more holistic view of technologically sophisticated and complex corporate and industry problems; Page 7.289.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering Technology at the University of Pittsburgh atJohnstown (UPJ) in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. Before joining the faculty at UPJ, he was a Staff Engineer with GAIConsultants in Pittsburgh. His teaching interests include soil mechanics, foundation design, structural steel design,structural analysis, and incorporating practical design experience into the undergraduate civil engineeringtechnology curriculum. His research interests include soil behavior, behavior of laterally loaded transmission linestructure foundations, and statistical calibration of foundation design models. Dr. Rose received B.S. and M.S.degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 1985 and 1986 and a Ph.D. from
patterns eventually emerge). Chi has proposed that conceptualmisunderstandings arise when students incorrectly think of emergent processes as having theattributes of the causal processes they see in everyday life. [6] (Causal processes involvedistinct, sequential, goal-oriented events that have an observable beginning and end). Therefore,students may view the observed structure or patterns emerging from a series of events such asBrownian molecular motion (the result of an emergent process) as actually being the result of acausal process. They often incorrectly describe molecules as moving with intent in a linear andsequential process that stops at some point. Thus, Chi’s theory explains why students persist intheir belief that molecules move with
Session 1869 Development of the First Architectural Engineering Professional Engineers’ Examination Patricia S. Brown, P.E., Thomas E. Glavinich, D.E., P.E. Architectural Engineering Institute of ASCE/University of KansasIntroduction Historically graduates of Architectural Engineering (AE) programs have taken principlesand practices examinations in engineering disciplines that only partially address the breadth oftheir undergraduate education. An AE principles and practice examination is currently beingdeveloped to cover the key areas of engineering education that an AE
as astudent of a specific class. Furthermore, user forum was built into this environment to encouragecollaboration between users and to discuss problems. Teachers can register their classes on thetraining site and monitor their students’ progresses.While the asynchronous mode of teaching is becoming more and more popular, there is stillmuch to explore in the online teaching arena. The use of an integrated database on a web serverprovides new opportunities to research these methods. Many essential features of a large-scalelearning environment, such as user tracking, community collaboration, and assessment, aresupported by the database in the background. In particular, the system coordinates the learningactivities of each user to help them
application that combines traditional CD-ROMmultimedia tools with web tools to provide a media-rich collaborative environment.Specifically, the system is built around Macromedia Director and Microsoft’s ActiveServer Pages. Macromedia’s Shockwave Multi-user server is used as a conduit forsynchronous communications, and ASP pages are used for the storage and administrationof shared spaces. Microsoft’s Media Services and Active-X components are used toenhance the collaborative capabilities of the system.The system also address on-site collaboration through the integration of an intelligentmechanism capable of identifying users accessing the system from wireless PDA’s anddelivering alternate content through IEEE 802.11b Wireless LAN.IntroductionAs the
defining, understandingand solving problems while some others struggle with logical and critical thinking. Teaming andcommunication skills are being addressed in a relatively small number of college courses. Inorder to get students who can solve real problems, we must address the need for developmentand implementation of course modules in innovation and inventiveness in different disciplines,especially engineering and technology. Such modules can and should be designed to enhanceteaming, communication and interpersonal skills.This paper discusses some of the problems in teaching innovative problem solving and suggestssome possible solutions based on experience in an undergraduate course at Florida AtlanticUniversity titled: “Introduction to
anddisadvantages of a variety of alternate energy technologies. The course topics, contents, andgoals are discussed in detail in the paper. After two offering, the AES course meets the statedpurpose of the course and has become a popular elective even though the workload and effortrequired are significant.Background Virtually all mechanical engineering (ME) programs make use of technical electives toprovide students with depth or breath in an undergraduate ME curriculum. Many of thesetechnical electives explore traditional topical subjects such as finite element analysis or HVACsystems, but some such as composite materials or nanotechnology, provide introductions to newor emerging areas of mechanical engineering. Technical electives with titles
, faculty, students and industrial sponsors.IntroductionIt has been shown that industry experience is a proven benefit in the education and learningprocess of engineering students. The Industrial Engineering Department at the University ofPittsburgh has had a long history of utilizing team-based senior design projects working with acompany on a significant problem during the final semester of the students’ senior year. Overthe last decade, the senior design class faculty have made a concerted effort to enhance the seniordesign experience by improving the process by which projects are selected, monitored, andadministered. In the Fall 2001, the department launched its Sponsor An Industrial ENgineeringTeam (SAINT) Program. Via this formalized program
laboratory and its use with an introductory feedback-control-systemscourse has been described by Plett and Schmidt.1 In this present paper, we build on the previouswork and outline how the lab is being used to augment digital control systems courses at thesenior undergraduate level and graduate levels. Experiments and advanced student researchprojects (illustrating effects particular to digital control systems) with a magnetic levitation deviceand a control moment gyroscope are described.We have found the labs to be very helpful in aiding student understanding of control-systemsconcepts. Student comments indicate that real learning has taken place by using a hands-on labexperience that would have been missed if a purely theoretical approach had been
medium,suiting only the visual learner. The materials that are translated to this context should beprovided to the student in a way that will address as many learning styles as is possible.The Software. There are several vendors of course management software that provide an excellentfoundation for building a Web-based course. These programs manage a database of instructionalweb pages that are developed by the training institution (probably the instructor), the interfacesbetween the participants, and facilities for the assessment of student progress through theadministration of on-line testing. In presenting its programs, the department has used threepackages, each containing its own strengths: Centra ® (www.centra.com), WebCT®(www.webct.com
levels. He worked in consulting with CH2M Hill and Black &Veatch for 6.5 years. Dr. Mines holds a BS, ME, and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Military Institute,University of Virginia, and Virginia Tech. He’s a registered PE in Florida, New Mexico, and Virginia.JANET CARLSON POWELL is the Associate Director at the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, a non-profitdedicated to providing leadership in science education through curriculum and professional development, andresearch in these areas. She has a BA in environmental biology, an MS in curriculum and instruction, and a Ph.D. inscience education. She has taught and conducted research in elementary, secondary, and higher education settings.LAURA W. LACKEY has four years of
they developcurriculum intended to ensure equal access to rich curricular learning opportunities for allstudents. The state and national standards highlight the comprehensive nature oftechnological literacy. Knowledge of the national and state technology standardsinforms teachers’ practice as they work to integrate all aspects of technology acrossdisciplines within the curriculum. Student Learning Objectives Students should be able to: 6a.) Identify aspects of state and national technology standards in their inquiry- based projects. 6b.) Incorporate issues related to technology in the K-8 curriculum. ImplementationThe course builds on the successful course for first-year
positions on campus, mentoring and beingmentored, and lifelong learning. Course topics were selected with an eye towards when students would make the best useof the materials. Also, short assignments were selected to encourage the students to reflect uponour discussions and take positive actions in their daily activities. Students are encouraged tocontribute to all discussions and to provide input on other topics they would like to see in thecourse. Approximately 90 students begin the first semester course, with most continuing onthrough the second semester. Students have consistently selected this course as the most usefulcourse from their first year and strongly urge other students to participate in future offerings.I. Introduction
an innovative format that provideda remarkable result. At the center of this model are: a unifying theme, use a single instructor toteach a section (rather than each instructor teaching a single component of the course to allsections), and faculty working as a team to improve and teach the course. This paper describesthe changes we have made implementing this model and to address the issues of course content,exams, student work, and student/faculty assessment used to evaluate our success.I. IntroductionUnion College was founded in 1795 as a small liberal arts college, and was the first fine artscollege in the US to offer engineering as part of its curriculum. Union College is still a smallcollege with an undergraduate student population of
time this course will beoffered.Project ObjectiveThe UW College of Engineering funded development of a series of distance-learning courses tosupport its Engineering Co-op Program and make it easier for chemical engineers to participate.Students, potential employers, and our faculty agree that co-op can be a valuable part of anengineer’s education. Students may accept a summer-only assignment or they may extend theirtime-to-degree by working on a co-op assignment during the academic year.The HTOL course was designed to resolve the problem that few students in the Department ofChemical Engineering participated in the engineering co-op program because it hinderedprogress through the department’s curriculum. Some required courses are offered only
,learning and communications that are not found in conventional U.K full-time under-graduateprogrammes. These teaching methods range from text-based to internet-based delivery and havea strong emphasis on employment-based project work.The undergraduate course provides a ‘mainstream’ first degree in chemical engineering forindustry-based students who have some prior qualifications and experience. The postgraduatemasters-level courses are designed for a wider range of professionals with backgrounds inengineering and/or chemistry. They provide a technology-based version of an MBA and featurea strong multi-disciplinary theme that integrates advanced process technologies, managementand business (with a strong emphasis on the process of innovation) and
(ECSEL) program, to "renovateundergraduate engineering education through the infusion of design experiences acrossthe curriculum and to increase the diversity of the profession1”. ENES 100 took place inthe FSU catalogue in 1997, when the institution started to offer electrical and mechanicalengineering programs in collaboration with UMCP. In 1998-1999 academic year, ENES100 was added to the degree requirements for physics majors.The goal of the course is to improve the students’ creativity and provide an activelearning environment where students can acquire teamwork experience and practicalskills they will need during their engineering study and career. This goal is achieved bymeeting the following general course objectives: • Learning
and drives. The third unit deals withsingle-phase motors and their commercial applications. The fourth unit, the largest one, explainsthe operation and use of three-phase machines and variable-frequency drives; and the fifth unit isdevoted to the study of single-phase and three-phase transformers.II. Program DevelopmentNorthern Illinois University is strategically located in the industrial-belt area extended betweenChicago and Rockford. While the Technology Department at NIU has an excellent ElectricalEngineering Technology program, until recently, it has only one 3-credit hour course in electricmachine theory. To avoid increasing degree requirements as mentioned earlier, it was necessaryto revise the current program curriculum to allocate
in seven strategic areas: 1. Evolution of the Educational Environment 2. Accreditation of Professionalization 3. Technical Employment 4. Assessment and Evaluation 5. Education Continuum 6. Image and Marketing 7. Faculty IssuesThe project team met and wrote a major national report, entitled A National Agenda for theFuture of Engineering Technician Education. A manuscript, entitled “Workshop PondersCampus of the Future,” was published in the fall 1997 edition of this publication.The section of the report on image and marketing concluded that the success of an engineeringtechnician education program depends heavily upon the following factors that are related toimpact and marketing: · Having a
signal processing programs and processes data o Indirect data acquisition and control: PC serves as a local host to a digital signal processing system which crunches the data at very high speed.(III) Course DescriptionWeb experiments were introduced into the senior level course “EE482 Instrumentationand Control” in the 2001 academic year and has since been an integral part of thisrequired course. The old curriculum focuses extensively on classical frequency responsemethods such as complex variables, frequency response methods (Bode, Nyquist,Nichols), stability assessment techniques (Routh-Hurwitz, root locus), performancecriteria (sensitivity, steady accuracy, transient response
Instruction Integrated Into an Introductory EngineeringCourse,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 87, no. 4, October 1998, pp. 377-383.4. Petroski, Henry, “Polishing the Gem: A First-Year Design Project,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 87, no.4, October 1998, pp. 445-448.5. Little, Patrick, and Mary Cardenas, “Use of “Studio” Methods in the Introductory Engineering DesignCurriculum,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 90, no. 3, July 2001, pp. 309-318.6. Sorby, Sheryl A., and Beverly J. Baartmans, “The Development and Assessment of a Course for Enhancing the3-D Spatial Visualization Skills of First Year Engineering Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 89, no. 3,July 2000, pp. 301-307.7. Fournier-Bonilla, Sheila D., Karan L