Conference Session

Teaching Tools for Humanities and Ethics

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Edward Gehringer

Session 3661 Missing White House E-Mail: A Whistleblowing Case Study Edward F. Gehringer North Carolina State University efg@ncsu.eduAbstractWhistleblowing is a core topic for ethics courses taught to Computer Science and ComputerEngineering majors. However, most of the prominent engineering whistleblowing cases havelittle if anything to do with computing (the Hughes Aircraft case being a notable exception).Another recent case is appropriate for study, especially given the increasing focus on e-mailprivacy in the workplace

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Yun Cui; Edward Gehringer

.” In other cases, multiple assessors were used.Random matching is relatively easy to do. In an offline environment where papers are collectedat the start of a class period and then shuffled, it can be guaranteed that each student will get a Page 7.168.1paper to review, and each student will be reviewed by another student. When review takes place Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationoutside the classroom, or even when papers are collected in one class period and distributed inthe next [KPD

Conference Session

Cross-Section of Construction Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Joseph Cecere

” to the timeline for the project activities. This schedule will be one of the twokey driving forces, the other being cost, to the project and its success. The team discusses the importance ofmonitoring and updating the schedule to keep it on track.Value EngineeringBecause owners change their minds, other materials become available, or someone feels that there may be abetter process, the value engineering process is discussed. The team receives a memo from the owner requestingthe team to perform value engineering on a specific item. The team will define the item and its use, analyze thevalue of the item, review possible alternate options, and submit its review and recommendation. The teambecomes aware of what the word “value” means and that