Asee peer logo
Displaying all 2 results
Conference Session
PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only
Collection
2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Zhen Yu, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Ha Thu Le, California State Polytechnic University Pomona
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions
syllabus would not suit all projects andall teams. Therefore, we developed a general framework for the course. Then, based on thegeneral framework, each instructor develops a customized syllabus for a particular project.The general framework is as follows: 1) The course is a 1-unit class that comprises a team-based technical project component and a service learning component. It is an activity course, i.e. it may include classroom meetings, lab-based design, service learning, and other appropriate activities to meet the course learning outcomes. 2) The course learning outcomes (CLO) are specific for each project but must satisfy both the technical and service learning requirements
Conference Session
PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only
Collection
2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Xi Zhou, Northern Arizona University; Fang Lei, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications; Delbert D Willie, Northern Arizona University; Andrew Chrysler, Northern Arizona University; Liangbo Xie, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications; Phillip A Mlsna, Northern Arizona University; Jie Yang, Northern Arizona University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions
methodologies and students learning styleFor most NAU faculty, teaching in a Chinese university is a very special experience. There arealso well-known differences between the Chinese and U.S. education systems10,11,12. It is ofinterest to illustrate some of these distinctions between higher education systems.First, to a certain degree, the CQUPT education is still very much final exam-oriented, and this isreflected by comparing the course syllabus from both universities. In most CQUPT courses, thestudent’s performance is evaluated through a mid-term exam and final exam. It is very commonthat the final exam grade accounts for at least 50% of a student’s total grade and in many casesas high as 70%. On the contrary, the NAU or U.S. teaching philosophy