Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2017.[17] A. M. McAlister, D. M. Lee, K. M. Ehlert, R. L. Kajfez, C. J. Faber, and M. S. Kennedy, “Qualitative coding: An approach to assess inter-rater reliability,” in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[18] N. H. Choe, M. J. Borrego, L. L. Martins, A. D. Patrick, and C. C. Seepersad, “A Quantitative Pilot Study of Engineering Graduate Student Identity,” in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.AppendixTable 1: Participant, identity score reported from survey, interview, and selected demographicdata. Carnegie classification reported at time of
in academia and research, broaden my knowledge base, engage in evidence-based practices to promote the quality of life, and ultimately be an avid contributor to the world of academia through research, peer reviews, and publications. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Negotiating Identity as a Response to Shame: A Study of Shame within an Experience as a Woman in EngineeringAbstract: This research paper presents the findings of an interpretative phenomenologicalanalysis (IPA) case study of the experience of shame in a woman engineering student. Ouroverarching research question that framed this study was: How do woman students with multiplesalient identities
enrollment and persistence in college STEM fields using an expanded P-E fit framework: A large-scale multilevel study.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 915–947, 2014.[13] K. E. Winters and H. M. Matusovich, “Career goals and actions of early career engineering graduates,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1226–1238, 2015.[14] J. P. Martin, D. R. Simmons, and S. L. Yu, “Family roles in engineering undergraduates’ academic and career choices: Does parental educational attainment matter?,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 136–149, 2014.[15] R. L. Kajfez, K. M. Kecskemety, E. S. Miller, K. E. Gustafson, and K. L. Meyers, “First- year engineering students’ perceptions of engineering
engineeringeducation research to explore how engineering stakeholders conceptually understand or ‘cluster’ thegraduate attributes.In a large research university in Western Canada, an exploratory case study was designed with theoverarching objective to investigate whether the engineering programs in the Faculty of Engineeringemphasized the CEAB graduate attributes to reflect their reported importance by student, faculty andindustry member stakeholders. One purpose of the study was to determine how the CEAB graduateattributes cluster – or group – in practice for an Engineering-in-Training (EIT) at the beginning ofhis/her engineering career so that engineering education can be designed to more closely reflectengineering practice. In other words, when an engineer
study ofLatino/a adolescent students in that “students’ funds of knowledge should be the starting point forengineering education” [p. 14]. Second, funds of knowledge can help guide the people whosupport and mentor first-generation college students—from student service staff to professors—toidentify opportunities to help these students excel.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation under EAGERGrant No. (1734044). Interview data of first-year engineering students came from fundingsupported by the National Science Foundation under CAREER Grant No. (1554057). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect
engineering design studentsAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper describes the use of creativity practice exercises intended toenhance student creativity in a capstone design program. Engineering programs, in general, andcapstone design programs, in particular, that seek innovative conceptual solutions to complexproblems would benefit from techniques to develop and assess student creativity. Therefore, astudy was performed to evaluate two such techniques. Over the first two years of the study,capstone design students in the United States Air Force Academy’s Department of EngineeringMechanics were each assigned to one of 14 teams which received various learning experiences(treatments) intended to enhance individual creativity and design project
of the six the stages of problem solving: missing, inadequate, acceptable,and accurate. Any identification regarding group identity was removed prior to scoring andreplaced with a project-assigned ID number to maintain privacy and to mask group membershipfrom raters.A complete rating plan was proposed where four raters would use the PROCESS tool to score allsolutions submitted by all students from both cohorts. The four raters consisted of one chemicalengineering faculty member, one high school science teacher, and one graduate and oneundergraduate student in chemical engineering. All students completed ten traditional textbookproblems during the respective courses.AnalysesInitial inter-rater reliability was assessed in line with best
. Doverspike, and R. P. Mawasha, “Predicting Success in a Minority Engineering Program,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 265–267, Jul. 1999.[42] T. E. Murphy, M. Gaughan, R. Hume, and S. G. Moore, “College Graduation Rates for Minority Students in a Selective Technical University: Will Participation in a Summer Bridge Program Contribute to Success?,” Educ. Eval. Policy Anal., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 70–83, Mar. 2010.[43] M. W. Ohland and G. Zhang, “A Study of the Impact of Minority Engineering Programs at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 435–440, Oct. 2002.[44] “Solórzano and Yosso - Critical Race Methodology Counter-Storytelling as.pdf.” .
joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Ed- ucation and Outreach. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Exploring ‘Ways of Thinking’ of Interdisciplinary CollaboratorsAbstractCalls have been made for novel ways of thinking about engineering education research. Buildingon an earlier qualitative inquiry, this work in progress study examined the number and nature offactors underlying the constructs of futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking within thecontext of interdisciplinary engineering education research. Exploratory factor analysis of surveydata (n =111) supported a correlated
Group since 2010, working on a longitudinal study of over 200 graduate students in the life sciences.Her major research project, the National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded ”FIRSTS (Foundation for Increasing and Retaining STEM Students) Program: A Bridge Program to Study the Development of Science Identities,” examines mentoring relationships, identity development, and the role of outside-of-college commitments in persistence among students coming to STEM majors with limited financial support.Dr. Christopher Wagner, The College of New Jersey Dr. Wagner is currently Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ), where he has taught students at all levels of the curriculum
different groups on the map, shown inFigure 3. This will include recruiting students from different parts of the maps in order to conductlongitudinal interviews about engineering pathways and the negotiation of identities as engineers.This corresponding qualitative work will build upon this study’s existing quantitative results andwill inform additional studies with the insights recorded.ConclusionThis paper described the key model parameters that researchers must consider in using a newstatistical method, Topological Data Analysis (TDA). We also presented how TDA can be usefulto characterize students’ latent diversity from a survey study of 3,711 first-year engineeringstudents’ incoming attitudes, beliefs, and mindsets at 32 ABET-accredited