Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 6 results

Work in Progress: Assessment of Ethics Interventions in a First-Year Engineering Course

Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics in the First Year
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard T Cimino, Rowan University; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
/64/papers/14871/view​.[Accessed: March 29, 2018].[7] J. R. Rest, D. Navaez, S. J. Thoma, M. J. Bebeau, “DIT-2: Devising and testing a revisedinstrument of moral judgement,” ​J. Ed. Psych​., vol. 91, pp. 644-659, Dec. 1999.[8] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. Kenny Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, A. D Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-baseddesign teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” in ​121st ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014, ​[Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/23130​. [Accessed: Mar. 29, 2018].[9] L. Kohlberg, R. H. Hersh, “Stages of moral development,” ​Theory Pract.,​ vol. 16, pp.53-59,Apr. 1977.[10
Relevance Score: 0.020173868

Critical Approaches to CSR as a Strategy to Broaden Engineering Students’ Views of Stakeholders

Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics in the Engineering Curriculum
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Cassidy Laurel Grady, Colorado School of Mines; Nicole M. Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Linda A. Battalora, Colorado School of Mines; Emily Sarver, Virginia Tech; Carrie J. McClelland P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Rennie B. Kaunda , Colorado School of Mines; Elizabeth Holley, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Relevance Score: 0.017831348

Statistical Analysis and Report on Scale Validation Results for the Engineering Ethical Reasoning Instrument (EERI)

Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Assessment
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Peter Wesley Odom, Purdue University - Department of Engineering Education; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
EERI: 1) new items are created to replace the ones that need to be removed; or 2) theproblematic items are removed, no items replace them, and the scoring index is re-validated or re-created. References[1] Zhu, Q., Zoltowski, C., Feister, M., Buzzanell, P., Oakes, W., and Mead, A. (2014). The development of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decisionmaking in project- based design teams: integrating quantitative and qualitative methods. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Indianapolis, IN.[2] Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S., and Bebeau, M. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4), pp
Relevance Score: 0.017652135

Board 71: A Website to Host Educational Modules on Global Engineering Ethics and Conduct Research in Cross-Cultural Moral Psychology: A Work in Progress

Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division - WIP Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute; Charlemagne Manuel
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
class and utilitarian moral judgment,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 490–503, 2013.[41] H. Ahlenius and T. Tännsjö, “Chinese and westerners respond differently to the trolley dilemmas,” J. Cogn. Cult., vol. 12, pp. 195–201, 2012.[42] R. Berniūnas, V. Dranseika, and P. Sousa, “Are there different moral domains? Evidence from Mongolia,” Asian J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 275–282, 2016.[43] “Haidt et al -- Affect, Culture, and Morality,” Nat. Sustain., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2018.[44] M. Srite and E. Karahanna, “The Role of Espoused National Culture,” MIS Q., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 679–704, 2006.[45] A. Costa et al., “Your morals depend on language,” PLoS One, 2014.[46] Y. L. Chan, X. Gu, J. C. K. Ng, and C. S
Relevance Score: 0.017652135

Assessing an Online Engineering Ethics Module from Experiential Learning Perspective

Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics Across Contexts
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gokhan Egilmez, University of New Haven; Phillip A. Viscomi, University of New Haven ; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
. Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551–583, 2017.[17] J. Hess, L. Kisselburgh, C. Zoltowski, and A. Brightman, “The Development of Ethical Reasoning: A Comparison of Online versus Hybrid Delivery Modes of Ethics Instruction,” 2016.[18] R. S. Harichandran, M.-I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, C. Q. Li, J. Nocito-Gobel, and S. D. Daniels, “Developing entrepreneurial thinking in engineering students by utilizing integrated online modules,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society.[19] S. Walesh, “Resolving Ethical Issues e-Learning Module.” University of New Haven, West Haven, CT., 2017.[20] Texas Tech University, “Guidelines
Relevance Score: 0.015130401

When Eagle and Dragon Learn Together: Engineering Ethics Education in the Era of U.S.-China Trade War

Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics Across Contexts
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sharon Tsai-hsuan Ku, University of Virginia; Xiafei Yang, University of Virginia; Sitong Wang, Chongqing University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Relevance Score: 0.012608668