ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying all 13 results

Analysis of the Entrepreneurial Mind-set Elements in Established First-year Engineering Labs: Analysis Process and Lessons Learned and Changes for the Future

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nicholas Rees Sattele, Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Kadri Akinola Akanni Parris, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

performing than the other labs. The disparitybetween Q&P, SDP and the remaining labs was quite large in the first major category, withboth of them scoring high in opportunity, design, and impact.Additionally, with the exception of the Artificial Muscle lab, all got a majority of points inthe communication category and, with the exception of the SDP, most labs scored low pointsin the final major category, ‘Collaboration, ethics, and professionalism.’Curiosity, Connections, and Creating ValueAs seen in Table 1, most labs fell short in the Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Valuecategory, the foundation of the KEEN program, while the Software Design Project (SDP),Quality and Productivity (Q&P), and Wind Turbine performed slightly better

Relevance Score: 0.02488421

What Do Students Learn about Innovation?

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute and an Adjunct Assistant Professor of STEM Education Research in the Department of Technology Leader- ship and Communication at IUPUI. Dr. Hess’s research interests include exploring empathy’s functional role in engineering and design; designing STEM ethics curricula; and evaluating learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability. Previously, Justin worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Wel- don School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University where he created and refined ethical theory and learning modules to improve engineering students’ ethical reasoning skills and dispositions. Justin

Relevance Score: 0.019077528

Humanitarian Entrepreneurial Multi-Year Interdisciplinary BmE Capstone Design Course to Enable the Continued Supported Employment of Persons With Disability

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, wire the meters, programthe sensors and the meters, and test their completed total-izer baby, and to understand how and why they did so.That served as a superb buy-in ownership concept. Plusthe individuals cross-taught each other best practices.Figure 7: Students receiving & wiring their “babies.” In this mix were Chem E, Mech E, Bioscience & Physics students.A rich history of pedagogy exists re the “design” of a capstone design course.10 Under studentoutcomes (Criterion 3) for the accrediting board ABET,11 our capstone course like others satis-fies (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realis-tic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety

Relevance Score: 0.016521621

Assessing the Growth in Entrepreneurial Mind-set Acquired through Curricular and Extra-curricular Components

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

manner 11. Discern and pursue ethical practices 12. Contribute to society as an active citizenWe administered this questionnaire to 227 first-year engineering students at the University of NewHaven in 2014. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was first applied to analyze the collected data.The EFA results suggested that 27 out of the 37 items loaded on 10 factors should be retained inthis instrument and the item numbers in each of the factors should be adjusted according to thelevels of internal consistency and reliability [9]. Based on these EFA results a revised instrumentwas developed in the second design stage. The second questionnaire (Appendix 3) contained 50items with 49 loaded on 14 factors and 1 as the comparison indicator [12

Relevance Score: 0.016521621

Why Don’t Commuter-school Students Pursue Start-ups?

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: David G. Novick, University of Texas, El Paso
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

included making sure that students hadexperience with team diversity and conflict. Five of the participants reported that their team hadnot been “in sync.” Two other participants reported that their teams were split on whether tolaunch their project as a startup. As one participant reported, their team’s dynamics started on theright path but did not go as well toward the end of the project. The goal, he said, was to get thegrade and not to pursue the project. As another participant put it, his assigned team had noguarantee of a common work ethic or a common vision.A third factor involves lack of passion for the project. These results were aggregated into the“not among students’ main goals” factor in Fig. 1 but are striking enough to merit

Relevance Score: 0.015738158

A Complementary Approach to Implementing Entrepreneurship into a Mechanical Engineering Senior Capstone Course Sequence

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nathan John Washuta P.E., The Citadel; Patrick Bass, The Citadel
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

traditionalengineering coursework. Throughout the process of developing a product for commercializationand pitching this venture to potential investors, it is not difficult to imagine a wide range ofABET outcomes being addressed, in ways that traditional engineering curriculum is lacking.These exercises could align with ABET outcomes (2) an ability to apply engineering design toproduce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, andwelfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors, (3) an ability tocommunicate effectively with a range of audiences, and (4) an ability to recognize ethical andprofessional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which mustconsider

Relevance Score: 0.013768019

A Conceptual Framework for Implementation: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Southeast Angel Investments

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Andrew J. Czuchry, East Tennessee State University; Shawn A. Carson, University of Tennessee; James H. Lampley, East Tennessee State University; William H. Knight, East Tennessee State University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

theserelationships have been demonstrated in an ad hoc fashion. What we are doing now isformalizing that process which will hopefully enhance the success rate of our entrepreneurs. Figure 1 A Conceptual Framework for Implementation is Comprised of Four Steps Table 1 Ranking of Critical Risk Factors with at least 70% Consensus Critical Risk Factors Mean Value Founders and Management Team Factors - Ability to execute 5.00 Relationship Factors - Trustworthiness 5.00 Relationship Factors - Ethics/Honesty

Relevance Score: 0.013489849

Expanding and Evolving an Innovation Concentration

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Karl D. Schubert FIET, University of Arkansas; Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas; Alan E. Ellstrand, University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

; teaching engineering ethics; developingdecision-making competencies; impact of problem-based learning on women in STEM; facultyworkshops; cultures of innovation; and, educating creatives.The fact that there is very little published on the design, pedagogy, implementation, and iterativeimprovement of multi-college interdisciplinary innovation-based concentration / track forengineering and business students together does not confirm they do not exist. There were twoprograms identified: 1. University of Nebraska [155]: focused on computer science, computer engineering and management, only. 2. The Ohio State University [156]: an integrated business and engineering honors program taking existing classes together as a cohort focused on

Relevance Score: 0.012718352

Modifying the VALUE Rubrics to Assess the Entrepreneurial Mind-set

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Brock Alexander Hays, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

2 3 0 Creative Thinking 1 3 0 Critical Thinking 0 3 0 Ethical Reasoning 0 0 0 Information Literacy 0 2 0 Inquiry and Analysis 2 2 0 Integrative Learning 3 3 3 Intercultural Knowledge and Competence 3 3 0 Foundations and Skills for Lifelong Learning 3 0 3 Oral Communication

Relevance Score: 0.011128558

Entrepreneurial Engineering Education – A Research Experience for Undergraduates Focused on Entrepreneurship and Technical Innovation

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Hadi Bozorgmanesh, University of Connecticut; Manisha Srivastava, SurePath Evaluations LLC; Randi Mendes, University of Connecticut
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

-based education, engineering ethics, and process safety education.Prof. Hadi Bozorgmanesh, University of Connecticut Professor of Practice, School of Engineering A director with over 20 years of nonexecutive and executive board of director’s experience, with deep knowledge of enterprise and academic entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship. Board of governance experience includes audit & risk management committees, finance and M&A committees, and executive compensation committeesMs. Manisha Srivastava, SurePath Evaluations LLC Ms. Manisha Srivastava is the founder and president of SurePath Evaluations LLC. Her experience in- cludes implementing program assessments at the federal level and serving as the principal

Relevance Score: 0.011128558

Emerging Support Systems for Entrepreneurship Education in the Context of an Ambitious National Reform in Chilean Engineering Schools

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Macarena Zapata P.E., Universidad de Chile ; Sergio Celis, Universidad de Chile
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

have strong work ethics and that in general want to do things such as working with a professor or start an entrepreneurship. (Faculty member, UAI)PUC students feature similar characteristics of those at UAI. Some students enroll in engineeringwith the idea of continuing the family business. However, the school strongly encourages theteaching of entrepreneurship skills to their students so they can develop it in their professionallife, either by launching their own project or in a public or private organization. When theyengage in entrepreneurship they see it as a way of generating social impact.What are the main strategies the selected engineering schools use for the promotion ofentrepreneurship education?As a synthesis of these

Relevance Score: 0.009538764

Fostering Curiosity, Creating Value, and Making Connections in First-Year Students Through Product Archaeology

Conference Session: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Bruce D. Oestreich, Rowan University; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions: Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given