Paper ID #24605I Kissed Homework Goodbye: Replacing Homework with Online QuizzesDr. Thomas S. Soerens, Messiah College Thomas Soerens is Professor of Engineering at Messiah College. He teaches in Civil and Environmental engineering with specialization in storm water, ground water, and water treatment. He performs design and applied research in water systems in rural developing communities. He is a Professional Engineer and a Certified Ecological Designer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 I Kissed Homework Goodbye: Using Online Quizzes in
Paper ID #25115Safety Protocols in Civil and Environmental Engineering LaboratoriesDr. Alan S. Hoback, University of Detroit Mercy Alan S. Hoback is Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Michigan. Dr. Hoback received his Bachelor’s degree in Physics from Hastings College, Nebraska in 1987. He earned his B.S., M.S and Sc.D. from Washington University in 1989, 1991, and 1993, respectively.Dr. Alexa Rihana Abdallah, University of Detroit Mercy Alexa Rihana Abdallah is a Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering
. Malmberg, “Students’ qualification in environmental and sustainability education — epistemic gaps or composites of critical thinking?,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 259–275, 2016.[30] S. Perini, M. Margoudi, M. Fradinho, O. Marco, and M. Dipartimento, “Increasing middle school students’ awareness and interest in manufacturing through digital game-based learning (DGBL),” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., no. January, 2017.[31] L. Stanszus et al., “Education for sustainable consumption through Mindfulness Training: Development of a consumption-specific Intervention,” J. Tea, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2017.[32] C. Ormond et al., “Environmental education as Teacher Education: Melancholic reflections from an emerging
Engineering.AcknowledgementsThe author acknowledges the work of Dr. Jordan Trachtenberg and Dr. Tony Ribera in the Officeof Institutional Review and Project Assessment at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology foradministering the surveys, and conducting and transcribing the interviews.References[1] USEPA, "Constructed treatment wetland," O. o. Water, Ed., ed. Washington, DC, 2004.[2] C. S. Campbell and M. Ogden, Constructed wetlands in the sustainable landscape. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1999.[3] R. H. Kadlec and S. D. Wallace, Treatment wetland, Second ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.[4] USEPA, "Combined sewer overflows: guidence for long-term control plan," O. o. W. Management, Ed., ed. Washington, DC, 1995.[5] USEPA, "Greening CSO
new formative assessment probes. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association, 2016.[6] P. Keeley, Uncovering student ideas in science, Volume 1, Second edition. Arlington, Va.: NSTA press, National Science Teachers Association, 2018.[7] S. Foroushani, “Misconceptions in engineering thermodynamics: A review,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, p. 030641901875439, Feb. 2018.[8] D. Hammer, “More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research,” Am J Phys, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1316–1325, Oct. 1996.[9] J. P. Smith, A. A. diSessa, and J. Roschelle, “Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis
Paper ID #24810Utility of Reading Assignments in Environmental Engineering Education forEffective Learning and Greater Student Engagement in an Era of InnovativePedagogy and Emerging TechnologiesDr. Sanjay Tewari, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Tewari is Assistant Teaching Professor of Civil Engineering at the Missouri University of Science & Technology, Rolla, MO. Prior to joining Missouri S&T, he worked as Assistant Professor at Louisiana Tech University. He earned his Bachelor of Engineering (Civil Engineering) and Master of Technology (Chemical Engineering) in India. He later joined Texas A
Sensing (S) 4 7 10 Intuition (N) 5 7 10 Thinking (T) 6 8 12 Feeling (F) 3 6 8 Judging (J) 7 9 17 Perceiving (P) 2 5 3 Enrollment status Distance 0 1 2 Face to face 9 13
Environmental Engineering Curriculum: American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20-23, 2004, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.[2] A. Mitchell and C. Savill-Smith, “The Use of Computer and Video Games for Learning, AReview of the Literature,” Learning and Skills Development Agency, 2004.[3] B. K. Sato, U. Alam, S. J. Dacanay, A. K. Lee, and J. F. Shaffer, “Brewing for Students: AnInquiry-Based Microbiology Lab,” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, vol. 16-2, pp.223-229, Dec. 2015.[4] D. J. Wood, “Beer Brewing as a Model for Improving Scientific Literacy in HigherEducation,” Journal of the Human Anatomy and Physiology Science, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 19-27,Apr. 2016.[5] M. W. Pelter and J. McQuade, “Brewing Science
molecule, or a feedstock formany useful products. Molecular Synthesis of Plant-based Chemicals is a significantly moresustainable means to produce pharmaceuticals, industrial molecules, but there is a need to educateand train young minds in the methods, practices, and processes of MSPC. Clary sage, Salviasclarea, is an MSPC success story and a cautionary tale of the need to be aware of scientific trends.Clary sage oil contains the diterpene sclareol that is used to produce ambroxide that is areplacement for ambergris, an expensive and rare perfume ingredient. Around 120 family farms inNorth Carolina depend on Clary sage production, a success story that can be traced back toattempts to commercialize its production in the 1950’s in Washington state
value with some aspect of thedemonstration. We received the strongest responses with “This demo activity was a good use ofclass time” (4.71±0.57) and “This demo was interesting and engaging” (4.68±0.58). One studentshared with us that “I love demos. You are interacting, and you are not just watching a YouTubevideo.” The variation between the responses to the quiz questions and the activity questions maybe explained by Watson et al.’s [30] understanding from previous studies, where students tend toover-estimate their attitudes.We understand that these results are not to be generalized to all groups of environmentalengineering students. The demonstration was tested with a single cohort of students (n=31) fromthe Air-Quality Engineering course. To
-professional,” Collegiate Employment Research Institute, Michigan State University, 2017.[7] P. Rogers, and R. J. Freuler, “The “T-Shaped” Engineer,” Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2015.[8] J. Bradley, T. Waliczek and J. Zajicek, “Relationship Between Environmental Knowledge and Environmental Attitude of High School Students,” The Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 17-21, 1999.[9] D. Levine, and M. Strube, “Environmental Attitudes, Knowledge, Intentions and Behaviors Among College Students,” The Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 308-326, 2012.[10] S. Liu, and H. Lin, “Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Mental Models of the
non-business majors. The authors are continuing to improve this wireless watermonitoring system to meet the various needs of the water analysis applications.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by Dr. Hur’s Texas A&M start-up research fund.References[1] U. Borchers, J. Gray, K. C. Thompson, “Water Contamination Emergencies: Monitoring,Understanding and Acting,” Royal Society of Chemistry, 2011.[2] R. E. Paull, “Effect of temperature and relative humidity on fresh commodity quality.”Postharvest biology and technology 15.3, pp. 263-277, 1999[3] Texas A&M Engineering, “NSF I-CORPS” Available: https://engineering.tamu.edu/student-life/eep/nsf-i-corps.html[4] S. G. Blank, B. Dorf, “The startup owner's manual: The step-by-step guide for
).” [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/p2. [Accessed: 08-Nov-2018].[3] P. US EPA, OCSPP,OPPT, “Grant Programs for Pollution Prevention.” [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/p2/grant-programs-pollution-prevention#result. [Accessed: 08-Nov-2018].[4] P. US EPA, OCSPP,OPPT, “E3: Economy - Energy - Environment.” [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/e3. [Accessed: 08-Nov-2018].[5] L. T. M. Bui and S. Kapon, “The impact of voluntary programs on polluting behavior: Evidence from pollution prevention programs and toxic releases,” J. Environ. Econ. Manage., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 31–44, Jul. 2012.[6] P. US EPA, OCSPP,OPPT, “FY 2014 Pollution Prevention Grant Results Summary.” [Online]. Available: https
learning.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank the students who participated in this study by completing surveysand providing feedback, as well as the student who pulled together the survey data into electronicform for analysis. References[1] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson. "Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 87-101, 2005.[2] C. A. Bodnar, D. Anastasio, J. A. Enszer and D. D. Burkey. "Engineers at play: Games as teaching tools for undergraduate engineering students." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 147-200, 2016.[3] B. D. Coller, D. J. Shernoff and A. Strati. "Measuring Engagement
), Introduction to Public Health for Environmental Engineers: Results from a Three-year Pilot Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30720 7. Monahan, T., and Fisher, J.A., 2010, “Benefits of ‘Observer Effects’: Lessons from the Field,” Qualitative Research 10(3):357-376. 8. Chickering, A.W., and Gamson, Z.F., 1987, “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education,” Bulletin of the American Association for Higher Education (AAHE). 9. Lieb, S., 1991, “Principles of Adult Learning,” Phoenix, Arizona: Vision – South Mountain Community College 10. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 2015, “Criteria for
struvite precipitation reactor, and four lagoons. Testing locationsfor water quality are shown in red text for liquids (L) and solids (S). Opportunities for resourcerecovery are shown in green text.Student groups worked on three sub-projects focused on varying resource recovery strategiesrelated to the food-water-energy nexus: ● Water Reuse: system boundary includes infrastructure and O&M phases of the four lagoons and reutilization of the reclaimed water for fish production. ● Nutrient Recycling: system boundary includes infrastructure and O&M phases of the struvite reactor and subsequent utilization of the struvite fertilizer for crop production. ● Energy Recovery: system boundary includes infrastructure and O&M