Paper ID #26276I Have a Ph.D.! Now What? A Program to Prepare Engineering Ph.D.’s andPostdoctoral Fellows for Diverse Career OptionsTeresa J. Didiano, University of Toronto Teresa Didiano is the Special Programs Coordinator at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She develops and coordinates leadership programs for under- graduate students, graduate students, and engineering professionals. Teresa has an HBSc and MSc from the University of Toronto, and Life Skills Coaching Certification from George Brown College.Ms. Lydia Wilkinson, University of Toronto Lydia
Paper ID #26824SciComm: An Oral Communication Professional Development Program forSTEM Graduate StudentsDr. Amy M. Clobes, University of Virginia Dr. Amy M. Clobes is committed to supporting current and future graduate students as Assistant Director of Graduate Education for the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. In her current role, Dr. Clobes collaborates to support existing programs and develops new initiatives in graduate student recruitment, training, education, and career and professional development. Dr. Clobes holds a B.S. in Biology from the University of Michigan and Ph.D. in
student organizations and a departmental Student Ambassador program. She also co-developed an orientation course for first-semester students in the major. She continually looks for ways to enhance student learning, development and career preparedness.Dr. Timothy J. Jacobs, Texas A&M University Associate Professor in Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Training Engineers to Professional Management through the Doctor of Engineering in Engineering DegreeIntroductionEngineering has been a long-standing profession and educational area of study. Mostundergraduates seek employment after degree
in two differently-funded programs at the same university with a variety of research topics, mentors, and theirresearch groups. However, the two programs had a similar structure of research experiences forstudents, sharing the same housing and common activities for 10 weeks. Pre- and post-surveysrevealed the common and uncommon areas of the impact of the programs on national andinternational students’ career goals, self-efficacy on graduate school, perceptions of research, andresearch expectation and experiences. Results showed that most students came to favor graduateeducation and research, and their preferences did not change significantly at the end of theprograms. Students’ perceptions of research knowledge, skills, and engineering
research partnerships [1]. In support of this overall goal, the followingobjectives are addressed: 1. To provide underrepresented and financially needy undergraduate students with information on the benefits and opportunities associated with graduate education 2. To provide underrepresented and financially needy undergraduate students with enhanced financial support and career experiences to improve the likelihood of completing both a B.S. and an M.S. in engineering 3. To provide personalized integrated industry and academic mentoring and professional development that results in increased enrollment and completion of graduate engineering degrees involving industry beneficial research 4. To increase
a Ph.D. Previous work has shown that writing attitudes andconfidence in writing skills correlate with likelihood of pursuing certain careers and persistenceand attrition in the program. However, all work to date has considered graduate students alltogether: In this study we seek to understand potential differences in the ways that U.S. domesticstudents and international student (both those studying in the U.S. and those studying in othercountries) so that researchers and faculty who teach engineering communication can better tailortheir activities and approaches to teaching writing. A survey accessing the students writingapproaches, concepts, and self-regulatory efficacy was distributed to engineering graduate studentsat universities in
Technology for 12 years, and then returned to UIUC in 2015, where he teaches the Programming Languages and Data Structures courses. He has recently adopted Computer Science Education as his research focus.Mr. Lucas Anderson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Lucas Anderson is a Specialist in Education at the Center for Innovation in Teaching & Learning (CITL) at the University of Illinois. He organizes the central campus teacher training program for the more than 800 new Teaching Assistants (TAs) Illinois welcomes each year. He continues to work with TAs throughout their graduate career by observing their classes, helping them collect and interpret feedback from their students, and shepherding them through
of the economy, that doctoralprogram was designed from its inception to raise up a new generation of scholars.However, there are many professionals who find that their lives are incompatible with thetraditional PhD’s structure and philosophy. Take, for example, a working engineer in her 40swho is earning a six-figure salary, has a family (spouse, kids, dog, and mortgage) and is eager toadvance her knowledge and career. Because we offer online master’s education options, she canpop open her laptop and take graduate-level courses in the evening after the house is settled.Once that master’s degree is in hand and she finds herself hungry for the depth and research-intensive experience of doctoral education, though, what options does she have
their self-efficacy. Another paper from the group [12] investigates the importance of timing in effectiveness of DFAM education. An important observation is made that introducing DFAM concepts at an earlier stage improves students perceiving utility. A valuable take away from their work is that introducing Additive manufacturing education at an early-career level proves to be advantageous and aids in effective learning. Additional potential overarching research questions the Engineering Education research community could contribute to solving include How can online, remote, or virtual educational environments be designed to harness best practices in active learning developed for residential
their professional careers. Fives,Hamman, and Olivarez [11] further summarized that research indicating that factors associatedwith role ambiguity, lack of decision making power, and perceived lack of control contribute toburnout among these pre-service student-teachers.Contemporarily, higher education news highlights the burnout of graduate students. Wedemeyer-Strombel [12] discussed the personal sacrifice of graduate school in terms of lost relationshipsciting the immersive, exhaustive, and unyielding demands of graduate student responsibilities.The immersive, demanding, and sacrifice-oriented acculturation of graduate students becomesnormalized in higher education because advisors and faculty control much graduate students’professional
practices to prevent defects and other issues in software thatdrive the need for cybersecurity professionals to secure this software and systems.It is also notable that for secure code development, it is highly beneficial to have computerscientists and software engineers with backgrounds in safe coding practices. Thus theseextended programs prepare students for careers outside the core cybersecurity area.The graduate certificate, alternately, is a four course sequence that is well suited to be taken inconjunction with another graduate degree, by on campus students. It is also designed to serveindividuals who perhaps have graduated from a computer science, information technology orsimilar degree program some time ago and who want to gain new skills
strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies.Dr. Gwen Lee-Thomas, Quality Measures LLC Dr. Gwen Lee-Thomas is the CEO of Quality Measures, LLC, a Virginia-based consulting firm special- izing in program and project evaluation, team-building, and capacity
minorities, and the shortage of highlyqualified teachers. The goal of Grad Student STEM Share is to connect graduate students inSTEM with diverse K-12 students and provide these students with role models while excitingthem about new developments in science and engineering. While not all graduate students gointo teaching careers, it is important that they learn how to communicate effectively and havemeaningful experiences with diverse students. Grad Student STEM Share allows graduatestudents to have introductory classroom experiences in a guided manner. Graduate students need to be confident that they can help improve STEM education byvolunteering in schools and mentoring students, even if they do not pursue academic careers. Inaddition
health; 4) provides corecompetencies; and 5) allows for career exploration. These transformations are particularlyimportant for students from underrepresented groups and/or underserved communities.The Preparing Engineering Graduate Students for the 21st Century (PEGS21) program at theUniversity of California, Davis (UC Davis) is a National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarshipsin Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (S-STEM) program targeting graduatestudent applicants who are academically talented, low-income and/or first generation. This NSFgrant will fund five cohorts over its length; the first cohort started in the 2016-2017 academic year.Through a cohort-building seminar, multi-pronged mentoring activities, and a stipend to ease
All are at Purdue University West Lafayette, IN, USA ABSTRACTExpertise demands engendered by the convergence of pressure for increased competitivenessand the accelerating advance of technology have become obvious to leaders in technology-centric business and industry. Because the Polytechnic’s faculty maintain active engagementwith such business and corporate leaders and their enterprises, they also recognized signalswhich evidenced that there were responsible personnel in the private sector who wouldbenefit from, and actually want, an advanced technology-oriented degree above the master’slevel. But, the faculty also noted that because of the career development
transformative change in the graduate program arenafrom a traditionally prevalent Master of Science program is a Professional Master of Science orTechnology program (PMS or PMT). At a college in a mid-western land grant university, the PMTgraduate degree is designed to help advance, or even change, the career path of professionals to reachtheir professional goals. The objective of PMT is to leverage the real-world experience and sharpenprofessional skills while providing the educational credentials sought after highly by industry. Thus, theProfessional Master of Technology program (PMT) at Kansas State University Polytechnic Campus is aninnovative interdisciplinary graduate degree program that helps working professionals and studentsexpand their
noted thevalue of student-student and student-faculty interactions. They have commented on the richnessof discussions with their classmates and the instructor. Most participants are Ph.D. students inengineering who expect to pursue a career in academia. They have a variety of backgrounds.Some have many years of teaching experience (at the college or pre-college level, in the UnitedStates or abroad) and are returning to campus to earn a Ph.D. Some have been in industry andwant to move to a faculty position. And many have come to graduate school directly from anundergraduate engineering program. They come from almost every engineering discipline anddozens of different countries. Students also appreciate that most of the certificate coursesinvolve
; increased leisure time; non-sequential learning formats; movement across educational systems; increased life expectancy;increased rates of mid-career changes; new trends in occupational licensing requirements; andeconomic restraints [12]. In articulating the growth of distance education, Ferguson [12] highlightsthe distinction between what Toffler [13] called “second wave” and “third wave” civilization.Second wave “industrial” citizens, having experienced the clashes and technological developmentsthat came with the First and Second World Wars, were more inclined to accept factory jobs andseek less education beyond what was needed for the majority jobs of in the U.S. On the other hand,influenced by the list of societal changes noted above, “third
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Transition Zone: a training ethos designed to scaffold a PhD degreeAbstractThe Transition Zone is our bespoke training programme to support transitions throughdifferent stages in a researcher’s career: (1) into doctoral studies as a high performingresearcher, (2) through doctoral studies to make the most out of their doctorate and associatedtraining and, (3) on exiting, to empower and equip them as highly employable graduates. Thispaper focuses on the first (i.e. ‘Transition In’) and the second transitions (i.e. ‘TransitionThrough’). The purpose of this paper is to offer a programme evaluation of these twotransitions in order to assess whether the
to upskill while retaining their current job cannot afford to take 1-2 years to study abroad. • Family ties: Students who have responsibilities to their family (e.g., kids, aging parents) cannot fulfill these duties while studying abroad. • Visa restrictions: Students who come from countries where getting visas to the U.S. is diffi- cult might not be eligible for residential programs.At the same time, getting an advanced degree from a U.S.-based institution is still of high value tosome of these students: • Career opportunities in multinational firms: Students can advance their careers based on educational credentials from a known, international university. • Potential eligibility for the U.S
. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research in- terests include diversity & inclusion, students’ persistence, advising and mentoring, engineering career pathways, and school-to-work transition of new engineers. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. Prior to beginning his doctoral studies, Hassan worked for five years at General Electric where he graduated from their Edison Engineering Development Program (EEDP) and then worked as a gas turbine fleet management engineer. In addition to his technical role, Hassan supported the recruiting, interview, and selection process of the
/W1siZiIsIjIwMTQvMDgvMDEvMTJf MzBfNTRfNDI0X0hNU19Db2RlYm9vay5wZGYiXV0/HMS_Codebook.pdf.[21] K. Kroenke, R. Spitzer, & J. Williams, “The PHQ‐9: validity of a brief depression severity measurem,” Journal of general internal medicine, 16(9), pp. 606-613, 2001.[22] T. Henderson, “Exploring the Post-graduation Benefits of High-Impact Practices in Engineering: Implications for Retention and Advancement in Industry,” in ASEE: Proceedings of the 124th Annual Conference and Exposition 2017, Columbus, OH, USA, June 25-28, 2017.[23] T. Henderson, K. Shoemaker and L. Lattuca, “Early-career Plans in Engineering: Insights from the Theory of Planned Behavior,” in ASEE: Proceedings of the 125th Annual Conference and Exposition 2018