- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jessica R. Deters, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Christopher Zobel, Virginia Tech; Margaret Cowell, Virginia Tech; Jennifer L. Irish, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
scorings facilitated by Author 1. Each facultymember brought a different disciplinary perspective to the scoring: one faculty member is basedin Civil and Environmental Engineering, another in Business Information Technology, and thethird in Urban Affairs and Planning. Given the pilot, exploratory nature of this study, thissecondary scoring helped validate the initial scoring categories and illuminate potentialdifferences in both assessment of student learning and understanding of DRRM acrossdisciplinary boundaries. Note, however, that because both the sample size (9 participants) andthe scorers (1 from each discipline) are small, the analysis cannot support conclusions bydiscipline; instead, it highlights potential differences that merit further
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education Division Technical Session Session 12
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Megan Keogh, University of Colorado, Boulder; Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder; Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
how team dynamics affect undergraduate women’s confidence levels in engineering.Dr. Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder Malinda Zarske is a faculty member with the Engineering Plus program at the University of Colorado Boulder. She teaches undergraduate product design and core courses through Engineering Plus as well as STEM education courses for pre-service teachers through the CU Teach Engineering program. Her primary research interests include the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity - es- pecially women and nontraditional demographic groups in engineering - as well as pathways and retention to and through K-12 and undergraduate engineering, teacher education, and
- Conference Session
- Multidisciplinary Endeavors: Engineering and Liberal Arts
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Sarah Summers, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Anique Julienne Olivier-Mason, Brandeis University; Marina Dang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Diana M. Chien, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Multidisciplinary Engineering
, Salt LakeCity, Utah. Jun. 2018.[3] Yoritomo, J. Y., Turnipseed, N., Cooper, S. L., Elliott, C. M., Gallagher, J. R., Popovics, J.S., Prior, P., and Zilles, J. L. “Examining engineering writing instruction at a large researchuniversity through the lens of writing studies,” in Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, Utah. Jun. 2018.[4] Hanson, A. J., Lindahl, P., Strasser, S. D., Takemura, A. F., Englund, D. R., and Goldstein, J.“Technical communication instruction for graduate students: The Communication Lab vs. acourse,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, Ohio. Jun. 2017.[5] R. Day Babcock and T. Thonus, “A sample research question: What is a successful tutorial?”in Researching the Writing