Displaying all 8 results
- Conference Session
- Materials Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Marguerite Anne Tuer-Sipos, University of Toronto; Stephen Manion, University of Toronto; Yasaman Delaviz, University of Toronto; Scott D. Ramsay, University of Toronto
- Tagged Divisions
- Materials
Teaching Innovation Professorship. The authors would like tothank the students for their feedback. This study complied with the University of Toronto’spolicies on research ethics.7.0 References[1] K. Barns , R. C. Marateo, and S. P. Ferris, “Teaching and Learning with the Net Generation,”Innovate: Journal of Online Education, vol. 3, no. 4, April 2007.[2] M. Prensky, “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants,” On the Horizon, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 67–85,Oct. 2001.[3] B. Mitra, J. Lewin-Jones, H. Barrett & S. Williamson, ‘The use of video to enable deeplearning”, Research in Post-compulsory Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 405- 414, July 2010[4] A. Clifton, and C. Mann, “Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning”, Nurse EducationToday, vol. 31, no. 4
- Conference Session
- Materials Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Susan P. Gentry, University of California, Davis
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Materials
Research Council, Washington, DC, 978-0-309-11999-3, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12199/integrated-computational-materials-engineering-a- transformational-discipline-for-improved-competitiveness[3] R. A. Enrique, M. Asta, and K. Thornton, "Computational Materials Science and Engineering Education: An Updated Survey of Trends and Needs," JOM, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1644-1651, September 01 2018.[4] K. Thornton, S. Nola, R. E. Garcia, M. Asta, and G. B. Olson, "Computational materials science and engineering education: A survey of trends and needs," JOM, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 12-17, October 1 2009.[5] L. Li. (June 2016). Integrating Computational
- Conference Session
- Materials Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Lorraine Francis, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Michael Manno, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
- Tagged Divisions
- Materials
project has a common set ofspecifications that all student groups work toward. After brainstorming and selection of aprototype idea, the teams design their part(s) in SW and begin 3D printing, and redesigniterations. In 2013 - 2015, students carried simple analytical calculations of the performance,although some ambitious students did SW simulations. Starting in 2016, SW simulations were arequired part of the design process. Figure 4Schematic of semester-long design project in Materials Performance. Table 2Team design projects titles and specificationsYear Materials Performance (Fall) Materials Processing (Spring)2013/14 Backpack
- Conference Session
- Materials Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Ajay P. Malshe, University of Arkansas; Salil T Bapat, University of Arkansas
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Materials
Academy of Engineering (NAE) for ”For innovations in nanomanufacturing with impact in multiple industry sectors”; Society of Manufactur- ing (SME)’s David Dornfeld Blue Sky Manufacturing Idea Award for ”Factories-In-Space”; SME-S.M. Wu Research Implementation Award; three Edison Awards for Innovation; Tibbett Award by the US Small Business Association sponsored by EPA for successful technology transfer; R&D 100 Award, (the ”Os- car” of innovation); Fellowships to the International 1. Academy of Production Engineering (CIRP), 2. the American Society of Materials (ASM), 3. the American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME), and 4. the Institute of Physics (IoP), London, England; multiple best paper awards
- Conference Session
- Materials Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Sabrina Jedlicka, Lehigh University; Gregory Mark Skutches, Lehigh University; Siddha Pimputkar, Lehigh University
- Tagged Divisions
- Materials
-traditionalartifact) may be better received by younger educators. We will continue to explore thishypothesis in the future, as active learning approaches permeate more classroom settings. Component Assessment Score Sophisticated Competent Not Yet Competent 3 2 1 Identifies pertinent technical information about the material(s) All important major and minor
- Conference Session
- Materials Division Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Lessa Grunenfelder, University of Southern California
- Tagged Divisions
- Materials
success.Open-ended responses from the course evaluations of the lab-based sections taught by InstructorA and Instructor B were also examined for positive and negative comments related to any of thechanges in the redesigned model of the course. Students are asked in USC course evaluations tocomment on the most and least valuable aspects of a course. While not all students providecomments, responses from these two categories, related specifically to components of theredesigned course (labs, online homework, videos, etc.) are presented below.Table 1. Open-ended student comments on university course evaluations. Please describe the MOST valuable aspect(s) of this course • The real–life applications and labs were great for understanding why this was
- Conference Session
- Materials Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Cheng-Wei Lee, Univ of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Andre Schleife, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Dallas R. Trinkle , University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jessica A. Krogstad, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Robert Maass, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Pascal Bellon, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jian Ku Shang, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Cecilia Leal, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Timothy Bretl, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Shengchang Tang, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
- Tagged Divisions
- Materials
). Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] K. Thornton, S. Nola, R. E. Garcia, M. Asta, and G. B. Olson, “Computational materials science and engineering education: A survey of trends and needs,” JOM, vol. 61, no. 10, p. 12, 2009. [2] R. A. Enrique, M. Asta, and K. Thornton, “Computational materials science and engineering education: An updated survey of trends and needs,” JOM, vol. 70, pp. 1644–1651, Sep 2018. [3] M. Borrego and C. Henderson, “Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in stem higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies,” J. Eng. Educ., vol
- Conference Session
- Materials Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Breanne Przestrzelski, University of San Diego; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego
- Tagged Divisions
- Materials