Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 11 results

The Methodological Promise of Narrative Inquiry for Exploring Student Veteran and Service Member Experience as "People in Relation"

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
, and veteran undergraduates in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Methodological Promise of ‘Narrative Inquiry’ for Exploring Student Veteran and Service Member Experience as ‘People in Relation’AbstractStudent veterans and service members (SVSM) represent a significant, yet vastly underutilized,human resource for strengthening and diversifying the nation’s science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) workforce. It is estimated that, by the year 2020, over 5 million post9/11 service members will have transitioned out of the U. S. Armed Forces. Yet, despiteadvanced technical skills and training and access to unprecedented levels of educational benefits,today’s
Relevance Score: 0.018993005

ASEE Support to Student Veterans: Results of a 2018 ASEE Leadership Roundtable

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy; Jakob C. Bruhl, U.S. Military Academy; Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Christina Nicole Willis, University of Utah; Michael Scott Sheppard Jr., Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
education.References[1] National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics, “Education program beneficiaries,” 2014.[2] ABET, “Accreditation policy and procedure manual (APPM), 2016 – 2017,” 2016.[3] J. B. Main, M. M. Camacho, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner, and S. M. Lord, “Using focus groups to understand military veteran students’ pathways in engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016, pp. 1–9.[4] US Department of Veterans Affairs, “Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs,” 2018.[5] K. McBain, L.; Kim, Y.; Cook, B.; Snead, “From Soldier to Student II: Assessing Campus Programs for Veterans and Service Members.,” Washington D.C., American Council on Education, 2012.[6] R. Ackerman, R., Diramio, D
Relevance Score: 0.012523617

Veteran Student Leadership Skills in an Engineering Technical Writing Course

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
with assessment from self on the first line and peerassessment on the subsequent lines. The normalized scores are on the right and listed as with andwithout self-assessment to check if the student’s self-perception matches the group’s. Softwarewas formatted to color cells when assessment data was +/- 0.05 or greater (< 0.95 = orange, >1.05 = green), making it easy to find low and high performers. Table 3: Student X Assessment at Project Initiation Student X L E A D E R S w/self w/o self 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0.901 0.911
Relevance Score: 0.012224344

Institutional Agents' Roles in Serving Student Veterans and Implications for Student Veterans in Engineering

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Prof. Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego Michelle M. Camacho is Professor of Sociology at the University of San Diego. She began her career at UC San Diego in 1999 as a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for US Mexican Studies, and later as a UC Faculty Fellow in Ethnic Studies. In 2015-16, she returned to UC San Diego as a fellow of the American c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
Relevance Score: 0.011432445

How the "Needs of the Force" Impact Navy and Marine Corps Veterans' Decision to Major in Engineering

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford Univer- sity. She is currently Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include inclusive pedagogies, electronics, optoelectronics, materials sci- ence, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education
Relevance Score: 0.009900788

Developing a Studio Model Computer Curriculum for First-Year Undergraduate Students

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas E. Mertz, Kansas State University - Polytechnic Campus; William E. Genereux, Kansas State University - Polytechnic Campus; Troy Harding, Kansas State University - Polytechnic Campus; Tim Bower, Kansas State University - Polytechnic Campus; Katrina M Lewis; Michael Lee Oetken, Kansas State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
—an effort that we have already begun. ● Fully implement the portfolio initiative.References[1] Harding, T., Mertz, T. E., Genereux, W. E., Guzek, S. A., Bower, T. (2017). Reinventing a computer technology curriculum to meet the needs of students and future employers. Proceedings of the 2017 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/28790.[2] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor (2018). Occupational Outlook Handbook, Web Developers. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and- information-technology/web-developers.htm.[3] Koo, T. S. (2012). Integrating design
Relevance Score: 0.009240735

Development of Military Friendly Cybersecurity Courses and Programs

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeremy Straub, North Dakota State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
as well as several areas of potential future enhancement. Cybersecurityprogram and course development at NDSU is still an area of ongoing rapid growth. New courseofferings as well as additional delivery enhancements should enhance the student experienceboth for on-campus and distance students and civilian, active duty military and veterans alike.References[1] J. P. Merisotis, “President’s Message,” Lumina Foundation Focus, p. 1, 2013.[2] D. Lederman, “What Makes a College ‘Military Friendly’?,” Inside Higher Ed, 28-Feb- 2008.[3] S. E. Minnis, “Take the right steps to become more veteran-friendly,” Recruit. Retaining Adult Learn., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 5–5, Mar. 2015.[4] S. E. Minnis, “Consider whether your institution
Relevance Score: 0.009145956

Social Responsibility and Veteran Student Retention in Engineering

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeffrey Chase Hood MA, Kansas State University; Stacey E. Kulesza P.E., Kansas State University; Jia G. Liang, Kansas State University; Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Kansas State University; Jeff Zacharakis, Kansas State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
also testing if different interventions are moreeffective for different cohorts (e.g., Veteran students, students in different majors, students withdifferent social responsibility perceptions).Finally more research is needed to identify and test interventions that increase student retentionin engineering, specifically among underrepresented populations such as Veteran students.AcknowledgementsFunding provided by the National Science Foundation (Award #1738145). Opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. The authors express their gratitude to all surveyparticipants and members of the advisory board for their role in this
Relevance Score: 0.0068594664

Restructuring the Engineering Activities in a Pre-college Summer Program

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Wayne Freeman P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
Engineering Engineering Honors Workshop, https://www.engineering.iastate.edu/engrhonors/​, Accessed September 1, 2018. 3. Horan, S. (2001, June), ​Introducing Pre College Students And Teachers To Engineering Via A Summer Enrichment Program​ Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico. ​https://peer.asee.org/9474 4. Chandler, J., & fontenot, D. (2003, June), ​Ttu College Of Engineering Pre College Engineering Academy©​ Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. ​https://peer.asee.org/12026 5. Salzman, N., & Ricco, G. D., & Ohland, M. W. (2014, June), ​Pre-College Engineering Participation Among First-Year Engineering Students​ Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual
Relevance Score: 0.00528042

Military-Bound and Veteran Student Views on Socially Responsible Engineering

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
Relevance Score: 0.004667276

Supporting Regional Engineering Demand by Effective Transition of Veterans on Campus

Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel; Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel; William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel; Robert J. Barsanti Jr., The Citadel
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
, June 24-27, 2018.[9] D. Molina and A. Morse, “Military-connected undergraduates: The current state of research and future work,” Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 2015.[10] R. Rabb, K. Bower, R. Barsanti, and R. Welch, Veteran Students in Engineering Leadership Roles, Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Columbus, OH, June 25-28, 2017.[11] M. Loughry, M. Ohland, and D. Moore, “Development of a Theory-Based Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 67 (3), pp. 505-524, 2007.[12] T. O’Neil, S. Park, N. Larson, A. Deacon, G. Hoffart, B. Brennan, M. Eggermont, and W. Rosehart, Peer Ratings and Intentions to Change: Adopting the
Relevance Score: 0.0046203677