Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 4 results

Board 132: Documenting Student Perspectives of Learning While on Co-op

Conference Session
Student Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katherine M Ehlert, Clemson University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University
Tagged Divisions
Student
expansion of the content itself. Many educators argue that authentic engineering unknown in the field of engineering education research: The Q-methodology. The Q-methodology tasks and prepare students for engineering in the 21st century. Co-operative education (co-op) can is a quantitative analysis approach that is intended to systematically measure and document provide such experiences. Studies have shown that students who have participated in co-op perspectives or viewpoints. Twenty-five students will first sort a set of subjective statements related programs
Relevance Score: 0.08077214

Board 129: Girl Scout Engineering Programs' Impact on Middle School Girls’ Engineering Identities

Conference Session
Student Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Abigail Clark, Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student
. . [5] Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V, & Fan, X. (2006). CAREER CHOICE: Enhanced: Planning Early for Careers in Science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128690 eed.osu.edu
Relevance Score: 0.04038607

Studying the Resource Networks of First-year Engineering Students: Establishing a Data Collection Method

Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexis Rae Walsh, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Emily Diehl, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Tagged Divisions
Student
problem- based learning and predict performance,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1–21, 2018.[6] E. Nogueira and D. F. Tsunoda, “A Proposed Model for Consumer-Based Brand Equity Analysis on Social Media Using Data Mining and Social Network Analysis,” J. Relatsh. Mark., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 95–117, 2018.[7] X. Lin, X. Hu, Q. Hu, and Z. Liu, “A social network analysis of teaching and research collaboration in a teachers’ virtual learning community,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 302–319, 2016.
Relevance Score: 0.020193035

The Impact of Socio-cultural Factors in Qatar on Females in Engineering

Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maha Sultan Alsheeb, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Amy Hodges, Texas A&M University at Qatar
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student
, pp. 271–286, May 2007.[8] T. E. Basford, L. R. Offermann, and T. S. Behrend, “Do You See What I See? Perceptions of Gender Microaggressions in the Workplace,” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 340–349, Nov. 2013.[9] N. F. Sulaiman and H. AlMuftah, “A Qatari perspective on women in the engineering pipeline: an exploratory study,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 507–517, 2010.[10] A. Berrais, “Arab Women in Engineering Education: Current State and Future Perspective,” in Symposium Female Higher Education: Trends and Perspectives, 2011.[11] A. Powell, B. Bagilhole, and A. Dainty, “How Women Engineers Do and Undo Gender: Consequences for Gender Equality,” Gender, Work & Organization, vol. 16, no. 4. pp. 411
Relevance Score: 0.020193035