Conference Session

Teaching Engineering Students and Library Staff: New Ideas and Best Practices

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeanine Mary Williamson, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Natalie Rice, University of Tennessee ; Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Jordan Kaufman; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

library research instruction," RQ, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 524-541, 1994.[3] L. R. Kunkel, S. M. Weaver, and K. N. Cook, "What do they know?: An assessment ofundergraduate library skills," The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 430-434, 1996.[4] AASL/AECT, Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning. Chicago, IL:ALA, 1998.[5] S. Virkus, "Information literacy in Europe: a literature review," Information Research-anInternational Electronic Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1-56, Jul 2003.[6] M. Hepworth, "A study of undergraduate information literacy and skills: The inclusion ofinformation literacy and skills in the undergraduate curriculum," presented at the 65th IFLACouncil and General Conference Bangkok

Conference Session

Best Practices for Chemical Engineering Lab-Based Courses

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael David Mau Barankin, Colorado School of Mines; Tracy Q. Gardner, Colorado School of Mines; Jason C. Ganley, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Oral Report 2 Lab 3 Stats Exam Due Draft 3 Due Draft Rvw 3 Final Report 3 Due Debrief + Writing Week 3 Do Lab 4 Oral Report 4 Lab 5 Workshop Due Draft 5 Due Draft Rvw 5 s Final Report 5 Due Week 4 Do Lab 6 Oral Report 6 Lab 7 Debrief Due Final Report 7 Due Week 5 Do Lab 8 Oral Report 8 Lab 9 Oral Briefing 9Students are further divided into sub-groups or “houses”, two of which follow theMonday/Wednesday schedule

Conference Session

Big Picture Questions in BME

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole L. Ramo, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan; Barry Belmont, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

coding and categorization procedure, a sampling of studentdefinitions and the assigned codes/categories are shown in Table 3. It is important to note that asingle definition may be coded into multiple categories depending on the specific phrases itincludes. As previously stated, the newly declared and senior design students’ responses to theadditional open-ended questions were not analyzed directly; instead, these responses providedcontext for discussion of the associated student population definition of BME.Table 2. Specific codes and organizing categories which emerged from qualitative coding ofstudent definitions of BME (italic text lists the words or phrases identified during in vivocoding) Category Code(s

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessie Marshall Zarazaga, SMU Lyle School of Engineering; Andrew N Quicksall

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Conference Session

Engineering Design for Elementary Students

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amanda C. Johnston, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Ruben Dario Lopez-Parra, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Kristina Maruyama Tank, Iowa State University; Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Barbara Fagundes, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 10: Understanding Student Experiences

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Candice Bolding, Clemson University; Jennifer Harper Ogle, Clemson University; Catherine Mcgough Spence, Clemson University; Joseph Murphy, Clemson University; Rachel Lanning, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

students that consistently ratelow and others that consistently rate high. Additional analysis of groups of students in the upper andlower thirds or quartiles will be conducted in the future as part of our ongoing studies. Similarly, in astudy that clustered engineering students based on quantitative measure of non-cognitive factors,including engineering identity and belongingness, over 40% of the participants did not fit into clusters(Scheidt, Senkpeil, Chen, Godwin, and Berger, 2018). In Scheidt et al.’s study, engineering identity andbelongingness were 2 of just 5 factors (out of about 20 total factors analyzed) that drew distinctionsbetween clusters; in other words, engineering identity and belongingness are two of the most variedaffective

Conference Session

Computational Thinking in Pre-College Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Abeera P. Rehmat, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Hayaam Osman; Carson Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ibrahim H. Yeter, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

children go aboutsupporting their children 's engineering learning—especially given the upswing in the number ofchildren being homeschooled in the U.S. over the past decade [1] [2], which is expected tosteadily grow in the future. Thus, in this study we aim to investigate the role a homeschoolparent plays in their child’s engineering learning. Literature review In the last decade computers have become less of a cutting-edge technology and more ofa commonality in every household. The shift in technology from exciting innovation to pertinenttools requires more than the ability to use computers for work. In fact, it is becomingincreasingly pertinent for children to think like computer scientists and

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mathew D. Evans, Arizona State University; Michelle Jordan, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

and what response they receivedfrom their audience(s).The student writing projects were analyzed using discourse analysis 12 and multimodal analysis30,31 in order to examine how the students enacted positions through roles and relationships visa vithe reader, and the extent to which they were successful in their positioning (RQ1).We considered criteria for successful positioning in multiple ways. First, we asked ourselveswhether the authors actually positioned themselves as engineering researchers or engineers -what were the strategies they use, and did they appropriately signal membership in thatcommunity. For instance, scientists are expected to use the language of uncertainty and to avoidoverstating their claims when discussing the

Conference Session

Best In DEED

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Reynolds Brubaker, Stanford University; Vikas Rammohan Maturi, Stanford University; Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; David Beach, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 2004.[6] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, Jun. 2014.[7] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, “Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 87–101, Jan. 2005.[8] K. Sheridan, E. R. Halverson, B. Litts, L. Brahms, L. Jacobs-Priebe, and T. Owens, “Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 505–531, Dec. 2014.[9] E. C. Hilton, C. R. Forest, and J. S. Linsey, “Slaying Dragons

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Monday Cornucopia (Classroom Innovations)

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Duncan Davis, Northeastern University; Jimmy Gitming Lee, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

free of charge. The following is a more detaileddescription of the project requirements: o Fabricated object – Make a themed object from scratch. Usually this will be part of your puzzle, but they can also be hiding places and objects of interest in the room. For examples: Puzzle boxes, a small chest of drawers, the apparatus used to play your puzzle, or theme appropriate furniture (still needs to be portable). ​This object should be small enough for one person to carry it without assistance. o 3D printed object – Using Solidworks to make the object, each team will 3D print a small piece(s) used in their puzzle and/or fabricated object. Examples: Three different colors of numbered keys, a

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Student Empathy & Human-centered Design

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Colin Dixon, Concord Consortium; Corey T. Schimpf, The Concord Consoritum; Sherry Hsi, Concord Consortium

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Theresa Green, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University, Teacher Education and Leadership

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

completely different adhesive with a differentspecification (Table 5).Socially Situated ActivitiesAs shown in Table 6 in the Appendix, we identified six socially situated activities. Similar to theevaluative frameworks, we found that all of the socially situated activities we identified wereused by engineers from both disciplines. For example, these activities include troubleshootingroot cause(s) of failure and multimodal communication as shown in Figure 2.In discerning relationships between the three layers of literacy practices (i.e., genres,frameworks, and socially situated activities) shown in Figure 2, we noticed two things. First, thegenres that an engineer chose to engage with were mediated by the interpretive or evaluativeframework they were

Conference Session

Active & Cooperative Learning in ECE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stewart Thomas, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

assessment feedback in student learning”, J. Studies in Higher Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2002. [5] Epstein Educational Enterprises. (2019). “IF-AT by Epstein Educational Enterprises”, [Online]. Available: http://www.epsteineducation.com/. [Accessed Jan. 7, 2019]. [6] S. H. Cotner, B. A. Fall, S. M. Wick, J. D. Walker, and P. M. Baepler, “Rapid Feedback Assessment Methods: Can We Improve Engagement and Preparation for Exams in Large-enrollment Courses?”, J.Science Education and Technology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 437–443, Oct. 2008. [7] B. R. Cook and A. Babon, “Active learning through online quizzes: better learning and less (busy) work”, J.Geography in Higher Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 24–38, Jan. 2017. [8] S

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Professional Skill Development

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University; Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Paper ID #25277Visibly Random Grouping Applied to First-Semester EngineeringDr. Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics and engineering education departments. She is currently a member of the

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David G. Novick, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

: • Course(s) enrolled • Employment during university enrollment, • Factors leading students to not pursue their project as a startup, and • Suggested measures for increasing the rate of startup formation from course projects3. ResultsThe study’s three hypotheses were assessed using the interviews and the coded data. On average,each of the 16 participants provided 2.2 reasons for not launching their project as a startup. 3.1. Hypothesis 1Hypothesis 1 was that students do not continue with their projects because they cannot take timeaway from the paying jobs that are supporting their education. The data suggest that this is true.As shown in Fig. 1, students most frequently mentioned lack of time as a factor discouragingpursuing a

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Endeavors: Engineering and Liberal Arts

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Multidisciplinary Engineering

3.00 L E A D E R S Average Normalized Ind Avg Wk 1 4.25 4.25 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.14 0.90 Tm Avg Wk 1 4.62 4.62 4.56 4.62 4.62 4.56 4.56 4.60 1.00 Ind Avg Wk 5 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 1.10 Tm Avg Wk 5 4.53 4.67 4.60 4.53 4.47 4.53 4.53 4.55 1.00 Ind Avg Wk 1 Tm Avg Wk 1 Ind Avg Wk 5 Tm Avg Wk 5 Figure 2: Student ‘D’ Leadership AssessmentThis positive improvement in

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hamid Eisazadeh, Old Dominion University; Milan Rakita, Purdue University; Mona Torabizadeh, Old Dominion University; Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

University B (Blind-review)’s learningmanagement system. Papers in each section are milestone works in that discipline and span a fewdecades of development of theory and practice. Each week students are assigned to read on averagetwo to three papers that will be referred the most during the next lecture.Even though theoretical in nature, practice, and observation is a very important component of thiscourse. The equivalent of laboratory exercises in undergraduate classes, the purpose of practiceand observation is to perform simple experiments in order to verify theoretical calculations andpoint out their limitations and some trends. The course is offered as 3 lecture hours per week andno laboratory hours, which is traditional for graduate courses

Conference Session

Key Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession - and ASCE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Horst Brandes, University of Hawaii; Eric L. Flicker, Pennoni Associates Inc.; Kelly Dooley P.E., American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

community by influencingABET criteria, and by encouraging the need for additional academic requirements as aprerequisite for licensure, and hence professional practice, by NCEES, NSPE and the NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE).In response to the release of the CE-BOK1, Policy 465 was changed accordingly in 2004:“ASCE supports the attainment of a body of knowledge for entry into the practice of civilengineering at the professional level.” The policy was again refined in 2007 to make it clear thatfulfillment of the CE-BOK “requires additional education beyond the bachelor’s degree forpractice of civil engineering at the professional practice,” although no mention was made of whatspecific advanced academic degree(s) or alternate pathways would be

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Barillas, Rowan University; Stephen Fernandez, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

) μ σTechnology plays an important role in solving society's problems 3.29 0.77Engineers make more money than most other professionals 3.23 0.76My parent(s) would disapprove if I chose a major other than 1.5 0.81engineeringEngineers have contributed greatly to fixing problems in the 3.51 0.73worldEngineers are well paid 3.3 0.74My parent(s) want me to be an engineer 1.86 0.98An engineering degree will guarantee me a job when I graduate 3.32 0.81A faculty member, academic advisor, teaching assistant, or other 1.89 1.04university affiliated person has

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dominik May, University of Georgia; Mark Trudgen, University of Georgia; Allen V. Spain, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

experiment(s) were clear to 2 5 2.67 1.11 1.22 me at all time. 29 I have had many difficulties with the server and 1 4 2.5 0.96 0.92 technical re- VISIR. strictions 30 The response time of the system was adequate. 3 5 4 0.82 0.67 31 I found it difficult to find time to carry out the ex- 1 4 2.67 1.11 1.22 periments allocated. 32 VISIR worked without any problems. 3 4 3.5 0.5 0.25In addition to the closed questions presented in Table 1, the students were asked to

Conference Session

Creating Impactful Learning Experiences for Engineering Leaders

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; John Jongho Park, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

interpersonal behaviours of leadership for early-career engineers,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. In Press, 2019.[4] R. Agarwal, C. . Angst, and M. Magni, “The performance impacts of coaching: A multilevel analysis using hierarchical linear modeling,” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2110–2134, 2009.[5] L. Ratiu, O. A. David, and A. Baban, “Developing Managerial Skills Through Coaching: Efficacy of a Cognitive-Behavioral Coaching Program,” J. Ration. - Emotive Cogn. - Behav. Ther., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 244–266, 2016.[6] R. G. Hamlin, A. D. Ellinger, and R. S. Beattie, “Coaching at the heart of managerial effectiveness: A cross-cultural study of managerial behaviours,” Hum. Resour. Dev. Int., vol. 9

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 23: Courses and Research on Communication

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Fife, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

doctoral level to developtheir communication skills are relatively lacking. Furthermore, the basic realities of doctoralprograms make it difficult for students to make use of available resources to help them improvetheir writing and oral competencies.This research paper presents results of an exploratory survey of Ph.D. students and identifiesseveral communication-related needs that should be addressed in their programs to enable themto function as independent researchers. The ability to communicate effectively supportsengineering Ph.D.’s ability to fully participate in the many communication-related aspects oftheir scholarly community such as the exchange of ideas, informal and formal collaborations,and collegial interactions. They need

Conference Session

Technical Session 6: Modulus Topics Part 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paras Sud, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Craig Zilles, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Limited, 06 2015, pp. 243–250. [3] C. Zilles, R. T. Deloatch, J. Bailey, B. B. Khattar, W. Fagen, C. Heeren, D. Mussulman, and M. West, “Computerized testing: A vision and initial experiences,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/p.23726. Seattle, Washington: ASEE Conferences, June 2015, https://peer.asee.org/23726. [4] R. F. DeMara, N. Khoshavi, S. D. Pyle, J. Edison, R. Hartshorne, B. Chen, and M. Georgiopoulos, “Redesigning computer engineering gateway courses using a novel remediation hierarchy,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/p.26063. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, June 2016, https://peer.asee.org/26063. [5] B. Chen, M. West, and C. Zilles, “How much

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amanda Vazquez, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Erica J. Marti, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Erdogan Kaya, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

). Epistemic practices of engineering for education. Science Education, 101(3), 486-505.[2] Deniz, H., Yesilyurt, E., Newman, J. S., & Kaya, E., (in press). Towards Defining Nature of Engineering in the Next Generation Science Standards Era. Critical Issues in STEM Education.[3] Hartman, B., & Bell, R. L. (2017, June), Teaching the Nature of Engineering in K-12 Science Education: A Delphi Study (Fundamental) Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28927[4] Karataş, F. Ö., Bodner, G. M., & Unal, S. (2016). First-year engineering students' views of the nature of engineering: implications for engineering programmes. European Journal of

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Reddy, Colorado School of Mines; Leslie Light, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

stakeholder needs.In spring 2017, Polak served as Executive in Residence in the Division of Engineering, Designand Society at Colorado School of Mines to guide faculty and staff on how to incorporate enduser information into routine design problem definition and solution processes. Today, thiscourse, which exposes students to both user empathy and stakeholder engagement [19], has thefollowing learning objectives: 1. Identify, breakdown, and define open-ended problem(s). 2. Research the context and background of problems and solutions, through a variety of scholarly and authoritative sources. 3. Design solutions through cycle of testing, refining, iterating, and feedback. 4. Equitably contribute to team efforts from start to end on a

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 8: Survey and Instrument Development

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 343-351, 2004.5. M. A. Holsapple, D. D. Carpenter, J. A. Sutkus, C. J. Finelli and T. S. Harding, "Framing Faculty and Student Discrepancies in Engineering Ethics Education Delivery," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 169-186, 2012.6. C. J. Finelli, M. A. Holsapple, E. Ra, R. M. Bielby, B. A. Burt, D. D. Carpenter, T. S. Harding and J. A. Sutkus, "An Assessment of Engineering Students' Curricular and Co-Curricular Experiences and Their Ethical Development," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 469-494, 2012.7. A. Van den Broeck, M. Vansteenkiste, H. De Witte, B. Soenens and W. Lens, "Capturing Autonomy, Competence, and

Conference Session

Aerospace Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelia Greig, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Alex Powaser, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Douglas Howe, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Will Alan McGehee, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

theprinciples of electrostatic propulsion, a different device known as an electrospray thruster may beused instead. Electrospray thrusters are significantly simpler to make and, although the operationis somewhat different to gridded ion and Hall thrusters, the basic principles of electrostaticpropulsion can be accurately demonstrated with the electrospray system.Electrospray thrusters are not a new technology, being first developed in the 1960’s [1]. Initiallythey were not popular due to low thrust levels and high voltages required. The emergence ofmicro- and nano- satellite technologies has seen a resurgence in interest in electrospray systemsas there are more avenues for their use and improvements in technology have dropped therequired voltages [2,3

Conference Session

Creating Impactful Learning Experiences for Engineering Leaders

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Bayless, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

otherprograms. Students were assessed by the faculty and external mentors during the course of theprogram. Students also performed self-assessments of the development of their personalleadership qualities and the overall worth of the program.While actual execution of the project was done in a cross-functional team, each engineeringstudent was asked to identify how they were developing their leadership skills within theirproject. Specifically, they were asked to provide their personal narrative to • Explain his/her vision of the project and why it was appropriate to undertake • Describe what information he/she would be responsible for gathering and the communication strategy required • Describe which task(s) you he/she would lead in

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Siqing Wei, Purdue University; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University; Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

dimensionsubgroups at each peer rating event. Table 3 Self-rating and Peer-rating Across Dimension (Convergence) ANOVA Analysis Intervention Peer Difference P-value Effect Size Difference P-value Effect Size Review Mean (Cohen's d) Dispersion (Cohen' s d) Time CD = 0 1 -0.5175 = 22 1 -0.4292 = 22 2 -0.00952 0.9098 .0287 .005837 .8835 .0309CD >= 22 3 0.02424 0.7729 .0041