chain to work together efficiently is a much more complex problem than I initially thought”. From the responses the authors can conclude that development of communication skillswas the most frequent response. Students recognized the importance of communication at theworkplace, as well as acknowledged that their communication skills improved as a result of theirparticipation in the course project. Observations of the in-class project meetings and out of class meetings of the teams’leaders revealed that students took their roles seriously and played the simulated company as ifthey were real employees. Besides the required documents (communication plan, memorandums,letters) they prepared and used additional documents to
comes from industry, academia, national laboratoriesand service entities. Through weekly lectures and studio meetings, instructors work with teamsto apply the design tools to their problem and scope of work. While each project is unique,student teams generally follow a similar process, developing concepts and fully designing thefinal concept in the first semester, and developing and executing a validation plan in the secondsemester. The goal of the program is to provide a significant design experience for studentsthrough which they can apply the various theoretical knowledge and analytical skills that theyhave collected in their previous coursework. Since practicing engineers will employ the designprocess repeatedly, the program also seeks to
human behavior [3,7]. As researchers plan heuristicsstudies in various domains, especially engineering course design, the considerations and themespresented in this study can provide a starting point for framing the focus and extent of datacollection. More specifically, researchers should consider how differences in quantity; heuristicspace coverage, specificity, and conceptualization; specificity of individual heuristics; and locusof specificity in heuristics examples may be relevant to their study and its overarching goals.ConclusionThis study compared the course design heuristics identified using three distinct data collectionmethods. While analysis focused on comparison, it was evident that the three methods producedsimilarities in
, creativity is seen as the ability to generate new ideas, either as new ways oflooking at existing problems or of seeing new opportunities, perhaps by exploiting emergingtechnologies or changes in markets [1-4]; as shown in Figure 1, creativity has two phases. Incontrast, innovation is seen as the successful exploitation of new ideas—i.e., it is the process thatcarries new ideas through to new products, new services, new ways of running the business, oreven new ways of doing business [5-7]. By the time we reach our university studies, most of ushave been trained to move quickly from divergent thinking to convergent thinking, so we can findthe best answer or best plan to whatever problem we face. Interestingly, at an early age, primaryschool children
Thursday. Faculty Figure 1: Map of RET Teacher Participants To Date (green in nested VA map is Appalachia)mentors for the RET site come from four different colleges (Engineering, Science, Agriculture &Life Science and Natural Resources & Environment) and share a common interest in waterresearch. An annotated process flow is presented in Figure 2. The red chevrons show the overallschedule by week, with major milestones called out, while the blue chevrons represent therepeating daily plan which occurs each of the six weeks. Figure 2: RET Summer Schedule FlowThe first day is dedicated to orientation, where the RET teachers are introduced to the site, learnabout the study conducted here, and are offered consent
programmatic assessment and develop- ment, as well as course-level assessment in strengthening student learning outcomes. With seven years of experience in planning, programming, and supporting faculty and staff in assessment related activities, Catherine provides expertise in survey, test and rubric development, as well as conducts focus groups and prepares statistical reports supporting assessment activities. Catherine holds an M.A. in Public Policy, as well as an M.A. in Higher Education Administration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Online Engineering Dynamics Class for College Sophomores: Design, Implementation, and Assessment1
anotherdatabase. If they are primarily engineers, I always do this exercise. Every class I have. I will sayI want you to use the engineering databases. Find good resources. Then I would break them intoteams; we use that approach sometimes too. So, the active learning is all the difference in theworld, they get hands-on, then can peek over each other's shoulders, they can work in teams, theycan see how it works, and they can see the results.[I2]"A second theme concerning instruction that arose was that assignments have to be course specificand help the faculty in teaching what they already were planning on teaching:"The second thing is to not make it something that is really time-intensive, to take as much of theworkload off them [faculty members], to
(pilot) Intro to Mechanics majors only) (pilot) Calculus STEP Exit STEP Exit STEP Exit Exam STEP ALEKS PPL Placement Exam Exam Method Advising tools Advising with Advising with Dedicated staff Dedicated staff advisor Golden Eagle Golden Eagle advisor; Flight Plan8 Flight Plan Faculty MentorsThe FYrE16 cohort had 67 students, on the new semester system, chosen randomly from eligibleand
rural school in theNortheast attempted to optimize a truss structure.Description of the Optimization Project Many freely available K-12 engineering lesson plans instruct students to design and builda structure with a constrained amount of material that is either as strong as possible [11] or as tallas possible while able to hold a weight [12]. However, neither of these goals resemble the workof engineers [13]. Builds like this would be wasteful in terms of resources, so many civilengineering firms employ engineers specifically to minimize material, time, and cost while stilladhering to the specifications of the structure. The goal for students in this activity was to minimize cost, weight, and deflection of atruss cantilever
simplifies the process of working with microcontrollers, and offers advantages over othersystems: • Inexpensive - Arduino boards are relatively inexpensive compared to other microcontroller platforms. • Cross-platform - The Arduino Software (IDE) runs on Windows, Macintosh OSX, and Linux operating systems. • The Arduino Software (IDE) is easy-to-use for beginners, yet good enough for advanced users. • Open source and extensible software - The Arduino software is published as open source tools, available for extension by experienced programmers. The language can be expanded through C++ libraries. 1 • Open source and extensible hardware - The plans
convention.CONCLUSIONIn this work, NetLogo, a multi-agent based programming language was used to build a buildingenvironment and simulate occupants. A basic spatial-temporal model has been developed whereinstructors and students can interact with each other by moving around the environment space. Theinstructors and students can be added and remove from the system, and the number of occupantscan be monitored using plots in real time. In the future, we plan to expand the model in variousother applications where there is continuous agent interaction.AcknowledgementThis work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), which issupported by National Science Foundation grant number ACI-1548562. We would like to thankXSEDE Empower program for
learner-centered e-based environment, making it ready for largescale dissemination. Examples of calculus concepts that the author and his team plan to developand integrate include: (a) games, (b) puzzles and teasers, (c) animations, (d) visual and intuitivedaily-experience-based examples, (e) movies and short video clips, (f) demonstrations, (g)hands-on activities (including those based on virtual reality and augmented reality), (h) teamingand communication exercises, (i) small-scale inquiry-based research, (j) presentations, and peer-based teaching/learning, (k) visual click-based e-book, (l) community and social engagement,and (m) challenges beyond the basics.The main idea As mentioned earlier, this paper focuses on introducing three
. She has also helped catalogue lead fishnet weights from Uluburun, a late Bronze Age shipwreck, in Turkey. In her free time, she works as the co-founder and CDO of Bezoar Laboratories LLC, a R&D company focusing on probiotic supplements.Mr. Rogelio Casas Jr., Texas A&M University Rogelio Casas Jr. was an ESET student at Texas A&M University and graduated in the Fall of 2018. He was the Project Manager throughout the project and is currently working at General Motors in Austin, Texas as a Software Developer. He plans on continuing his education through hands-on training and a potential Masters in Computer Science.Erika L. Davila c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
: http://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/ [Accessed Feb. 3, 2019].[5] National Research Council, Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying EffectiveApproaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: NationalAcademies Press, 2011.[6] National Research Council, A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices,Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2012.[7] NGSS Lead States, Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by States. Washington,DC: National Academies Press, 2013.[8] National Science and Technology Council, Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) Education: 5-year Strategic Plan. Washington, DC: Committee on STEMEducation, 2013.[9] National
be implemented in large laboratory courses.More work is planned in analyzing a more diverse sampling of discussion questions and in evaluatingstudent self-perception of their critical thinking skill development.References 1. Zhao, Y. "Impact of Oral Exams on a Thermodynamics Course Performance.". 2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference, Boulder, Colorado, 2018, March. 2018, March. 2. Woods, D. R., Felder, R. M., Rugarcia, A., & Stice, J. E. (2000). The future of engineering education III. Developing critical skills. change, 4, 48-52. 3. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2004). The intellectual development of science and engineering students. Part 2: Teaching to promote growth. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(4
studying civil engineering at Cornell University. She par- ticipated in the Nebraska Summer Research Experience for Undergraduates and is currently working on writing her own research proposal related to transportation in urban areas. She plans on pursuing a grad- uate degree in Civil Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Moving from outside to inside - traffic engineering field exercises through virtual realityAbstractThe study of traffic engineering typically uses field observations of traffic. These fieldobservations take place along highways and at intersections. Field observations have severalissues including the exposure to traffic
understanding by exploring engineering students’ researchexperiences through an interweaving of quantitative survey data and connected qualitativeinterviews. By integrating quantitative and qualitative data, we can better understand students’researcher identities and ultimately better support their research academic and career choices.Introduction and BackgroundUndergraduate research experiences (UREs) give students the opportunity to understand what itis like to be a researcher while enhancing their metacognitive and problem-solving skills [1].Exposure to UREs can help prepare students for a thesis-based graduate program and, morebroadly, can help them clarify their career plans and goals. UREs have been shown to increasestudents’ confidence in their
collaborative and inclusive environment, establishgoals, plan tasks, and meet objectives, and Outcome 7 - an ability to acquire and apply newknowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies. This paper discusses the issues,benefits, and effective approaches in designing and executing multidisciplinary undergraduateresearch projects.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces Marine Corps weaponoperation and maintenance. Section 3 describes the design and implementation of the ARproject for M16A4. Section 4 presents current results. Section 5 discusses future work andchallenges.2. Marine Corps Weapon Operation and MaintenanceOne important use of augmented reality is equipment operation and maintenance [1, 2
Work-in-Progress: A Web-Based Tool to Assess Computational ThinkingAbstractWhen President Obama unveiled his plan to give all students in America the opportunity to learncomputer science [1], discussions about Computational Thinking (CT) began in earnest in manyorganizations across a wide range of disciplines. However, Jeannette Wing stated the importanceof CT for everyone a decade earlier in her landmark essay [2]. Since then, several people andorganizations have posted their own definition of CT, which presents a challenge in being able toassess CT understanding and awareness in people. In an effort to build consensus on how to bestassess CT, the authors have developed a web-based tool that will enable CT experts globally
on this project has included the creation of the server with the database and thewebserver, and the simultaneous transmission of data from four Arduino/ESP8266 module pairs.Work continues on fine tuning the database and on expanding the number and type of graphicalobjects that can be used to display the data from the database. It is our intention to introduce thisproject into one or more sections of our ENGR 122 courses in the upcoming spring quarter thatruns from March 12, 2019 through May 24, 2019. We have identified a place in the curriculumfor this course that we believe will be suitable and that occurs just after the midpoint of thequarter. There are several mechanisms that we plan to use to assess the outcomes of this project.Since one
diversity) anda sense of community that allows students to learn from each other [3], [4]. However, this isparticularly difficult in large online courses because it is practically impossible to connect withevery single student and follow his/her progress in detail.The literature has also reported other problems that instructors face when shifting from face-to-face to online learning environments that I too have experienced. For example, the time neededfor the “significant upfront planning and organization” because materials should be loadedbefore the semester starts [2]. This is one of the issues that explains my struggle with thecommunicating assignment instructions. Another is translating and modifying materials from theregular classroom to the
constraints are very important for first-year engineering students and are also emphasizedin the course. Students are taught that the design process requires an open mind, and awillingness to fail. Efficient time use is important, since usually the first design solutions, orprototypes, are not the best design options and improvements must be made. As part of this first-year engineering course, students create Gantt Charts and a project management plan. Thisassists student in staying on track in meeting the project and course goals, and in using the coursetime efficiently. Their time in lab may be the only time that the whole team can meet togetherand have access to the lab equipment. It is also important that the team works effectivelytogether. An
), 2012. IEEE, 2012.[12] M. Mohammadi-Aragh, R. Kajfez, and A. Clark, “Establishing a Baseline and Future Plans for Exploring Engineering Community and Identity,” 125th Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., 2018.[13] A. M. Clark, R. L. Kajfez, and M. J. Mohammadi-Aragh, “Work in Progress: Baseline Survey about Community and Identity,” 125th Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., 2018.
they can do to succeed in their courses. This isshown in both a heavily analytical course (Dynamics) and a more qualitative course (SCADA). Even more interesting is that none of the students in the SCADA class studied with otherstudents. The conclusion we come to here, is that this may have been related to the type of course(analytical vs. qualitative) selected to include in this analysis, but we recognize that there areseveral other factors that could influence this behavior. In the future we plan to revisit questionsin the Formative and Summative surveys to help students and instructors to better understandcriteria that leads to satisfactory performance.6 References[1] M. Kaplan, N. Silver, D. LaVaque-Manty, and D. Meizlish, Using
.225 Passive .1102 10.838 525 .000* Out-of-class .729 .270 In-class .269 .256 Disengaged -.0709 -7.277 536 .000* Out-of-class .340 .250Future WorkWhile we have shown the SCCEI measures modes of cognitive engagement inside and outside theclass distinctly, work remains to clarify the meaning of these constructs to students and educators.We plan to continue this work both quantitatively and qualitatively. We have proposedinterviewing students with respect to their
description of this case, documentation, archival records, interviews,direct observations, surveys, and both physical and digital artifacts were be used for datacollection and analysis. Data collection included direct observations of participants using fieldnotes, photography, and audio/video recordings. Both physical and digital artifacts wherecollected throughout the study including planning documents, the final “demo reel” of the movieeffect, blogs, Slack conversations, Trello project boards, and student-generated photos/videosthat were shared in a course repository.AnalysisAnalysis for this work-in-progress paper focuses on findings from exit interviews and end-of-course survey. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed in NVivo 12 qualitative
ability to solve most problems, even if no solution is immediately apparent to me. PSC 9 Many problems I face regularly are too complex for me to solve without assistance. PSC 10 When starting a problem, I tend to try the first solution method I think of to solve it. AAS 11 When deciding on a solution method, I do not consider the chances of success of each method AAS versus the time investment required to implement each method. 12 When I make a plan to solve a problem, I am almost certain that I can make it be successful. PSC 13 I try to predict the overall outcome
issues identified broadly inengineering education community has not yet been made, so comparisons currently are limited.However planned future use of consensus reports to identify issues should enable ad hocjudgements of how EER is achieving policy impacts and identification of relevant concernsexpressed by administrators.Bibliography[1] A. Campanini, “Bologna Process,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 2015.[2] H. Blumer, “Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method,” in The methodological position of symbolic interactionism, Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 1986.[3] C. Groen, D. Rutledge, and L. McNair, “An Introduction to Grounded Theory: Choosing and
toprovide funding for graduate students when promoting other conferences, if engineeringeducation programs consider is important that students are exposed to different spaces to sharetheir research, it has to come with financial support.Future workWe consider that results from this study provided an initial understanding of conferenceparticipation in one engineering education department. We consider this work to be importantand relevant, hence, we plan to conduct a sequential explanatory mixed methods study. We planto expand our data collection in two ways, one by develop a qualitative inquiry, particularly onthe decision making process to better understand the reasons people have to attend. Secondly, weplan to expand our sample size. We want to
checked bymore experienced engineers. Brad trusted his advisor who told him that his designs werebeing reviewed and checked by experienced engineers. Brad had faith that his approachin conveying his concern to his advisor would result in a satisfactory solution. Theunpleasant fact that Brad discovered later was that his designs were not reviewed orchecked, and that they were passed straight to contractors after being stamped by aprofessional engineer. Although, legally speaking, the engineer that stamped and signedthe plans assumed the responsibility related to the accuracy and compliance of the designwith applicable codes, Brad could not bear the thought that these were his designs and,due to lack of experience and sophistication, such designs