the past ten years, it is virtually unchanged at 21.3%, as can be seen inFigure 1 [1]. This same conclusion is supported by other sources, including Lichtenstein et alusing National Science Foundation data [2]. Compared to the overall US population of 50.8%women [3], there is significant room for improvement, with improvement defined as an increasein this percentage. Those in the engineering professions know, and have known for decades, thatthis percentage needs to increase, yet society struggles to make any noticeable improvement.While “engineering” as a discipline is commonly discussed in literature, almost no researchspecific to industrial engineering retention and graduate school was identified. The only researchfound addressing
stubborn trend is not changing much [1, 2]. Theoutcome is worse for black and Hispanic students, who usually comprise less than 10% ofengineering graduates [3, 4]. The lack of enrollment and graduation of female and minoritystudents in STEM programs has traditionally led to a STEM workforce that lacks diversity [5–9].To address this lack of diversity, the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) has instituted the Girls’Engineering Exploration (GEE) day. GEE is an annual STEM outreach event for elementaryschool girls, especially minority students. The objective of GEE is to increase interest in STEMfields among the girls who participate in the event, along with increasing their self-confidence insuccessfully performing STEM activities. Traditionally
spread through each of the typical four years with easilyaccessible, appropriate, effective, and ready-to-deploy instructional resources and faculty guidesat no cost.Methodology:Standards Infusion Module DevelopmentA cadre of nineteen (19) engineering education and standards experts from ASME Standards andCertification Committees were assembled in the initial development, planning and execution ofthe project. During the project year, these experts developed instructional modules and guides,derived from the initial modules in Figure 1.The modules were developed for use throughout all four years of ME and MET degree programsand were applicable to multiple industries. All the modules have been successfully classroompiloted at least once by the
causal loop diagrams predict that an increase inthe number of women engineering professionals yield an increase in the number of femalestudents enrolling in engineering colleges, creating a feedback loop that gives an exponentialgrowth in the number of women engineering professionals.1. IntroductionEducate women and their community will prosper. Deny them education and the world willsuffer [1-3]. The study sought to find how women in the engineering profession perceived theirinfluence at the workplace, home, and community. According to the 2010 U.S. Census, femalescomprise of 50.8% of the total population [4]. Further, the U.S. Census Bureau shows that 6% ofcollege graduates are women in STEM fields while men were about 18% [5]. Women in the
). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & society, 4(2), 139-158.Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. Classics of organizational theory, 6, 450-459.Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & society, 20(4), 441-464.Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., ... & Wilson, D. M. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48-88.Alinsky, S. D. (1989). Rules for radicals: A practical primer for realistic radicals. Vintage.Baillie, C., Ko, E., Newstetter, W., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2011). Advancing diverse and inclusive
technology self-efficacy, 0.83 forinnovation orientation, 0.85 for design, 0.83 for design self-efficacy and 0.95 for belonging.Factors are listed by item in the appendix.FindingsTable 1 provides an overview of the analytical sample. All data analyses were conducted usingStataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.From the initial pool of n=372, responses were removed by listwise deletion if they were missingvalues for any of the five factors of interest. The sample was then further narrowed to onlyinclude students who had complete responses for both all factors of the pre- and post- survey.These students were matched using unique UT student ID numbers. This left an analyticalsample of n=172. The
is Assistant Professor of Engineering at Metropolitan State University of Denver. He was formerly on the faculty at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. He has a B.S in mechanical engineering from Tribhuvan University, Nepal, a M.S. in Mechatronics from Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea, and a Ph.D. in industrial engineering from Western Michigan University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Page 1 of 9 ©2019 American Society for Engineering Education. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 15-19, 2019, Tampa, FloridaInnovative Baccalaureate Degree Program in Advanced Manufacturing SciencesRobert Park 1 and Ananda Paudel 21 Lockheed
is designed to be completed in one or two weeksby a student team that consists of no more than two students (some students prefer to work bythemselves), where students pick their team members at the beginning of the semester. For many ofthe labs, students are expected to work outside of the scheduled lab time in order to complete theobjectives. A listing of the projects for the course is shown below.• Lab 1: Software-defined Calculator (1 week)• Lab 2: Type-K Thermocouple (1 week)• Lab 3: Type-K and Type-J Thermocouple (1 week)• Lab 4: Analog Input for Resistance Measurement (1 week)• Lab 5: Temperature Measurement
improve learningand retention in STEM with particular impact on underrepresented groups [1]. However, despiteadvances in classroom design for interactive teaching and pockets of enthusiastic adopters, thechallenge to bridge the gap from research results to common classroom practice remains.Workshops to introduce evidence-based teaching practices are prevalent, but one-time effortsrarely result in sustained change, and hence ongoing support is needed [2], [3].The study presented in this paper takes place in the context of the SIMPLE Design model forfaculty development, which was studied in implementation over a two-year period [4]. Asdescribed in more detail in the next section, the SIMPLE Design model employs ongoingdiscipline-based faculty
Electronics Engineering Technology at Savannah State UniversityDr. Bryan Knakiewicz, Savannah State University M.S. Engineering Technology The University of Toledo Ph.D. Technology Eastern Michigan University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Inspiring Middle School Girls into Engineering and Technology FieldsIntroductionAccording to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 47% of the United States’ workforce is female[1], although females constitute only 14% of the engineering and technology workforce [2]. Asengineers continue to make some of the biggest advances of our time, the demand to achievediversity in the engineering and technology workforce is constantly increasing [3]. Studies
firstembarked on this project, we adopted the CT Vocabulary and Progression Chart provided by theCSTA & ISTE (2011) as we reported in a 2016 ASEE paper (Hynes et al, 2016). However, as weprogressed in the project, we conducted a more thorough review of CT competencies from otherworks (Barr & Stephenson, 2011; Brennan & Resnick, 2012; Cserkawskit & Lyman, 2015;Grover & Pea, 2013, Lye & Koh, 2014; Wing, 2016). Through this review we refined some thedefinitions, added new ones from our initial 2016 list, and then translated them into languageappropriate for K-2 teachers. Table 1 shows the original CT competencies along with twoadditions we have since added--debugging/troubleshooting and pattern recognition. With this listof eleven
academic institutions. We interviewed 24 individuals in Fall2014 and Spring 2015; interviews lasted between 30 and 90 minutes. Interviewees worked in avariety of settings across campus, including financial aid and health services. We alsointerviewed a First-Year Engineering (FYE) staff member.To better understand the broader context of SVEs’ educational experiences beyond departmentsof engineering, we explore the IAs’ perspectives on their duties in serving student veterans andtheir suggestions for improving policies and programs, both at the university level and withinengineering. We also examine some implications of these perspectives for engineeringeducation. We focus this study on two research questions: 1. How do IAs describe their roles
[1-8], but also widely viewed as deficient [9]. The National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) [4] and National Science Foundation (NSF) [10] have devoted resources andattention to improving the ethics education of students. This includes both microethics, orindividual responsibilities, and macroethics, addressing the “role of engineers in societalimplications about technology” and the broader societal and environmental responsibilities of theprofession [11].Although accreditation requires some degree of ESI education [7,8], the precise nature is notconstrained and seems to be largely at the discretion of individual programs and their faculty.Lattuca and Stark’s Academic Plan Model [12] describes faculty teaching choices. It is similar toother
results for the TPACK approach werethen compared to that of the traditional instruction approach. Results showed that the instructionsdesigned and implemented aligning with the TPACK framework significantly increased theinstructional quality of the instructor and the overall teaching and learning outcomes andeffectiveness. The results can inspire instructing STEM courses especially the mechatronics coursefollowing the TPACK framework.1. IntroductionIncorporation of educational technologies to promote effective pedagogy and teachingeffectiveness is increasing rapidly [1]. Hence, educators need to learn and adjust with neweducational technologies to teach successfully. However, educational technologies cannot be seenfrom standalone point of view
relevant to teachingSTEM courses and practices that have been empirically linked to better student learning outcomes andcourse completion rates. The use of evidence-based teaching practices in a course, is used as a proxy forteaching effectiveness in this system that consists of three parts. First, faculty complete the TeachingPractices Inventory (Wieman & Gilbert, 2014), a self-report measure on the types of teaching practicesused in their classroom. The TPI is comprised of eight categories including (1) course information provided,(2) supporting materials provided, (3) in-class features and activities, (4) assignments, (5) feedback andtesting, (6) other (e.g., new methods, assessments), (7) the training and guidance of teaching assistants
retention rates at public colleges and universities as shown in Figure 1. [1]Figure 1. The average of retention rates for first-time undergraduate students returning for thesecond fall in 4-year degree granting public institutions by cohort year. [1]Retention rates are important as they are a key metric of the amount of resources wasted, bothfinancially and human, by the students and the institutions that attempted to support them.Students, who attempt a degree but drop out, have no saleable skills to show for the enormouseffort put forth and the funds expended. Similarly, institutions do not have graduation rates thatreflect the expenditure in operating and capital expenses they have made to teach these students.From an institution and at a
to be sufficient to address this complicated, yetessential part of the accreditation process.The Model is based on a case of a program that has a Mechanical and ManufacturingEngineering Technology title. This program has to satisfy:1. ETAC a through k student outcomes,2. Society of Manufacturing Engineering (SME) a through d criteria,3. American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME) a thorough h criteria.Needless to say that the above reference Outcomes and Criteria (a, b….) of the threeorganizations do not necessarily line up. 1Our model was built in response to the need of finding a common denominatorOutcomes/Criteria and map the three different ones to it. We will demonstrate that the
, Mathematics & Statistics Department2 1 Edwardsville, IL 62026AbstractThis Evidence-based practice complete paper describes the experiences with a holisticMathematics Enrichment Sessions, Freshmen Mentoring, Mathematics Tutoring and newFreshmen Engineering course that are implemented during the last five years at Southern IllinoisUniversity Edwardsville as part of our NSF STEP project. The mathematics Enrichment Session(ES) idea, which is a combination of the best aspects of Supplemental Instruction idea andPeerLed Team Learning methods, can be an effective way of supporting students in their firstyear of studies. The implementation of the peer-mentoring program that was
the primary learning outcomes.BackgroundIn the modern educational environment, many instructors have embraced web-based LearningManagement Systems (LMS) to manage course data. According to Cavus et al. [1], “An LMS isoften regarded as the starting point for developing an online course or program by researchers asit provides a means for managing, delivering, and tracking online instruction and studentoutcomes.” Furthermore, an LMS also acts like a bridge between the instructors and learners byproviding a common point of contact and direct line of connection [1].To be an effective system, an LMS must meet several requirements: availability, scalability,usability, interoperability, stability, and security [2]. Availability, as the name suggests
-worldapplications, demonstrations, and/or hands-on experimentation. However, some concepts’ depth andcomplexity can cause all traditional attempts to be unsuccessful, particularly for concepts withoutobvious visual representation such as fugacity, and given the non-visual nature of equations.1 Improving and broadening visual instruction is beneficial for learners beyond those with aperceived inclination for visual learning. Studies have shown combining text with images improvesretention of the information,2,3 and students can better transfer the gained knowledge towards solvingproblems when the instruction is delivered through a multimedia presentation of concepts.4 In order toimprove chemical engineering instruction, developing better visual
, curriculum design, electrical engineering, capstone design1. IntroductionAn alarm was sounded in 2010 by two influential government reports delivering the following twomessages: a) Over 60% of US undergraduate STEM students drop out from their engineeringprograms [1], b) Many US engineering graduates feel unready for engineering practice andeventually leave the engineering field altogether [2]. The challenges posed to engineeringeducation institutes were to find quick solutions how to recruit and retain engineering students andhow to instill in all engineering graduates a sense of pride and a lifelong passion in being engineers.The correlation between low retention of engineering majors and lack of lower divisionengineering coursework was well
integration of business andentrepreneurship into the curriculum. This paper describes the efforts made to integrate theEntrepreneurial Mindset (EM) into the fall semester first-year engineering course. The course isa 2-credit hour semester long course that meets once a week for 100 minutes. Serving as anintroduction the engineering profession, the course presents active-learning sessions on each ofthe five engineering disciplines offered at Mount Union: Biomedical, Civil, Computer,Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering. A 7-week design project focused on buoyancy [1] isalso a part of the course. Starting in the Fall 2017 semester and continued in 2018, EM active-learning exercises were integrated into the course to teach the EM. Prior to 2017 only
them in the curriculum. Therefore simulation studies were thebest option for students to understand geothermal heat pump design and operation.This paper describes the curriculum enhancement for an existing junior level alternative energyclass in a B.S. in Engineering Technology program by adding geothermal energy fundamentalsand industrial applications in it. The curriculum includes (1) the analysis of the refrigeration cycleon a pressure-enthalpy diagram using pressures and temperatures measured in a FESTO Didacticgeothermal heat pump system, and (2) obtaining coefficient performance (COP) and the energyefficiency ratio (EER) of a geothermal heat pump using measured temperature, humidity, voltage,and current values in normal and different
University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. , Lecturer, formerly visiting Professor, in the School of Engineering, in the Mechanical Engineering Design Group at Stanford University. Barbara’s research focuses on four ar- eas: 1)grounding a blend of theories from social-cognitive psychology, engineering design, and art to show how cognition affects design; 2) changing the way people understand the emotion behind their work with the intent to do something new; 3) shifting norms of leaders involved in entrepreneurial-minded action; and 4) developing teaching methods with a storytelling focus in engineering and science educa- tion. Founder of the Design Entrepreneuring Studio: Barbara helps teams generate creative environments
knowledge and hone theircommunication, teamwork, and problem-solving skills. Given the nature of senior designcourses, they offer an opportunity for engineering programs to integrate the outcomes of ABETcriteria [1]. In contrast to much of the undergraduate curriculum, the problems that students workon in senior design tend to be more ambiguous, require the consideration of multiple tradeoffs,and have no ‘right’ answer. As such, engineering design problems require individuals to makedecisions about what counts as knowledge by assessing various sources of information,balancing constraints, and evaluating alternative solutions. These acts can be grouped together asepistemic cognitive processes and require individuals to reason “about specific
, engage key course/subject concepts andmaterials through an interactive and adaptive manner in the classroom. Research demonstratesthat active learning pedagogical practices are more effective for promoting student learning andachievement. After conducting a thorough review of the literature, Prince concluded thatengineering faculty should consider incorporating new instructional practices and techniques,especially active learning principles, into their classroom, based on compelling evidence in theliterature base which suggests that student-centered teaching promotes greater student learning[1]. In a separate review of the literature, Freeman et al., conducted a meta-analysis of 225studies that examined instructional practices in undergraduate
could engage in engineering after school to complement thescience and engineering learning during the normal school day [1]. Our initial goal was tointroduce a variety of engineering topics/platforms that related to the atmosphere and associatedsciences including wind power, solar energy, aircraft design, atmospheric sensors, and testingphysical models of dropsondes using a wind tunnel.The project team collaborated with an after-school program near Boulder, Colorado, whosemission was to serve students from low-income families by offering multi-year programming tostudents and support for families. This group was initially interested in Engineering Experiencesin order to provide STEM opportunities to their students.In order to get to know the
% of those with an apparent mental health problemreceiving treatment in the past year [1]. Although this study was able to draw out differencesbetween graduate and undergraduate students, it was limited in the analysis as it was focused oncomparing the two groups. Another recent publication regarding doctoral students’ well-beingpresented a systematic literature review detailing finding from 17 recent publications from fourdatabases. However, the broad review scope and search terms used makes this work hard to betransferable for a specific discipline [2].These findings demonstrate that an ideal study of graduate student mental health would bedesigned to focus specifically on a graduate population within a specific discipline. Multiplestudies
theclassroom. The expectation is that students who experience classrooms led by ISE-2 faculty willhave higher engagement, success, and retention than students in non-ISE-2 classes. Additionally,although students from all backgrounds are expected to benefit from experiencing ISE-2classrooms, underrepresented minority (URM) students in Engineering programs (i.e., women,ethnic minorities, first generation) are expected to have an even greater positive outcome thantheir non-minority peers, because the content of the development program directly addressessome of the causes of experiences that lead URM students to report feeling less welcomed in thefield of Engineering [1], [2]. The project period is March 1, 2017 to February 29, 2020 [3].As part of the
empowerment. The workshop celebrated its twentiethanniversary in summer 2018. Here, a reflection on the lessons learned from running the programfor the past 20 years is provided. The AWE Workshop is impactful in young girls’ exploration ofnot only engineering but also other STEM fields.1.0 Introduction1.1 Attracting Women into Engineering (AWE)Summer camps or programs strive to provide an outlet for children to interact with each other.Traditional goals include teaching participants certain skills but these camps aim to do so in fun,engaging ways [1]. The Attracting Women into Engineering (AWE) Workshop is a summerprogram hosted by the Henry M. Rowan College of Engineering at Rowan University. The AWEWorkshop strives to introduce girls from local