viewers. Her primary research interest is science identity, STEM education, and participation in online communities.Mr. Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University Matthew Bahnson is a doctoral student at North Carolina State University in Applied Social and Com- munity Psychology. His research interests include engineering identity, diversity, bias, stereotypes, and STEM education. He works with Dr. Cheryl Cass at NCSU.Ms. Marissa A Tsugawa, University of Nevada, Reno Marissa Tsugawa is a graduate research assistant studying at the University of Nevada, Reno in the PRiDE Research Group. She is currently working towards a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. She expects to graduate May of 2019. Her research interests
Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2017.[17] A. M. McAlister, D. M. Lee, K. M. Ehlert, R. L. Kajfez, C. J. Faber, and M. S. Kennedy, “Qualitative coding: An approach to assess inter-rater reliability,” in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[18] N. H. Choe, M. J. Borrego, L. L. Martins, A. D. Patrick, and C. C. Seepersad, “A Quantitative Pilot Study of Engineering Graduate Student Identity,” in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.AppendixTable 1: Participant, identity score reported from survey, interview, and selected demographicdata. Carnegie classification reported at time of
author and co-author of numerous papers and served as project lead on a major study of transfer in engineering. Ms. Schiorring holds a Master’s Degree in Public Policy from Harvard University. She is a graduate of NSF’s I-Corps program for educators.Dr. Paul S Nerenberg Dr. Paul S. Nerenberg is currently an Assistant Professor of Physics and Biology at California State University, Los Angeles. He received his PhD in Physics from MIT and has a strong interest in improving the quality of introductory physics education, particularly for students who enter college with little or no previous physics coursework. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Quantitative and Qualitative
in academia and research, broaden my knowledge base, engage in evidence-based practices to promote the quality of life, and ultimately be an avid contributor to the world of academia through research, peer reviews, and publications. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Negotiating Identity as a Response to Shame: A Study of Shame within an Experience as a Woman in EngineeringAbstract: This research paper presents the findings of an interpretative phenomenologicalanalysis (IPA) case study of the experience of shame in a woman engineering student. Ouroverarching research question that framed this study was: How do woman students with multiplesalient identities
first-time engineering graduate student instructors (GSIs) to teach inclusively?Improvements to the OrientationOver the years, the teaching orientation has evolved to accommodate a growing population ofgraduate student instructors (e.g. 141 GSIs in 2011 to 179 in 2018), and the priorities of theCollege of Engineering. Most significantly, to support University and CoE diversity, equity andinclusion strategic plans the orientation has been revamped to make inclusive teaching trainingmore central. In the 2017-2018 academic year, we embarked on a pilot program to learn moreabout the experiences of GSIs, and to see if the orientation was meeting their needs, especiallyrelated to the inclusive teaching professional development. The results of
requirecooperation among experts from many fields. Successful leaders must harness the diversecapabilities of teams composed of these experts and be technically skilled. Undergraduateengineering students can fill this need by learning how to be effective leaders during theirformation as engineers. Unfortunately, many engineering students graduate with littledevelopment of leadership skills; engineering educators do not currently have asufficient understanding of how engineering students develop into leaders.This NSF ECE supported project seeks to improve educators’ understanding of the interactionbetween leadership and engineering identities in the formation of undergraduate engineers. Thiswork postulates that a cohesive engineering leadership identity
Update Proposed Revisions to EAC General Criteria 3 and 5". 2016 EDI, San Francisco,CA, 2016, March. ASEE Conferences, 2016.3. Denecke, D., K. Feaster, and K. Stone. "Professional development: Shaping effectiveprograms for STEM graduate students." Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools(2017).4. Trevelyan, J. The Making of An Expert Engineer. (Taylor and Francis, 2014).5. Ahlqvist, S., London, B. & Rosenthal, L. Unstable Identity Compatibility How GenderRejection Sensitivity Undermines the Success of Women in Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics Fields. Psychological Science 24, 1644-1652 (2013).6. Wieman, C., & Gilbert, S. (2014). The Teaching Practices Inventory: a new tool forcharacterizing college and university
Paper ID #27632Implications of Gamification in Learning Environments on Computer Sci-ence Students: A Comprehensive StudyMs. Leila Zahedi, Florida International University Leila Zahedi is a Ph.D. student in the School of Computing and Information Science (SCIS) at Florida International University. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering from the University of Is- fahan and two Master’s degrees in Information Technology Management from the University of Yazd and Computer Science from Florida International University. Her research interests include computer science education, quantitative data analysis, and data
Computing Identity and Persistence Across Multiple Groups Using Structural Equation ModelingAbstractDespite the projected growth of computer and information technology occupations, manycomputing students fail to graduate. Studying students’ self-beliefs is one way to understandpersistence in a school setting. This paper explores how students' disciplinary identity sub-constructs including competence/performance, recognition, interest, and sense of belongingcontribute to academic persistence. A survey of 1,640 students as part of an NSF grant wasconducted at three South Florida metropolitan public universities. A quantitative analysis wasperformed which included a structural equation model (SEM) and a multigroup SEM. The
collected during this study were both qualitative and quantitative, making this a mixedmethods study. The data we collected to extract creativity were mainly qualitative. Though therewere 11 instruments in total that we could use to extract data, and 13 graduate engineering studentsparticipating in the study (in 5 groups: G1 to G5), we had only nine complete sets for all 11instruments. As a result, we used a critical case study approach for our analysis.RQ1: How do engineering students perceive the importance of creativity in their leadershipdevelopment before and after creativity instruction?To answer our first research question, we examined the pre-course questionnaire and comparedthe participants’ ratings and reasons with their post-course self
entrepreneurship, and women and leadership courses and initiatives at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. Prior to her work in academia, Nathalie spent several years in the field of market research and business strategy consulting in Europe and the United States with Booz Allen and Hamilton and Data and Strategies Group. She received a BA from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, an MBA from Babson College, and MS and PhD degrees from Purdue University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Communicating the Value of a Transdisciplinary Degree: Comparing and Contrasting Perceptions Across Student GroupsAbstractMultidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and
enrollment and persistence in college STEM fields using an expanded P-E fit framework: A large-scale multilevel study.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 915–947, 2014.[13] K. E. Winters and H. M. Matusovich, “Career goals and actions of early career engineering graduates,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1226–1238, 2015.[14] J. P. Martin, D. R. Simmons, and S. L. Yu, “Family roles in engineering undergraduates’ academic and career choices: Does parental educational attainment matter?,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 136–149, 2014.[15] R. L. Kajfez, K. M. Kecskemety, E. S. Miller, K. E. Gustafson, and K. L. Meyers, “First- year engineering students’ perceptions of engineering
engineeringeducation research to explore how engineering stakeholders conceptually understand or ‘cluster’ thegraduate attributes.In a large research university in Western Canada, an exploratory case study was designed with theoverarching objective to investigate whether the engineering programs in the Faculty of Engineeringemphasized the CEAB graduate attributes to reflect their reported importance by student, faculty andindustry member stakeholders. One purpose of the study was to determine how the CEAB graduateattributes cluster – or group – in practice for an Engineering-in-Training (EIT) at the beginning ofhis/her engineering career so that engineering education can be designed to more closely reflectengineering practice. In other words, when an engineer
answer the research question “What culturalfactors influence Muslim women’s occupational pursuit of computer science?”4. Methods This qualitative pilot study utilizes a case study approach through a small sample ofpeople’s experiences. Employing purposive sampling, four graduate Muslim female participantswere solicited from a large public university in Florida. All the participants were Ph.D. studentsmajoring in computer science and have been in the program for at least one year. Three out of fourstudents passed their qualification exams, two of them have also defended their proposals. Thefourth student was in her second year of the Ph.D. program and was taking courses to meet therequirements of the department for taking the qualifying
, 2006.[13] Ricardo, J., Guide, V. G., Hanson, A., Auzenne, M., & Williamson, S., “Enhancing criticalthinking skills of civil engineering students through Supplemental Instruction”, ConferenceProceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Honolulu,Hawaii, 2007.[14] Malm, J. Bryngfors, L., Fredriksson, J., “Impact of Supplemental Instruction on dropout andgraduation rates: an example from 5-year engineering programs”, Journal of Peer Learning, 11,2018, 76-88.[15] Malm, J., Bryngfors, L., & Morner, L.-L., “Benefits of guiding Supplemental Instructionsessions for SI leaders: A case study for engineering education at a Swedish University”, Journalof Peer Learning, 5(1), 2012.[16] Wilson, C., Steele, A
scorings facilitated by Author 1. Each facultymember brought a different disciplinary perspective to the scoring: one faculty member is basedin Civil and Environmental Engineering, another in Business Information Technology, and thethird in Urban Affairs and Planning. Given the pilot, exploratory nature of this study, thissecondary scoring helped validate the initial scoring categories and illuminate potentialdifferences in both assessment of student learning and understanding of DRRM acrossdisciplinary boundaries. Note, however, that because both the sample size (9 participants) andthe scorers (1 from each discipline) are small, the analysis cannot support conclusions bydiscipline; instead, it highlights potential differences that merit further
Paper ID #24617Understanding Undergraduate Engineering Student Information Access andNeeds: Results from a Scoping ReviewMs. Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo Kate Mercer is the liaison librarian for Systems Design Engineering, Electrical & Computer Engineering and Earth & Environmental Sciences at the University of Waterloo. Kate’s main duties include providing instruction and research services to students, faculty and staff. Kate graduated with a MI from the Univer- sity of Toronto in 2011, and in addition to her job as a liaison librarian is a PhD Candidate at the University of Waterloo’s School of
in Choice of Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” Psychol. Sci., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 770–775, 2013.[10] B. L. Oo, S. Li, and L. Zhang, “Understanding Female Students ’ Choice of a Construction Management Undergraduate Degree Program : Case Study at an Australian University,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2018.[11] J. W. Elliott, M. K. Thevenin, and C. Lopez del Puerto, “Role of Gender and Industry Experience in Construction Management Student Self-efficacy, Motivation, and Planned Behavior,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2016.[12] R. Su and J. Rounds, “All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain
component, termed the hiddencurriculum, pertains to perspectives and processes that are both outside of, and rooted in, theformal curriculum. The hidden curriculum inadvertently conveys to students what is important inthe educational community. This paper employs a hidden curriculum perspective to explore therole and value of ethics and societal impacts (termed ESI) in engineering education. As part of alarger study on the ESI education of undergraduate and graduate students, this paper exploresESI through a hidden curriculum lens using an ex post facto design and mixed-methodsapproach. Individuals who teach engineering and computing students participated in a surveywhere they reported their own ESI education practices and their perceptions of the
study ofLatino/a adolescent students in that “students’ funds of knowledge should be the starting point forengineering education” [p. 14]. Second, funds of knowledge can help guide the people whosupport and mentor first-generation college students—from student service staff to professors—toidentify opportunities to help these students excel.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation under EAGERGrant No. (1734044). Interview data of first-year engineering students came from fundingsupported by the National Science Foundation under CAREER Grant No. (1554057). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect
-origin.With regards to the term “immigrant parentage,” it is used to distinguish between participantsborn to two immigrant parents and those born to one or no immigrant parents; this distinction isrelevant as the findings of past research suggests that the former group (individuals born to twoimmigrant parents) may possess a unique academic advantage (Thomas, 2009).Study LimitationsHere, we address a few limitations to our study. First, we do not take into account time period ofenrollment and its impact on the experiences of Black engineering students with faculty. So, forexample, we do not explore emergent differences in the responses of Blacks who graduated withengineering degrees in the 1970s and those who graduated in the 2000s. Second, given the
Paper ID #25209Student Designers’ Interactions with Users in Capstone Design Projects: AComparison Across TeamsMr. Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan Robert P. Loweth is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. He earned a B.S. in Engineering Sciences from Yale University (2016), with a double major in East Asian Studies. He also holds a Graduate Certificate in Chinese and American Studies, jointly awarded by Johns Hopkins University and Nanjing University in China. His current research focuses on how undergraduate engineering students approach front-end design
, there were 442,273 international students in China in all, in which48,394 majored in engineering, ranking only below the numbers of students majored inthe traditional popular majors-Mandarin Chinese (169,093) and Western Medicine(49,022). In addition, with China joined the Washington Accord as a signatory countryand lots of engineering programs taught in English was developed for internationalgraduate students further increase of international engineering students can be expected. Existent studies have explored the motivation, social-cultural adjustment,learning experiences of international students in China. Nevertheless, few studies haveexplored their learning outcomes. Considering the shift towards outcome-basededucation in global
education. In addition, she has completed several graduate-level courses in the Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. Dr. Morrison’s public policy master’s thesis was a research study on diversity policy in the Center for Aviation Studies and whether or not that policy impacted students’ considerations for leaving the academic program. Her expertise is in curriculum de- velopment, especially as it pertains to women and underrepresented minorities in education. Dr. Morrison takes an interdisciplinary approach to research, using both qualitative and quantitative methods that were informed by her background in education and public policy. c American Society for Engineering Education
incorporating intersectionality into quantitative methodological approaches,” Review of Research in Education, vol. 42, no.1, pp. 72–92, 2018.[23] L. A. Clark and D. Watson, “Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 309–319, 1995.[24] A. L. Griffith, “Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?” Economics of Education Review, vol. 29, no. 6, 2010. pp. 911–922, 2010.[25] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, “An analysis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans,” Journal of Engineering
listening are key to success in a highly collaborative working environment [6].Studies have shown that involving students in engineering projects helps improve technical andinterpersonal communication within teams, with the suppliers of technical parts, and non-engineers. It has also helped improve English writing skills for international students [7].One would expect engineering students to possess high levels of these skills upon graduation;however, the results of past surveys show that engineering students are inadequately equipped tomeet this need [8-9]. Although engineering students are typically required to communicate theirdesign to a broader audience at the end of the senior capstone course, there is not much emphasisand attempt to provide
engineering-based integrated STEM. Compulsorycoursework driven by a teacher’s need to address specific academic standards in science andassociated with grades for students is likely to create a different environment for studentinteractions than elective, non-graded, informal experiences. In addition, existing studies oftenuse quantitative analyses to investigate associations between motivation, context, andengagement [28]. With small group work ubiquitous with STEM, the affordances and limitationsof small group activities must be considered.This study addresses the gap in the literature to explore the following research questions: 1) What differences, if any, are seen in the engineering practices middle school girls and boys display during
. R. Thorndyke, “Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study,” J. Eng. Educ., no. October, pp. 313–320, 2004.[8] C. P. Veenstra, E. L. Dey, and G. D. Herrin, “Is Modeling of Freshman Engineering Success Different from Modeling of Non-Engineering Success?,” J. Eng. Educ., no. October, pp. 467–479, 2008.[9] T. Nomi, “Faces of the Future: A Portrait of First-Generation Community College Students,” 2005.[10] J. Ma and S. Baum, “Trends in community colleges: enrollment, prices, student debt, and completion,” Coll. Board Res., pp. 1–23, 2016.[11] K. E. Gerdes, C. A. Lietz, and E. A. Segal, “Measuring empathy in the 21st century: Development
Paper ID #27333Partners in Professional Development: Initial Results from a CollaborationBetween Universities, Training Programs, and Professional SocietiesDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Assistant Dean for Graduate Student Services at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her
byextensive field testing, materials design, and a research program, of which this study is a part.The curriculum units foster opportunities for middle-school children in OST settings to becomeengineers and solve problems that are identified as “personally meaningful and globallyrelevant” [20]. Each unit has been developed to include fourteen Curricular Design Principles forInclusivity [21], identified through previous research studies to support student learning, in fouroverarching categories: Set learning in a real-world context, present design challenges that areauthentic to engineering practice, scaffold student work, and demonstrate that everyone canengineer. The Curricular Design Principles are detailed under Findings in Table 3. There