objectives? Describe recommended changes.7) Comment on linkages between course and program outcomes. Should specific linkages be added or deleted?8) State whether the course has significant design content. If so, state what percentage of student grade is assigned to design-related material. Describe the project(s), including how the project addresses economic, environmental, sustainability, manufacturability, ethical, health and safety, social, and political considerations. Also, state whether and to what extent teamwork and communication were addressed. Page 9.977.13 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering
method of engineering as a purposeful and systematic practice for innovation, entrepreneurship, and responsible leadership driven by an innovation ethic for betterment that is responsive to real-world needs. Whereas strategic directed scientific research that is often necessary to gain a better understanding of physical phenomena is frequently required during the purposeful, systematic technology development process, scientific research is not the primary driver. Creative engineering practice requires proactive responsible leadership beginning with the identification of meaningful real-world needs. During the creative technology development process, however
. Page 9.1216.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Introduction Definitions of Technology Health Care Time Line Technology is... Today's Medicine Eastern & Western Logic Medical Knowledge Technology Over Time Practice of Medicine Cities Ethics
the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationcurrent (or at least fresh) process experience on the part of the mentor. Such process skillsinclude: • consulting practice skills: the role of the consultant; stakeholders; interviewing skills; client/consultant relationships and "buy-in"; implementation issues and reward systems; • the context of business management; • proposal preparation and proposal "selling"; costing; project planning; • problem structuring methods, methodological issues, ethical issues; • how groups of people work; and • the use of decision support systems
seminaris similar to that described by Swamidass and Bryant1, except in addition to having studentswork on team-related activities, there are also guest speakers who present their entrepreneurialactivities, and the teams begin to concentrate on identifying a single product idea. For eachoffering, 3 teams of between 3-5 students were selected.Course outcomes include being able to: • Understand and experience selected elements of the product realization process. • Demonstrate that students can function effectively on multidisciplinary teams. • Develop a complete business plan for the introduction of a new product. • Have a demonstrated understanding of intellectual property and ethical issues associated with new product
helpful.Other units of material that we have included in the initial base set course material are as follows:11. Cost estimate at different level and stage.12. Ethics, product liability related to design practice.Developing Shared Design and Teaching ToolsTo use the base set of lecture materials and Capstone Design Manual, some web-based tools have beendeveloped. Others recognized as useful will be developed in the near future. The developed teaching anddesign tools include a design case library, a tolerance/fits specification tool, an optimization subroutinelibrary, a cam-follower modeling and dynamic simulation tool, and a tolerance stack analysis tool. Amore general purpose mechanism simulation program is currently being implemented. These tools
Engineering Department at Georgia Institute of Technology.Dr. McIntire received his B.Ch.E. and M.S. degrees in chemical engineering from Cornell University in 1966 andhis Ph.D. degree in chemical engineering from Princeton University in 1970. Dr. McIntire has edited two texts:Biotechnology - Science, Engineering and Ethical Challenges for the Twenty-First Century [Joseph Henry Press(NAS), 1996] and Frontiers in Tissue Engineering [Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd., 1998]. Page 9.459.10 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American
years for research anddevelopment programs coordinated among several federal agencies. According to the bill, tenfederal agencies, such as the National Science Foundation, would award grants to sixnanoscience research centers established by the National Nanotechnology Initiative. It authorizespublic hearings and expert advisory panels, as well as the American NanotechnologyPreparedness Center to study the emerging technology's potential societal and ethical effects.3About 70 percent of the new nanotechnology funding will go to university research efforts,which will help meet the demand for workers with nanoscale science and engineering skills. Theinitiative will also fund the projects of several governmental agencies. Much of the research
final product is put to the test in anational competition involving the top universitiesacross the United States. However, crossing thefinish line is not the only goal of the students. Theymust also participate in the written and oral sections of the final competition, whichrequires the teams to defend their choices both on paper and on stage.One project: two solutionsOf course the first time an engineering department atany university embarks upon such a competition,there will naturally be issues to smooth out. ForMTSU, the problem initially was not how manystudents were available for the task, rather it was howto organize them into productive teams. There wereso many interested freshmen who possessed theenthusiasm and work ethic for such a
overcome, andproviding a reasonable working environment (space and computing resources) was among themore difficult obstacles to overcome. Benefits to many of the undergraduate students of participating in the research activities isthat they have been able to develop synergies between their research assignments and some oftheir course related activities (e.g., term papers / projects). Other benefits and outcomes of theefforts of including undergraduate and high school students in research activities include thefollowing: build confidence and self esteem encouragement to continue their education and pursue higher education (retention and recruitment) develop a good work ethic and professionalism develop a sense of
One-Week Design Projects for Chemical Engineering Freshmen Ramesh C. Chawla Department of Chemical Engineering, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059 Chawla@scs.howard.eduAbstractFreshman chemical engineering students along with students from other engineering disciplinestake a two credit Introduction to Engineering course in their first semester. The students areintroduced to various topics including career options in various engineering fields, resume’workshop, communication skills, ethics, intellectual property, problem solving, critical thinkingand time management. Approximately 30-35% of the grade is based on homework, quizzes
provide direct technical assistance to the project. Thisarrangement provides some direct ties between students and faculty to make sure thatthey have a known place to go to get answers, and to make sure that they make consistentprogress throughout the year. During the first semester some limited laboratory andmaterial resources are also made available so students may experiment with unfamiliardevices or systems to better understand their applicability to their project. At the end ofthe first semester, each student team produces a design document that includes acomplete conceptual description of their project, a proposed timetable for completion, alist of resources and sections that addresses any potential safety, ethics or ecologicalissues
by thousands of U.S.organizations to stay abreast of ever-increasing competition and to improve performance. Fortoday’s business environment, the Criteria help organizations respond to current challenges:openness and transparency in governance and ethics; the need to create value for customers andthe business; and the challenges of rapid innovation and capitalizing on their knowledge assets.Whether a business is small or large, is involved in service or manufacturing, or has one office ormultiple sites across the globe, the Criteria provide a valuable framework that helps a business toplan in an uncertain environment. The Criteria helps an organization to align resources andapproaches, such as ISO 9000, Lean Enterprise, Balanced Scorecard
to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data.3. an ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs.4. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams.5. an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems.6. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.7. an ability to communicate effectively.8. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.9. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning.10. a knowledge of contemporary issues.11. an ability to understand the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.12. an ability
Review 9 Self-assembly from the condensed Self-assembly from condensed phase II phase I. Read: Text (P. Ball) Chapters 10 pages Read: Text (P. Ball) Chapters 9 396-398, 400-404, and 407-415 Student team presentation 5: Dean D. Klein, Director of Center for CT, Nanocarbons Union College: Ethics in Nanosciences, 10 Student team presentation 6: Nanobots & Nanorevolution Langmuir-Blodgett films Read: Sc. American article pages 74-91 Discussion of NANOTRACTS II
Problem Solving (1) and Safety (1) ENG3957 / 3967 Product and Process ENG3958 Engineering Ethics Development (1) in Design (1) ENG3966 Design for ENG3968 Manufacturing Manufacturing (1) Processes (1) ENG3969 Project Phases of ENG4955 Concurrent Design (1) Engineering (1) Table 2. Listing of Business, Communication and Elective Modules for MTU Enterprise Program
another change, industry is not likecollege. Industry offers more emphasis on team accomplishments, more ambiguous problemdefinitions, and significant amount of time spent in communication, both oral and written.” Heasserted that these skills are not only more necessary but become critical to the recent graduate’ssuccess. Illustrating how important these skills are, Tobias5 reported that the ability to assume aleadership role, yet function within a team and to communicate effectively are some of thetypical characteristics which recruiters rate higher when looking for new employees. Reid(2000) then asked, “How can we teach effective communication, problem solving, criticalthinking and develop a work ethic in our students without turning our
hands-on projects that should provide a snapshot of what life is like as an EETgraduate. Page 9.193.1 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”Course PhilosophyThe basic philosophy of the course is to provide a “get acquainted to EET” experience in arelatively non-threatening, interesting manner. Diverse issues such as engineering ethics, jobsatisfaction, marketing issues, life long learning and global market pressures are presented aspart of the class assignments and project development
scientific and technological factors withpolitical, social, economic and ethical considerations in problem-solving techniques.Through the sophomore year, the ISAT program requires students to take classes thatemphasize the role of science and technology in society, discrete and continuousmathematics, information systems, knowledge-based systems, statistics, organizationalbehavior, chemistry, physics, biology, environmental science, engineering, manufacturingand instrumentation and measurement. [4,5] These courses are designed to provide thestudent with the fundamental knowledge of science and engineering principles andintroductory knowledge to transition into the technology sectors in the junior and senioryears. The goal of the program at the
success.75. I am disappointed with my choice of major.76. My overall attitude about Clemson University is positive.77. I can speak in front of an audience effectively.78. I am an inadequate problem solver.79. My math courses have prepared me for this course.80. I can apply my knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.81. I can design and conduct experiments.82. I can analyze and interpret data.83. I can design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs.84. My overall attitude about the Chemical Engineering Department is positive.85. I can function on problem-solving teams.86. I can identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems.87. I have an understanding of professional and ethical
discussion of “words to thewise” about business social etiquette. Topics covered include proper introductions, handshaking,exchanging business cards, meal etiquette, proper business attire, the art of small talk, thank younotes, cultural awareness, ethics, and influencing.B. EG 422 Integrated Engineering and Business Advanced ConceptsThe advanced course builds on the EG 421 with the objective of providing the students with anunderstanding of the interrelationships of the corporate functions and the development of thestudent’s personal skills. These objectives are accomplished with the following modules:1. CAPSTONE Business SimulationIn this exercise students are assigned to teams and compete with other teams using an internetbased business
for Engineering Educationdeveloped. A partial list of the course topics include: design process, design teams, engineeringmanagement, engineering ethics, professionalism, project management, failure analysis,optimization in design, concept generation, financial considerations, concept evaluation, productdesign, product specification, product generation, product evaluation, proposal generation, finalproject assembly and oral/written presentation. Creativity of the design is emphasized withimagination and learning from mistakes is also encouraged. The course takes a product fromproposal through concept development to final production and product evaluation. This processis completed by a team of three or four students within the semester
identified, bothby the instructors themselves, and by reviewing feedback from student questionnaires. Itwas a clear reminder that we were learning as we went. The most glaring issue was thesheer magnitude of the workload required for the EE3730 students when this interactiveelement was added to an already packed course. Most of the students enjoyed and valuedthe experience, but complained, some vehemently, that it was simply too much. Evenbefore attempting this, Don Bowie had expanded content of the course by including morenon-technical topics of the engineering profession like management of self, effectivecommunication, relationships with others, design methodology, decision economics,career planning, leadership, and ethics. This was on top of an
environment because of more clearance thatallows the operator to move freely in the area. Also, before the redesign, the direction of therelative height for which the operation tables were designed was part of the problem. This hasnow been eliminated in the redesign and hence provided better reach. Flooring at the area wasdesigned to be adjustable. This flexibility is designed to accommodate shorter workers andreduce cumulative trauma disorder.Overall, the work ethics have improved and workers are more productive. Quality of productthat was neglected in the past because of efforts to meet daily production quota has nowimproved. Workers do not have to exert additional effort to achieve this goal and they don’thave to be shoveled between jobs.A
sequence consists ofintroductory computer science classes and the other consists of introductory electricalengineering classes. Students must complete a minimum of 123 semester hours of course workto graduate.3 • The General Education requirements for the program is 18 hours which consists of the following: o 2 Fine Arts courses o 2 Humanities courses o 2 Social Sciences Out of the above 6 courses, one should be an Ethics course and 2 should be upper division. • A minimum of eight math and science courses must be taken • A minimum of 23 computer engineering classes must be takenThe following computer science and electrical engineering courses are required (Core Courses
and for grading those products. Ph.D. students and/or Facultyfrom the School of Business provide an experience in team building early in the program to helpestablish an understanding the need for and means for good group dynamics. Outside lecturersalso provide perspective on Professional Registration, Design for Quality, Ethics in Industry, andIntellectual Property. Table 2: Presentations and Grading (*) by External Lecturers Expert Lecturer Lecture Content Target SubmittalStudent Placement Office Resume Writing Project Placement (4-days)Industry Mentors a. Project Kick-off a. PDR* in 4 weeks, b
fossil fuel and if U.S. will becomedependant to other countries. Dr. Bonnie Dunbar, a NASA astronaut, spoke about theChallenger tragedy. She was responsible for operating Spacelab and its subsystems whichperformed a variety of experiments, while participating in the 61-A Challenger (October 30-November 6, 1985). This was the first shuttle to carry eight crew members, the largest to fly inspace, and was also the first in which payload activities were controlled from outside the UnitedStates. Dr. Jim Wild, Professor of Biochemistry and Biophysics, provided a thought-provokinglook into the ethics accompanying the rapidly evolving business and science of biotechnology
presentations.”(3).The emphasis in the above description is on selected topics which can vary from year toyear, and on evaluation and review of current practices in construction. The evaluationand review requires students to read construction-related periodicals and journals,summarize and discuss articles of interest in the class. The course requires team work ingroup projects, and team presentation of their research paper. The students get to evaluateeach other in confidentiality, and are required to be active contributors in the groupprojects. Ethics are an integrated part of group work, and students are made aware at theoutset of the course.Student/Faculty Interaction & CollaborationA good syllabus is not a complete reflection of how the course
identify, analyze and solve technical problems, g. an ability to communicate effectively, h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning, i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities, j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, and k. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.This leads to an honest assessment of ARET Online as a web-based system for meeting therequirements above.6. Delivery SystemsA wide variety of online programs are being offered across the nation. The courses beingprovided by these programs provide their students with many online features such
business studentswill learn the basic engineering design process. Page 9.543.6 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”The 18-credit E-SHIP minor is made up of four core courses (12 credits) that forengineering students include:ENGR 310: Entrepreneurial Leadership. Coverage of the fundamentals of leadership,including theory, understanding of individual leadership styles, group and organizationalleadership, values and ethics, and life cycles of organizations. This knowledge basesupports an entrepreneurial