Auckland. At the time of this writing, theproject for the 2020 implementation of the Capstone course has not been selected.2.2 Team Formation and Initial Communications to StudentsAbout halfway through Semester 1, students are given a brief overview of the Capstone projectand begin forming themselves into teams using a specific software application with the guidanceof Capstone course coordinators. In the Capstone Project, students generally work in teams of nine(with a few exceptions depending on the total enrolment). Experience from a trial year and twoyears of large classes in the Capstone course has shown that with six major specialisations withinCivil Engineering, a team of nine works well. Teams of eight are workable, but if a
balcony. The Competition was limitedby requiring students to design alternative viable solutions and using the alternative solutionsas the Competition. Each member of the group had to investigate and design a uniqueframing plan. Finally, the Benefits were to be articulated through evaluation metrics considered in the design such as cost and constructability. An example of the written proposal is shown in Appendix 1.3.) Peer Evaluation (10%) Two rubric evaluations are conducted. Failure to complete the peer reviews by the deadline will result in zero score for the peer evaluation portion of the project. Due: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 & Friday, December 7, 20184.) Presentation (15%) Each team is to give a
School Psychology at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. She has extensive research experience in the field of psy- chology. Her thesis explored the influence of individual differences in executive functioning on learning outcomes in active learning environments.Dr. Chuang Wang, University of Macau Dr. Wang is Distinguished Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology at the University of Macau. His expertise includes educational research design, statistical data analyses, and program evaluation. He has published 7 books, 19 book chapters, 103 peer-reviewed journal articles, and 12 conference proceed- ings. Dr. Wang also has 18 invited presentations and 98 paper presentations at national and international
visits eight specific countries and places that represent the cultures ofother faculty in the department. This provides students with some cultural context of the otherfaculty members and an opportunity to engage in conversation relative to engineering in theirplaces of origin.World Structures Reports and PresentationsAs part of the ESCALA certificate program, the author performed a Timed Observation Protocolfor Student Engagement and Equity (TOPSE) in the prerequisite Mechanics of Materials course[6]. In the lessons studied, the author noted that he does not regularly give students anopportunity to teach one another in class. Peer-to-peer instruction is a powerful tool; therefore,when incorporating the new culturally relevant pedagogy, the
to jeopardize the credibility of theassessment.For a program that uses a senior seminar course to meet many of the ABET criteria, thatcourse could assist with this requirement as well. Students could be assigned to read abook or article on a complex project such as “The Great Bridge” or “The Path Betweenthe Seas” by David McCullough. The students could write an essay on the global,cultural, social, environmental and economic considerations of the Brooklyn Bridge orPanama Canal, respectively. Such books are filled with so many examples that no twostudents should arrive with the same answers.One challenge encountered with this requirement so far is distinguishing between thesocial and cultural considerations because many consider them
% (10-15% is comm) • Group presentation 10% comm • Final Exam 10% (5% is comm) • Other assignments, attendance, participation 5% (mostly comm)The full integration of oral communication into the project-based course underscores to studentsthe importance of communication skills in all aspects of an engineering career. Similarly,technical writing skills are emphasized in the Springer 2 course.Teaching MethodologyIn all teaching aspects of Springer 1, a significant emphasis on relevance is made throughout thecourse. This includes the relevance of material covered as well as the relevance of assignments.While a combination of teaching methods is used including lecture and flipped classrooms [8],the primary teaching methodology is project
: Arts & Science Focus or Engineering Focus.The survey consisted of questions of identification and differentiation such as demographics,name of institution faculty is serving, their title, and time in current position. The surveyparticipants were also asked to identify if they were tenured or in tenure-track positions, thepercentage of time they dedicate to research/teaching/service/other activities, and state thatpercentage according to their departmental guidelines for their job description.Survey participants were asked to state if they were given guidelines of tenure requirements andto provide these guidelines in terms of “Teaching Work Load”, “Teaching Evaluation Metrics”,“Research Dollar Amount”, “Number of Peer Reviewed Journal
hold the chain and another student to apply a tensile force to the chain to turn it into asemicircle. We note that the tensile force applied to turn the chain into a semicircle is analogousto the compressive force applied to the arch by the fill above the arch, which changes the flow offorces into one that fits within the geometric confines of the semicircular arch (see Figure 1).Figure 1. Line of action of a uniformly distributed load through a freestanding semicircular arch (left)and through a semicircular arch with lateral forces due to fill (right) 2 Others include Think-Pair-Share, one-minute papers, and peer editing of draft writing assignments.Eventually the Roman arch made
(modified from [7] Figure G-1; dashed linesand elements in blue added by the author)The only explicit mention of listening in the BOK3 is in the discussion of communication, whichhas both cognitive and affective outcomes: In creating designs that benefit all, the civil engineer must be able to listen and convey information appropriately to diverse audiences. …When civil engineers communicate, they integrate multiple forms of communication appropriate for the audience, such as listening, observing, speaking, writing, as well as nonverbal, visual, and graphical communication. [7, p. 44]Despite the lack of explicit discussion of listening with respect to other outcomes within theBOK3, these connections are present. The professional
graduates from the 22 years that the instructorhas taught the class, and obtained 184 responses (21 % response rate of all enrolled students),with yearly percent of total enrollments responding and cumulative responses plotted in Figure 3.Of the respondents, 42.4 percent (78 respondents) indicated that they have designed steelstructures in their career. Student’s self-perception of preparedness in structural steel design forthe workforce and graduate school are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Average ratings(on a 1 to 4 scale, with 4 being better prepared than peers) were 3.3 for both questions, indicatingstudent self-perception as being overall better prepared than their peers from other institutions.Results were similar whether the alumni
), GradingScheme and Structure (deliverables, weighting of deliverables, use of peer evaluations), StudentTeams (number of students per team, which disciplines, how teams are formed), Mentors(external mentors, other faculty involvement, technical advisors), Projects (how many teamswork on each project, how projects are solicited, nature of projects), Industry (involvement andfunding), ASCE BOK Readiness.Once the survey instrument was created in Qualtrics, two faculty members from otherinstitutions were asked to take the survey and provide feedback on ways to improve theinstrument. After comments from the two survey testers were addressed, the survey waslaunched through Qualtrics to the individuals identified to those on the survey distribution list.The
Mathcad. 7. Discover the best techniques to perform curve fitting in Excel and Mathcad. 8. Efficiently use Excel for statistical analysis. 9. Solve nonlinear equations using iterative solution methods in Excel and Mathcad. 10. Solve optimization problems using Excel Solver and using Solve Blocks in Mathcad. 11. Identify the basic elements of programming and write user defined functions in Excel and simple codes in Mathcad. 12. Recognize the advantages and disadvantages of the software, Excel or Mathcad, in the solution of different engineering problems.Course Components:CGN 2420 - Computer Tools in Engineering- has two major units: ● Unit I: Excel Tool and Applications. This unit is divided in five modules distributed in
of CE 4200 was atime period when our CE students’ performance on the NCEES Fundamentals of Engineering(FE) Exam was inexplicably low for certain topics. CE students were responsible for taking a 1-hour FE review course, but NCEES topic-level data [7] at the time indicated that Texas Techstudents were performing surprisingly below students at peer universities on certain subjects forwhich they had received instruction and were expected to know the content. CE 4200 offered anopportunity to provide focused re-learning for these particular topics. Further, CE 4200 provideda natural way to formally introduce the FE Exam to our students at an appropriate time in theirprogram, to explain the CE Department’s philosophy on engineering licensure, and
body responsible for accrediting all specialty andsubspecialty programs for physicians in the United States. The ACGME was founded in 1981 asa federation of several key medical organizations to include ABMS, American MedicalAssociation (AMA), Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), American OsteopathicAssociation (AOA), American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM), andthe Council of Medical Specialty Societies (CMSS)— each of which appoints members to theACGME's board of directors. Accreditation is achieved through a peer-review process overseenby volunteer physicians on 30 review committees [55].To accomplish its annual reviews of residency programs, the ACGME publishes institutionalrequirements [56], common