Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 6 results

A Change Model Approach: Integrating the Evaluation of Synergistic Departmental Efforts to Transform Engineering Education

Conference Session
Curricular Advancements in ECE
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Brandi Geisinger, Iowa State University; Arlene de la Mora, Iowa State University; Cori J. Hyde; Diane T. Rover, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
each cluster of activities was positioned to create departmental change andrevolutionize engineering education, the evaluators and team members then attempted to identifyhow each cluster of activities worked as change strategies within the model by Henderson,Beach, and Finkelstein (2011). Thus, evaluators were able to identify over twenty distinctclusters of change activities working as change strategies within the four pillars of the changemodel: Curriculum and pedagogy, reflective teachers, policy, and shared vision. Positioningactivities within this model allowed the evaluators and team members to 1) Better understand thebroad scope of departmental activities and change strategies, 2) Identify strengths and challengesassociated with their
Relevance Score: 0.027628368

Helping Students Write It Right: Instilling Good Report-writing Habits in a Linear Circuit Lab Course

Conference Session
Improvements in ECE Circuit Analysis
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Eva Cosoroaba, University of Vermont
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
emission free power generation. Dr Cosoroaba’s current research interest is engineering education with focus on mastery learning, the effect of social networks in the classroom on student learning and efficient implementation of active learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Helping Students Write it Right: Instilling Good Report Writing Habits in a Linear Circuit Lab Course I. IntroductionWriting is often not on the top of student’s priority list when it comes to their laboratoryexperience. This is reflected in the quality of the lab reports they submit. While grading andproviding feedback to students on these reports, the instructor often gets
Relevance Score: 0.02027368

Work in Progress: Building Community, Providing Scholarships, Developing Leaders: Recruiting and Retaining Underrepresented Students in Engineering and Computer Engineering Departments

Conference Session
Insights for Teaching ECE Courses
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kent A. Crick, Iowa State University; Matthew T. Seipel, Iowa State University; Lisa M. Larson Ph.D., Iowa State University; Mack Shelley, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
leadership course with otherECSEL participants. This course was designed to promote professional development, communityamongst the scholars, and connection to the campus community at large while enhancing theiridentity as ECSE majors. As a part of the course students were required to volunteer on campus,share current events with their fellow scholars, participate in in-class activities centered onleadership practices, participate in faculty mentor meetings and complete a reflection paper aboutthat experience, and present to the class an artifact reflective of one’s background. Theseactivities were designed to cultivate an environment of support and connection among scholarswhile also engaging participants in an active learning experience. Such
Relevance Score: 0.0165903

Bidirectional and Collaborative Feedback Between Instructors and Students for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)

Conference Session
Assessment of Learning in ECE Courses
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jinhui Wang, University of South Alabama
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
evaluation data are shown in Table 1 and listed in Fig. 1. They arerespectively about (a) the instructor had clear policies (e.g., grading, attendance, and assignments);(b) the instructor provided useful feedback on my progress within the course; (c) the instructor waswell prepared for in class meetings; (d) examinations and other assignments reflected stated courseobjectives and course material; (e) the instructor was successful in clarifying difficult concepts; (f)the instructor was well prepared for online class sessions and activities.Strongly disagree 1 ----- 5 Strongly agree INSTRUCTOR HAS CLEAR POLICIES INSTRUCTOR PROVIDED FEEDBACK 2018 Fall 2019 Spring
Relevance Score: 0.016255107

Student Sense of Community Through an Introductory Computer Programming Course Sequence

Conference Session
Insights for Teaching ECE Courses
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan; Amir Kamil, University of Michigan; Andrew Deorio, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
’ ratings fromone moment in time to another. Each survey included 13 questions intended to capture a student’soverall sense of community, derived from the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction andFrustration Scale [22]: Thinking about your experiences in your undergraduate studies so far, please indicate how true each statement is for you on a scale of 1 (Not at all true) to 5 (Extremely true). Each question also included a ”Not Applicable” option. 1. I feel a sense of choice and freedom in what I undertake 2. I feel capable at what I do 3. I really like the people I interact with 4. I feel confident that I can do things well 5. I feel that my decisions reflect what I really want
Relevance Score: 0.00829515

Hands-on Cybersecurity Curriculum Using a Modular Training Kit

Conference Session
Embedded Systems and Cybersecurity in ECE
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Asmit De, Pennsylvania State University; Mohammad Nasim Imtiaz Khan, Pennsylvania State University; Karthikeyan Nagarajan, Pennsylvania State University; Abdullah Ash Saki, Pennsylvania State University; Mahabubul Alam, Pennsylvania State University; Taylor Steven Wood, Pennsylvania State University; Matthew Johnson, Pennsylvania State University; Manoj Varma Saripalli, Pennsylvania State University; Yu Xia, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Swaroop Ghosh, Pennsylvania State University; Kathleen M. Hill, Pennsylvania State University; Annmarie Ward
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
from different disciplines 3.14(1.03) 4.14(0.69) Clearly identify the type of knowledge and skills possessed by teammates 3.07(1.07) 4.00(0.82) from other disciplines Accurately recognize goals that reflect the disciplinary backgrounds of 3.00(1.18) 4.00(0.82) other team members Talk about a project design using other discipline language 2.86(1.17) 3.86(1.07)rated as the least confident (M = 2.86). A total of 13 students completed 4 sets of knowledgequestions and confidence level rating in
Relevance Score: 0.008127553