. One flyer, labeled “Get Your PhD For Free,” laid out funding options for PhD studentsand ways to obtain them. We were surprised to learn how many undergraduate students were notaware of the funding that comes with getting a PhD in an engineering discipline, and this flyergenerated great interest. All newly developed materials were utilized in each component of theoverall strategy, and in other forms of advertisement commonly utilized across higher education(such as ASEE First Bell).Digital MarketingAs marketing of services through digital technologies continues to show success in acceleratingproduct value to consumers (i.e. the value of a particular educational program to prospectivestudents), we enlisted the help of a world-renowned
-graduates-drop-number-and-be-increasingly-diverse[3] B. L. Benderly, “A frayed welcome mat: Engineering deans struggle to attract foreign graduate students discouraged by the tone of U.S. policies and rethoric,” ASEE Prism, pp. 24–29, Mar. 2019.[4] M. L. Springer and M. T. Schuver, “Dwindling graduate student enrollments in distance-based programs: A researched-based exploration with underlying findings and premise,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018.[5] P. Bawa, “Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—a literature review,” SAGE Open, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2016.[6] T. Wolf, C. V. Hollot, R. Tessier, B. Polivka, C. Hoehn-Saric, J. D. Kang, and K. Newman, “Synchronous
and workshops on campus and at other campuses, to share titles of texts, authors, andarticles in the area, and to share perspectives on justice, history, equity, and potential newdirections within teaching in higher education.This consultation with experts in active learning and inclusive teaching informed the literaturereview and course materials review during summer 2019. Literature review included traditionalengineering education sources such as ASEE proceedings and JEE papers, but also included thereview of websites of many university-level centers for teaching and learning. These includedresources that broadened the scope of the literature to include education research and scholarshipbeyond the STEM domain, and were rich sources of
,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, vol. 13, no. 1, p.1508171, 2018.[6] S. J. Bork & J. Mondisa, “Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Graduate Student Mental Health: Insights from the Healthy Minds Network Dataset,” presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/33255, 2019.[7] J. Hefner & D. Eisenberg, “Social support and mental health among college students,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 491-499, 2009.[8] J. Hunt & D. Eisenberg, “Mental health problems and help-seeking behavior among college students,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 3-10, 2010.[9] D. M. Wilson, P
developers invariably envision a particular client group to serve as target forthe program that they are developing. Typically, their view of this group is one characterized bya set of characteristics that include assumptions of need, student goals, age and experience, andlocation among others. Of course, other important factors are also considered during newprogram design. These include institutional and originating department missions, geographicregion served, perceptions of need, advisory council input, leadership directions and more.In prior papers, delivered at the 2016[5] and 2019[6] ASEE conferences the authors addressedthe development process for the recently approved Doctor of Technology (DTech) offered by thePolytechnic Institute at Purdue
, Theory, and Culture, with a focus on Writing Program Administration in STEM. As an IEEE Senior Member, she currently serves as secretary to the IEEE Professional Communication Society Board of Governors and as Campus Representative for the ASEE North Midwest Section. She is also an active member of the Consortium for Graduate Communication and the National Council of Teachers of English. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020PeerPresentationsasaStudent-centeredLearningApproachinaNanotechnologyClassAbstract:BackgroundActive learning techniques have proven effective at engaging students in course content andfostering deeper learning, as compared with traditional lecture techniques
engagementDiscovery has completed six terms of program delivery, with total secondary school studentparticipation now exceeding 500. Our previous analysis focused on beneficial outcomes tosecondary student participants [13, 14]. Concurrently, we now share the multi-factorialopportunities to teaching skill development through this model. Both qualitative and quantitativeoutcomes suggest Discovery is having significant impact both on graduate (and undergraduate)student instructor development of professional skills, as well as secondary school studentengagement in STEM.Instructor participationDuring the first 6 semesters of programming (2017-2019; Spring & Fall each year), 93 universitystudent trainees engaged as program instructors, with 24 trainees acting
”, Nature, vol. 547, pp. 483-483(27 July), 2017.[5] P. Wankat, “Perspective: Teaching Professional Skills”, AIChE Journal, vol. 63(7), 2511-2519, 2017.[6] C. Horth, “Without Soft Skills, Technical Education is Stuck in the Past”, Industry Week,May 29, 2018, https://www.industryweek.com/talent/article/22025722/without-soft-skills-technical-education-is-stuck-in-the-past (accessed 20 February, 2020).[7] “Engineering Education: Beyond Technical Skills”, International Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 30(6), 2014.[8] ABET https://www.abet.org/approved-criteria-for-the-2018-2019-review-cycle/ (accessed20 February, 2020).[9] D. Reeve, C. Rottmann, and R. Sacks, “The Ebb and Flow of Engineering LeadershipOrientations”, 122nd ASEE Annual Conference
President, Dr. Stephanie Adams,highlighted this issue, making graduate education a key initiative for ASEE in 2019 [5].Published studies of students in engineering doctoral programs in relation to professionaldevelopment tend to focus on the research experiences [6, 7] with an emphasis on theknowledge, skills, and abilities gained or on how students’ research skills change over time [8].However, the important question of how effectively the research experiences of engineeringPh.D. students prepare them for professional practice remains largely unanswered. In order tostrengthen the quality of research on engineering Ph.D. students are being prepared forprofessional practice, there is a need for high-quality assessments designed and
the First Year of a NSF-sponsored Cyber-physical System Cybersecurity Research Experience for Undergraduates Program,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.Appendix A. Discussion Board Topics and ResourcesDiscussion Board Topic 1 – Experimental MethodologiesPlease pick one of the four experimental methodologies listed in page 6 of the Amy Aponpresentation handout and discuss how it could be applied to a computer science researchproblem. Please choose a methodology that someone else has not yet selected, until all four havebeen covered to ensure that we cover all four. By _____, please make your primary post. By_____, please reply to two other posts (at least one of which should be on a
of Virginia, 1993) is a professor of Engineering Science and Me- chanics at Penn State. In addition to teaching engineering mechanics courses ranging from sophomore level statics to graduate level mechanical behavior of materials, he researches structural health monitoring for aerospace, mechanical, and civil infrastructure applications. He is a member of ASEE, ASNT, ASME, ASCE, ASM, SES, and Sigma Xi.Prof. Francesco Costanzo, Pennsylvania State UniversityDr. Bruce Gluckman, Pennsylvania State UniversityDr. Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University Thomas A. Litzinger is Director of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State. His
University. He has published over 50 articles in different journals and conference proceedings. He has served as an investi- gator for research projects sponsored by National Science Foundation, Ford Motor Company, and the US Army. Before working at Indiana State University, he was a faculty in the University of Louisville for 10 years. He also has over four years of industrial experience. He received his D. Eng. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lamar University (USA) in 1999, M.Sc. in Materials Engineering from Isfahan Uni- versity of Technology in 1991, and B.Sc. in Metallurgical Engineering from Tehran University in 1988. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, and ATMAE.Dr. M. Affan Badar, Indiana State University M
relevant to the subject.Reflection on Critical Thinking for Graduate Students and the Adaptability of ThisImplementation in Other SettingsCritical thinking is a skill highly valued in both undergraduate and graduate education. Thenational studies cited at the beginning of this paper indicate that imparting these skills is notconsistent nationwide, and furthermore that critical thinking skills are assumed to developorganically in graduate education. A search of ASEE conference papers since 1997 showed 98contributions with “critical thinking” as a theme, surely an indication of the importance of thesubject. Fewer than 10 of these dealt with graduate education, however. As far as the