] proposed that students’ epistemic practice in SSI are understood through bothargumentation and informal reasoning [6], [13]. Based on an intensive literature review, Sadler [6]concluded that it is hard to assess the quality of student argumentation only by logical reasoningbecause in SSI contexts, everyday life experiences, moral and ethical beliefs, values, and cultureaffect students’ argumentation practices. Duschl also points out that student argumentation in SSIis a reasoning strategy that involves the general reasoning domain of informal logic as well ascritical thinking [10].In most recent research concerning argumentation, Toulmin’s model [14] was adopted as a usefultool to understand logical reasoning of argumentation. However, Toulmin’s
- Software process - Software quality - Security.In addition to the guidelines for software engineering education, the post-secondary student willbe exposed to the broader engineering curriculum. The Washington Accord Graduate AttributeProfile [13] defines 12 elements that graduates of engineering programs need: - Engineering knowledge - Problem analysis - Design/development of solutions - Investigation - Modern tool usage - The engineer and society - Environment and sustainability - Ethics - Individual and teamwork - Communication - Project management and finance - Life-long learning.While a pre-engineering undergraduate student would not be expected to master these skills tothe extent of a graduate, an
arbitrary. They are chosen to engage students in product designin the context of service to society, sustainability, and engineering ethics. This engineeringexperience provides young students with a more holistic understanding of engineering than otherprograms by presenting a wide variety of engineering disciplines connected by sharing goals ofaddressing far-reaching societal problems. Interdisciplinary collaboration is also modeledthrough cross-program collaborations and activities. The EID program has partnered with the Humanity in a Digital World program to discussthe ethics of artificial intelligence in autonomous vehicles. The undergraduate programs atNortheastern University have a strong emphasis on interdisciplinary learning and this
(seePlant biology, Ethics, They will debate ethical issues related to Figure 5)Engineering, Large food production and consumption and learn ● Garden beds designedscale construction, about tried and true methods and new specifically for the plantsCommunication innovations in farming. Then, they will grown in the school garden create a growing system for the school, learn what it takes to grow and harvest successfully, and practice responsibility towards our earth and environment. Figure 5: Vertical hydroponic
students face in their learning. Wealso qualitatively assessed the degree of reinforcement and attitude propagation within eachcohort as potential mechanisms for the enhancement or suppression of student interest on anindividual basis. This study may offer insight into the value of strategic targeting of differingstudent demographics to systemically enhance STEM performance and interest during key pointsin students’ early careers, such as the end of secondary school and during the transition to post-secondary study.Methods Ethical statementAll data collection involving students was approved by the University of Toronto HealthSciences Research Ethics Board (Protocol # 34825) and the Toronto District School BoardExternal Research Review
bioplastics. Engineering aspects of the physical, mechanical andchemical properties of bioplastics were investigated.A brief summary of each module for the lectures and hands-on activities of the chemicalengineering course, with the most important steps is described below:Module 0: Introduction to Chemical Engineering and Lab SafetyThe focus of this module is to introduce students to engineering concepts and show that engineersdesign, conduct experiments then analyze and interpret the data. Students learned that engineersdesign a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability andsustainability. The field of Chemical
science from Purdue University in 1978. She joined Michigan Tech’s faculty shortly after completing her doctorate and chaired the department of computer science from 1996 to 2010. Her research interests are in software engineering, including software pro- cesses, software measurement, and software engineering education. She also has interests in ethical and social aspects of computing and has been active in efforts to increase the number of women in computing for many years. She has been a co-PI on nearly $1.5 million in grants from industry and the National Science Foundation. Dr. Ott is a 2010 recipient of the ACM SIGSOFT Retrospective Paper Award for the paper ”The Program Dependence Graph in a Software Development
7 5 Technology 5 7 Computer Programming/coding 1 10 Design 2 4 Perseverance 3 4 Building 2 3 Creativity 3 3 Collaboration/Communication 4 8 Work Ethics 0 1 Electrical/Mechanical 2 3 Critical Thinking Skills 3 5
, “Service learning: A positive approach to teaching engineering ethics and social impact of technology,” age, vol. 5, p. 2, 2000.[15] E. Tsang, C. D. Martin, and R. Decker, “Service Learning as a Strategy for Engineering Education for the 21 st Century,” in 1997 Annual Conference, 1997, pp. 2–355.[16] L. J. Bottomley and E. A. Parry, “Assessment of an engineering outreach program: Hands on engineering,” Proc. American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE 2002, 2002.[17] D. E. Giles Jr and J. Eyler, “The impact of a college community service laboratory on students’ personal, social, and cognitive outcomes,” Journal of adolescence, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 327–339, 1994.[18] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. Canney, “Impacts of service
mechanical engineering through team- oriented projects. Table 3. Programs implemented by AmbassadorsIn addition to providing an overview of their projects and who the intended populations are, theAmbassadors provided further details on their plans, purpose and passion surrounding theirideas. The first ambassador showed excitement around being able to empower other girls andbuild their confidence: “I would like to spread my passion for STEAM and my passion for empowering girls so they can learn to believe that all they need is knowledge, confidence, strong work ethics and determination to achieve anything they want in any field they want. I will
was developed by graduate students, under the supervision of the Education &Outreach Staff Director (Mrs. Risa Hartman) and included statistics, fundamentals ofnanotechnology and ethics classes to offer a wide range of useful preliminary information. Thesafety training (combination of online and onsite) for a total of four hours, under the guidanceand supervision of trained laboratory graduate students, allowed YSs to learn about laboratoryprocedures. During the final day of bootcamp, mentors held a formal meeting with their scholarsto discuss details, plans and expectations about the specific project.During weeks 2-6, students worked on their project daily, performing original research under thesupervision of their graduate mentor
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020What will you do to help elementary students who struggle in the engineering design process? Analysis of teachers’ reflections. (Fundamental)IntroductionThe next generation of STEM workers and leaders requires knowledge and skills in order toeffectively contribute and compete in the global workforce [1], [2]. More importantly, thesustainability of our planet requires citizens who can work collaboratively to think critically,make ethical and moral decisions, and solve problems [3]. The science and engineering practicesdescribed by the Next Generation Science Standards [4] can provide a framework for teachers toengage their students in
, it allows for the solution to viewed as something realistic,usable, and practical, resulting in greater overall success [6]. As an engineer, it is important tolearn about those the project will impact to ensure that the product will meet their needs. Byasking students to consider the needs of others and providing realistic environments to practiceempathy in engineering design challenges, researchers hoped to achieve two outcomes: first,increased retention and initial registration in STEM-based classes after participating in theprogram, and second, greater overall success in designing and creating solutions.The empathy connections made in the program drew heavily from education research, includingNoddings’ ethics of care and Dweck’s growth