designing it to be suitable for online instruction. The course was designedin a modular construction, with each unit paired with an experiment focusing on a set ofexperimental design concepts, enabling the course to be studied online and asynchronously. Eachof the four modules focuses on learning objectives grouped around a subset of key experimentaldesign concepts, shown in Table 2.Table 2: Example of Mechanical Engineering SEEF work to support active learning in ME2 Learning Objective Experimental Problem Experiment Connection Solving Concept FocusUnderstand frameworks and systemicapproaches to the design and Goal, Hypothesis, Variables, All
format. For example, in a face-to-face format, collaboration and pairprogramming works well. Some instructors have even been successful implementing distributedpair programming in an online course [5]. However, in a flexible schedule, online format (Flex),the implementation of these activities is particularly challenging. In the Flex format, studentsstart the course at different points in the semester, work at their own pace and may not beworking on the same module at the same time. The asynchronous nature of the class makes itparticularly difficult for students to interact with each other. We propose the use of discussionboards within the learning management system to help create peer-to-peer code sharingexperiences in a Flex class. In this
. [Online]. Available: https://universaltechnews.com/it-ot-cybersecurity-convergence-arc- viewpoints-blog/.[5] J. Manyika and et. al., "Unlocking the Potential of the Internet of Things," McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey and Company, June 2015.[6] THECB, "Lower-Division Academic Course Guide Manual," Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, Austin, TX, 2019.[7] Center for Academic Cyber Defense, "2019 Knowedge Units," [Online]. Available: http://www.iad.gov/NIETP/documents/Requirements/CAE- CD_2019_Knowledge_Units.pdf. [Accessed 2020].[8] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs, Effective for Reviews During the 2020-2021 Accreditation Cycle," ABET, Inc., Baltimore, 2019.[9] J. K. Nelson, D. Davis, S. Smith and M
model”, Engineering Design GraphicsJournal, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 5-14, Fall 1991.[10] Engage. (2009-2019). “Spatial visualization skills,” [Online] Available: Engage,https://www.engageengineering.org . [Accessed Jan 29, 2020].[11] A. Friess, E. L. Martin, I. E. Esparragoza and O. Lawanto, “Improvements in student spatial visualization in anintroductory engineering graphics course using open-ended design projects supported by 3-D printedmanipulatives,” In Proceedings of the 2016 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, NewOrleans, LA, USA, June 26-29, 2016. USA: American Society of Engineering Education, 2016.[12] D. I. Miller and D. F. Halpern, “Spatial thinking in Physics: Longitudinal impacts of 3-D spatial training
CoursesBelow is a brief description of the four required courses, as well as a description of the virtuallaboratory in which all labs for the three core technical courses are run. Several of the electivesand graduate courses also are implemented in the environment. More details about the coursesincluding a recent syllabus can be found on the Iowa State University Information Assurancewebsite [4]Virtual Laboratory – ISELabThe ISELab virtual laboratory provides a real world networking environment for students. TheISELab provides 120 publicly addressable IP ranges “borrowed” from the Internet. These IPranges are connected to the backbone “Internet” network within the ISELab to allow students towork in or run their own “corporate” network. ISELab is air
havethe opportunity to earn academic credit for their engineering design work. A key difference in thisframework as compared to other typical capstone designs, independent studies, or research creditcourses is that undergraduate TAs and project managers within the project teams are responsiblefor developing many of the assignments distributed to those students enrolled the course as theproject progresses. The methods of student assessment within this framework include: individualor small-group weekly assignments, design notebook checks, peer and self-evaluations,participation, summative technical reports, and the Humanitarian Library. Additionally, unlikemany traditional problem set or laboratory courses, student skills are developed through
confronting issues related to inclusion. The department undergoes annual review byexternal evaluators Inverness Research. The 2019 review revealed instances where students didnot feel included. These situations involved faculty, staff, and students. Since becoming aware ofthe situations, the department has spent considerable time addressing inclusivity. All facultyattended microaggression and inclusion training (see below). Inclusion training has been addedto the new vertically integrated design project courses (see below) that will be required of allstudents. One faculty piloted a syllabus that includes a policy on microaggressions andharassment. The Department has prompted University’s Center for Teaching and Learning tolead the establishment of a
high external value through the form of a patent,publication, or peer-reviewed poster presentation. Future work includes collecting data fromfuture iterations of the course, expanding data collection to other universities that will beimplementing this system, and utilizing educational data mining techniques to explore patterns insuccessful/unsuccessful learning objectives. Although more work needs to be done to understandthe best ways to support students while also giving them academic freedom, this work is a step inthe right direction to empower students to innovate and grow as engineers.References [1] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs.” [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria
structures and the people who use them.The idea is summarized in a graphic syllabus (see Figure 1), as well as the standard courseoutline provided to the students (see Figure 2). Figure 1: Graphic SyllabusFigure 2: Standard Course OutlineIn order to make the tour more authentic, country themes were added to the handouts used by theinstructor and where possible, real-world examples were mimicked so students could readily seethe applications of the different analysis techniques being learned. In addition, the pictures ofstructures selected not only were there to inspire the students, but could act as talking points todiscuss the country’s culture during class and to maybe highlight key societal differences or inthe
, participated in team-building exercises, military training, and social activities.Course StructureCalculus I was taught with both face-to-face and online components over a six-week term. Embeddedwithin CSI, the face-to-face component was held five days per week in 110 minute sessions and led by amath instructor. Topics covered during instruction included: limits, continuity, differentiability, andintegrability. We worked closely with our Department of Mathematical Sciences to ensure that alllearning objectives addressed during a full-term Calculus I course were included in our acceleratedsummer course. Typical sessions included lecture time with intermittent problem-solving sessions. Thecourse syllabus is available by request.Online instruction and
early in the activity necessary for later deliverables? 12. For each day: What was/were the checkpoint(s) or deliverable(s) that day? ✓ 13. For each Deliverable: Was feedback provided to students that could be used ✓ during the event? 14. Who was available to assist students during the activity? ✓ 15. How were the students evaluated? ✓ Extrinsic motivation 16. Does the activity appear in at least one course syllabus in the term? ✓ 17. Approximately
Mathematical Sciences reviewed andrefined three mathematics gateway courses offered at the State Colleges (Trigonometry, Pre-Calculus, Calculus I). Note: The mathematics faculty decided to leave College Algebra for aseparate discussion which is currently taking place. The course refinement process consisted of acritical review of the different course syllabi used at the State Colleges followed by consensus ona common refined syllabus for each course that emphasized the core mathematical concepts andtheir sequencing so as to provide a well-thought-out conceptual instructional framework for eachcourse. The general framework for the course refinement process can be found in Appendix A.Using the refined course syllabi completed in year 2, State College
and one trained volunteer. By having two observers, multiple perspectives are capturedand the post-observation discussion is more robust. During the pre-observation meeting, the newinstructor goes over the course syllabus, lesson plan for the day they are to be observed, andpresents an overview of student feedback collected so far. They also inform the observers whataspects of their teaching they most want feedback on to help guide the actual observation. Onceobserved, the two observers share notes and write up a one-page summary of their observation.The instructor completes a self-reflection sheet before the post-observation meeting is conducted.At the debriefing, the conversation always begins with the instructor’s self-reflection
like to take notes on an iPad because I don't have to carry around notebooks and easier to look through old notes. I was taking a math course. One day I was running late and forgot to bring my notebook for that class which eventually led me to taking notes on my iPad. The professor at the time was so anti-electronics in class that they did not believe I was taking notes on my iPad. Even after showing them I indeed was taking notes for that class, they told me to put it up and ask someone for a piece of paper and pencil. I don’t understand how you are going to tell a student how to take their notes in college. Many professors have a no electronics policy in their syllabus. I understand how
complete several data collectionand analysis activities including:1. Content analysis of AM course syllabi will be used to develop lists of skills gained by students who successfully complete AM coursework. The unit of analysis is a syllabus from an individual course. All occupational completion points, student performance outcomes, or standards and/or certifications covered in the material will be analyzed through an iterative process using the codebook derived from relevant national, state, and professional standards and industry certifications. Researchers will also use established instruments to measure the extent to which the new professionals report entrepreneurial and intrapreneurial intentions [27-29]. In addition to
anddepartments as well; recent non-engineering participants have included pharmacy, animalsciences, and exercise physiology students. The course has also recently expanded to includestudents from a second university as well as online distance students that span four time-zones.Adding students from a variety of locations and disciplines has increased diversity among thestudents’ educational backgrounds and interests (both as undergraduates and graduates). Thediversity of the students’ skills and knowledge fosters multidisciplinary collaboration within thecourse itself and enhances innovative problem solving as each student can offer their ownresources and expertise to the class.In this model, each student is responsible for proposing a potential team
Immerwahr at Villanova University [36] andshown in Table 5 [40]. A copy of this rubric was included in the course syllabus to communicatediscussion expectations to students.All FYS courses at Lafayette College are writing courses, and the St. Martin’s Handbook [41] isused as a secondary text for students learning academic writing skills. They employ a process-writing approach in which students submit first drafts which they then revise after feedback froma peer Writing Associate and the instructor.The first writing assignment, which is given out during the first week of class, asks students toreflect on their own lived experience with semiconductor technology in terms of how they learnand work, communicate with friends and family, and seek
reveals that students were very positive aboutthe focus on a real-life engineering design project. As institutions of higher education considermethods of engaging typically under-represented youth in engineering, this project provides auseful model as to what can be achieved by students.Appendix A - Grant Logic ModelAppendix B-- Details about Each Cohort Cohort 1 OverviewThe first cohort met at the university from mid-fall of 2013 to April of 2014. This cohort wasenrolled for transferable credit in the College of Engineering freshman design course taught by auniversity instructor who also taught this course concurrently with university freshman. Theprogram course used the same syllabus, projects and metrics as the college level course, but
andreturned with detailed feedback. It is worth a maximum of 35 points. If the report containssignificant problems, you will be required to revise and resubmit it once again. Reminder: Asexplained in the syllabus, submission of passing lab reports is required to receive a passing gradein the course.
. “Design versus research in BME accreditation [ABET requirements and why research cannot substitute for design],” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 80–85, Apr. 2008.[15] “BME Design Course Syllabus and Outline,” Jan. 14, 2020, https://bmedesign.engr.wisc.edu/course/syllabus/.[16] G. N. Svarovsky and D. W. Shaffer. “Design meetings and design notebooks as tools for reflection in the engineering design course,” Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference, San Diego, CA, Oct. 2006, pp. M2G-7-M2G-12, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2006.322548.[17] “Google,” 2020, https://www.google.com/.[18] “Google Scholar,” 2020, https://scholar.google.com/.[19] IEEE. “IEEE Xplore Digital
uploaded online for students to familiarize the (Freshman) Fusion 360 concept before the corresponding face-to-face lecture. Surveying The course was movedSpring 2019 2nd yr. Surveying class was moved to 1st yr. (Freshman) to 1st yr. 2nd yr Surveying class was renamed as CAD and CAD and SurveyingSpring 2019 Credit increase Surveying and the previous 2-credit class was (Freshman
Paper ID #28865 education (OBE) workshop. He manages the PhD in Computing programme and has been implementing OBE to design curriculum and courses, contributing to its successful accreditation. He serves as a pan- ellist in the accreditation of various programmes and courses. He publishes research works in the areas of applied artificial intelligence, networking, as well as information and communications technology in education.Dr. Ing. Joao Ponciano P.E., University of Glasgow Eur. Ing. Dr. Jo˜ao Ponciano (CPE, LLB (Hons), M.Eng (Hons) , M.A. (Distinction), PhD, FIET, C.Eng, MBCS, CITP, SFHEA, MIEEE, FinstLM) started his career as a researcher for the International Or- ganisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) in
lecture, thestudents participated in an in-class activity during which they determined the most importantaspects of a molecular biosensor. The influence instructors have on students’ career choices is aphenomenon that has been noted (e.g., [13]). When instructors connect course content to theirown passions, perhaps students are more likely to attain the maintained situational interest phasedescribed by Hidi and Renninger [9].Respiratory Bioengineering and Biomanufacturing were two track codes that were never used. Itis curious, with the abundance of advertising related to respiratory issues and drug deliverymethods, that no topics were proposed in this category. Perhaps the fact that the class, andtherefore the topics listed on the syllabus, did
major parts. Part 1was demographic information (4 questions). Part 2 was the main survey consisting of 33questions. Topics surveyed in the main survey included: efficacy and structure of department-level developmental programs, responsibilities for faculty development, developmental areas,developmental best practices, frequency of mentorship, time allocated to mentorship, juniorfaculty developmental goals, Academy-level knowledge repositories, mentorship in the fivefaculty domains, classroom observation, scholarship, course directorship, and academicpromotion. Parts 3 and 4 were two separate “follow-on” surveys that asked questions regardingfaculty recruitment, new faculty integration and training, and more specific questions concerningtopics
teaching. • Design of an effective class: students will be able to establish learning outcomes, align assessments with course outcomes, align activities and assignments with course outcomes, and prepare an effective syllabus. • Creation of a productive learning environment: students will be able to promote a civil and engaging learning environment and embrace diversity in course planning and activities, use concept maps and other visualization tools, and develop self-directed learners. • Active learning techniques: students will be able to implement flipped classroom approach and create active learning opportunities in lecture courses. • Technology in teaching: students will be able to understand the
students in howto give professional presentations, choose/read academic journals, and write a proposal andmanuscript via a series of assignments.Assignment DescriptionEarly in the course, students practice four aspects of the research communication process usinggenre analysis [13]: 1. Reading a technical journal paper and learning the function of each portion (abstract, introduction, methodology, observations, analysis, conclusions, citations, etc.), 2. Defining the key components of effective research communication, 3. Preparing a professional presentation, and 4. Identifying the process of writing a journal paper.Students then review the syllabus to determine what topic is scheduled on a specific day and selectthe day that interests
. Thegoal of the lecture was to reinforce topics already outlined in the course syllabus while onlypresenting additional information, if it was absolutely necessary for students to understandaspects of the modules. Some of the topics already incorporated into the course curriculuminclude linear equations and matrices, eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and singular valuedecomposition. The lecture focused on methods for gathering data and representing such data inthe form of matrices and the utilization of basic applications of linear algebra on said matrices.The primary source for such data was www.data.gov and similar sites. In addition, students werepresented with the PageRank algorithm and a scenario utilizing it. Lastly, the lecture introducedthe topic
. TTF1 I view my role as an educator as a technical expert who delivers engineering knowledge content. TTF2 My students learn engineering best by taking good notes and paying careful attention to me during design meetings. TTF3 Careful planning by the faculty advisor and well prepared agendas maximize student learning. TTF4 Students develop an understanding of the content based upon information delivered to them in design sessions. TTF5 The syllabus provides guidance on what to teach students for their specific design project. TTF6 I encourage students to move on to new phases of their design project after they have expended the time allotted by the course
department also emphasizes service in the formof providing the materials necessary for everyday life.The statistically significant changes consistently noted in the Marietta classes deserve specialattention. While it could be partially due to the relatively lower scores with which studentsbegan, the course was different from the others in the study in substantive ways. It serves as aFirst Year Seminar (FYS), and the 2019 syllabus describes the course to students as encouraging“self-discovery and an awareness of your strengths and interests. It provides opportunities foryou to reflect on and make connections between your General Education classes, coursework inyour major(s) and minor(s), and your lives beyond the classroom. The FYS challenges you
; ● Outcome 5: An ability to function effectively as a member of a technical team.Project Specifications: In addition to a course syllabus, a detailed document specifying theproject requirements is provided to the students in the first semester of the project. The projectchallenges have gradually increased over the past three years and are described in the followingparagraphs.In spring 2018, as a pilot project, three teams consisting of EET and MET students were formed.The teams were assigned to procure an off-the-shelf RC car and integrate autonomous navigationcapability with obstacle avoidance as part of the capstone project. The duration of the projectwas for one semester. The design challenge was to include “high speed” as the main