polymeric materials under shear loading. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology where her research interests include novel manufacturing and characterization techniques of polymer and composite structures and the incorporation of multifunctionality by inducing desired responses to mechanical loading.Dr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the faculty of the South
deterring and a major barrier to retention andsuccess in the profession.[5-10]Several factors have been identified as key challenges: (a) the lack of exposure to engineering orcomputer science as fields of study or as career opportunities [11], (b) the lack of professionalidentity (inability to see oneself as a professional) [7], (c) an impaired sense of belonging [12,13], and (d) the lack of self-efficacy (how well one can execute a course of action to deal with aprospective situation) [14]. Adding to the challenge is the rigor of engineering curriculum whichsubstantially contributes to high dropout rates from engineering [15], averaging at 50%, andranging from 60 to 67% for minorities [12, 16, 17]. These numbers are strongly driven by highfailure
inclusion of ethical theory course content thatspecifically includes this concept, as students do not gain this understanding through a typicalcase study based curriculum. This and other studies make a case for supplementing case studyinstruction with ethical instruction that is more closely tied with course content and every daydecisions [5,10,11,12]. The use of case study examples where there is a correct answer andwhere there is a clear tragic outcome or heroic action suggests that ethical decisions are a once ina career event of major consequence. Further, arriving at a conclusion purely through discussionof the case indicates that ethical decisions are a purely cognitive process, dismissing any intuitiveresponse. This approach is likely to
scholarly journals, books, and proceedings in thesciences, social sciences, and arts and humanities” [14]. As the goal of this study was to lookholistically at research interests and scholarly outputs over entire faculty members’ entireacademic careers, the authors of this study included all available indexes, date ranges, andpublication types available from WoS for faculty publications for inclusion within this study’s datacollection. Therefore, faculty publications were not limited to the time periods in which they areemployed at their current institution. As a cut-off date for inclusion in this study, the authors onlyincluded faculty publications that were published before December 31, 2019.In order to disambiguate common author name searches
Mr. Beckstrom graduated with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Oklahoma State University and M.S. in Environmental Policy and Management from the University of Denver. He is a registered Pro- fessional Engineer. The majority of his 40 year career has been in industry interdisciplinary projects as an engineer, as commercial business developer, program manager, project manager and as an executive managing numerous project and strategic business teams. His recent industry consulting focus as been training and developing fresh engineering graduates to be productive contributors in their workforce and workforce competency and skills assessment. His work experience has included the high arctic of Siberia and Alaska
the national average. In addition, thepercentage of females in engineering has been declining since 2016 while the percentage of womennationally has been increasing. These trends are concerning and have been a focal point for recentdepartmental efforts related to improving equity and inclusion with a focus on increasing sense of belonging.The research team created a series of three simple interventions, embedded them into an existing course, andstudied the impact on the development of student sense of belonging. The interventions were added into afirst year, introductory engineering course (Introduction to Engineering & Design) with the aim of impactingas many students as possible early in their academic careers. The WWU Introduction to
include U.S. Presidential Early Ca- reer Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstanding publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020AbstractThis research paper examines a professor’s pedagogical adjustments over two semesters teachinga course that included a project in the university makerspace. In recent years, substantialresources have been invested into makerspaces
value to product or service but are necessary for the delivery ofproduct or service. In order to improve a given process, we should emphasize value addedactivities, minimize non-value add essential activities, and eliminate non-value add activities. There is an urgent need for skilled engineers to transform the manufacturing industry.Successful organizational transformations depend on a better understanding of the capabilities andmethods that can help to deliver whole system change. According to the Manufacturing Institute,the manufacturing workforce is older and less educated relative to other sectors. U.S. dominanceis in jeopardy as relatively few young Americans choose a manufacturing career [2] as the U.S.manufacturing skill gap
and graduate courses in power electronics, power systems, renewable energy, smart grids, control, electric machines, instrumentation, radar and remote sensing, numerical methods, space and atmosphere physics, and ap- plied physics. His research interests included power system stability, control and protection, renewable energy system analysis, assessment and design, smart microgrids, power electronics and electric machines for non-conventional energy conversion, remote sensing, wave and turbulence, numerical modeling, elec- tromagnetic compatibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published ten book chapters, several papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his areas of the
% (10-15% is comm) • Group presentation 10% comm • Final Exam 10% (5% is comm) • Other assignments, attendance, participation 5% (mostly comm)The full integration of oral communication into the project-based course underscores to studentsthe importance of communication skills in all aspects of an engineering career. Similarly,technical writing skills are emphasized in the Springer 2 course.Teaching MethodologyIn all teaching aspects of Springer 1, a significant emphasis on relevance is made throughout thecourse. This includes the relevance of material covered as well as the relevance of assignments.While a combination of teaching methods is used including lecture and flipped classrooms [8],the primary teaching methodology is project
definition orscope of a wicked problem. Wicked problems exist in a dynamic knot of social, policy,economic, moral, ethical and technical dimensions. Attempts to solve wicked problemsfrequently yield unintended outcomes that render the solution unsatisfactory or incomplete.Environmental engineering practice addresses challenges more like wicked problems than tameproblems. Accordingly, teaching principles of environmental engineering “in context” of the realsocial, political, economic and technical dimensions that exist with the challenges professionalsface in practice provides students with an opportunity to develop critical thinking skillsnecessary to be successful in their careers. Assessment of teaching in-context, and examplesfrom different STEM
? 31 1.97 1.17 2 25 2.24 1.23 2Did your preservice curriculum include anyaspects of Design/Engineering/Technology? 31 2.16 1.27 2 26 2.58 1.63 2Was your pre-service curriculum effective insupporting your ability to teachDesign/Engineering/Technology at thebeginning of your career? 31 1.94 1.09 2 26 2.65 1.38 3How confident do you feel about integratingDesign/Engineering/Technology into yourcurriculum? 31 3.35 1.11 3 26 3.65 0.98 4How important should pre-service educationbe for teachingDesign/Engineering/Technology ? 31 4.29
multiple times in their academic careers. Certainly, LibGuides are a frequently usedmethod of making information about information available to students.ConclusionHopefully, this study will shine the light on the need for librarians to share best practices forengaging with their faculty in engineering technology departments to improve the integration ofIL into the 3.g outcome and beyond. Engineering technology programs also would benefit fromsharing their practices with their institution’s librarians. Based on the results of this paper,librarians are an untapped resource when it comes to contributing to the assessment of students’‘identify and use appropriate technical literature,’ for accreditation purposes. Librarians could bedeveloping rubrics
that formed the basis for this project, and examine lessons learned. • We will detail the implementation and evaluation of our cyberlearning telepresence project, from an initial pilot study to a multi-year, multi-classroom program.Making as Micro-ManufacturingUsing technology to provide an individual with some element of embodiment has numerouspotential applications. Whether it is a land-based expert teaching enlisted men while they areaboard ship at sea, tourists remotely exploring foreign cultures, or STEM experts preparing thenext generation for careers in the sciences, enhancing the degree of embodiment of the remoteuser is beneficial any time human interaction takes place. Being physically present is the ”goldstandard” for
-resourced schools. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendellDr. Chelsea Andrews, Tufts University Chelsea Andrews is a post-doctoral researcher at Tufts University and University of Massachusetts-Boston in engineering education. She received a B.S. from Texas A&M University in ocean engineering, an S.M. from MIT in civil and environmental engineering, and a PhD from Tufts University in Engineering Edu- cation. Her current research includes investigating children’s engagement in engineering design through in-depth case study analysis.Dr. Tejaswini S Dalvi, University of
and lab motivated me to consider communication 3.4/5 engineer as a choice of future career 10. There should be more labs and lectures related to contemporary 4.4/5 communication systemsConclusions and Future WorksThis paper presents our attempt to introduce two highly demanded emerging techniques, IoTtransceiver and SDR, to undergraduate electrical engineering students. A hands-on integratededucational module on these two topics was developed for Communication Systems course toenhance students’ experience. The lecture in the module introduces the theoretical
shift, refinement, or reaffirmation in one’sunderstanding of ethical engineering practice.We hope that by exploring changes in how practicing engineers experience ethics throughouttheir careers, including how and to what extent myriad aspects of the work environmentinfluence one’s way of experiencing ethics, we will be positioned to identity which teachingapproaches are best aligned with how ethics learning actually occurs in engineering settings andwhether new pedagogy or interventions are needed. We do not anticipate the findings aboutchange incidents and influences to necessarily be normative (i.e., we do not assume the change inengineers’ ways of experiencing ethics always occur in a desirable direction). However, we doanticipate gaining
student survey is reflective qualitative remarks from individual commentssubmitted after course completion. The individual comments were in the form of an open endedessay with the writing prompt framed with three questions: What are the things you reallyappreciated about the course or things that could have be done better, what are the concepts thatyou learned that you think will help you in your continued career at Fulbright (and beyond!), andwhat are the things that surprised you that you learned about yourself through your time inCreating & Making.Students wrote between 500 to 1500 words for their personal reflections and the information wasthen compiled and evaluated as to congruence with the breakdown of elements in active learning
Paper ID #29164Exposing undergraduate engineering students to nonlinear differentialequations using a practical approach in project based learningenvironments ¨Dr. Gunter Bischof, Joanneum University of Applied Sciences Throughout his career, Dr. G¨unter Bischof has combined his interest in science and engineering applica- tion. He studied physics at the University of Vienna, Austria, and acquired industry experience as devel- opment engineer at Siemens Corporation. Currently he is an associate professor at Joanneum University of Applied Sciences and teaches engineering and applied mathematics.Mr. Maximilian Brauchart
commitment is not officially translated in credit hours and can result in an increased teaching load that administrators should take into consideration. This can have a significant impact in the careers of tenure-track faculty that have high research expectations. The importance of alignment. Having a shared vision for the major was essential for the good development of the shared courses and modules, because both instructors could have a higher-level view of how all those contribute to the formation of the design- construction professional. For example, both instructors agreed upon a more design- oriented studio focused on residential construction because we both planned a more
, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Associate Professor of Education at Tufts University. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Out- reach focus on supporting discourse and design practices during K-12, teacher education, and college- level engineering learning experiences, and increasing access to engineering in the elementary school ex- perience, especially in under-resourced schools. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendell c American Society for Engineering
differences in novelty and quality across students’ designs. This study also expandson current developments in methodology that has implications for expanding this study in orderto better relate students’ design experiences to their design ability.IntroductionEngineering students have a wide variety of educational experiences throughout theirundergraduate career within and outside of their required coursework. The goal of these variousengineering opportunities is to develop students into engineering professionals, that not onlysucceed but are also able to make a better, safer, more sustainable world [1]. There are essentialtopics in which students should become competent [2,3]. These key knowledge and skill areas areconsidered the most essential
project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Post- doctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Ms. Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New MexicoDr. Yan Chen, University of New Mexico Yan Chen is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Departments of Chemical AND Biological Engineering at the University
communication to otherwise gain access to. During this trip I found myselfasking many times, why can we not do this in the U.S.? Why do I not see these systems in place inmy home country?”Some students who went to Japan said,“In America, it’s all based on the “what can you do for me?” mentality whereas Japan is about“what can we do for each other?” or “how will this reflect on my company?” I would like totake this mentality into account going further in my career when I create new connections, inbusiness as well as life. For example, after I graduate, I would like to create my own practiceand invite others in my industry to help me grow. When I meet with the heads of companies whowould supply me, I will approach them with the collective mentality that
study, and this course, “Biochemistry”, was their first class within thebiomedical engineering department. One of the goals of the course was to excite the studentsabout their future careers in biomedical engineering. All of the students agreed (100%) that thecourse topics were “interesting with relevant examples” and 98% felt that “biochemistry is animportant course in BME and provides essential knowledge and skills”. A summary of theresults from the end-of-semester survey is provided in Figure 5.The enthusiasm of the Uganda students for active learning was not surprising. Previous studieshave indicated that active learning is not only more effective, but also more fun [9]. From thefirst day of class, the focus was on engaging students to be
literature review, debug and troubleshoot a system.Figure 3 presents a summary of the independent learning skills responses of the surveyparticipants. It is evident that respondents overwhelmingly believe that students should be able todebug and troubleshoot a system. One respondent opined that a literature review was more for aresearch-oriented career than actual development, although other respondents felt that theliterature review was important. Respondents also generally agreed that students should be ableto read and understand research articles, discuss works and results, and properly cite sources.Also important was being able to search for, read and interpret technical information and data.Some other skills identified by participants as
. Vogler, P. Thompson, D. W. Davis, B. E. Mayfield, P. M. Finley, and D. Yasseri, "The hard work of soft skills: augmenting the project-based learning experience with interdisciplinary teamwork," Instructional Science, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 457-488, 2017.[12] M. E. Beier, M. H. Kim, A. Saterbak, V. Leautaud, S. Bishnoi, and J. M. Gilberto, "The effect of authentic project‐based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3-23, 2018.[13] N. Mvududu, “A Cross-cultural Study of the Connection Between Students' Attitudes Toward Statistics and the Use of Constructivist Strategies in the Course,” Journal of Statistics Education [online], vol. 11 no. 3, 2003
respondents, and the types of CAD softwares used byindividuals in their product development workflow. ~85% of responses were taken fromindividuals from North America, with over 67% of them being mechanical engineers by rolecategorization. As well, the data is more skewed towards the respondents being in the start oftheir career (mid-late 20s). These were mostly as a consequence of the respondent recruitmentapproach. Implications of this bias are discussed below in section 5.1. Table 1: Summary Statistics of Demographic InformationYears Spent in RoleVariable Count Percentage of Total<1 year 2 7.14%1-4 years
Colleges, 1982.[7] I.H. Settles, L.M. Cortina, J. Malley, A.J. Stewart, “The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 2006, 47-58.[8] C.L. Maranto, A.E. Griffin, “The antecedents of a ‘chilly climate’ for women faculty in higher education,” Human Relations, 64(2), 2011, 139-159.[9] L. Howe-Walsh, S. Turnbull, “Barriers to women leaders in academia: Tales from science and technology,” Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 2016, 415-428.[10] K.N. Miner, S.C. January, K.K. Dray, A.R. Carter-Sowell, “Is it always this cold? Chilly interpersonal climates as a barrier to the well-being of early-career women faculty in STEM,” Equality
interviewed Gen Z students identified that they enjoyed creating and tinkering aschildren, suggesting an association between engineering as a career choice with the activities ofmaking and creating [2]. It is likely that Gen Z students will continue their strong preference forhands-on, practical education activities that provide meaningful experiences as young adults asthey continue into college courses and higher education [3]. Rickes proposes that craft-shopsand/or makerspaces may match students’ interests in creativity with a venue on campus in whichto make and design.A makerspace is typically defined as a space in which various tools and technologies areprovided to support rapid prototyping and creation of products [4]. Typical technology