of a larger National ScienceFoundation-funded study [35] dedicated to developing a theoretical model for onlineundergraduate engineering student persistence based on student LMS interaction activities andpatterns.Data SetAny study utilizing LMS interaction data requires researchers to actually have access to theassociated data. At the university where this research is situated, a separate university organizationoversees delivery of all the university’s online courses. This organization’s charge also includes aresearch mission. Correspondingly, they support related faculty research projects by providingaccess to the LMS interaction data, and the process of acquiring the data for this study includedbuilding a relationship between our research
Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University. Dr. Lenox served for over 28 years as a commis- sioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initia- tives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education
schools, are responding to theseserious issues with training, task forces, student groups, counseling services, and concertedattempts to shift the culture towards openness and accountability [30]. Further, there areprograms that actually center social justice, community engagement, and humility regardingprivilege and power are growing. Some examples include the Colorado School of Mines, MercerUniversity, Oregon State University, and Villanova University [31]–[34]. These not onlydemonstrate care for people and the environment impacted by engineering projects, but alsoencourages students to care for each other.An Ethic of Care may provide a framework through which engineering faculty and staff atuniversities can improve their cultures to be more
with disabilities2. Background2.1 Computing’s Diversity ScorecardComputing is a high growth field with well-paying career opportunities, but the percentage ofwomen and minorities in careers in computing is well below their percentages in both theworkforce and in society. With a 19% projected job growth in computing between 2016 and2026, employment prospects and compensation levels in computing are both excellent; the paygap between men and women is also low compared to other engineering disciplines.2 Yet overthe past decade, women have held only 25% of computer and mathematical (C&M) jobs whilecomprising 56%-58% of the total workforce [11]; in 2016, Blacks made up only 7.9% percent ofC&M workers while comprising 11.9% of all workers
-survey” was conducted two months later followed bya “very distant post-survey” another seven months after that, to further re-examine knowledge,skills, and attitudes.Statistically significant differences were found between TrussVR© and the other groups (p < .01)for recognition and recall of truss types two months and nine months afterwards. Likewise, thevirtual lab experience was highly rated in most respects.1.0 IntroductionAbout two and a half years ago, the authors of this study had the opportunity to engage in somevirtual reality (VR) demonstrations. Emerging from that experience with a belief that part of thefuture of engineering education lay in the application of VR for teaching and learning, a softwaredevelopment project was
Mahmoud, Wartburg College Murad is an Assistant Professor at the Engineering Science Department at Wartburg College. He has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University. Research interests include recruitment into STEM, diversity in STEM as well pedagogy and instruction.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design thinking. His areas
autoethnographies on female faculty in academia are limited [2, 11]. This researchgathered autoethnographic stories from three female faculty members in engineering, the authorsof this paper, who had also experienced gender bias in their teaching. This was then organizedinto a ”collective autoethnography”. The analysis and writing-up of the project were alsocompleted by the authors. According to Ellis’s autoethnographic principles [8], stories are centralto this paper. The literature presented and the emotions evoked after the stories are told is all doneto change the understanding of what it means to be a female instructor in the engineeringclassroom.The three authors of this paper are early-career faculty in small teaching-focused institutions.Two of the
projects broadly to find a solution that will have the 0.534 greatest impact I seek input from those with a different perspective than me 0.693 I seek feedback and suggestions for personal improvement 0.690 When problem solving, I focus on the relationships between issues 0.693 Science 0.758 Design an experiment to answer a scientific question 0.733 Confidence Conduct an experiment on your own 0.754 Interpret experimental results 0.742
significant differences between the engineeringdisciplines was individualism. We consider this result to be important and that has severalimplications for how engineering students will operate across disciplines. Research suggest thatengineering students tend overall to be more individualistic [6], [39], [42]. Part of thischaracteristic comes from the fact that early in their academic programs, engineering studentcourses tend to focus on more individualistic learning (e.g. math, chemistry, dynamics) wherestudents are evaluated by individual tests. Team projects are introduced later in their disciplinesand there are multiple disciplines that have considerably less exposure to teamwork (e.g.,mechanical vs. industrial) [43], [44]. We consider this to
engineering students. Significant challenges for second career undergraduateengineering students are demands outside of school, such as lack of childcare, living as workingoff campus, and family and work responsibilities interfering with schoolwork. The significantdifferences in mean levels of experienced demands, resources, and outcomes across the threestudied groups highlight the need for faculty and administrators to develop and implementstrategies and interventions tailored to support the needs of different engineering studentpopulations.AcknowledgementThis project was supported by NSF Division for Undergraduate Education, Scholarship in STEMprogram (Award #1833896).Table 1: Means, Standard Deviations, and Significance Testing for Study Variables
, pp. 301–310, 2012.[55] S. Kröger, B. Rutter, H. Hill, S. Windmann, C. Hermann, and A. Abraham, “An ERP study of passive creative conceptual expansion using a modified alternate uses task,” Brain Research, vol. 1527, pp. 189–198, 2013.[56] T. Shealy, and M. Hu. "Evaluating the potential of neuroimaging methods to study engineering cognition and project-level decision making." EPOC-MW Conference, Engineering Project Organization Society, Fallen Leaf Lake, CA USA, 2017.[57] K. Alexiou, T. Zamenopoulos, J. Johnson, and S. Gilbert, “Exploring the neurological basis of design cognition using brain imaging: some preliminary results,” Design Studies, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 623–647, 2009.[58] K. Goucher-Lambert
its’ value for designing complex systems [1]. Accordingly, what qualitiesdefine successful systems engineers as well as how to instill these qualities in engineeringstudents has been a major area of research amongst engineering educators. In a study conductedamongst engineering professionals, most of whom were systems engineers, researchers foundthat those exposed to formal education in systems thinking as well as had experience withacademic projects in controlled environments displayed a propensity for systems thinking andaptitude in systems design [8]. Research efforts to investigate systems thinking competenciesamongst undergraduate engineering students have shown that students generally do not exhibit astrong capacity for systems thinking
reported that “women werecomprised of approximately 52 percent of the U.S. population, African Americans 12 percent,Latinos 16 percent, Asians 5 percent, and all other racial-ethnic groups 3 percent” (p. 25).However, women (11 percent) and African American, Latino, and Native American males (7.4percent) only accounted for less than 20 percent of the engineering workforce in the U.S. in 2010(Byars-Winston, Fouad, & Wen, 2015). If these trends continue as we approach the middle of thetwenty-first century it could have a damaging impact on the United States’ skilled workforce.This is especially true since it is projected that by the year 2050 approximately half of the totalU.S. population will be comprised of people of color (Palmer, Maramba
-structured problem is included in Figure 1. This ill-structured problem was developed by research team members, along with other problems, and sent to the project advisory board members for feedback. Participants were asked to read the problem first and then formulate a solution in 30 minutes. They were instructed to think aloud while they worked on the problem. When they fell silent for more than 20 seconds, an interviewer reminded them to think aloud. The participants were not allowed to use the Internet during the problem solving process. Problem solving processes of participants were audio and video recorded for transcription purposes. Each participant also filled out a demographics survey. Gum Removal in Central
critical aspects (or Dimensions of Variation) and their variation within. For our project,we conducted 11 iterations for phase 1. For some, the first author performed by himself, while inothers, the other co-authors play the role of the “devil’s advocate” asking for further validationand new iterations were needed (literature accepts either one researcher or teams of researchersfor phenomenographic research [6]). In total, we found nine (9) “Dimensions of Variation”(DoV) or “Critical Aspects” in this phase, which means that for each dimension of variation, wefound two or more critical features or ways in which the critical aspect varies. One exampleborrowed from our study is the dimension of variation related to how participants were able to“see
modified in future iterations of the course. For example, the course could beadapted for a larger enrollment, and some videos could be improved. Finally, the blended coursestructure developed in this work, as well as the collections of videos and activities, can be usedas desired by other faculty teaching statics within the University of Maine System.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to express their gratitude towards the University of Maine System forfunding this project. The authors also would like to thank the University of Maine Center forInnovation in Teaching and Learning (CITL) for their support in the creation and deployment ofthe video modules.References[1] The National Center for Academic Transformation, “How to Redesign a
al. describe ProfessionalDevelopment (PD) sessions aimed at providing teachers ways to incorporate engineering and CSconcepts into non-technical courses 13 . When teachers blend technology with traditional subjectssuch as math and language arts, students find creative and novel ways to utilize engineering andcomputer science. Through teacher surveys, Hamner et al. found that PD sessions improvedteacher confidence in implementing robotics and programming projects into theirclassrooms.Cortina and Trahan describe a five-day workshop aimed at providing teachers ways to incorporateCS into their classrooms without having to make major changes to their curricula. For example, amath teacher could use a short computer program to display a geometric
and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 59–73, 2005.[3] K. E. Bledsoe, R. Shieh, Y.-S. Park, and E. Gummer, “Role perceptions and role dynamics between graduate scientists and K-12 teachers in a school-university outreach project: Understudied constructs,” J. High. Educ. Outreach Engagem., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 107–122, 2004.[4] C. Gartland, “Student ambassadors: ‘Role-models’, learning practices and identities,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., 2015.[5] M. Portsmore, C. Rogers, and M. Pickering, “STOMP: Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program.” Proc. 2003 Annu. Conf. American Soc. Engineering Education, Nashville, TN, USA. https
would have for college students like me whoare still trying to find their path."Students who chose to explore an engineering student organization valued becoming an activemember of a team, gaining hands-on experience and putting skills into practice. One studentsaid:"I expected (the student organization) to be more hands-off for me, only allowing the olderstudents or leaders of the group to work on the project. However, this is not the case! (Thestudent organization) creates teams and sub-teams so that everyone, from freshman to seniors,get the opportunity to engage in the project."Assignment #7 also asked students to report the learning, benefits and overall gains obtainedafter participating in the selected activity. The analysis suggests
engineering problems, including fluids, geotechnical, and structural problems. She is a CEE faculty mem- ber since January 2010 and she was also member of the faculty of Universidad Simon Bolivar, Venezuela, for fifteen years.Dr. Lili Steiner, Florida International University I design and implement education solutions that are efficient, effective, and scalable. Specifically, I focus on the development of meaningful learning innovation from discovery and design through production and deployment. My research and experience have shown that a full-cycle approach is the most effective way to deliver value. Because of this, I work on full-cycle, full-scale projects. Conceptually, this means that I’m involved in every
research paper aims to support such investigation bydeveloping a survey instrument to measure student beliefs, experiences, and attitudes related totheir online undergraduate engineering courses. Survey instrumentation was undertaken as partof a larger, National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project investigating the course-levelpersistence of online undergraduate engineering students. A Model of Online Course-levelPersistence in Engineering (MOCPE) was developed by the research team to guide surveyinstrumentation based on theories of student motivation relevant to persistence in online andengineering education. Longitudinal survey responses from a sample of current onlineundergraduate engineering students will be combined with clickstream data
there was an LCT. It was a relationship between SFL and codetheory as it was first proposed by Basil Bernstein [15]. LCT represents a further development ofBernstein’s original code theory. A recent instance of collaboration between the LCT and SFL isthe DISKS (Disciplinary, Knowledge and Schooling) Project. The DISKs Project “was anationally-funded, three-year research study” located at the University of Sydney [4]. The aimswere to “analyze the bases of knowledge-building” across a range of secondary school subjectsand “develop pedagogical practices” that might better promote cumulative knowledge-building[4]. Indeed, the studies cited just above also represent examples of that relationship andcollaboration.So what is SFL exactly and why is
teaching achievements have been cited by engineering educators across North America for their excellence.Prof. Naoko Ellis P.Eng., Naoko Ellis is a Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of British Columbia (UBC). She holds a Ph.D. (UBC, 2003); M.E.Sc. (Western, 1993); and a B.Sc. (Hon- ours, Waterloo, 1991). She is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of BC. Her expertise lies in the area of multiphase reaction engineering with emphasis on biomass utiliza- tion. Some current projects include: biomass gasification and pyrolysis; CO2 capture, including chemical looping combustion; pyrolysis product utilization; and biofuels. She is also
, Finite Element Analysis, Mechanical Medical Devices Design. Highly interested in Higher Education Curriculum Design, Academic Leadership, and teaching and classroom innovation.Dr. Lili Steiner, Florida International University I design and implement education solutions that are efficient, effective, and scalable. Specifically, I focus on the development of meaningful learning innovation from discovery and design through production and deployment. My research and experience have shown that a full-cycle approach is the most effective way to deliver value. Because of this, I work on full-cycle, full-scale projects. Conceptually, this means that I’m involved in every phase rather than just research and design: I
. Students, who could pick any of the sections based on their course schedule make tworotations during the semester. They spend a total of three weeks in each of the experiential learning facilities(laboratories and other learning environments), and working with a dedicated teaching team to get exposed tovarious project-based approaches in each field of study.Following this model, a set of one-credit courses are also designed to be offered in the second semester,focusing on each particular undergraduate program. Therefore, in their first year, students not only know aboutother programs of study in the school, but also get experience with a deep-dive, program-specific survey courseas a follow-up in their second semester of study. As an added benefit
directly from page 9. This short introductory video to creativity included a quick activity to encourage them to think outside the box. III. Team construction | As part of the class, students were grouped for their team projects in groups of 2-5. While all data for this study was collected on an individual basis, students were instructed to dissect different products than their teammates. IV. Concept Introduction | Students were introduced to the inventive concept they would be brainstorming and discussing with their teammates. For the graduate students, they would be discussing the design of a novel alarm clock for those that have a difficult time waking up
introductory course (CSO) also includes a brief computer history, data representation,binary numbers, speakers from the CS department who share their research, and the studentsexplore their interests in CS by completing a semester project which culminates with a teampresentation.To develop programming problem-solving skills, students practice writing pseudocode and usingflowcharts to solve simple problems which make use of the basic programming constructs, e.g.,sequential, decision, and repetition structures. Programming concepts such as identifiers, datatypes, variables, assignments, arithmetic operations, relational and logical operators, andfunctions are introduced and used by students to complete exercises.3.1 Team-based learningTeam-Based
recognized as essential for spurring positiveattitudes and action [37] and igniting deep personal growth and self-actualization [38], [39], [40].Contextual Awareness (Picture Making)The ability to maintain a mental model of a current situation and then contextualize newsituations was a heavily emphasized behavior observed across the resilience literature. Writingabout cognitive processes and situational awareness related to aviation human factors, Endsley’sdefinition of situational awareness in aviation operating environments provided a foundation tocontext-driven awareness: “The perception of the information in the environment within avolume of time and space, the comprehension of their meaning and the projection of their statusin the near future
is posted in the departmentABET website to share with department community.CMMI Practice 12: Collect Process-Related FeedbackCollect work products, measures, measurement results, and improvement informationderived from planning and performing the process to support the future use andimprovement of the organization’s processes and process assets. This generic practiceprovides a reminder to all organizations and projects to constantly and forever keepimproving the process.Our ABET practiceThe department has made great strides in the assessment, evaluation and implementation ofcontinuous improvement activities.Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) Cycle Applied to Criterion 4 of ABETThe Computer Science Department has been using the CMMI norms diligently
, influence of, and use of published research forconducting routine tasks.Research-to-practice Overall, the current literature on research-to-practice (RTP) is centered on how researchis used in practical settings, the transferring of knowledge from scientists to practitioners, andpinpointing the source of the innovation (Flaspohler, Duffy, Wandersman, Stillman, & Maras,2008; Klein & Sorra, 1996). The emphasis on RTP has been primarily attributed topolicymakers, who fund research and set expectations for scholars leading research projects toevaluate and specify how their projects are relevant and make an impact in practice (Daley &Shinton, 2014). Accordingly, various fields and disciplines (e.g., farming, construction,linguistics