Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Rachel D. Mosier, Oklahoma State University; Sandeep Langar, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

among construction industrystudents to a) evaluate their experience of natural disasters, b) examine the source of knowledgeof resilience on natural disasters, c) measure knowledge of post-disaster evacuation, and d)evaluate disaster preparation from university education. The study found that the population of thestudent body existed that had not experienced a natural disaster and were unaware of its impactseither on a personal or familial basis. Further, the majority of the responding students felt that theirmajor(s) and universities did not prepare them in terms of handling natural disasters and extremeweather events. Finally, a correlation was found between the location students live and a desire forknowledge about extreme weather events at

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Jessica Watkins, Vanderbilt University; Rebecca D. Swanson, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

teachershaving meaningful engineering experiences with their development of epistemic empathy thatadds to the conversation about productive learning experiences in K-12 teacher preparation inengineering.AcknowledgementsWe thank the research team members and participants who made this study possible. Thismaterial is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1720334. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.REFERENCES[1] L. S. Nadelson, J. Pfiester, and J. Callahan, “Who Is Doing the Engineering, the Student or the Teacher? The Development and Use of a Rubric to

Conference Session

Lessons Learned about Faculty Development!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Emily Peterek Bonner; Vittorio Marone, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Timothy Yuen, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Robin Nelson, University of Texas at San Antonio; Joann Browning P.E., The University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

collaboration.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.#1525345. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. This work is done in collaboration with the University of Kansas, Indiana University,Queen’s University at Kingston, University of British Columbia, University of California, Davis,University of Colorado Boulder, and the University of Texas at San Antonio.References [1] C. Baillie and G. Fitzgerald, “Motivation and attrition in engineering students,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 2000. [2] B. N. Geisinger and D

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division 4: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yi-hsiang Isaac Chang, Illinois State University; Dave Yearwood, University of North Dakota

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

-dirty prototypes to gain quick feedback. Functionalprototypes are built for benchmarking purposes while at the same time verifying whether theproposed solutions actually resolve the issue(s). Through the design-build-test process, it isexpected that students would develop the knowledge and experience of the “subject matterexperts”, and thus various activities at the project planning stage will become more meaningful.Using the test result(s) of functional prototypes, the team(s) will revise their solution(s) anddevelop a project plan to scale up their proposed solution(s), either with a product productionline or a service model. The paper will conclude by discussing the outcome of this approach,identify possible limitations, and provide

Conference Session

Relationships Between Skills and Knowledge Domains

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ryan H. Koontz, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Daniel F. Dolan, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Kimberly Karen Osberg, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. Atman and K. M. Bursic, “Verbal Protocol Analysis as a Method to Document Engineering Student Design Processes,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 121- 132, 1998.[2] C. J. Atman, R. S. Adams, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg and J. Saleem, “Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 359-379, 2007.[3] C. J. Atman, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns and R. Adams, “Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: an in-depth follow-up study,” Design Studies, pp. 325- 357, July 2005.[4] G. Mathews, M. Zeidner and R. D. Roberts, Emotional Intelligence, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002.[5] R. S. Adams and C. J. Atman, “Cognitive Processes

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Huseyin Sarper P.E., Old Dominion University; Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Ben J. Stuart, Old Dominion University; Karina Arcaute, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

each other out. The final speed of the rocket is found by dividing the total momentum forthe exhaust or the opposite rocket momentum by the mass of the rocket. This simple explanationignores gravity and air resistance. In this project, many model rockets were launched, and thestudents clearly observed that expelled gases push against something (the launch pad) only duringthe brief ignition and lift-off moment. In Figure 12, model rocket ZE-1’s flight trajectory showsthe rocket thrusting without having to push against anything for up to 53 meters.Energy Source for Propulsion for Model Rocket Engines The The Chemical Side Physical

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division 3: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael Sollitto, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi; Mehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

, J. M. Caputo, E. A. Ford, R. Fu, S. A. Leibowitz, T. Liu,…C. Wu, “Investigating workplace communication behaviors,” Journal of Business Communication, vol. 50, pp. 152-169, 2013[5] J. R. Meredith, S. M. Shafer, and S. J. Mantel, Project Management: A Strategic Managerial Approach, 10th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018.CONFLICT NEGOTIATION TRAINING[6] ABET. (2020, Jan ). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. [online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/[7] A. L. Mello, and L. A. Delise, “Cognitive diversity to team outcomes: The roles of cohesion and conflict management,” Small Group Research, vol. 46, pp. 204-226, 2015.[8] J

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Morteza Nagahi, Mississippi State University; Raed Jaradat, Mississippi State University; Samaneh Davarzani, Mississippi State University; Mohammad Nagahisarchoghaei, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Simon R. Goerger, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

, namely interaction, independence,change, uncertainty, complexity, systems worldview, and flexibility, as shown in Table 4. Basedon these dimensions, the ST skills of an individual are evaluated. Table 4: Seven Dimensions of Systems Thinking (ST) Skills Instrument [17] Less Systemic (Reductionist) Dimension More Systemic (Holistic) Complexity (C): Expect uncertainty, work Simplicity (S): Avoid uncertainty, work on linear Level of Complexity: Comfort with on multidimensional problems

Conference Session

Student Motivation, Identity, and Resilience

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Timothy D. Ropp, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Stephen M. Belt, Saint Louis University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

) Nathanael et al., Dekker & (2014) Woods (2010) Hollnagel et al. (2006)References[1] S, Flumerfelt, F-J Kahlen, A. Alves, and A.B. Siriban-Manalang, “Lean EngineeringEducation : Driving Content and Competency Mastery. Momentum Press, 2015.[2] K. O’Brien, S. Venkatesan, S. Fragomeni & A. Moore, “Work Readiness of Final-Year CivilEngineering Students at Victoria University: A survey”, Technical Paper, Institution ofEngineers Australia, Australiasian Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 18, No. 1, 2012.[3] N.V. Hernandez, A. Fuentes & S. Crown, “Effectively Transforming

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 4: Assessing Success in Mathematics Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Johannah L. Crandall, Washington State University; Kristin Lesseig, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

Crandall, a clinical associate professor of computer science atWashington State University, for his thoughtful assistance in outlining an ontology of computingtools reported by participants in this study, especially those closely associated with specializedengineering endeavors involving embedded systems, web development, and 3D drawingsolutions. 9References[1] Brown, J. S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture oflearning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.[2] Magana, A. J., Falk, M. L., Vieira, C. and Reese, M. J. (2016). A case study ofundergraduate engineering students' computational literacy and self-beliefs

Conference Session

Approaches to Assessment and Student Reflection

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Ocean and Marine

, Pathway, or Ecosystem – Do Our Metaphors Matter?” Distinguished Lecture, ASEEAnnual Conference, Tampa, 2019.Deslauriers, L., E. Schelew, and C. Wieman, Improved Learning in a Large- Enrollment Physics Class. Science, 2011. 332(6031): p. 862-864.Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.Freeman, S., S.L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M.P. Wenderoth, Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. 111(23): p. 8410-8415.Friedrichsen, D. M., Smith, C., & Koretsky, M. D. (2017

Conference Session

STEM Issues in ET II

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Meher Rusi Taleyarkhan, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Natalie Hobson, Sonoma State University; Therese M. Azevedo, Sonoma State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

anxiety can bedevastating, as mathematics is an important part of life [3]. Math anxiety can cause individuals toavoid math or situations that require analytical and rational thought [4]. Several studies havebeen carried out with elementary and grade school students to learn more about human reactionto mathematics [5], yet fewer studies have been done on college students or later. Furthermore,the majority of these research studies on college students focus on first-year students enrolled ina mathematics course [3]. The current study of this paper is focused on a less studied populationof engineering technology students, and their tendency to engage in rational-analytical thoughtprocesses.Literature ReviewIn the 1970’s researchers indicated that

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Maker Spaces in the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville; James E. Lewis, University of Louisville; Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

less than 450 per year) and is housed within anddelivered via a 15,000 ft2 makerspace. The ENGR 110/111 sequence is relatively new, resultantfrom the desire to restructure the previous iteration of the institution’s introductory engineeringcourse. A key motivational factor in the desire to restructure included aspiration(s) to conform tomodern research in engineering education methodologies, especially the implementation of activelearning.Active learning has been defined as “any instructional method that engages students in the learningprocess”. Generally, active learning refers to activities that are introduced into the classroom, withthe core elements of student activity and engagement in the learning process. In summary, activelearning

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: First Year Programming (2)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alark Joshi, University of San Francisco; Gian Bruno; Xornam Apedoe, University of San Francisco; Sophie Engle, University of San Francisco; Sami Rollins, University of San Francisco; Matthew Malensek, University of San Francisco

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #30680Engendering Community to Computer Science Freshmen through an EarlyArrival ProgramProf. Alark Joshi, University of San Francisco Alark Joshi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of San Francisco. He was a co-PI on the IDoCode project (http://coen.boisestate.edu/cs/idocode/) that led to a change in the landscape of computer science teacher preparation and education in the state of Idaho. Currently, he is a co-PI on the S-STEM proposal focused on engaging students in the local community to enable successful outcomes for them with respect to courses and internships/jobs

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Diversity 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Richard A. Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Russell Andrew Long; Hossein EbrahimNejad, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Hassan Ali Al Yagoub, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Mr. Russell Andrew Long, Russell Long, M.Ed. was the Director of Project Assessment at the Purdue University School of Engineer- ing Education (retired) and is Managing Director of The Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD). He has extensive experience in performance fund- ing, large data set analysis, program review, assessment and student services in higher education. One of his greatest strengths lies in analyzing data related to student learning outcomes and, therefore, to im- proving institutional effectiveness. His work with

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Design

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Foad Hamidi, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Shawn Grimes; Stephanie Grimes; Adena Moulton, Digital Harbor Foundation; Andrew Coy, Digital Harbor Foundation

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation. 6. References [1] S. L. Chu, R. Schlegel, F. Quek, A. Christy, and K. Chen, “‘I Make, Therefore I Am’: The Effects of Curriculum-Aligned Making on Children’s Self-Identity,” in Proc. of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2017, pp. 109–120. [2] L. Martin, “The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education,” J. Pre-College Eng. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, Apr. 2015. [3] P. Blikstein and D. Krannich, “The makers’ movement and FabLabs in education: experiences, technologies, and research,” in Proc. of the 12th international conference on interaction design and children, 2013, pp. 613–616. [4] S. Papavlasopoulou, M. N

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Outreach and Retention

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nina Robson, California State University, Fullerton; Allison Serrano; Axel Alvarez Loya, California State University, Fullerton; Nikol Miojevic; Kimberly Krystal Lopez-Zepeda; Madeline E. Rasche

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

a STEM researchproject. National Science Foundation Middle/High School Student Attitudes Towards STEM (S-STEM) Survey [8] was used to assess the overall impact of the outreach program on the femalestudents’ self-confidence and motivation in pursuing future cross-disciplinary STEM careers.The results showed that the 21st Century skills related to critical-thinking, communication, andcollaboration was the section with the most radical improvement.Keywords: kinematics of mechanisms, protein kinematics, biomechanics, biochemistry, DNAnano-mechanismsIDEAL Online Summer Outreach Program Curriculum Plan and MethodsDuring the summer of 2019, mechanical engineering faculty and two undergraduate studentsfrom both NSM and ECS colleges offered a two

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Thomas Neil Dempsey, Forestville Central School; M. Raymond Ng, Cathedral Preparatory School ; Zachary Rhodes; Jiawei Gong, Pennsylvania State University; Faisal Aqlan, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

counter electrode is made by spaying Pt catalyst using atomizer on the FTO glass.Finally, both electrodes are sandwiched and sealed with 60 μm plastic (Surlyn, Dupont), followedby the injection of electrolyte through the reserved channel. Figure 2 shows the assembly of theDSSC components. Figure 2. Schematic of DSSC device assembly.The following steps convert in a DSSC photons (light) to current. The incident photon is absorbedby Ru complex photosensitizers adsorbed on the TiO2 surface. The photosensitizers are excitedfrom the ground state (S) to the excited state (S∗). The excited electrons are injected into theconduction band of the TiO2 electrode. This results in the oxidation of the photosensitizer (S

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Student Thought

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Justin L. Hess, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Alison J. Kerr, University of Tulsa; Dayoung Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michael C. Loui, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

presented at the conference. In addition, the review of criticalincidents related to RQ2 is ongoing. Future work pertaining to RQ2 will include (1) continuingextracting incidents for all remaining participants, (2) sorting incidents into current themes andcategories, and, as appropriate, defining new themes, and (3) disseminating results in a scholarlyjournal. Finally, RQ3 will seek to identify how Phase 1 and 2 results align with extant theoriesand frameworks utilized in engineering education.Acknowledgement:This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1737303. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily

Conference Session

Faculty and Student Perspective on Instructional Strategies

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kristi Glassmeyer, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College teaching, 44(2), 43-47.[4] Jungst, S., Likclider, L. L., & Wiersema, J. (2003). Providing support for faculty who wish to shift to a learning-centered paradigm in their higher education classrooms. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 69-81.[5] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 11(23), 8410-8415.[6] Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers’ approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32(1), 77–87

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicole Johnson-Glauch, California Polytechnic State University; Lauren Anne Cooper, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Materials

outreach with underrepresented groups in STEM.Dr. Lauren Anne Cooper, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lauren Cooper earned her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering with a research emphasis in Engineering Education from University of Colorado Boulder. She is currently an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. Her research interests include project-based learning, student motivation, human-centered design, and the role of empathy in engineering teaching and learning.Dr. Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Professor and Department Chair of Materials Engineering at

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Diversity 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicholas A. Bowman, University of Iowa; Lindsay Jarratt, University of Iowa; KC Culver, University of Southern California; Alberto Segre, University of Iowa

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

study focused primarily on short-term outcomes that were specific to relevantcoursework and content, which limits the types of conclusions that can be drawn. Future researchshould explore relevant dynamics in greater detail, including the longer-term effects from suchexperiences, outcomes that extend well beyond the scope of pair programming, the conditionsunder which cross-national groupwork is most effective, and the ways in which these findingsmay or may not be similar for other forms of collaborative learning (e.g., problem-basedlearning, jigsaw classrooms). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research designswould be helpful for providing an in-depth understanding of these issues.References[1] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aasakiran Madamanchi, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Scott R. Bartholomew, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Vetria L. Byrd, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

SCMcurriculum [10], and is proven to be very effective and popular across all levels of programsincluding undergraduate, graduate, and executive education [11]. Developed by MIT′s SloanSchool of Management in the 80s, the Beer Game was originally created to teach students systemsconcepts and systems thinking [12]. However, as the content area of SCM continues to expand, sodo the Beer Game learning extensions which now span demonstrating the bullwhip effect, risk-pooling, and technology integration, to name a few [13]. In response, student participants get thechance to actively learn about the benefit of supply chain awareness and communication, theimportance of supply chain collaborative strategic decision making, and the benefit of working asa team to

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Danielle Marie Fredette, Cedarville University; Nathan Jessurun, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

cycles, with definite goals reached each iterative cycle. Agile requiresteams to break large tasks, such as designing a system to act upon GPS data, into small, bite-sizedpieces. In the GPS example, this would involve turning the overall goal into objectives able to becompleted in 1-2 weeks like: • Design an interface to poll the EMLID system for positional data Figure 4: Drive by wire hardware for braking and steeringFigure 5: The Reach GPS unit and an example of the waypoints collected along a driving path.Data plotted using ♠❛♣s✳❣♦♦❣❧❡✳❝♦♠. • Develop an algorithm to extract heading and velocity data from progressive geographical timestamps • etc.The Agile mindset proved highly useful to our senior design team

Conference Session

Around the Water Cooler: Ideas and Issues in Civil Engineering Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cassandra J. McCall, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech; Ashley Shew, Virginia Tech; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida; Courtney Zongrone, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

civil engineers do.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNo. EEC-1733636. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. We would also like to thank our participants, who have given generously oftheir time to help us better understand their experiences.References[1] M. W. Ohland, S. M. Lord, and R. A. Layton, “Student Demographics and Outcomes in Civil Engineering in the United States,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 141, no. 4, p. 7, 2015.[2] C. Groen, L. D. McNair, M. C. Paretti, D. R. Simmons, and A. Shew, “Exploring

Conference Session

Postgraduate Pathways and Experiences

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jacqueline Rohde, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jared France, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brianna Benedict, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

for the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. She has also been recognized for the synergy of research and teaching as an invited participant of the 2016 National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Symposium and the Purdue University 2018 recipient of School of Engineering Education Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching and the 2018 College of Engineering Exceptional Early Career Teaching Award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Exploring the Early Career Pathways of Degree Holders from Biomedical, Environmental, and Interdisciplinary/Multidisciplinary Engineering Jacqueline Rohde, Jared France, Brianna S. Benedict, and Allison

Conference Session

Research! Research! Research! in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amber Gallup, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Pil Kang, University of New Mexico; Kristen Ferris, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

analytic lens may contribute to understanding about how co-peersand peer-designers might most effectively play roles in changing faculty practice, and ultimately,in creating more inclusive learning environments for diverse students.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.#1623105. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] M. Meyer and S. Marx, "Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 525-548, 2014.[2] S. E

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Hossein EbrahimNejad, Purdue University, West Lafayette; George D. Ricco, University of Indianapolis; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

of students. References[1] S. Olson and D. G. Riordan, "Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President," Executive Office of the President, 2012.[2] A. W. Astin, "College retention rates are often misleading," Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. A48-A48, 1993.[3] A. W. Astin, "What matters in college? Four critical years revisited," San Fran, 1993.[4] R. M. Hall and B. R. Sandler, "Out of the Classroom: A Chilly Campus Climate for Women?," 1984.[5] S. M. Lord, M. M. Camacho, R. A. Layton, R. A. Long, M. W. Ohland, and M. H. Wasburn

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: RED 2 / Civil Eng

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida; Nicholas Anthony Clegorne

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

.[4] K. Charmaz, Constructing grounded theory. London: SAGE, 2014.[5] S. R. Komives, J. E. Owen, S. D. Longerbeam, F. C. Mainella, and L. Osteen, “Developing a Leadership Identity: A Grounded Theory,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 593–611, 2005.[6] S. R. Komives, S. D. Longerbeam, J. E. Owen, F. C. Mainella, and L. Osteen, “A Leadership Identity Development Model: Applications from a Grounded Theory,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 401–418, 2006.[7] S. R. Komives, S. D. Longerbeam, F. Mainella, L. Osteen, J. E. Owen, and W. Wagner, “Leadership Identity Development,” Journal of Leadership Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 11– 47, Jan. 2009.[8] P. Kirkbride

Conference Session

Learnin' Lessons about Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura Ann Gelles, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

efforts, especially if they are untenured.References[1] M. Davis, “Engineering as profession: Some methodological problems in its study,” in Engineering identities, epistemologies, and values, S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham and B. Newberry (Eds)., Springer, 2015, pp. 65–98.[2] J. R. Lohmann and J. E. Froyd, “Chronological and ontological development of engineering education as a field of scientific inquiry,” in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, (Eds). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 283–309.[3] S. M. Lord, E. J. Berger, N. N. Kellam, E. L. Ingram, D. M. Riley, D. T. Rover, N. Salzman, and J. D. Sweeney