Collection

AEE Journal

Authors

Katie Schneider; Amy Martin; Terri S. Hogue

distribution. These methods are applied here because they are not strongly affected by outli-ers (Helsel and Hirsch) and because the datasets are small. Another important consideration is thatthe sample of responses under question represent 100% of teacher participants for the 2017 and2018 WE2NG programs but represent only a small convenience-sample of STEM teachers in general.Thus, results of inferential statistical methods should be treated with caution when considering theirapplicability to the entire population of STEM teachers. RESULTS & DISCUSSIONPre- and Post-Program Surveys Prior studies have shown that self-efficacy in teachers is critical to both teacher and studentperformance (Doménech-Betoret, et

Collection

AEE Journal

Authors

Sarah Dart; Edmund Pickering; Les Dawes

midway through and at the end of each semester to evaluate the overall course experi-ence. The Likert scale question “I am satisfied with this course” was used as a measure of studentsatisfaction for the present study. Response rates on this survey are also included in Table 2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION To understand the impact and effectiveness of WEVs, several areas were analyzed includingusage statistics, student interactions with WEVs, student satisfaction, and impact on perceivedacademic performance.Usage Statistics Table 2 presents key metrics across the eleven cohorts, totaling 3290 students. It is immediatelyapparent that the videos were highly utilized with approximately 55,000 recorded views