Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education and an M.S. student in Systems Engineer- ing at Virginia Tech. She is the graduate assistant for the Rising Sophomore Abroad Program, a global engineering course and study abroad program for first year engineering students. Her primary research fo- cuses on the design and assessment of global engineering programs, but she also studies the development of systems thinking skills in engineering students.Kirsten was recently awarded the Harold Josephson award for professional promise in international education by the Association of International Education Administrators.She holds a B.S. in Engineering & Management from Clarkson University and an M.A.Ed. in Higher Education
with prospective freshmen and transfer engineering students. In 2018, he transitioned to the role of Assistant Research Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at the Clark School. His research interests transfer students who first enroll in community colleges, as well as developing broader and more nuanced engineering performance indicators.Dr. Medha Dalal, Arizona State University Medha Dalal is a postdoctoral scholar at Arizona State University. She received her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Gujarat University, M.S. in Computer Science from New York University, and Ph. D. in Education from Arizona State University. Her research seeks to build capacity for engineering education stakeholders at the
programs to encourage girls to pursue their interests in computing and engineering and some of the pre-professional programs to help students prepare for their careers. Her previous experience includes work in student leadership development, campus programming, student organization manage- ment, and alumni relations. Greenwood holds a master’s degree in Higher Education Administration from Washington State University, a B.A. in Advertising/Public Relations from Grand Valley State University, and is currently pursuing a graduate certificate in Community Leadership at UMBC.Ms. Erica L D’Eramo, University of Maryland, Baltimore County: CWIT Erica D’Eramo is the Assistant Director of the Center for Women in Technology (CWIT) at
mindfulness, resilience, and grit. This coursework includes: ● A first-year STARS seminar facilitated by STARS advising staff, which offers a space for students to reflect on their learning and educational experiences; brainstorm strategies for self-improvement; and develop “master schedules” to improve students’ time management and study skills. The seminar also provides an overview of non-STARS university resources for students such as counseling services and writing and tutoring centers. Students participating in the seminar also receive professional development opportunities through collaboration with the College of Engineering community and career centers. Engineering faculty and professionals discuss the
professional identity development in Civil Engineer- ing students with disabilities. Her work in CENI focuses on building networks between the University and multiple community sectors and supporting engagement in science, engineering, arts, and design. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6654-2337 American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 “I'm looking at you, you're a perfectly good person …”: Describing Non-Apparent Disability in EngineeringIntroductionIn recent years, studies in engineering education have begun to intentionally integrate disabilityinto discussions of diversity, inclusion, and equity. To broaden and advocate for the
B. Dwyer, “Exploring college students’ identification with an organizational identity for serving Latinx students at a Hispanic serving institution (HSI) and an emerging HSI,” Amer. J. of Educ., vol 124, no. 2., pp. 191-215, 2018.[14] H. Holloway-Friesen, “The role of mentoring on Hispanic graduate students’ sense of belonging and academic self-efficacy,” J. Hispanic High. Educ. vol 1, no. 13, pp., 1-13, 2019.[15] R. A. Revelo Alonso, “Engineering identity development of Latina and Latino members of the society of Hispanic professional engineers,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Seattle, WA, USA, June 14-17, 2015, pp. 1–13, doi: 10.18260/p.23967[16] P
, sense ofbelonging); enhanced career development (e.g., forum for enhancing skills, network for keepingup-to-date) [12]; and, increased satisfaction with the overall educational experience [15].Given that LCs are rich social interactions where personal relationships are developed, ways ofinteracting and collaborating are established, and a common sense of members’ identity iscreated [12], a learning community in the context of engineering education can impact students’sense of connectedness and self-efficacy [16],[17],[18]. Recognizing that military veteranstudents face unique challenges as they pursue their engineering and technology degrees, theirparticipation in a targeted learning community can addresses their unique challenges in
builds on our earlier study [1],which developed a conceptual model of belongingness among international engineering doctoralstudents based on their interactions with faculty, peers, and staff. A literature review informedthis conceptualization and revealed a lack of consistency in the conceptual structure ofbelongingness in both higher education and engineering education. This work will include thefollowing: 1) a brief review on the varied characteristics of sense of belonging (e.g., definitionsand constructs/defining components) in different context (e.g., K-12 education, undergraduateeducation, graduate education, and community) among different populations (e.g., adolescents,undergraduate students, underrepresented students, and adults), 2) a
University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Monica E. Cardella is a Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University.Natali Huggins, Natali Huggins is a PhD student in the Higher Education program at Virginia Tech. She holds a master’s in public administration from the National Experimental University of T´achira in Venezuela. She has sev- eral years of experience in higher education administration and internal audit in Venezuela. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion in graduate education, particularly international and Latinx grad- uate students’ persistence and development. She is interested in supporting students in their transition and adaptability to higher education in
Dr. Long, email: Leroy.Long@erau.edu.Dr. Sharnnia Artis, University of California, Irvine Dr. Sharnnia Artis is the Assistant Dean of Access and Inclusion for the Henry Samueli School of Engi- neering and Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences at the University of California, Irvine. She is responsible for programs at the pre-college, undergraduate, and graduate levels to facili- tate the recruitment, retention, and overall success of students from traditionally underrepresented groups in engineering and information and computer sciences. Dr. Artis has 18 years of experience working with education and outreach programs in engineering and over 35 publications in STEM education and outreach. Prior
-12 makerspace, Fassoand Knight [9] found that the constant negotiation and collaboration required to complete aproject within the makerspace provide a sociocultural space to support identity development. Inhigher education settings, Carbonnel, Andrews, Boklage, and Borrego found that a semester-longproject which required the use of an engineering makerspace increased students’ technology anddesign self-efficacy, affect towards design, innovation orientation, as well as their sense ofbelonging in a makerspace [5]. In addition, in research that has emerged from this largerresearch study, Greene, Kellam, and Coley found that while makerspaces overall promotedagency and engineering identity for Black male undergraduates, makerspaces at PWIs
help and therefore, less capable. The author recommends changes to WIEprograms: offer their benefits to all students or those who are selected based on academics, notdemographic criteria or shift the emphasis of WIE programs to pre-emption of unprofessionalbehavior (for example, include activities on how to conduct yourself in engineering).In [21], Doerschuk describes a program developed for female computer science students. Theprogram involves multi-faceted mentoring, community building activities, and a researchprogram with significant educational components (work under the mentorship of a femalefaculty, conference presentation, participation in recruitment and outreach). Reed Rhoads et al.interview students in an engineering program that