Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Logan Oplinger, Arizona State University; Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

was given a rank from -3 to 3 basedupon how frequently they expressed the leadership roles. The 0 mark acted as an averageexpression mark.Results: Profiled MakersFor this study the 40 Makers were profiled on a leadership spectrum using the CVF. TheseMakers came from four flagship Maker Faires. From the collected data the frequency ofresponses was mapped across the CVF spectrum. The CVF utilizes scores between -3 and 3. Anaverage of representation of the trait among Makers was taken in order to determine the 0—oraverage representation—mark. A minimum value (-3) shows that the Maker did not represent theleadership trait. A maximum value (3) shows that the Maker represented the highest frequency oftrait representation. These minimum and maximum