- Conference Session
- The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity CollegeDublin, The University of Dublin
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
, 2016 From Problem Solvers to Problem Seekers: The Necessary Role of Tension in Engineering EducationIn this paper it is proposed that the current focus on problems in engineering education andtechnological literacy may be more constructively reframed by focusing on tensions. PriyanDias claims engineering has an identity crisis that arises from tensions inherent in: 1) theinfluence of the profession on society, 2) the role engineers play, and 3) what constitutes validknowledge in engineering. These are ethical, ontological, and epistemological tensionsrespectively, which Dias frames as a tension between identities of homo sapiens and homo faber.Beyond the tensions in engineering there are additional tensions that arise
- Conference Session
- Interactive Panel on Improving the Experiences of Marginalized Students on Engineering Design Teams
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Lorelle A Meadows, Michigan Technological University; Denise Sekaquaptewa, University of Michigan; Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Debbie Chachra, Olin College of Engineering; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education, Electrical and Computer, Engineering Libraries, First-Year Programs, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Student, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering
successful interactions and learning outcomes.1-3 One important challenge centers onthe interactions between students from groups negatively stereotyped as poor performers inengineering (e.g., women and under-represented racial minorities) and others. A body of researchin psychology indicates that students from these marginalized groups may have qualitativelydifferent group work experiences compared to others, which may contribute to their self-selection from engineering and thus their group’s under-representation in engineering fields.Recent research suggests that the negative experiences of people from marginalized groups onengineering student design teams can influence many factors that contribute to persistence andsuccess, such as development of
- Conference Session
- Dimensions of Engineering Literacy and Engineering in General Education
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
John Krupczak Jr, Hope College; Mani Mina, Iowa State University; Kate A Disney, Mission College
- Tagged Divisions
-
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
solution ofproblems stated as analogies [7]. The test is designed to assess analytical thinking. The testcontent is drawn from various academic subjects. No specific prior training in any one particularacademic discipline is assumed. Positive correlations have been shown between MAT scoresand subsequent success in graduate programs in academic disciplines [7].The ACT Science Reasoning Test, the Law School Admissions Test (LSAT), the CriticalThinking Assessment Test (CAT) and the Miller Analogies Test (MAT) were taken as modelsfor developing an Engineering Reasoning test. The term “Engineering Reasoning” was adoptedas more appropriate than “engineering” or “technological literacy.” Like science reasoning,engineering reasoning points to a specific
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
address such issues. Management, teaching,and medicine also educate people for practice and must continually engage with a changingworld to remain relevant. In this paper it is hypothesized that degree programs in thesedisciplines confront, with varying degrees of success, a tension between providing theknowledge needed to act and inculcating the ability in students to act spontaneously and in theright way. This paper explores this tension by looking across these disciplines to identifypractices that are believed to be effective in giving students the knowledge and abilities neededto act professionally. The general approach that has emerged is having students actively addressproblems of varying degrees of difficulty and constraint through
- Conference Session
- Non-Canonical Canons of Engineering Ethics
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Xiaofeng Tang, Penn State University; Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
examination,”by which we mean examination of the status of practice in a profession against the ethicalstandards enacted in its particular code, and vice versa. For example, Clause 8, which wasrecently added to the IEEE Code of Ethics, requires all members “to treat fairly all persons andto not engage in acts of discrimination based on race, religion, gender, disability, age, nationalorigin, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.”57 This clause provides richopportunities for students to discuss the necessary structural changes to the engineeringprofession—in areas such as employment policies, workplace culture, college admissions,facility design, etc.—so as to live up to the code. Similarly, instructors could also