Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leslie Potter, Iowa State University; Richard Stone, Iowa State University; Devna Fay Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Science Career Decisions andActive Learning,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol 6, pp. 297-306, Winter 2007.[12] Overath, R., Zhang, D., and Hatherill, J., “Implementing Course-based Research IncreasesStudent Aspirations for STEM Degrees,” Winter 2016 CUR Quarterly, Volume 37, Number 2.[13] Mendoza, B. and Brown, P.A., “Incorporating Undergraduate Research Experience in anEngineering Technology Curriculum, 2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic Section Spring Conference,Baltimore, MD, April 7, 2017.[14] Fyock, A., Potter, L., Stone, R., and Popejoy-Sheriff, D., “Filling the Graduate Pipeline ViaCourse-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs),” 2018 IISE National Conference,Orlando, Florida, May 2018.

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Giannina Costa, Universidad Andres Bello; Juan Felipe Calderón, Universidad Andres Bello; David Ruete, Universidad Andres Bello; Danilo Leal, Universidad Andres Bello; Lilian Pamela San Martín Medina, Universidad Andres Bello

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #33885Relationship Between Guided Interactive Activities and Self-concept inEngineering StudentsDr. Ing. Giannina Costa, Universidad Andres Bello Doctor en tecnolog´ıa de informaci´on Universidad Atlantic International University, Magister en Inform´atica de la Universidad Andr´es Bello de Chile, Ingeniero Inform´atica de la Universidad T´ecnica Federico Santa Mar´ıa de Chile. Experiencia docente de m´as de 12 a˜nos, realizando diversas asignaturas del a´ rea de la In- genier´ıa de Software, inteligencia de negocios, metodolog´ıas a´ giles en las carreras de Pre grado, Advance y Mag´ıster de la Universidad Andr

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Western Michigan University; Charles Henderson, Western Michigan University ; Daniel Collier, Western Michigan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. The French et al. studyworks on the odds ratio. None of the four studies has showed statistically significant differencein men’s retention, though. Three studies indicate higher retention for women19,18,46. Cohen’sstudy has showed statistically higher retention for women students. The studies that are in favorof men retention have considered the MIDFIELD database and NC university database; whilethe ones that are in favor of women retention have considered a national database (Engineeringworkforce commission- EWC) of 1999-2001 graduating students and a mid-Atlantic collegedatabase. Three of the four studies that indicate higher retention for men compute 4-yearretention, while the NC study35, which indicates poor retention of women, computes

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Chris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech; Francesca Giardine, Smith College; Robin Ott, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Anne Kary

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

college in the northeast, and two large publiccomprehensive universities (one in the mountain west and one in the mid-Atlantic). After startingwork, participants were interviewed with a semi-structured protocol that focused on theirresponsibilities, work activities, challenges, and accomplishments at 3, 6, and 12 months ofwork. All subsequent data collection was managed by three researchers (co-author [Author 1] aswell as two additional members of the research team, [Member 1] and [Member 2]). Allworkplace interviews used a common base protocol, followed by tailored prompts to follow upon previous data collection; for example, the six-month interviews followed up on commentsfrom the three-month interviews and so forth. This approach allowed the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

engineers are mostly likely tohave this attitude in the results section.MethodsThis section describes our process for classifying engineers according to their acculturationattitudes, as determined by their acculturation preferences, and exploring differences in theseattitudes based on their personal and job characteristics.Participants: Data for this study was collected as part of a larger research project administered inFall 2019 [46]. Nearly twelve thousand alumni who earned engineering degrees from a large,public university in the southwestern U.S. within the past 15 years were invited to participate inan online survey via an initial invitation email and two reminder emails sent over the course of atwo-week period. All participants had the