. Figure 1: Student responses in 2019 & 2020 for (Q1).ties for community engagement and connections. We found no statistically significant differencebetween white students and BIPOC students in this question.3.3. (Q3) Do you feel like a typical computer scientist? This question provides insight into a student’s feelings of a science identity, or asso-ciating their identity with their career choice. Again, as documented in Rainey et al. [9], scienceidentity provides perspective on a sense of belonging. As seen in Figure 4, in 2019, 67.8% ofstudents did not feel like typical computer scientists. In 2020, 57.9% of our students did not feeltypical. In 2020, we found a statistically significant difference between men and women
sag) by at least oneof the load resistors. The students measure the output voltage for each load resistor, and eachteam plots its results on a single graph on the lab whiteboard. Thus, they discover that the loadresistance must be much greater than the resistances selected for the divider.The remaining three class meetings in the first section of the subject are similar in pace andstructure. We will highlight the main features of them in the balance of this section.Week 2.In the second week we introduce diodes and LEDs, and the students investigate theability of an diode to act as a simple voltage regulator. Also in the second week, we present thethree-terminal linear voltage regulator (e.g., 7805) as a method of creating a stable voltage
contentchanges are currently being piloted in an effort to best serve students given the challenginglearning circumstances and the new context in which they are exploring their identities, values,and roles in their larger communities.The instructors also plan to initiate more intensive research regarding GCSP outcomes later thisyear. A concerted data gathering effort will draw upon feedback from the course but also fromsurveys that will be administered to a broad range of students and alumni, including studentswho did not take the course or participate in the GCSP program, as well as students whograduated many years earlier. The research project will attempt to determine whether the GCSPlearning outcomes were achieved during students’ time at Olin or
engineering. I asked two of them in a direct manner ifthey met with the professor who was recommended by their academic advisor and they said“No”. Students appear to value graduating on time and earning high grades. Two of the studentsindicated that they were honor students in high school and that they had to work harder at theuniversity to earn high grades in the engineering, science, and mathematics courses. There was aconsistent concern expressed about graduating on time. These were students who were still intheir first two years of their engineering courses. Taking more than four years to finish theirundergraduate degree was not agreeable to them even though they knew that many engineeringstudents do balance their course load over five or
Paper ID #37226Assessing Engineering Students’ Embodied Knowledge ofTorsional Loading Through GestureMatthew M Grondin (Research Assistant) Matthew is a joint-degree graduate student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Currently, Matthew is working between the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Department or Educational Psychology-Learning Sciences to bridge the research and communication gap between these two academic silos. As an Interdisciplinary Training Fellow, Matthew hopes to conduct novel research related to embodied learning and assessment in engineering education and translate this research
requisite components of self-efficacy, reflection, and critical thinking.Effective support must also address the challenge of balancing theoretical understanding andrelevant, authentic practical application.Mini-projectsPer mini-project structure, course material is divided into “bite-size” chunks, with each chunkrepresenting a core aspect of the syllabus. These chunks are then crafted into a series of mini-projects, usually between four and eight, that are offered as team-based or solo assignments. It isimportant to note that a series of mini-projects is not simply a collection of discrete learningunits, but rather a scaffolded learning platform that is flexible enough to accommodate theindividual needs and desires of students. The use of such a
- tudes and beliefs teachers hold about cultural diversity and teaching culturally diverse students. Past and current projects include designing and teaching undergraduate and graduate-level coursework intended to help teachers develop effective science teaching practices and culturally relevant pedagogy for their classrooms, mentoring pre-service science teachers, working with in-service science teachers to develop and implement integrated STEM curricula, leading STEM integration professional development for in- service science teachers, working with administration and teachers to develop STEM programming in their schools, and developing a K-12 STEM observation protocol that can be used in a variety of educa- tional
energy balance, combustion chemistry (to place carbon dioxide effects in context),the status of climate change and predicted impacts, electrical energy systems, convergences withother energy consuming sectors (such as transportation, industry, and agriculture), deliverysystems and reliability considerations, and the latest statutes and policies governing energy. Thecourse concludes with each student giving a 10-minute presentation on a chosen conversiontechnology, arguing either for or against it. An abbreviated course syllabus is included inAppendix B.Given this knowledge and insights, students are then expected to allocate US $100 billion tovarious conversion technologies, acting as either U.S. government energy czars or as privateinvestment
to increase the representationof the Latinx population in engineering significantly.Faculty play a critical role in supporting students’ self-efficacy and self-regulated learning behaviors [3].For Latinx students, in particular, faculty support is a key factor in student retention [4]. Instructorssupport students by serving as role models, acting as mentors, and inspiring students. When educatorsmaintain these relationships, particularly outside the classroom, they contribute to higher studentsatisfaction and persistence to graduation [5]. However, not all faculty at HSIs share their students’ Latinxethnicity [6] and must find alternative means of developing relationships that support their students.To achieve this level of support for
Daniel Anastasio received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009. He is pursuing a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering at the University of Connecticut while acting as an in- structional specialist for the chemical engineering undergraduate laboratory. His research interests include osmotically driven membrane separations and engineering pedagogy.Dr. Aravind Suresh, University of Connecticut Page 23.718.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Improving Student Attitudes Toward the Capstone Laboratory Course Using
-Peñalvo and A. Bello and A. Dominguez and R. M. Romero Chacón, “Acciones, políticas y estrategias para el balance de género en el ámbito STEM: Resultados de una dinámica World Café,” Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), vol. 20, p. 15, Dec. 2019. e-ISSN:2444-8729, Doi: 10.14201/eks2019_20_a31 Appendix – Students interview protocolObjectives. To know about general aspects of the program. Specifically, a) to improve attractionand access to the program, b) to improve retention and decrease attrition, and c) to promotetimely qualification.Participants. Female students from the first, middle and last thirds of the program.A. Greeting and thanking the intervieweeB. Data of the interviewee: Name, graduation year
groups are encouragedto design meaningful experiments. In this process, the coordinator may be able to discover thosestudents with a high level of interest and enthusiasm. Some of these student-proposed experimentsmay be expanded/fine tuned into conceivable and practical entities. Several such experiments andtheir associated apparatuses that have been successfully conceived through the proposed approach arebriefly discussed. These case studies range from a simple and yet quite an ingenious experiment tothose that are novel and not commercially available. Elements of Group Dynamics and theinstrumental role of the coordinator in recognizing the capabilities and limitations of each group andhis/her necessary willingness to spend the time for
explanation for this is that, on average, faculty spend the most time with53 students, compared with staff, administrators, and advisors. For most courses offered in higher education,54 this time is at least three hours per week; for research mentoring, the faculty contact time can increase55 dramatically [12]. Classroom interactions between students and faculty have a significant potential to56 influence students’ graduation path [13]. Yet, concerning the instruction by faculty, engineering students57 reported that the quality of instruction in engineering was lower than in their non-engineering courses58 [14], [15]. A 2017 study by Gandhi-Lee et al. found that most faculty are unaware of actions that59 positively influence STEM
experience and the entry-level demands of the first six months in the workplace. Capstone design, as the culmination of anundergraduate program is one of the key places for creative leadership in the curriculum. Theresults of the study support the Capstone course as one of the major design experiences in thecurriculum.Once Capstone students graduate, the entry-level roles they have in the first six months’transition and the type of entry-level leadership that is required shifts even more heavily to theControl quadrant than in Capstone. Here, new employees are less likely to be asked to makemajor management contributions and are more likely to be expected to learn to act as newprofessionals, who monitor and coordinate the individual tasks they have
integration of material testing and prototyping equipment into both labs and coursework. She is pursuing her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research interests include identity development in engineering education, student voice and participation in engineering education, and pedagogical strategies for enhancing retention in engineering education.Dr. Heidi G. Loshbaugh, University of Colorado Boulder Heidi G. Loshbaugh, Ph.D., is passionate about higher education’s role in the public good. She has taught, conducted research, and served as a college administrator with a keen focus on equity. As a community college dean, she was PI for a $3.5M US Dept. of Ed. award to transform STEM
without truly realizing the problematic nature of their actions. StudentW (a Black woman) shared, “It’s not unintentional, but it’s not intentional small acts of racism,small comments that you make. You’re kind of unaware of it, but it’s just instilled within you…”The subtleness of microaggressions meant that students often second-guessed their own reactionsto the microaggression, or were quick to label microaggressive interactions as acts of curiosity asopposed to potential harms. For example, Student P (a Black woman) noted that if her classmatesasked questions about her identity they would preface anything potentially insulting with “no,I’m just asking.” Students within the study were often reluctant to label microaggressions asharmful, and
persistence and attrition.Figure 4: The relationship between ACT score and a student’s first term math grade (left) is muchclearer than the relationship between ACT score and a student’s likelihood of being retained (right).However, ACT scores by themselves not a good way to predict student retention. The size of thedot in the above plots corresponds to the number of students with those respective ACT scores.Additionally, we expect that as a semester gets underway and grades begin to accumulate, studentretention prediction will become more accurate. However, in this case, time and accuracy are trade-offs. Models that incorporate more data will be more accurate, but advisors and professors will losevaluable time which can be used to support and
feedback from student participants during Year 1. We present the results of thementorship strategies by year and include feedback from both student participants and facultymentors in the sections that follow.Year 1 Mentorship FeedbackStudent participants from Cohort A responded to ten question prompts at the end of the fallsemester. All feedback that program participants provided was positive. The ESP was describedby participants as “very thorough” and acted as a “bridge that covered the gap between classroomlecture/lab and individual interests”. Participants reported that they felt invited into this uniquecommunity and that the program components fostered community. Some students raised concernsregarding social awkwardness and finding a balance
Paper ID #26930Key Sociocultural Influences Shaping Latinx Students’ Pathways to Engi-neering/CS: An Ethnographic LensDr. Erika Mein, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Erika Mein is an Associate Professor of Literacy/Biliteracy Education and Associate Dean for Under- graduate Studies and Educator Preparation at the University of Texas at El Paso. Her scholarship focuses on disciplinary literacies in postsecondary contexts, with a particular emphasis on engineering identities and literacies among English Learners and bilingual students. Her research has been published in journals such as Theory into Practice, Action in
work with diverse groups of colleagues on authentic projects; to interact with clients, vendors,and industry mentors; to report to faculty who adopted roles as supervisors or managers as wellas learning facilitators; and to see projects through full design cycles provided both familiaritywith the kinds of situations students experienced at work and strategies for overcomingchallenges and negotiating contexts.As with any study, of course, the findings here are limited by their contexts. Participants weredrawn primarily from a single discipline, though to date no differences have emerged whencomparing the mechanical engineering graduates to the engineering science graduates. Perhapseven more importantly, the study itself acted as an intervention
preconstruction planning documentssuch as preliminary schedule, cost estimate, and site utilization plan. After delivering theirwritten deliverables in the evening, teams then give an oral presentation the following day to thepanel of industry judges. Participating in this intense competition offers significant benefits for the civilengineering program. First, a portion of the program’s graduates gain valuable exposure toindustry problems and strengthen their design, construction, and project management expertise.Second, the department benefits from networking with similar programs in the region. Third, andmost applicable for this paper, the department gains a core set of student leaders who will serve acritical role in the department’s
and Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). Kali’s research interests center on exploring the ex- periences of marginalized engineering students, with a particular focus on their hidden identity, mental health, and wellbeing. Her work aims to enhance inclusivity and diversity in engineering education, con- tributing to the larger body of research in the field.Gabriel Van Dyke, Utah State University Gabriel Van Dyke is a Graduate Student and Research Assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. His current research interests are engineering culture and applying cognitive load theory in the engineering classroom. He is currently working on an NSF
the case that student understanding of ethics ispoor, suggesting that there is a misalignment between ethics instruction and students’ ethical 6behavior [18]. Employers expect to hire engineering graduates with a wide range of professionalskills including the ability to identify and make appropriate decisions regarding ethical dilemmas[7], [19], [31]. Engineering as a field has not sufficiently focused on preparing graduates that candemonstrate ethical behavior as compared to other professions, which is especially concerninggiven the embedded social and political nature of engineering projects [5].Table 1: Article Selection Process
in thisarea [2]. Launched in 2014 and refined each semester subsequently, this training program isdesigned and delivered consistently with the literature on teaching workplace skills toundergraduate students.As a result, engineering students in the capstone course and business students in a businesscommunication course at the same university receive identical professional communicationtraining in teamwork skills, conflict management techniques, presentation skills, and teamleadership from the same communications instructor. The goal is to help students developprofessional skills considered essential by employers who hire new college graduates. Each year,the National Association of Colleges and Employers' (NACE) Job Outlook survey
narrative (in italics) on the prevailing conceptions and pre-dispositions ofthe student authors to working in engineering industry.The first author is a Senior in the Biomedical Engineering department who is a member of theAfrican American community. Her role in this study helped provide insight on the experiences ofa first-generation Black female engineer navigating the transition from higher education into theworkforce. In my engineering career thus far, I have worked in different research labs, as well as had two internships. I plan to go to graduate school to further my knowledge in materials research and then enter industry. In my future career, it is important that I work at a company that respects a work-life balance
satisfies these needs maynot be fully felt until much later than when the act of volunteerism occurred. This sense of valuing, orappreciation, seems to have a salient effect on the participants of this exploratory study. Additionally, theseveral “appreciation” interactions described by participants happened by chance, with participantsrandomly interacting with students in settings outside of the volunteerism scenarios.Future WorkGiven that this work is situated in a larger study, future work consists of analyzing the obtainedinterviews from students at the graduate level. Once the interviews have been coded using the VFI, weplan to look at the results within and between academic levels. In addition to looking at the results withinand between levels
privileged beliefs and the impact on our top threeprogram goals to (1) illustrate the diversity of engineering, (2) engage students in human-centered activities that promote collaboration, and (3) nurture each students’ potential to becomean engineer.Researchers’ PositionalitySince critical reflection requires elements of self-reflection to interrogate ones’ belief system, itis important for us to provide positionality statements as the foundation of our analyticalperspectives.KaylaAs a Graduate Assistant in Engineering Education, I focus my research on improving the cultureof engineering to support the engagement of diverse learners. As a straight, cisgender, multiracialfemale, I recognize that although my racial and gender identities position me
in meeting the challenges of a globalized world. The destruction of the artificialdichotomy between engineering and humanity engendered by a “mentor-focused” pedagogy will,by definition, produce more holistic graduates.31Every course should have a global focusWhile the shibboleth of interdisciplinary cooperation has already been broached, it is incumbentupon faculty and curriculum committees to expand their focus on this subject if the challenge ofglobalization is going to be met by this generation.32 The time for offering an olive branch to theSocial Sciences Department, and likeminded colleagues, is long past – engineering departmentsmust be willing to throw them a tow line and haul them into the boat.Integration, however, is not an act of
that extensive foundation focused on systems thinking and systems dynamics, including low fidelity modeling. Our new program's top-level goal lies in developing student competencies for effective systems thinking across a broad range of domains alongside the ability to express and test understanding within modeling software in the context of human-made systems. The program is a type of systems engineering program that appears to be emerging in some universities across the United States. The MichTech BSE degree program is an ABET-accredited degree program under the ABET general criteria. One role BSE fills in our college is to act as an incubator for new engineering degree programs. The systems engineering program we
abstract thinking skills, further bolsters this methodology in engineeringdesign. Moreover, ethics will play a crucial role in establishing contemporary designmethodologies that prioritize transparency and agency between humans, nature, and complexartificial intelligence systems.In 2023, qualitative results spanning an eight-year period were examined to evaluate the impactof teaching a Holistic Engineering (HE) pedagogy. This pedagogy encompasses a HolisticDesign Thinking (HDT) methodology enriched with extensive transdisciplinary knowledge [17].The investigation included instruction at both the postsecondary and secondary levels.Specifically, feedback was obtained from undergraduate and graduate students who wereenrolled in separate HE