. Findingsof the study are used to develop a model for teaching preparation and practice at for-profit, non-traditional universities.The third study deals with developing and testing a longitudinal model synthesized fromthe literature to (a) investigate the associations on persistence for nontraditional studentsattending nontraditional institutions, (b) assist staff, faculty, and administratorsimplement high quality intervention strategies, and (c) refocus institutional resourcestoward enhancing student persistence. Data were collected in a three-step process over a5-year period. Results yielded significant differences between students who persisted totheir second year or not and those who graduated or not within 5 years. Further analysesindicated
country, and being an international graduate student, she has witnessedfirsthand the systemic issues that women and international students face in engineering. Theseexperiences have ignited a deep passion for transforming engineering education into a space thatis more inclusive, equitable, and just. She brings her personal journey to her work, recognizingthat her identity and lived experiences inform how she engages with literature and theperspectives she brings to her research. This awareness drives her commitment to criticallyreflect on and challenge the structures that perpetuate inequities in the field.The second author is a first generation college student and an International Black woman,studying to obtain a doctoral degree in Engineering
discussion rent sessions sections, managing laboratory classes, or handling office hours. 55 min each In the second session, participants choose one of the following topics: teaching problem solving, grading, or handling office hours. Undergraduate Teaching Orientation Graduate Teaching Orientation Practice In small groups (5-7), participants take turns delivering a five-minute explanation on a Teaching topic of their choice. Peers and one trained facilitator act as students during the lesson, 2 hrs then provide written and oral feedback on the teaching.Table 1: Engineering teaching orientations during the Fall of 2017.As seen in Table 1, the new instructor
questions thatexplore the role of disciplinary culture in engineering education. Participation by engineeringdepartments at partner universities will yield results grounded in a variety of institutionalcontexts.Consequently, the intellectual merit of this proposal lies in its ability to develop a theory todescribe relationships between disciplinary culture and the outcomes of engineering education;this theory can then inform targeted curricular interventions to enhance the innovative andcollaborative abilities of engineering students. This theory would have explanatory power for arange of characteristics of engineering students and programs, from the difficulties students facewhen dealing with unstructured, open-ended design problems, to the
context of research involvement, positively influencedstudents’ success by fostering the development of students’ scientific identity and their beliefs intheir own abilities [8,9]. In addition, adequate socioemotional and culturally relevant mentoringseems to play an important role for the positive development of underrepresented students in thiscontext (e.g., first-generation college-going students) [10]. Unfortunately, these studies did notinvestigate the impact of faculty mentoring for transfer students in particular, leaving a gap inknowledge as to whether transfer students would benefit from these additional beneficialoutcomes as well.Apart from faculty mentoring, research also indicates that peer interaction and peer mentoringseems to
asked to wear a lapel microphone. Audio/video recording wasdone to capture the participants as they verbally worked through the problem, as well as, to showwhat participants were reading, drawing, and so on. The documents used in administering theproblem were colored to help the observer differentiate between information (blue), problemdefinition (yellow) and student work (white).Three hours were allotted for students to complete the design task, although the average studentcompleted the problem prior to the administrator stopping the session. During the participant’sdesign session, a member of the research team acted as the administrator of the problem. Theadministrator provided the students with a physical copy of the design task and read it
postsecondary education.The purpose of this paper is to present a review of literature to elucidate systemic and personalbarriers that hinder the success of students with disabilities in engineering, along with promisingpractices for overcoming those barriers and needs for additional research. The search wasconducted using EBSCOHost Academic Search Complete and ProQuest using combinations ofterms related to engineering education, STEM education, and students with disabilities.Disability on College CampusesThe Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments (2009) define disability as “(a) a physical ormental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of such individual;(b) a record of such an impairment; or (c) being regarded as
-regulation4,6. Furthermore, there is aninherent connection between the self, motivational theories, and personal fulfillment. Ryan8identified the role of the self in intrinsic motivation, emphasizing that “the more fully one adoptsa social value or prescription, the more it is identified with the self, and the more it is performedor acted on with a sense of autonomy and personal commitment” (p. 216).Through this work, we propose a pedagogical approach that would add value to students’learning experiences through reflective self-discovery, as well as offer a research opportunity toinvestigate students’ sense of self and inform teaching practice. Our pedagogical approach andresearch method consists of a two-part series of workshops designed as a
, students begin to demonstrate SDL in terms of questioning theworth or value of certain assignments and deciding for themselves if or how much effort to putin. Students also begin to see themselves as “in control” of their learning and development.Choice now includes topics for assignments or projects, teammates, and even project goals.Ability to reflect develops alongside autonomy and ownership, and sometimes the surveys orfocus groups themselves act as an “interventions” that enable students to reflect on theirdevelopment towards self-directed learning.While many factors play a role in the development of SDL, time not surprisingly seems to be afactor. Entering freshmen carry with them expectations from their K-12 experiences and thatrepeated
Bergom is a PhD candidate at the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan.Mr. Brian A. Burt, University of Michigan Brian A. Burt is a Ph.D. candidate in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education (CSHPE) at the University of Michigan. His scholarly interests include graduate student learning, reten- tion and persistence, STEM education, and the Black student experience. His current research explores what doctoral students learn from research experiences and how their experiences influence perceptions of and preparation for the professoriate.Dr. Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan Lisa R. Lattuca is Professor of Education at the University of
to increase the number of low-income, academically talented students with demonstrated financial need who begin theirengineering education at two Hispanic-Serving California Community Colleges; transfer to ahighly-selective, predominantly white public institution; and then are retained in and graduatewith a B.S. degree in engineering, and enter the STEM workforce or graduate program. Thebroader project also seeks to transform our institutions and the relationships between them toprioritize transfer student success via the utilization of the Essential Transfer Practicesframework created by the Community College Research Center at Teachers College and theAspen Institute [1]. The identified Essential Transfer Practices are designed to
known as NetworkFellows (NF), who oversee communication between sites and document, plan, and implementprojects for network and site level activities. In practice, the AF team’s work is focused intenselyon planning the Assembly, while the NF team does its work continuously over a semester-longtimescale. The NF team is the focus of our study in this paper.The NF team is made up of student representatives from each site in Access. They are given astipend that is compensation for their work during their semester-long tenure. The NF teamincludes both undergraduate and graduate students, usually at a 2:1 ratio, respectively. Studentswho serve in this role may also be involved in their own site leadership; some NFs have gone onto become members of
significant differences in the clusters of attitudesselected by male vs. female students; there were not significant differences in the number ofpeople attitudes selected by students in different majors (Kruskal-Wallis sig. 0.404); there was asignificant difference between majors for the number of work attitudes selected as characteristicof themselves (Kruskal-Wallis sig. 0.002; environmental average 1.3 vs. civil average 1.8, post-hoc adjusted significance 0.015).The results indicate that personally individuals select a more balanced set of people-oriented andquality work attitudes, in contrast to the quality work attitudes that most believed dominatedengineers’ attitudes. This difference could be due to the persistence of long-held stereotypes
meaningful relationships between a community of scholars.V.A. Increasing students’ access to opportunities and enhancing students’ human capabilitiesOver the last few years, the Engineering Education Research Group and STS Program leadershave regularly conversed and mutually supported one another. This community metsemi-regularly over the Summer of 2020 to process the pandemic, consider its influence on ourlives and our communities, and envision new activities for the STS program. The pandemicmade it strikingly clear to us the lack of social infrastructure for meeting people’s basic needs forfood, health care, shelter, and utilities. We talked about the uncompassionate and inhumaneexpectations being placed on workers and the disregard for human life
Review Board at Stevens.Informed consent was obtained, and a sports medicine physician screened the health historiesprior to participation. A study proposal was prepared to satisfy all legal entities that the research,involving human subjects, would protect the privacy of the subjects, that it would be safe, andthat it would be worthy of the use of human subjects.Six students participated as part time research assistants. The researchers were initially trainedand subsequently mentored throughout the study by the Principal Investigator and the MedicalAdvisor, both of whom were Biomedical Engineering faculty. Five were undergraduates and onewas a graduate student. The graduate student performed the role of Investigator, and utilized thebody
Paper ID #42943A Systematized Literature Review on Problem-Solving in STEM EducationExploring the Impact of Task Complexity on Cognitive Factors and StudentEngagementMr. Zain ul Abideen, Utah State University Zain ul Abideen is a Graduate Research Assistant and Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU). With an undergraduate degree in Computer Engineering and a Master’s in Engineering Management, coupled with over 12 years of teaching experience with undergraduate engineering students, Zain is currently dedicated to pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at USU in Logan
experiences, new types of pressures may impact both students and their families. Toidentify some of the pressures that should be anticipated when introducing a new program, thisexploratory case study focused on the hopes, concerns, and fears of the first cohort of studentsenrolled in the first semester of a pilot program at the Purdue Polytechnic Institute – a new multi-disciplinary, hands-on, competency-based program. Since students do not act in isolation,additional considerations are given to expectations and concerns of their parents, and facultyresponse to those concerns. Students and parents were surveyed, and in-depth interviews wereconducted with both students and faculty. Qualitative and quantitative analyses found that whilethe majority of
applying it as a change agent.Students had to produce an integrating final project in one semester (around 18 weeks), andboth students and instructors pointed out that, at the end of the whole degree program,students were not ready to undertake a high caliber project which incorporated much learning,skills, and professional attitudes.Responding to that problem, the university introduced a Capstone Course in systemsengineering in the mid 1980s. It came in the next to last semester of the program, just beforethe student thesis and graduation. Lasting 17 weeks, the course required students to developan intervention for improvement in an administrative system, aimed at integrating andapplying methods and skills learned along the way. Thus students
students to help us explore potential socially engageddimensions in the test scenarios. In this phase, six graduate engineers participated. Demographicinformation is omitted here to protect anonymity. Each interview lasted between 1-2 hours, andeach participant was presented with 2-6 projects, averaging 1.5 hours and 3 projects perparticipant. Each project was presented in the prescribed task format of the problem statementfirst, and then the solution presentation. The purpose of these interviews was twofold: 1) to testour selected scenarios to ensure they elicited responses related to a range of potential engineeringconsiderations, and 2) to inform our understanding of what experienced engineers might addressin the scenarios, particularly social
often rivals reality. We tend to express our expectations of in-dividuals in entrepreneurial action with contentment, anger, frustration, confusion, and grati-tude in different ways. In seeing how men and women respond to a CEO/founder's behavior,we discover how interpersonal perceptions matter. Recent engineering graduates tell us thatthey learn about themselves by observing and listening to all sides of the story, and then theyfill in the blanks. One student, after interning as an innovation development lead explains, “Isee conflicts that I would never had expected to arise among co-workers, and some internalconflicts in my attempt to reconcile the rulebook and my own conscience. I struggle withpeople I work with in ways that may harm our
facilitators andcreated three groups– each with two Faculty Fellows from different disciplines, three StudentFellows, and visiting student and PI faculty facilitators. Two of the Student Fellows in eachgroup had been brought into the project by a Faculty Fellow; the third was unaffiliated witheither Faculty Fellow. This was intended to help facilitate the development of interdisciplinaryconversations. Mines PIs and Student Fellows spent significant time with this material inadvance of the event. With that preparation, Student Fellows took a primary role in promptingconversation, making the workshop space more than just another conversation between faculty.With support from Mines PIs and visiting faculty facilitators, Student Fellows led FacultyFellows
the betterment of society.A project based at Ryerson University – empowering girls, themselves, to create a female-inclusive engineering identity – gave us the insight and model for our paper. The projectinvolved two components: a branding project, led by graduate students enrolled in theProfessional Communication program at Ryerson’s Faculty of Communication and Design; anda youth think tank, comprised of 36 female teenagers from high schools in the Greater TorontoArea. The project – part of the collaborative partnership WEMADEIT – was envisioned byfaculty and staff from Ryerson University’s Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science(FEAS), and by Groundswell, a youth engagement and communications firm, which hereinreferred to as “the
introduce underrepresented,underprivileged high school students (mentees) to engineering and help them prepare for thechallenges of an undergraduate engineering degree program. DREAM has three main goals thathave evolved and come into focus over the four years of the program’s existence. First, DREAMseeks to change mentees’ perceptions of what is possible, leading them to a better quality of lifethrough college education and subsequent rewarding and lucrative engineering and STEMcareers. Second, DREAM prepares mentees for the rigors of undergraduate STEM education byforming connections between engineering applications and high school classes, and promotingenrollment in upper-level math and science courses. Third, DREAM prepares mentees for
; Sons, Ltd, 2015, pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0171.[9] A. Godwin and A. Kirn, “Identity-based motivation: Connections between first-year students’ engineering role identities and future-time perspectives,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 362–383, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20324.[10] M. Tsugawa, “Testing an Identity-Based Motivation Conceptual Framework for Engineering Graduate Students,” Ph.D., University of Nevada, Reno, United States -- Nevada, 2019. Accessed: Mar. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2384227469/abstract/773096F1405F46C9PQ/1[11] D. Lindstrom, “From Community College Faculty to Dean: Using Schlossberg’s Transition Theory to Understand the Transition Experience
pot to “Toughie,” a welded scooter for a student’s young daughter.The PRL is sustained by its community of four key faculty, about 20 graduate student CourseAssistants (CAs), and a broad population of students from the arts, engineering, humanities, andsocial and physical sciences. The CAs play a special role in the community as design and makingcoaches [24]. Through everyday interactions in the makerspace, newcomers and long-timemembers of the PRL form a rich fabric of continuously evolving and renewing social relations.The aim of this study is to describe this social and cultural fabric and how it shapes student’sparticipation in the makerspace community of practice.4. METHODSWe take an inductive approach to understanding how students
acquires knowledge, gains experience todevelop needed skills, and adopts professional values that lead to a successful start in their career[15]. In essence, students should be able to answer three questions as they progress through theprofessional socialization process: 1) What do I do with the skills learned? 2) What am I supposed to look like, and how should I act in my professional field? 3) What do I, as a professional, look like to other professionals as I perform my new roles? [17].Researchers have offered multiple and complex conclusions around professional socializationand its contribution to identity formation [18, 19]. Several studies have used the framework toexplore undergraduate
that it requires a strong background in math and physics. Most engineeringmajors need help along the way with their studies, including me.)Competing responsibilities. Almost a quarter of the students expressed that they felt challengedby competing responsibilities. As a result of the financial need they experienced, studentsreflected on their need to work and provide for themselves while balancing an academic career: Ihad to work part-time while balancing my schoolwork. I had difficulty balancing myresponsibilities and managing my time, so I had to make tough decisions where I needed tochoose between taking less classes or working less hours. Other students mentioned a plethora ofdifferent responsibilities they need to manage, including work
. College students tell stories about the engineer who decided to step down as CEOwith vivid action shots of emotion and stunning motivational characterizations. The story ofthe leader is brimming with both the need for achievement, including images about thechallenge to make/do great engineering work and themes of innovation, and with a desire todo it over and over again. The tension is that obstacles emerge along the way in studentstories when there is a collision between needs – like the need to achieve with the need foraffiliation or high need for performance with a pessimistic inclination as they struggle to finda system for repeatable success. One example of the tension is in a story a woman wroteabout Jessica: “After graduating
identifications cannot possibly be playing a role [31]. Meritocratic ideologies supportindustrial capitalism’s long-standing stratified wage structures and vice versa. For example, theidea of engineering classrooms as inclusive, tolerant sites of learning fully shaped by DEIintentions makes complete sense of divergent educational opportunities across communities: noteveryone can be an engineer, in every sense of those words. If we are unbiased, the absence ofBlack students from graduate programs in STEM, say, can only be explained by the intellectualand behavioral deficits of absent persons. That is, the “post-racial” U.S. need worry no moreabout anti-Black, misogynistic, anti-trans or other social-structural “flaws” and accepts that somepersons will
Hitachi or Toshiba nor even university graduates employed in engineering positions. Engineering education was most congruent with the new metric of progress when it effectively de-‐emphasized the identities of graduates qua engineers. Global engineering education to provide protective competencies The neatness of this relationship between experiences in engineering education and lifetime employment within a corporate household began to erode with increased multi-‐national flow of major Western corporations. The image of economic competitiveness was not itself felt as news across Japan. What was news was the scale and scope that the expansion of