publications. Evelyn is not only outstanding in teaching and research, but also in service. She recently received the 2013 Chair’s Award for Outstanding Service in the Department of Computer System Tech- nology.Ms. Nina Exner, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University Nina Exner is a research librarian at North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University and a doctoral pre-candidate in information science at UNC-CH. Her research and publishing history centers around researcher emergence, practitioner-researcher information needs, and mentoring.Dr. Sherry F AbernathyDr. Rajeev K Agrawal, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Rajeev Agrawal has been teaching in the Department of Computer
elevate naturalisticand child-centered learning.” By sharing and testing their expertise with college engineeringstudents through the service-learning project, museum staff from multiple departments have theopportunity to practice communicating about the museum and guiding a design process. Throughthe years, The DoSeum exhibits, education, guest service, and operations departments havesupported this project. The DoSeum staff have participated as part of the team that goes to thecollege to pitch the opportunity to the students and test their proposals and prototypes, as part ofthe staff that works with the college faculty and students to produce the product testing event,and as part of the team who judges and recognizes the best student
-based learning (PBL) and general engineering industry concepts (problemsolving, professional practices, and quality control) to guide literary research and analysis andcontinuously improve students’ written, oral, and visual communication (WOV) skills, as well astheir abilities to understand new social, political, and economic contexts, an important criterionof EC 2000. In short, this strategy presents students with a problem: determine the best Americanfiction of a particular year. The faculty member then guides students through literary researchpractices, and a formal call for proposal process. She divides the class into teams, and each teamproposes a selection of texts to read during the semester. After the winning proposal is selected,the
, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. Kenneth Reid, Virginia Tech Kenneth Reid is the Assistant Department Head for Undergraduate Programs in Engineering Education at Virginia
experience with Ford Motor Company’s Interactive Conceptual Design and Ap- plications lab. Dr. Moore was instrumental in developing cobots - a novel human-robot collaborative technology for applications requiring humans to work in physical contact with robots. His research in- terests include robot-based 3D printing, haptic interface design and control, and teleoperation. Through grants from NASA and NSF, Dr. Moore is preparing students for STEM-related fields and developing success strategies for undergraduate and graduate STEM majors. He is also a member of the NASA SMD Bridge Workshop Organizing Committee. Dr. Moore has published 22 papers in robotics, graduated 12 graduate students, and been awarded nearly $11.0
.& Laverty, J. (2000). “Effects of career preperation experiences onthe initial employment success of college graduates”, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 41 No.6, pp. 753- 767. 16. Domal, V. Stappenbelt , B. & Trevelyan, J. (2008). “Professional development at university: Student perceptions of professional engineering practice”, In The Australian Association for Engineering Education 2008 Annual Conference. 17. Matusovich, H. Strveler, R. & Miller, R. (2010). “Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students‟ Motivational Values”. Journal of Engineering Education, October, pp. 289-303. 18. Paolillo, J. & Estes, R. (1982). “An
students designed for seeding entrepreneurship and researching technologies thathave direct impact on local communities in Montana by partnering with non-profit organizations,as well as public and private high technology companies. It is a platform that provides thenecessary processes and environment to deliver real products. It is about learning, sharing andgrowing entrepreneurial ideas that span the causal chain from inception to deployment, but notcommercialization. The Software Factory brings together students and experiencedprofessionals enabling unique cooperative projects that serve as incubation points for new ideasand technology innovation. The idea of a Software Factory approach for MSU was developed by working in
between academic theory and real world practice. Accordingly, the proposedsenior projects should include elements of both credible analysis and experimental proofing asdiscussed in ABETs criteria6. The senior design project can serve as an excellent culminatingexperience in the program of study when it focuses on research and design projects that have Page 24.632.4practical value to consumers or to industry. For the Drexel’s College of Engineering’s ETprogram at our university, the senior design course is a year-long educational journey (threequarters) that takes an idea generated by a student team or an industrial sponsor and culminatesin a
offer courses on Eclipse-based MBD of embedded system, only the graduate school in Chinese Science Academy hasopened a research course recently as far as best knowledge.5. ConclusionMBD is cost effective for developing complex and reliable-critical embedded systems. Thispaper presents our teaching experiences of integrating this new MBD paradigm into a system-level Programming Tools course for CE and EE students. It mainly describes two new topicsintegrated to this PT course: MBD concepts and eclipse-based software tools supporting MBD,from the course materials preparation and instruction approaches two aspects. In the future,students and our teachers will together create and gather more capstone projects related to MBDby means of eclipse-based
Paper ID #40912Game-Based Immersive Learning for Education: Empowering Autistic HighSchool Students to Address the Growing Cyber Threats in K-12 SchoolsKaren N Nix, Auburn University Karen Nix is a PhD student at Auburn University, Samuel Ginn College of Engineering. She received a bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from LaGrange College and a master’s degree in Computer Science with a concentration of Software Development from Columbus State University. She works as a Graduate Teaching Assistant at Auburn University and recently began work for the City of Opelika, AL in the IT department as Assistant CIO. Her research
schedules in fall and spring semesters. More details on creating theSTEP Cohorts can be found elsewhere [3].We survey students placed in cohorts at the end of each fall semester. A significant majority ofthe students reports in the survey that they have studied with other students in their cohortsoutside the classroom. Our graduating seniors have told us that the relationship they developedwith others students in the study groups which they formed during the first-year, carry over tosenior capstone design project.Factors Supporting Institutionalizing STEP at Western Michigan UniversityIn order to make lasting impacts to support student success in engineering, the best practicesidentified by projects supported by the National Science Foundation need
the practice of service learning in the communities, with all the challenges thatgrassroots engineering brings with itself, providing the students with the opportunity to learnfrom more experimented grassroots engineers’ practice; iv) on the feedback given by the team’sstaff on the individual and/or group performance.Most undergraduate students used to be granted an extension scholarship (from UFRJ) during atleast a part of the time they spent at Soltec’s activities. This financial support, in addition to thecompelling ideals of grassroots engineering, motivate undergrads in engaging at Soltec’sprojects. For the graduate students, participation at Soltec’s interventions is usually part of theirmain research project, building a strong
received NAE’s Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder DANIEL W. KNIGHT is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from the Louisiana State University, and an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of retention, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education.Diane Sieber, University of Colorado, Boulder DIANE SIEBER is an
Professor of Information Systems in the College of Engineering and Information Technology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). Dr. Lutters serves as one of the inaugural STRIDE fellows in addition to a role on the ADVANCE Executive committee and advisory boards for the Center for Women in Technology (CWIT) and the Honors College. Dr. Lutters’ research interests are at the nexus of computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW), social computing, and social informatics. He specializes in field studies of IT-mediated work, from a socio-technical perspective, to better inform the design and evaluation of collaborative systems. Recent projects have included cyberinfrastructure for e-Science
women in tenure-track appointments have ever been promoted to associateand/or full professor. Among them, about 10 have received promotion to full professor. Untilrecently, practices used to evaluate faculty research and teaching accomplishments had notaligned well with either the OSU promotion and tenure (P&T) Guidelines or the COE strategicplan. Such misalignment made it difficult to ensure a fair and proper evaluation and also limitedany potential for guiding faculty energy in ways that best serve our mission-specific activities.For example, academia has institutionalized a number of barriers to collaboration, and these areespecially apparent to untenured faculty. Establishing independence as a researcher is oftenprioritized over
Dakota School of Mines and Technology for over 5 years before joining Carnegie Mellon as a Teaching Faculty in 2016. Dr. Be- dillion’s research interests include distributed manipulation, control applications in data storage, control applications in manufacturing, and STEM education.Dr. Marsha Lovett, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Marsha Lovett is Associate Vice Provost of Teaching Innovation, Director of the Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation, and Teaching Professor of Psychology – all at Carnegie Mellon University. She applies theoretical and empirical principles from learning science research to improve teaching and learning. She has published more than fifty articles in this area, co
into being would offer strategies to otherfaculty who develop new courses, and for some that these might be innovative approaches thatwould ease course development. Thus, the purpose of the research reported here is to chroniclethe development of a course in real-time, embedded-systems networking. As such, this paper notonly offers a strategy for developing courses, but also suggests what such a course mightincorporate.RESEARCH METHODSThe research process followed ethnographic traditions commonly used by culturalanthropologists: enter the field being studied and become an observer of everyday activity there,capture the activity, who participates in it, and where it takes place through field notes taken overthe course of the activity studied
Paper ID #43175Board 429: Work in Progress: Capacity-Building for Change Through FacultyCommunities Exploring Data and Sharing Their StoriesDr. Amy B Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana Amy B. Chan Hilton, PhD, PE is the Director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning and a Professor of Engineering at the University of Southern Indiana. Her interests include faculty and organizational development, learning analytics, teaching innovations, and storytelling for institutional change. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Capacity-Building for Change Through
professional skillslike communication and lifelong learning in order to adapt to the needs of their industry.However, graduates hired in computer engineering and electronics frequently lack the abilitydesired by employers to concisely communicate their designs and technical results [4]. Forexample, Campi and colleagues researched communication skills in a project-basedMicroelectronics course designed to simulate an industrial environment [4]. This study wasdriven by the need for professionals in the microelectronics engineering industry to be able toreport individual, specialized work to team members and supervisors. The authors emphasizethat communication "becomes even more important when the graduate has to face, in the courseof his/her professional
2006-2554: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CURRICULUM TO INSTILLENGINEERING LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT SKILLS INUNDERGRADUATE STUDENTSAna Ferreras, University of Central Florida Ana Ferreras is a Ph.D. student at the University of Central Florida in the department of Industrial Engineering & Management Systems. She holds a Master of Science degree in Engineering Management from Florida Institute of Technology and a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering from University of Central Florida. Ana holds a 6-Sigma Black Belt certification from the Harrington Group, and she has worked as a Radio Frequency Design Engineer for almost two years. Her research focuses on Engineering Management, Quality
interest inengineering. Not only do makerspaces offer chances for young students to engage in engineeringendeavors in creative ways, but makerspaces have shown great potential in addressing broadergoals of education, such as the augmentation of first-year engineering student retention. Much ofthe research on makerspace impacts and practices have focused on K-12 and informal education.Little is known about how a well-designed, makerspace-based engineering course can addressbarriers to first-year students’ persistence in engineering, such as the interest in engineering barrierfocused on in this paper.Research also suggest that the makerspace movement provides a beneficial opportunity forstudent development of interests and identity. The structure of
. 5–6, pp. 351–357, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11251-008-9059-4.[9] E. Soloway et al., “Learning Theory in Practice: Case Studies of Learner-centered Design,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, 1996, pp. 189–196. doi: 10.1145/238386.238476.[10] A. Briliyanti, J. Rojewski, T. J. Van Nguyen, K. Luchini-Colbry, and D. Colbry, “The CyberAmbassador Training Program,” in Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (learning), New York, NY, USA, Jul. 2019, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1145/3332186.3332218.[11] A. Briliyanti, J. W. Rojewski, D. J. L. Colbry, and K. Luchini-Colbry, “STEMAmbassadors: Developing Communications
for coordinating instructional technologies to reinforce learning and the recruitment and retention of a diverse student body.Kathy Schmidt, University of Texas, Austin KATHY J. SCHMIDT is the Director of the Faculty Innovation Center for the Cockrell School of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. In this position, she promotes the School's commitment to finding ways to enrich teaching and learning. She works in all aspects of education including design and development, faculty training, learner support, and evaluation.Wonsoon Park, University of Texas, Austin WONSOON PARK is a doctoral student in the College of Education at the University of Texas at Austin
hones students’ skills in soliciting community stakeholderfeedback in order to generate innovative solutions. In PFE I, students are introduced toengineering and ethical best practices, as well as various career opportunities. In PFE II, studentsare further introduced to careers in technology development, research, and academia. Studentstour engineering labs, experience faculty guest lectures, and consider how to solicit and integratecommunity stakeholder perspectives as they generate solutions to engineering-related problems.Finally, in PFE III, students learn how to use ethical engineering principles to create designs thatmeet societal needs. In each PFE I–III course, about 50 out-of-class hours are allocated forworking on students’ capstone
), retail, and high-rise building construction—Professor Buyones brings a wealth of practical knowledge to his teaching. His primary research interests are focused on education and innovation in construction, the application of artificial intelligence within the construction industry, and construction management.Dr. Monica Quezada-Espinoza, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Monica Quezada-Espinoza is a professor and researcher at the School of Engineering at the Universidad Andres Bello in Santiago, Chile, where currently collaborates with the Educational and Academic Innovation Unit, UNIDA (for its acronym in Spanish), as an instructor in active learning methodologies. Her research interest topics involve university
. Solnosky is also a licensed Professional Engineer in PA. Ryan is also an advisor for Penn State’s National AEI Student Competition teams. His research interests include: integrated structural design methodologies and processes; Innovative methods for enhancing engineering education; and high performing wall enclosures. These three areas look towards the next generation of building engineering, including how systems are selected, configured and designed.John J Phillips (Architectural Engineering Associate Professor) Professor of Architectural Engineering at Oklahoma State University, focusing in analysis, design, and construction of building structures. © American Society for Engineering Education
Learning. Journal of College Student Development, 59(1), 55-70.10. Matthews, M. (2017). Keeping students in engineering: A research-to-practice brief. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved from the American Society for Engineering Education Website: https://www.asee.org/retention-project/keeping-students-in-engineering-a-research- guide-to-improvingretention11. NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). (2011). The Nation’s Report Card: Mathematics 2011 (Report No. NCES 2012-458). Retrieved from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education Website: https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/ 2012458.pdf12. Palmer, R., and Gasman, M. (2008). It Takes a Village to Raise a
education institutions, and the potentialimpacts of considering OR theories for engineering education.Introduction Resilience is a complex concept analyzed by the literature and can be defined as the“ability to recover from or adjust easily to misfortune or change”2. Since the COVID-19pandemic shocked the world, various research has been developed to understand and reflect onthis phenomenon. One scope of this research analyzes the educational context, and how highereducation institutions responded in their practices while learning about external shocks. Whilesome universities suffered from this unexpected disastrous scenario, some were sufficientlyprepared to smoothly pivot to the obligated online modality to learn and teach. This
teamwork, communication, data analysis and problem solving [16].Additionally, a recent review of international literature identifying skills needed by graduate andfuture engineers found teamwork and communication skills to be among the top five mostemphasized skills [17]. Despite the body of evidence that should inspire engineering and other STEM faculty toincorporate collaborative activities in their courses, lasting changes in teaching practice havebeen slow to take place [2], [18]. Fairweather [2] noted that faculty perceive curricular changewill take valuable time away from research activities critical to promotion and tenure. This is notnecessarily the case, as barriers to change for STEM faculty have been researched and
, and Staff Perceptions Amir Hedayati-Mehdiabadi1, PhD Elizabeth A. Moschella-Smith2, PhD MA Mala Htun1, PhD1 University of New Mexico2 Prevention Innovations Research Center, University of New Hampshire Abstract In recent years, the adverse impacts of harassment on career outcomes of women andracial minorities in academic engineering has been increasingly recognized. The way individualsdefine harassment has important implications for designing prevention programs and the abilityof the engineering community to recognize and address this issue