third is aset of specific sustainability principles, which provide the foundation for the vision and the road map.More details on these three elements, which are described next, can be found in [20].A Vision for Built Environment SustainabilityA vision for Built Environment Sustainability (BES) has three levels: a global level, an industry level,and a project level visions. At each level, there are questions that could be answered through research,problems and needs that could be solved and satisfied through design and construction, opportunitiesthat could be realized through entrepreneurship, and aspirations that can be fulfilled through practice,outreach, service, education, and/or research. The full vision for BES offers an initial
environmental ethics and bioethics, focusing on questions of ethics, science, and representation. He teaches a wide variety of undergraduate and graduate courses on related topics.Dr. Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University, West Lafayette Andrew O. Brightman is an Associate Professor of Engineering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomed- ical Engineering at Purdue University where he serves as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs. His re- search background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He and his multidisciplinary team are committed to developing effective pedagogy and tools for enhancing ethical reasoning skills for innovative engineering design and socially responsible engineering
competenciesrequired to pursue STEM careers in academic, industry or government settings. The program focuses oninterdisciplinary scientific areas that are considered a high national priority, and within them, educationand training models that are considered innovative, evidence-based, and aligned with workforce andresearch needs. In doing so, the program emphasizes broad and diverse participation fromunderrepresented groups; seeks catalyzes institutional capacity building; and encourages strategiccollaboration with industry, national research labs, and academic partners.In NSF’s portfolio of graduate training programs, that NRT Program took the place of the IntegrativeGraduate Education and Research Traineeship Program (IGERT). For many years, the IGERT
added questions to explore issues of creativity,innovation, aesthetics, teaming and organizational approaches. The survey tool is shown infigure 8. Each survey issue was rated according to the ease and/or difficulty that the individual Page 25.162.6 Issue A little Somewhat A lot 1 2 3 4 5 Impact of R and D in generating successful design Opportunity for innovative concepts Role that aesthetics played in the design Utility of design documentation to construct
student development of these skills.While freshmen-level bioengineering courses include scientific, biological, chemical, physical,mathematical, and engineering principles, students struggle to understand how these conceptsintegrate as a whole in the field of bioengineering, in part due to the broad nature of the field(ranging from medical to environmental applications). With time, greater appreciation for thefield occurs well into their senior years (i.e., capstone design) but may limit the amount of timethat students can nurture these specialized skills before graduation. Therefore, by offering moreopportunities to foster research-related skills (hypothesis formulation, dataanalysis/interpretation, oral communication) early in their education
Paper ID #18081Successful Teaming Characteristics Revealed in an Intensive Design Experi-enceMr. Rodney Boehm, Texas A&M University Rodney Boehm is the Director of Engineering Entrpreneurship and an Associate Professor of Practice in the Texas A&M University College of Engineering. He has broad industry experiences, including over 30 years in all aspects of the telecommunications industry (sales, marketing, manufacturing, business de- velopment, and technical design), the creation of a telecommunications standard (SONET - Synchronous Optical Network) for the fiber optics industry that is still in use
- structors during game-based learning activities, and how these practices affected student motivation. His research interests include engineering faculty development, student motivation, game-based teaching and learning, gamified classrooms, and engineering faculty collaborations around the scholarship of teach- ing and learning. He is currently the Associate Director for Educational Innovation and Impact at the University of Georgia’s Engineering Education Transformations Institute.Dr. Ella Lee Ingram, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Ella L. Ingram is an Associate Professor of Biology and Director of the Center for the Practice and Schol- arship of Education at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her educational
students will understand increasinglycomplex content and concepts by learning, practicing and applying engineering design, thinkingand skills.The three goals of the research are achieved through a three-year incremental deploymentcoordinated with the formative assessments. The ICE-HS framework, shown in figure 2,illustrates the major activities and the outcomes for each dimension. Page 22.1701.6Innovative Curriculum for Engineering in High School (ICE-HS) Activities Outcomes Course and
Paper ID #40740Successful mentoring practices for women undergraduate STEM studentsDr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer is Associate Director of the Women in Engineering Program and Asso- ciate Professor (by courtesy) in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at Purdue University. She conducts research around student success.Ms. Elizabeth Hart, University of Dayton Beth Hart is a Principal Lecturer for the University of Dayton School of Engineering Innovation Center. She received her B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Dayton, both in
have designed, built, tested, and launched include Scorpio Alpha, an instrumentationpayload designed for flight using weather balloons; AEROCam, a three-band, one-meter spatialresolution imaging sensor designed for flight by UND Aviation small aircraft; AgCam, a two-band, ten-meter spatial resolution imaging sensor to be installed in the International SpaceStation for capturing precision agriculture data; and an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, a radio-controlled airplane with a three-meter wingspan, capable of flying scientific payloads with amass of up to four kilograms. Generally, teams consist of master’s-level graduate studentsconducting thesis research and undergraduates enrolled in the two-semester capstone seniordesign sequence. Primarily
, planning, scheduling, budgeting), critical thinking, self-drive andmotivation, cultural awareness in a broad sense (nationality, ethnicity, linguistic, sexualorientation) and high ethical standards, integrity, and global, social, intellectual andtechnological responsibility [3]. The focus of this paper is on some of those professional skills.Below are some examples of things that many employers look for in new engineering graduates: Leadership examples in school, at home, at work, in outside organizations, etc. Previous relevant work experience, preferably internships, co-ops, and research projects with professors. Can cogently discuss major projects, especially their capstone. Passion / interest in the company and
University Carl H. Hauser is an Associate Professor of Computer Science in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) at Washington State University (WSU). His research interests include concurrent programming models and mechanisms, networking, programming language implementation, and distributed computing systems. Prior to joining WSU, he worked at Xerox Palo Alto Research Center and IBM Research for a total of over 20 years.Robert Olsen, Washington State University Robert G. Olsen is Associate Dean of the College of Engineering and Architecture and the Boeing Distinguished Professor of Electrical Engineering at Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. He
frequent concern regarding self-reflection is selecting a method or approach that can beconsistently executed. For many of the same reasons as above, self-reflection practices that aretoo complex, too time-consuming, or less actionable in design are quick to be discarded whenfaculty find themselves unable to regularly complete them or to use them directly to impact theirteaching.During the one-hour reflective teaching workshop, facilitators shared self-reflection tools andpractices that could deepen their sense of self to strengthen their equity-oriented teaching. First,the facilitators shared ways in which practitioners and educators could make reflection a routineelement of teaching (e.g., formal journaling before and after instruction, making
findings at the end of the summer experience.Year 3The focus of the final year of the research methods course was the preparation of students for theculminating summer research experience with a STEM faculty mentor. Course activities weredesigned to allow students to gain a greater understanding of and practice in: 1) formulatingresearch questions, 2) developing experimental designs, 3) creating and testing researchhypotheses and 4) data collection and analysis. Students were tasked with integrating both thescientific method and engineering design process in the modeling, design and testing of amousetrap car. Students explored the effect of wheel size, type and number, center of gravity, massand friction on mousetrap car performance. Participants
the 21st century has been built squarely oninformation, communications, and computational technology (ICCT). In this WIP, we explorehow ICCT impacts the way that engineering is learned with the goal of establishing a researchagenda for propagating the effective use of ICCT in engineering education. We seek to informaction and generate conversation amongst administrators, instructors, researchers, and students.We can approach this goal from two broad perspectives. First, ICCT has fundamentally changedengineering practice by supporting discovery, collaboration, and innovation processes.1 Intandem, learning technologies promise to provide an unprecedented opportunity to improveinstruction, provide adaptive learning, and foster increased access
- building in instructional technology.Alana Unfried, North Carolina State University Alana Unfried is a Graduate Research Assistant at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University. She works on the Data Analytics team for the MISO Project (Maximizing the Impact of STEM Outreach through Data-Driven Decision Making), funded by the National Science Foundation. Alana’s responsibilities include the development of statistically sound evaluation instruments for teachers and students involved in these campus outreach programs. She also analyzes survey results and related data to understand the collective impact of these pre-college outreach programs. Alana is also a full-time Ph.D. student
. Paul’s current research interests involve studying the impact of technology in engineering education.Dr. Angela C. Shih, California State Polytechnic University, PomonaMichael Pavel Ramirez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Undergraduate fourth year and graduating Cal Poly Pomona student studying Psychology and Physiology.Laura Queiroz DaSilva, California State Polytechnic University, PomonaMr. Nguyen NguyenMiss Cheyenne Romero, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Successfully flipping a fluid mechanics course using video tutorials and active learning strategies: Implementation and AssessmentAbstractThis paper investigates
, responsible conduct of research, and others. These sessions also serve to monitorstudent and team progress. Multiple assessment tools are used to evaluate student learning. Otherassessment tools, such as a Self-&-Peer evaluation and a Work Effort Certification are used toassess team work. This paper describes the individual topics of the course, the assessment toolsused, and the outcomes over the past 6 years.IntroductionEngineering design is a critical component of every undergraduate engineering program and isspecifically required by accreditation agencies, for example the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET). According to ABET, “Students must be prepared forengineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major
principles within select courses across the Grainger College of Engineering.Mr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I work with a group of wonderful and talented people at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates our practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and informal learning environments. My Research focuses on studying students’ collaborative problem solving processes and the role of the teacher in facilitating these processes in STEM classrooms.Prof. Timothy Bretl
Developed from a Research-Informed FrameworkI. IntroductionThis document describes an introductory helicopter aerodynamics and design engineering coursefor undergraduates in aeronautical or aerospace engineering. The three major sections of thisdocument are Content, Assessment, and Pedagogy. These sections have been developedaccording to Engineering Education research principles and findings, such that the three sectionsare aligned with one another. Each section presents at least one tool to guide coursedevelopment. The course’s foundation is to provide authentic practice for meaningful learning.The primary purposes of this paper are to present a unified strategy and a toolkit for developingengineering courses in Figure 1 and to use helicopter
engineering educators by IUCEE (Indo-universal consortium of engineering education) in 2017.Dr. Charles Henderson, Western Michigan University Charles Henderson is a Professor at Western Michigan University (WMU), with a joint appointment be- tween the Physics Department and the WMU Mallinson Institute for Science Education. He is the Director of the Mallinson Institute and co-Founder and co-Director of the WMU Center for Research on Instruc- tional Change in Postsecondary Education (CRICPE). His research program focuses on understanding and promoting instructional change in higher education, with an emphasis on improving undergraduate STEM instruction. Dr. Henderson’s work has been supported by over $9M in external grants
Obj 2: Provide a forum for hands-on training and practice Obj 3: Emphasize best practice teaching techniquesGOAL III: Enhance Professional development opportunities Obj 1: Create an open mentoring environment between Fellows and Faculty Obj 2: Encourage self-efficacy and self-confidence of TF’s in public-presentation environment Obj 3: Provide the opportunity for TFs to review basic knowledge Obj 4: Reinforce critical thinking skills through public dialogMethodsThere are eight TFs who participated in the training program, six men and two women. Theywere all new BS graduates from this university in one of the four following disciplines:Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical and Computer
providing remote technical assistance that includes students, faculty andprofessional mentors volunteering expertise to assist with humanitarian projects in developingcommunities. This paper provides an overview of the program design with an emphasis on the verticalintegration of projects across undergraduate and graduate engineering programs. Details on the curricularaspects of the program as well as a participatory framework that includes depth and breadth of opportunityis provided. The motivation for this paper is to demonstrate best-practices in engineering service-learningwith the objective of highlighting the role of academic institutions when engaging with humanitarianorganizations internationally. The design and execution of the
Technical Managers2023 ASEE Engineering Management Division (EMD) Abstract This work in progress (WIP) paper aims at demonstrating the innovative design ofintegrating a communication course with the Capstone course, which is part of the Master ofEngineering Technical Management (METM), a 21-month online graduate program for workingprofessionals in the engineering technical management fields. As the culmination of theirgraduate study, students must identify an organizational/technical challenge, formulate a feasibleproject plan to address the issue to bring impact to the organization. During this process, theywill conduct research, create a strong business case for their industry sponsors
since 1986.She is an Associate Professor, teaching both undergraduate and graduate design related classes, as well asconducting both experimental and analytical research. Dr. Sheppard was recently appointed Senior Scholar at theCarnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.CYNTHIA ATMAN is the founding Director of the Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT) in theCollege of Engineering at the University of Washington and the Director of the NSF-funded Center for theadvancement of Engineering Education (CAEE). She is also a Professor in Industrial Engineering. Dr. Atmanreceived her PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University, her MS in IndustrialEngineering from Ohio State University, and her BS in
for posterity and toencourage engagement within other academic institutions and professional societies. Some of ourexamples and strategies can be scaled and adapted to address institutional or regional challengesor to increase awareness and engagement in other national societies. Outcomes seen throughinitiatives have resulted in increased connections with previously disenfranchised members tothe ASEE community, engagement across divisions, and expanded programming in support ofdiversity, equity, and inclusion practices.1. Importance of Diversity, Equity, and InclusionEngineers have a significant impact on society. Their actions shape future technology,infrastructure, and innovation. Improving workforce diversity has been shown to
impacts of different factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for 77 cards, and designing innovation workshops for students without design or engineering background and teaching them design thinking methodologies. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and a research faculty in Center for e-Design.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Research Scientist and Adjunct Assistant Professor in the College of Engi- neering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in
Paper ID #11249Digital-Storytelling for Apprenticeships in Sustainability Science and Engi-neering DesignDr. Tamara Ball, UCSC Baskin School of Engineering Dr. Tamara Ball is a project-scientist working with the the Sustainable Engineering and Ecological De- sign (SEED) collaborative at UCSC. She is the program director for Impact Designs - Engineering and Sustainability through Student Service (IDEASS) and Apprenticeships in Sustainability Science and En- gineering Design (ASCEND). She is interested in understanding how extracurricular and co-curricular innovations can support meaningful campus-community connections in
), Washington, D.C., Boston, Modesto (Calif.), Hong Kong and Mel- bourne (Australia). In the fall of 2001, she was invited as the Lise Meitner Visiting Professor, department of design sciences, Lund Technical University, Lund, Sweden. Prior to teaching at WPI, she worked as a manufacturing engineer for the Norton Company in Worcester, Mass., and product development engineer for the Olin Corporation in East Alton, Ill. Professor Ault’s primary teaching responsibilities include undergraduate- and graduate-level courses in computer-aided design, mechanical design, and rehabilitation engineering. Her research interests include computer-aided mechanical design, geometric modeling, kinematics, machine design, rehabilitation engi
is seeing and being managed asbusiness, which it is and valued as a noble mission as well.These aspects lead to the fact that prepared engineering educators will certainly contribute to thesuccess of the program. So it is also very important to prepare the engineering professor05.4. The Engineering ProfessorThe initial training for teachers in higher education, in the manner as has been practiced involvesthe acquisition of skills as a researcher and production of knowledge in specific areas, because ofthe tendency for teachers to make the choice by admission to graduate programs in their areas. Itis perceived that specific knowledge of the contents are more valued in detriment of knowledgeof teaching and so research ends up getting more