implemented and the student is provided an opportunity to earn bothexperience and a doctorate or masters degree. The intent of an assistantship was not to havegraduate students undertake the work of the mentor, work which is then ultimately used forpromotion and tenure. Further, in the context of co-authorship, the work is presented to the Page 25.650.5editors and public as that of the professor/mentor without the disclosure of the deft hand,insights, or abilities, or lack thereof, of the graduate student. The same type of co-authorship issues arise in journal publications through various possiblescenarios. In some cases, mentors provide little or
perceptions of his own design skills and strategies did not change in a significant way.Furthermore, while the quality of the solution produced for the third problem was a significantimprovement over the evaluation of the second-session artifact, the scores for the second solutionwere much lower than the first. Only two of the third artifact metrics scored higher than the firstsession, so the increase in quality from session two to session three was more like a recovery to theinitial quality level for most of the metrics.Subject C Results Subject C was a male second-year graduate student in the Master of Computer Science program.He had one year of work experience in software development, and had taken many advancedcomputer science courses at the
anexisting reality: conversations can be understood as practices “that systematically form theobjects of which they speak”.15Prior Research and Literature ReviewThis paper is a comprehensive extension to a previous literature review that examined howempathy and care are conceptualized in standards and curriculum of fields that are traditionallyperceived to be empathetic and caring, fields that “have mastered the integration of teaching ofempathy and caring into their regular curricula”.13 The previous literature review also examinedhow the terms “empathy” and “care” were being used within engineering literature.In the previous study, we found 22 empathy and 16 care-related engineering papers explicitlyusing these terms. Nearly half of these (14 and
full year of university study under my belt and I decided to take the winter quarter to travel to Europe to visit two exchange students. . . . During the stay at my friend's house in Stockholm, I realized that English conversation on my behalf quickly reverted back to Swedish among friends and family, leaving me feeling as if I had suddenly been isolated in bubble wrap. . . . Being forced to use [German] to communicate in my home stay environment in Southern Germany made all the difference in my German skills. It was in this environment where I began to see the multiple levels of complexities involved in mastering a language. Successfully completing homework and classroom exercises was one thing, negotiating on a variety of levels in a
twelve departments, comprises about 6,100 undergraduates and 2,300 graduate students. Last fiscal year, externallyfunded research expenditures in the college exceeded $125 million. The Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering has 41 tenure/tenuretrack faculty members and enrolls nearly 1,050 Page 15.653.3undergraduates, 180 masters degree students, and 90 doctoral students. The department 2 participates in many interdisciplinary research centers including the
. ‚ Apply the basic elements of the TRIZ methodology to generate product concepts. ‚ Effectively use concept classification trees and concept combination tables during the concept generation process. ‚ Apply decision matrices to select product concepts. ‚ Develop and carry out a prototyping plan. ‚ Create different types of prototypes for a given product concept. ‚ Prepare and execute a simple concept testing plan. Product Planning and Development This is a one-term, three-credit, mandatory course in the Master in Product DevelopmentProgram (MPD) at the University of Detroit Mercy (UDM). The main goal of the course is toprovide a fundamental understanding of all the key steps that are
Department at Lawrence Technological University in the summer of 2003, after two decades of industrial research, and product development experience. Dr. Fletcher earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Washington, in Seattle, and the Master of Science and Ph.D. degrees in Chemical Engineering, both from the University of Michigan. He teaches a number of alternative energy courses at Lawrence Tech. Because of his firm belief that the first experience students have with engineering education is critical and needs to be a challenging, engaging and positive one, Dr. Fletcher in 2004 began actively working with other engineering faculty to reconfigure the Introduction to
knowledge with the tutorials for Unigraphics. Allstudents were observed to master the fundamentals of these tasks. Particularly, the Unigraphicsbasics were well illustrated. Additionally, a FORTRAN program was utilized to obtain a 2D,inviscid, incompressible solution for flow around an airfoil. The students were exposed to the Page 8.799.13 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationlanguage of modern software applications in an effective manner. The necessity for self-familiarization through tutorials
diversity. Working ingroups to develop reports and providing many written reaction papers address the standards ofcommunication and working in groups. Communication with Blackboard software andassociated e-mail techniques gave another example of mastering modern tools techniques andskills.Dr. Drake felt that the process of working through course objectives and comparing them to thestandards gave a much better perception of how those objectives fit into the overall scheme ofproviding, in SMSU's campus vernacular, “an educated person.” The process of developingthese objectives and associating them with the ET2K standards took about one hour for eachcourse. This involved reviewing the course syllabus and textbook to identify what the outcomeobjectives
Senior’s Capstone Design Project can be imposing courses foran engineering student that has come to expect single answers (to four decimal places) toclassical text book problems in Thermodynamics, Calculus and Fluid Dynamics, to name afew. The typical methodology for studying such traditional engineering subjects is to reviewthe concepts, review worked examples presented by the instructor (hopefully these workedexamples are derived from real-world engineering applications) and then apply theseprincipals to homework problems of the same ilk. The good (or perhaps a better adjective is:trained) student quickly masters these chapter problems and moves on to the next chapters andtheir content of engineering principles that must be mastered.Creative
Institute of Technology Dr. Christie Stewart is a Senior Academic Professional in the School of Biological Sciences and a certified Gallup strengths coach. She received a Bachelor of Science in Movement Science from the University of Pittsburgh, a Master of Education in Clinical Exercise Physiology from the University of Georgia, and her Doctorate in Educational Leadership from Mercer University. She is co-director of the wellness requirement at Georgia Tech and co-developed the course, Flourishing: Strategies for Well-being and Resilience. Christie has a passion for helping others develop skills in self-care and creating a culture of well-being at Georgia Tech. She centers her research and teaching on the
to increase engagement and methods to teach artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education.Dr. Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida Lilianny Virguez is a Instructional Assistant Professor at the Engineering Education Department at Uni- versity of Florida. She holds a Masters’ degree in Management Systems Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. She has work e ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Nuestro Impacto: An insider look into the connections between our past experiences and current teaching and mentoring practicesAbstractThis full research paper discusses the experiences of five Latiné/x faculty in
, Engineering, Mathematics, and Technology (STEM). A further strand of his research examines the development of interdisciplinarity in the sciences and works to define the mechanisms by which it is formed, identify the contexts conducive to its flourishing, and develop the educational experiences that accelerate its development.Carlie Laton Cooper, University of Georgia Carlie is a doctoral student in the Louise McBee Institute of Higher Education at the University of Georgia (UGA). She earned a bachelor’s degree in Psychology from UGA (2017) and a Master of Education in Higher Education Administration from Georgia Southern University (2021). She has higher education experience in business affairs and academic advising. She
Paper ID #42474Board 12: Work in Progress: Enhancing Student Engagement and Interest inSTEM Education through Game-Based Learning Techniques in Bioengineeringand Electrical Engineering Core Curricula and How to Create ThemDr. Ali Ansari, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Ali Ansari is a Teaching Assistant Professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He holds a Masters and Ph.D in Bioengineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and graduated from Southern Methodist University with a degree in Electrical Engineering. Ali has been teaching for the past two years at Bucknell University in
students grow. He has a masters in Civil Engineering. Before Purdue, he received an Erasmus scholarship for an exchange program at the University of Jaen, Spain. He had his undergraduate degree in Civil Engineering at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria.Siddhant Sanjay Joshi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Siddhant is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette. His research interests include understanding how GenAI can facilitate better student learning in computing and engineering education.Dr. Kirsten A. Davis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Kirsten Davis is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research explores
some balance of: consulting/co-planning with teachers to Page 22.329.7help those teachers build all students’ creative and critical thinking skills and to challenge highachieving students during instruction; co-teaching within teachers’ classrooms to help teachenrichment lessons to large groups of students or more targeted lesson enhancement to small,clustered groups of students; and providing pull-out experiences for small groups of students whohave already mastered content that the classroom teacher is teaching. Although it is notuncommon for enrichment teachers to engage in these practices for science or social studies, theirmain focus is on
) Block 1: Block 2: Block 3: Block 4: Individual & Availability Student Co- Curricular Institutional of Academic Curricular Emphases Controls Minors Activities β β β β Research institution1 0.121 *** 0.145 *** 0.138 *** 0.100 ** Masters institution1 -0.023 0.012 0.015 0.009 Large institution2 -0.223 *** -0.243 *** -0.223 *** -0.112 *** Medium institution2 -0.171 *** -0.156 *** -0.144 *** -0.060 * Biomedical/bioengineering3 -0.003
Science Foundation Award# 0737616, Learning through Engineering Design and Practice.John Thieken, Arizona State University John Thieken, MEd., is currently a high school mathematics teacher at the Paradise Valley School District and a doctoral student in the PhD in mathematics education at Arizona State University. He has a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Northern Arizona University and a Masters in Secondary Education from Old Dominion University. He is currently involved in doctoral research (Learning through Engineering Design and Practice, National Science Foundation Award# 0737616) where he engages in research methods, measurement, data analysis (quantitative
Masters of Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2005, both from Purdue University. His specialization in his graduate program was in the performance analysis and design of wireless networks and sensor networks. Since 2005, he has been the Research Coordinator for Purdue's Center for Wireless Systems and Applications (CWSA). His research interests include wireless sensor networks, embedded security, and software engineering.Julia Melkers, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julia Melkers teaches and conducts research in the areas of public management, organizational theory, and science and technology policy. Her current funded work addresses collaboration patterns and social networks in