to identity construction [13, 14]. In this study, particularlyin our preliminary analysis, we focus on the interactions between two such factors: disability andprofessional identity. We thus focus our discussion on the ways in which experiences withdisability influence and are influenced by the ways in which students engage in, internalize, andinterpret the civil engineering profession as they move through their undergraduate careers.Professional Identity and the AOI ModelOur work is also informed by prior research on professional identity construction. Typically,professional identity is described using a variety of research lenses that capture a dimension ofidentity that forms as individuals learn and internalize the values, behavioral
synonymously in the literature; however, postgraduate can either refer to aperson who has earned a high school diploma or who has also earned a collegiate-level degree.Graduate students and undergraduate students often follow different paths in the academicenvironment. They serve divergent roles, face separate challenges, and have differentexperiences. Graduate students face obstacles beyond the classroom—in their ability to meetwith advisers, attend conferences, and develop social support from their peers—thatundergraduate students may not face [3]. Even in the classroom graduate students may beexpected to meet different expectations than their undergraduate counterparts. This may includea greater volume of reading and reading assignments provided
-Career Engineering GraduatesAbstractIt is widely acknowledged that engineers “are foundational to technological innovation anddevelopment that drive long-term economic growth and help solve societal challenges” [1].Consequently, it is a major goal in engineering education to ensure and further improve thedevelopment of innovation skills among its students. While many studies focus on currentengineering students and their innovation goals and skills, it is also informative to see howthese goals and skills are translated into realized innovative behavior in the workplace. Bystudying the characteristics of innovative behavior of engineering graduates we revealvaluable insights and draw conclusions for engineering
adjustment and their success in college.4 In fact, the academicachievement of Latino students in particular tends to be enhanced by professors perceived to besupportive and accessible.4Students’ level of comfort approaching faculty for academic and social support can contribute totheir sense of belonging.3 Students who cultivate relationships with faculty members outside theclassroom tend to both report higher levels of satisfaction with their college and graduate.4 Infact, minority students who complete science and engineering degrees often highlight the role ofa faculty member as being instrumental to their success.4 Positive experiences with supportivefaculty can increase students’ sense of belonging and contribute to a climate that
. - Arran, Civil and Environmental EngineeringThough this quote reinforces harmful assumptions about expectations, overwork, and lack ofwork-life balance well-documented in the literature, but also reflects a dominant assumption onthe differences between a postdoctoral scholar and a graduate student that then influencesmentoring philosophies. Hugo, also in civil and environmental engineering, compared doctoralstudents and postdocs in their ability to conduct research and the amount of supervision requiredof them. Hugo feels more comfortable in giving postdocs freedom in their work when comparedto doctoral students who still require careful supervision. The level of contribution from a postdocreflects this expectation to be more independent
College offers multidisciplinary programs in the social sciences founded ona model of liberal education and designed to prepare students for law school, graduate study,decision-making roles in public and private enterprise. Students examine how public policyproblems are identified, analyzed, and resolved in the United States and globally.13Residential College in the Arts and HumanitiesThe Residential College in the Arts and Humanities (RCAH) is an interdisciplinary college forundergraduate students interested in the global connections between literature, history, ethics,culture, world languages, the visual and performing arts, and their own civic engagement in thesefields of work and study. Students, faculty, visitors, and staff are able to
(WIED) at ASEE convened a panel of current graduate students andpostdoctoral scholars to discuss visions of gender equity in engineering 130 years from now, whereall gender identities feel respected, experience gender equity, and are able to maintain a healthywork-life balance. The panelists reflected on their experiences on advancing womxn and genderequity in engineering, envisioned the progress that should be made in the coming 130 years, andshared ideas on how to achieve those visions, focusing on how dualistic thinking around genderand cis-normativity serve to marginalize womxn in engineering’s learning environments andworkplaces, as well as the critical ways that racial identity and gender intersect in womxn of colors’experiences
the graduate level [4].2. A User-Oriented Approach to Engineering Ethics EducationPrevious research has recognized the critical role engineering faculty members play ineducating students about engineering ethics [5][6]. Such recognition, however, contrastswith a general trend in engineering education: faculty members are usually slow andreluctant in adopting research-based pedagogical practice, a trend that challengesnumerous designers of educational innovations [7] [8] [9]. In particular, scholars havereported that educational innovations that follow a “replication model,” in which facultymembers passively accept and adopt pedagogical innovations designed by educationalresearchers, have very limited effect in generating faculty engagement
. Kajfez and L. McNair, “Graduate student identity: A balancing act between roles,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014.[4] D. L. Liddell, M. E. Wilson, K. Pasquesi, A. S. Hirschy, and K. M. Boyle, “Development of professional identity through socialization in graduate school,” J Stud Aff Res Pract, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 69–84, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1515/JSARP-2014-0006/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS.[5] T. Luft and R. Roughly, “Engaging the Reflexive Self: The Role of Reflective Practice for Supporting Professional Identity Development in Graduate Students,” Supporting the Success of Adult and Online Students Proven Practices in Higher Education, pp. 53–62, 2016.[6] H. L. Perkins, M. Bahnson, M. A
inspiring and educating the next generation of engineers.Concluding RemarksThe involvement of undergraduate students in this research provided them with valuable hands-on experience, enhancing their practical skills and knowledge. Programs supportingundergraduate research, like this one, play a critical role in preparing future engineers to tacklereal-world challenges. These experiences not only yield meaningful research results but alsosignificantly impact students' understanding of engineering principles and their careertrajectories, bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical applications.The transformative effects of these programs call for a reconsideration of resource allocation.The tangible outcomes emphasize the need for
of teaching graduate engineering coursesusing students’ Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences (MI). Thirty volunteers answeredcommercially available Learning Style and MI tests in our Electrical Engineering department.Learning styles are grouped as visual, auditory, and kinesthetic (VAK) and can determined bythe VAK learning style test. Learning styles are reflected in different academic strengths,weaknesses, and skills. Studies show that the differences between learning styles will affect botha person’s choice of profession and their success in this profession, both in education and in theworld of business. People who work at something that fits their learning style have a betterchance of becoming successful in it. In this study, tools
. Reasons for attending included the need for motivation and addressingstruggles they were facing in their programs. These reasons point to challenges students facetransitioning to graduate school (e.g. balancing act). Students were reassured after attending thisworkshop that they possessed or could enhance the skills needed to persist and achieve successin graduate school.For the second PEGS21 cohort (entering Fall 2017), we applied first cohort feedback byencouraging the students to attend GradPathways workshops in pairs or groups as a means tofurther build community within the group. Time during seminar was also dedicated to eachparticipant sharing the two workshops they planned to attend. A list of these workshops andplanned attendees was
acknowledges the complex identities and experiencesof STEM graduate students.Addressing the mental health concerns of graduate students, and especially those from groups suchas IWOC, demands a collective endeavor beyond conventional disciplinary limits. The complexityof mental health challenges necessitates collaboration across various disciplines and sectors. Theestablishment of partnerships between scholars with expertise in mental health and scholarsembedded within STEM disciplines can most effectively help to uncover opportunities to not onlyimprove the well-being and academic success of graduate students but also cultivate a more justand supportive environment across the academic landscape.Future WorkThis paper sets the stage for a more
more. It was interesting to noticethat the two students who retook the class in subsequent quarters reported that the plans made inthe beginning of the quarter were being followed and helped them to be on top of their assignmentsand studying while balancing self-care, social time with family and friends, and extra-curricularactivities.b) Reflection leadership assignmentClass time was devoted to discussing effective and ineffective qualities of a leader and emphasizedthe importance of identifying potential causes of high stress level in leadership positions. About60% of the students reported taking a leadership role in the past which includes students’ clubs,group projects, sports, scout, and activism. The students who have not taken leadership
” Black person in their engineering ecosystems [11].Because of their only status, visibility for Black students is felt on two extreme ends. On oneend, they are hypervisible. Because they are the “only,” they stick out in the hegemonic Whitespaces. Jones [12] describes this experience of hypervisibility with one of their participants, whoholds a popular leadership position at the university. This student is the third Black student tohold this position in the university’s history. They described how they feel self-consciousbecause of their racial identity because the role brings a lot of attention. They describe tactics ofbeing hyperaware of how their racial identity and social status at the school could harborprejudice's unwanted attention [12
works from authors with diverse identities is present in theresearch. This paper documents the efforts that have been put in place so far aroundimplementing citation justice education at UMD libraries including developing instructionmodules and research guides. In particular, focusing on the librarians’ instigation of a closepartnership with the faculty and graduate students of the Civil and Environmental EngineeringDepartment (CEE) who were particularly receptive to expanding their scholarly communicationpractices to include aspects of citation justice. Additionally, it explores the potential to developfurther support for tools including code, templates, and author associations and lists that can beused to implement diverse citations. Future
, collaborative filtering, latent treegraphical models, student success, graduation rates, educational data mining1 IntroductionIn our study, we explore analytics focusing on a crucial aspect of student success: the curriculumpathways that lead students toward achieving their learning outcomes and ultimately earningtheir degrees. In the realm of higher education, the role of analytics is increasingly recognizedas a tool for decision-making that enhances student success outcomes. For example, various ini-tiatives have used student demographics and prior academic performance to guide interventionssuch as counseling, mentoring, and tutoring to improve retention and graduation rates 1,2,3 . Ourperspective emphasizes that the core of student academic
time faculty course loads weredecreasing to make way for increased research and publication. Graduate students tooksome of the slack but increasingly it was necessary to turn to adjuncts to staff courses.Adjuncts were too often looked on as second class stand-ins or “warm bodies” fillingvacant lines in the class schedules. Too often also they perceived themselves in the sameway. They were assigned classes, syllabuses, and textbooks and took as given theacademic teaching role assigned. During this process, the potential for the practical,“clinical,” and critical perspectives for which they are particularly fitted have too often belost.Building a New Type of Graduate FacultyThe authors believe that a major task in reshaping graduate education
that guide engineering research. I, and many of my colleagues, while noting the historyof marginalization of people who look and think like us in engineering contexts, beganquestioning the value systems that undergird the engineering research enterprise in which weoperate. We noted discrepancies between the espoused values of the enterprise and those thatwere enacted by some of the agents that operate in engineering research spaces. For example, inour graduate context, we noted an espoused desire for equity and inclusion alongside aperpetuation of stress culture, a centering of White theories in our foundational classes, and alack of accommodation for non-traditional and neurodivergent students. We began to questionother value systems having
profession with men in large majority, has been socially constructed. For example,the works of Wendy Faulkner and Teresa Cardador have, respectively, revealed the way “genderin/authenticity” between person and norms affect who finds identification and belonging inengineering, and offered the “inverted role hierarchy” as a framework to explain why womenadvancing into management roles often lose occupational status and their sense of engineeringidentity as they move away from the “technicist”-centric variety of work (i.e., masculine-leaningconception of engineering).Using data from a 2022 survey with responses from 982 engineering graduates across Canada,and building on our previous qualitative work identifying five distinct engineering career
women are not making their future career choices based on someoneelse’s convictions. They may be following what could be determined as the traditional scriptssociety has set for females, but this is happening only after they have “bucked the system” infollowing a non-traditional major.These female students are beginning to build their internal foundations by balancing the varied,and many times conflicting external voices with their own inner voice. While this researchcontinues longitudinally through follow-up interviews scheduled for three – years, post-graduation in 2013, some students have already changed their career paths as evidenced throughsocial network contacts. As females develop personal and professional identities that areauthentic
the value of“coaching on formulating empathic phrases, and conveying empathy verbally and nonverbally”[69, p. 1173]. Role playing was also shown to be effective, as students considered the linksbetween themselves and stakeholders and built emotional connections aligned with the “sharing”component of Zaki’s framework [56, 62, 76, 77].Previously Wong et al. described how social identity sharing and active listening experiences canbe used to foster cognitive empathy and to facilitate learning on how culture can impactcommunication [31]. In a two day workshop they used several exercises, such as case studies,small group activities to practice active listening, and lectures about stereotype threats, aversiveracism and sexism, and the benefits of
these lines showstatistically significant changes. Given of the magnitude of the estimated mean standard error,ten students who scored 9 or 10 on the pretest could not achieve statistically significant increaseson the posttest. Twenty-four of the 45 students who could achieve statistically significantincreases did so on the posttest. Only three students showed a statistically significant decrease inscore, two decreased by 2, and one by 4. Twenty students had changes of 1 or -1, which are notstatistically significant, and the balance had identical scores on the pre and posttest.Figures 4 and 5 are cross-plots of pre and posttest results for the number of correct and incorrectjustifications chosen. A positive outcome would be that the number of
% 43% 21% Business Oriented (N=15) Content Knowledge (N=19) General Personal Attributes (N=276) Professional Skills (N=134) Specific Entrepreneurial Attributes (N=197) Figure 1: Frequency of Students’ Reported Entrepreneurial CharacteristicsConclusion and DiscussionEngineering as a field is constantly evolving, and so are expectations of duties and roles thatengineering students should be capable of performing upon graduation [14]. Driven by changingneeds, entrepreneurship education has been implemented in engineering curriculums by multipleinstitutions to
accidental. A study by Borrego and Newswander [5] suggested thatfaculty are intentional about improving specific student learning outcomes when developing newmultidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary programs. Through a content analysisof 129 successfully awarded interdisciplinary studies proposals to the National ScienceFoundation, the authors discovered five focus areas for student learning outcomes specific tointerdisciplinary graduate education including content integration, teamwork, critical awareness,communication, and disciplinary grounding. Yet, challenges associated with these types ofdegrees still exist, such as the need to balance curriculum depth with breadth, offer stability andflexible simultaneously, and update
Paper ID #11811Into the Pipeline: A freshman student’s experiences of stories told about en-gineeringMr. Michael BrewerDr. Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia Dr. Nicki Sochacka received her doctorate in Engineering Epistemologies from the University of Queens- land, Australia, in 2011. She is currently a member of the CLUSTER research group at the University of Georgia where she holds a research and teaching position. Nicki’s areas of research interest include: STEAM (STEM + Art) education, diversity, interpretive research quality, the role of empathy in engineer- ing education and practice, and student reflection.Dr
are rare in undergraduates, we need to grow them in our mentors. Additionally,we need to grow these skills as students graduate. We need a low cost, but highly effectivemeans to grow mentoring skills. Furthermore, since mentoring happens in the dynamics of aconversation, the skills growth process needs a “real-time” component.We believe that mentors can grow their skills quickly by reflecting on their performanceimmediately following a mentoring session and “scripting” more effective practices. The“scripts” are pre-planned responses the mentor will use in future mentoring situations. Thementor also relies on peer observer feedback recorded during the mentoring session to guide thewriting of the scripts. The scripts are then reviewed before
enough time todistract from their other courses. Student projects are sponsored by a faculty research advisor, andeither the faculty member or a post-doctoral researcher or graduate student mentor act as their day-to-day point of contact. By providing students with opportunities for immersive learning in their first college semester,FIRE seeks to engage freshmen in engineering in a more accessible manner, supplementing theirrequired coursework. The research projects are carefully selected and framed not only to cover abroad range of mechanical engineering topics (from biomechanics to combustion to 3D printing)but also to provide opportunities for undergraduate researchers to exercise creative problemsolving, design and hands-on skills, self
Engineering and Affiliated Faculty in Aerospace Engineering in the College of Engi- neering at Texas A&M University. She also serves as Director of the Craig and Galen Brown Engineering Honors Program. She received her BS, MS, and PhD from the College of Engineering at Texas A&M. Kristi works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating preparation in ar- eas, such as mathematics and physics, evaluating engineering identity and its impact on retention, incor- porating non-traditional teaching methods into the classroom, and engaging her students with interactive methods.Dr. Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University Karan L. Watson, Ph.D., P.E., is currently a Regents Senior Professor of
improve society, yet less than 100 people had read it. It felt like the effortwasn’t having the impact that I wanted. Further, there had been a couple of experiences atconferences in my professional field where other researchers dismissed or diminished ourgroup’s work. I was experiencing Imposter Phenomena9 episodes during conferences that hailedback to my days in graduate school. My students and I had recently received a scathing,unprofessional review for a manuscript10 and my satisfaction with the research treadmillplummeted, I came to the conclusion that I should instead focus on commercializing our workso that it didn’t remain buried in the literature and could be translated to improve society. Thesecond conclusion I came to was that if my