a bachelor’sdegree, are an emerging population in higher education. However, FGS matriculate, persist, andgraduate with a bachelor’s degree at lower rates than continuing-generation students (CGS). Thenational FGS population is more diverse than CGS, with a greater percentage having one or moreintersecting, underrepresented identities. With national, state, and institutional leaders trying toclose the “achievement gap” and meet diversity and equity outcomes, understanding and servingFGS is critical to meeting those goals.Helping FGS persist to graduation is also important to science, technology, engineering, andmath (STEM) bachelor’s degree programs. FGS who are enrolled in STEM bachelor’s degreeprograms persist and graduate at lower rates
focuswithin the engineering education community. Prior research has centered around graduatestudent engineering identity (Choe & Borrego, 2019; Miller, Tsugawa-Nieves, Chestnut, Cass, &Kirn, 2017; Perkins et al., 2020; Satterfield et al., 2019), writing concepts and processes ofengineering graduate students (Berdanier & Zerbe, 2018a, 2018b), and engineering graduatestudent attrition (Berdanier, Whitehair, Kirn, & Satterfield, 2020; Whitehair & Berdanier, 2018).Berdanier et al. (2020) created a model for graduate student attrition, called the GrAD model,based on Reddit posts of engineering doctoral students who were considering or had left theirgraduate programs. Additional research examines the experiences of engineering
Head of the Graduate School Darmstadt.Head of Research Center Electric Mobility c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Taking the Role of Others to Increase the Success Rates of Innovations1. IntroductionTraditionally it is the disciplinary knowledge that is the main focus of education in academicinstitutions1. In a recent publication Hart Research Associates2 present a surprising result: “Nearlyall employers (96%) agreed that, regardless of their chosen field of study, all students should haveexperience in college that teach them how to solve problems with people whose views aredifferent from their own, …”. Of the 400 employers participating in the research, 59% stronglyagreed. To cope with
university to employment represents a major transition with personal, economic,and societal implications. In recent years, the study of transitions has attracted renewed interest frompolicy makers and researchers in the light of changing labor market patterns, the diverse transitionpathways of young people, the transformation of professional knowledge, and an increasingdisjuncture between students’ academic training and the specific skillsets sought by employers [1, 2,3]. Yet very little is known about this transition in the field of engineering [4]. Most studiesconcentrate on the job readiness of engineering graduates [5, 6]. Fewer studies have explored howthe knowledge, skills, and experience that engineering students gain in university facilitate
], avoid stigma [45]–[47] and prevent being discredited[14]. This is true for graduate students who navigate the dissidence between their academicidentities, the ablest expectations they face, and being positioned as disabled [14]. It may beespecially true for Black and indigenous graduate students who may face resistance from facultyto provide accommodations and a need to engage in higher levels of forced intimacy6 than theirwhite peers [48]. It is also true for students in STEM fields where requests for access areconsidered a nuisance and perceived as a sign of weakness [5]. As Mingus notes in a keynoteaddress at Femmes of Color 2011 “it can be very dangerous to identify as disabled when yoursurvival depends on you denying it” [49].Stigma is not
graduate students, a seniorundergraduate and a junior undergraduate student. The focus of this study is on training graduatestudents to take on participatory roles in leading education and research initiatives, and in thiscontext their interaction in guiding undergraduate students has been important. All of thesestudents were participants in the research groups of four engineering faculty mentors engaged inthis project. For both teams, the project began with a faculty mentor presenting a simple physicalsystem and its dynamics and asking the teams to explore the reasons for its behavior and furtherunderstand how the system dynamics may be measured. The physical system was a tape-measurethat was fixed at one end at the edge of a table and the
Paper ID #32581Caregivers’ Multiple Roles in Supporting their Child through anEngineering Design Project (Fundamental)Dr. Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton Amber Simpson is a Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education in the Teaching, Learning and Edu- cational Leadership Department at Binghamton University. Her research interests include (1) examining individual’s identity(ies) in one or more STEM disciplines, (2) understanding the role of making and tinkering in formal and informal learning environments, and (3) investigating family engagement in and interactions around STEM-related activities
implementation. Surveys were conducted pre-and post-training to assess the effectiveness of individual skill development and determine whatelements of the program should be continued. A final survey was conducted of students andmentors to assess the effectiveness of teamwork development. Participants reported increases indevelopment of individual skill areas over the course of the program. When rating their teamperformance, participants ratings were between somewhat agree and agree on the majority of theaspects of team performance assessed. Overall, participants had a positive view of theirexperience in the program. IntroductionEach generation of new engineering graduates has entered a workplace with roles
Paper ID #47692Empowering Professional Skill Training for STEM Graduate Students ThroughActive Learning and Inductive TeachingJemimmah Namodi, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Jemimmah Namodi is a PhD student in Higher Education at the School of Education, Iowa State University. She earned her MBA from Kenyatta University and a Master of Science in Student Affairs from Missouri State University. Her research interests focus on rural populations, emphasizing their educational experiences and pathways in higher education.Dr. Ann M Gansemer-Topf, Iowa State University Ann Gansemer-Topf is Professor and
set.Freedom, Authority, and AgencyFreedom was the earliest and most prominently identified theme in the student-authors’reflections, defined by the students as the ability to make independent decisions about theproblem without being constrained to a specific method or set of equations. This theme served asa catalyst for several other impactful outcomes, including the development of confidence,interdisciplinarity, and engineering identity during the OEMP. Where the student-authors use theterminology “freedom,” others have used words such as “agency” and “authority” to describe thesame ideas in existing literature [22], [23]. Engle and Conant define authority as “studentshaving an active role, or agency, in defining, addressing, and resolving such
succeed—and helps students form a positive STEM identity, both of which are strong predictors ofacademic persistence. Similarly, [4] found that students who participate in structured mentorshipprograms are more likely to remain in STEM majors and pursue advanced degrees. Thesementorship relationships provide students with guidance, role models, emotional support, andaccess to professional networks, thereby reducing the feelings of isolation that often discourageunderrepresented students from persisting in STEM fields [6]. Equally important are hands-onresearch experiences, which allow students to apply classroom knowledge to real-worldproblems, thus reinforcing their understanding and increasing their motivation. A meta-analysisby [7] found that
years of occupational experience, with her most recent experience being in teaching, research, and service. Dr. Ofori-Boadu is a dedicated instructor, advisor, mentor, and role model who has served over 1,500 undergraduate and graduate students. Andrea has received almost $2M from funding agencies to include the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Engineering Information Foundation (EIF), the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the National Housing Endowment (NHE), and East Coast Construction Services (ECCS). In 2019, she received her prestigious NSF CAREER grant to construct substantive theories that explain professional identity development processes in undergraduate architecture, engineering, and
andgraduating students. The IE department is currently in the final stages of developing and seekingapproval for a Ph.D. in Systems and Engineering Management. This paper presents some of thecurriculum and educational issues involved with developing such programs. It also explores theissues and balancing act that must be dealt with in juggling the demands of training/continuingeducation, education and research (applied vs. theoretical). Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas Tech University Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education IntroductionFormal engineering management education
forming study groups, and microaggressions [30]. Other factors shown tonegatively impact the participation and progression of ethnic minorities and women inengineering education include inadequate advising and a lack of mentors and role models[28], [31], [32]. The latter is found to impede the progress of graduate students [28], [31],[32], [33], [34], [35], [36], something which is of particular concern given theunderrepresentation of minority ethnic staff in HE leadership roles [4].When considering minoritized students, it is also important to consider the ways in whichdisadvantage can overlap due to a person’s intersectional minority identity. Race scholarsstress how the concept of intersectionality is necessary for understanding oppression, as
as thick (reducing the bending stiffnesses by a factor of 8).4. Development of a Concept InventoryIn order to assess the effect of introducing the experimental platform on student learning in theStrength of Materials class, a short set of 10 questions were developed to be used as a pre andpost assessment of the intervention. The questions were carefully written to target students’misconceptions about the role of material properties, loading characteristics, and geometry inbeam bending stress and strain. The 10 questions are included as Appendix A of this paper.Referring to the three conceptual goals stated in the introduction, it is seen that questions 2, 4,and 5 relate strongly to concept C1, while questions 3 and 6 strongly relate to
aretrying to find or establish their place in the organization, such reactions to critiques of their designmay be derived from defensiveness. This is especially so if they believe that the design critiquereflects any lack of confidence (real or perceived) by more senior engineers or managers.All of this points to a key linkage between confidence and mastery of the capabilities(competence) that are central to the engineering profession. If one’s confidence is based on truemastery, then the engineer will view questions and critiques regarding his/her design as valuablecontributions towards excellence in the outcome. It becomes a contribution toward the successof the innovation, rather than a personal challenge to one’s capability. It is this balance
ethic of careand to listen to the expressed needs of the students being served 11. Noddings explains the ethicof care: If my expressed needs are not treated positively, or at least sensitively, I will likely not feel cared for. Attempts to care frequently misfire this way. Would-be carers think they know what the cared-for needs and act on their inferences in the name of caring. (p. 148)Postsecondary administrators often implement initiatives based on the perceived needs of a Page 23.915.3population or because a program has had success in another area. As Noddings discussed, thereis a definite difference between the
appropriate expectations for graduate students, navigatingdifferences in perspectives and goals, managing self-doubt, and addressing problems outside thetraditional role(s) of a graduate advisor. The student-advisor relationship allows both the advisorand the student to act as catalysts for growth in terms of both professional and personaldevelopment.The work presented within this paper is only the preliminary results of a larger body of researchseeking to identify and characterize mutually beneficial graduate advising practices. Future workwill include the analysis of transcripts from all four of the workshop sessions (EffectiveStrategies for Mentoring Graduate Students, Effective Strategies for Identifying the RightGraduate Students, Effective
synonymously in the literature; however, postgraduate can either refer to aperson who has earned a high school diploma or who has also earned a collegiate-level degree.Graduate students and undergraduate students often follow different paths in the academicenvironment. They serve divergent roles, face separate challenges, and have differentexperiences. Graduate students face obstacles beyond the classroom—in their ability to meetwith advisers, attend conferences, and develop social support from their peers—thatundergraduate students may not face [3]. Even in the classroom graduate students may beexpected to meet different expectations than their undergraduate counterparts. This may includea greater volume of reading and reading assignments provided
Facility at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). Dr. Rutt received her doctorate in Educational Studies from the UNL in 2020. Her personal research interests and experiences include examining international students of Color’s first-year experiences at Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs), ethnic identity development in heritage scholars (study abroad), working on eliminating minority health disparities, and studies on identity (including cultural identity, conflict identity, and nationalism). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 “I haven't really made those connections that maybe most would their first year”: A qualitative study of the COVID-19 pandemic and student social
to identity construction [13, 14]. In this study, particularlyin our preliminary analysis, we focus on the interactions between two such factors: disability andprofessional identity. We thus focus our discussion on the ways in which experiences withdisability influence and are influenced by the ways in which students engage in, internalize, andinterpret the civil engineering profession as they move through their undergraduate careers.Professional Identity and the AOI ModelOur work is also informed by prior research on professional identity construction. Typically,professional identity is described using a variety of research lenses that capture a dimension ofidentity that forms as individuals learn and internalize the values, behavioral
2019 was only 26% [4]. In contrast to the relatively lownumber of women graduates from GEPs, public discourse supports increasing the number ofwomen within engineering. Academia [5], industry [6], and government in Canada [7] are unitedin seeking to increase the number of women in the engineering profession but there remains agap between this aspiration and the reality within the profession. This paper explores why asimilar gap exists between public discourse and the actual long-term graduation rates fromCanadian graduate engineering schools and the experience of students and faculty within theseprograms.Studying GEPs in Canada is important as GEPs are a critical source of new women engineeringleaders in industry and the only source of new
-Career Engineering GraduatesAbstractIt is widely acknowledged that engineers “are foundational to technological innovation anddevelopment that drive long-term economic growth and help solve societal challenges” [1].Consequently, it is a major goal in engineering education to ensure and further improve thedevelopment of innovation skills among its students. While many studies focus on currentengineering students and their innovation goals and skills, it is also informative to see howthese goals and skills are translated into realized innovative behavior in the workplace. Bystudying the characteristics of innovative behavior of engineering graduates we revealvaluable insights and draw conclusions for engineering
was open to all graduate students interested in machine learning and alsoincluded students from other engineering and science disciplines, including civil engineering,industrial engineering, and psychology. This disciplinary diversity, combined with the diversity inresearch interests among students, contributed to a variety of perspectives during the module’sclass discussions. Each of the two lectures in the module was attended by between 20 and 30students (out of a total enrollment of 40). This represented a significant drop in attendance for thecourse, attributable to the fact that module material was not being assessed and class attendancewas not tracked. While the smaller class size paralleled a graduate seminar environment, thelower
. - Arran, Civil and Environmental EngineeringThough this quote reinforces harmful assumptions about expectations, overwork, and lack ofwork-life balance well-documented in the literature, but also reflects a dominant assumption onthe differences between a postdoctoral scholar and a graduate student that then influencesmentoring philosophies. Hugo, also in civil and environmental engineering, compared doctoralstudents and postdocs in their ability to conduct research and the amount of supervision requiredof them. Hugo feels more comfortable in giving postdocs freedom in their work when comparedto doctoral students who still require careful supervision. The level of contribution from a postdocreflects this expectation to be more independent
adjustment and their success in college.4 In fact, the academicachievement of Latino students in particular tends to be enhanced by professors perceived to besupportive and accessible.4Students’ level of comfort approaching faculty for academic and social support can contribute totheir sense of belonging.3 Students who cultivate relationships with faculty members outside theclassroom tend to both report higher levels of satisfaction with their college and graduate.4 Infact, minority students who complete science and engineering degrees often highlight the role ofa faculty member as being instrumental to their success.4 Positive experiences with supportivefaculty can increase students’ sense of belonging and contribute to a climate that
(WIED) at ASEE convened a panel of current graduate students andpostdoctoral scholars to discuss visions of gender equity in engineering 130 years from now, whereall gender identities feel respected, experience gender equity, and are able to maintain a healthywork-life balance. The panelists reflected on their experiences on advancing womxn and genderequity in engineering, envisioned the progress that should be made in the coming 130 years, andshared ideas on how to achieve those visions, focusing on how dualistic thinking around genderand cis-normativity serve to marginalize womxn in engineering’s learning environments andworkplaces, as well as the critical ways that racial identity and gender intersect in womxn of colors’experiences
effectively in this new setting.The concept of Funds of Identity also sheds light on the emotional foundations students rely on,such as family and cultural connections, which help them maintain balance amid uncertainty.Though physically distant, these ties remain emotionally central and act as anchors. However,balancing these relationships with academic pressures and time differences often creates tensionbetween adapting to a new life and preserving cultural continuity.Importantly, the identity resources students draw upon are not fixed. They evolve as studentsconfront and adapt to the demands of their temporary academic stay. These shifts often lead todeeper self-awareness, with participants beginning to see new educational possibilities, such
the graduate level [4].2. A User-Oriented Approach to Engineering Ethics EducationPrevious research has recognized the critical role engineering faculty members play ineducating students about engineering ethics [5][6]. Such recognition, however, contrastswith a general trend in engineering education: faculty members are usually slow andreluctant in adopting research-based pedagogical practice, a trend that challengesnumerous designers of educational innovations [7] [8] [9]. In particular, scholars havereported that educational innovations that follow a “replication model,” in which facultymembers passively accept and adopt pedagogical innovations designed by educationalresearchers, have very limited effect in generating faculty engagement
College offers multidisciplinary programs in the social sciences founded ona model of liberal education and designed to prepare students for law school, graduate study,decision-making roles in public and private enterprise. Students examine how public policyproblems are identified, analyzed, and resolved in the United States and globally.13Residential College in the Arts and HumanitiesThe Residential College in the Arts and Humanities (RCAH) is an interdisciplinary college forundergraduate students interested in the global connections between literature, history, ethics,culture, world languages, the visual and performing arts, and their own civic engagement in thesefields of work and study. Students, faculty, visitors, and staff are able to