public policy departments (as opposed to engineering professors)? 1. Would such knowledge of public policy eventually help a student advance in their career? 1. Would you favor hiring students with educational background in public policy?We were able to gather a broad range of information concerning the demographics of the surveypopulation. The respondents were from a variety of engineering backgrounds. The distributionof engineering disciplines included in the survey was 40 CS/EE, 20 aerospace engineering, 15chemical engineering and 25 civil engineering. We were also able to gather information aboutjob title. All of the interviewees indicated that they are presently (or have been) in hiringpositions; twenty five percent
talented international pool ofentrants versus the smaller domestic pool.10The DataThe following variables were obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics: OccupationalEmployment Statistics11, mainly for the years 1997 through 2009, although the series isincomplete in some cases: total employment: the number of engineers of a specific type reported employed in a given year. The list of engineering specialties includes aerospace, agricultural, biomedical, chemical, civil, computer, electrical and electronic, environmental, safety, industrial, marine, materials, mechanical, mining, nuclear and petroleum. As is typical with time series data, the methods change periodically, resulting in some incomplete series. For
Paper ID #5727Beyond SES: Individual Financial Status as a Predictor of Persistence forHigh-performing Undergraduate Engineering StudentsDr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Dr. James J. Pembridge is an assistant professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry- Riddle Aeronautical University. He earned a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, M.A. Education in Curricu- lum and Instruction, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. His research has focused on mentoring as pedagogy for project-based courses and understanding the adult learning characteristics of undergraduate
International Business from ESC Lille, Graduate School of Management. He is currently working on a Masters of Science in Program & Project Management, focusing on Aerospace Engineering and Learning Science research. He often represents Boeing internationally and domestically as a presenter and has authored PLM integration patents primary relating to advanced aircraft construction, PLM-CAD-CAM metrology and Learning Science research.Paul Newton, The Boeing Company Paul Newton Operational Concept Analyst, Modeling and Simulation Group Strategic Projects & Analysis, Phantom Works The Boeing Company paul.c.newton2@boeing.com 206-544-7641 As an Operational Concept Analyst for
. The ideal case is one where the professors both know each other and have Page 11.173.3 complimentary areas of expertise that fit into a single course and the schedules match. Kurt Maute in our aerospace department has run a course with his colleague in Munich in advanced aircraft design. In this course there were three design teams one of which included students in both countries. Coordination problems and learning how to work together took some time and made the international team somewhat slower. However, the students were uniformly positive about the experience and the next time it is tried this coming fall some of the
2006-157: POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR FEDERAL FUNDING OFENGINEERING EDUCATION RESEARCHDevin Stewart, National Academy of Engineering Devin Stewart was a summer 2005 Science & Technology Graduate Policy Fellow at the National Academies. He is currently a research assistant with the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at the National Academy of Engineering. He received his MS in Aerospace Engineering at Virginia Tech, and earned his BS in Aerospace Engineering and BA in Spanish Language and Literature from the University of Maryland, College Park.Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering Dr. Norman L. Fortenberry is the founding
private-sector executives. Webber’s research, expertise and commentary have been featured in the New York Times, The Daily Telegraph, BBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, NPR, Discovery, Scientific American, Popular Mechanics, MSNBC and every major newspaper in Texas. Michael received a B.A. and B.S. with High Honors (Aerospace Engineering and Liberal Arts) from UT-Austin, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University. Page 14.1335.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Using the Texas Interactive Power Simulator for Direct
of a pilot episode. If the pilot garners interest in the televisionmedia and moves forward, it has the potential to reach both future college students and theirparents. Given an exciting television show with interesting and multidimensional characters, theaudience could change their views of engineers and engineering, and younger viewers mayconsider a career in engineering so they can emulate their favorite character.1. National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.2. Augustine, N.R. (1992) L. A. Engineer. Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 7 (10), 3-5.3. Cohen, J. (2006) Audience identification
stakeholderssuch as industry, clinicians, and patient groups in an effort to understand the current state of theart in the industry as well as to understand the risk associated with the devices. Patient groupswere invited to gauge the benefits desired by patients from the technologies and what risk maybe acceptable to patients.The first workshop topic was the use of additive manufacturing for production of medicaldevices. Several industry representatives, both from companies who develop the additivemanufacturing equipment as well as those in the medical and aerospace industries who currentlyproduce additively manufactured products, presented information on the capabilities of thetechnologies and benefits compared to traditional manufacturing. The workshop
(17-2131), Aerospace Engineers (17-2011), Agricultural Engineers (17-2021), Electrical Engineers (17-2071), Industrial Engineers (17-2112), Marine Engineers and Naval Architects (17-2121), Mechanical Engineers (17-2141), Nuclear Engineers (17-2161), Computer Software Engineers, Applications (15-1031), Computer Software Engineers, Systems Software (15-1032), Biomedical Engineers (17-2031), Computer Hardware Engineers (17-2061), Electronics Engineers, Except Computer (17-2072), Environmental Engineers (17-2081), Mining and Geological Engineers, Including Mining Safety Engineers (17-2151), Petroleum Engineers (17-2171), Biological Scientists, All Other (19-1029
Society for Engineering Education, 2018 An Exploration on the Reform of China’s Engineering Education under the Background of Made in China 2025IntroductionIn 2015, Chinese government proposed Made in China 2025, which is the first ten-yearstrategy of upgrading the country’s manufacturing sector under the background of the newscientific and technological revolution and industry transformation. This strategy putsforward the basic development guidelines of “innovation driven , quality prioritized, structureoptimized, and talent oriented”, and decides to gather all kinds of innovation resources in theten key areas such as new information technology, high-end numerically-controlled machinetools and robotics, aerospace and
the College of Engineering and a Professor of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering at Wichita State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Oklahoma State University. His Ph.D. is from The University of Texas at Arlington and is in Industrial Engineering. He also has 10 years experience in the aerospace industry. His research interests are in enterprise engineering, engineering education, and lean manufacturing.Mr. Ali Ghobahi Katamjani, Wichita State University Page 24.465.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Efficiency
incorporated data for 75,036 individualsdistributed across 11,149 unique buckets. Table 1: Comparison of reported engineering salaries Median Salaries Population IRR US BLS Payscale US BLS Payscale % % Aerospace $ 92,520 $ 70,442 71,600 2,677 3.7% 5.6% Biomedical $ 77,400 $ 76,470 16,000 6,472 40.5% 5.7% Chemical $ 84,680 $ 77,852 31,700 11,567 36.5% 6.6% Civil $ 74,600 $ 61,009 278,400 9,520 3.4% 5.0% Computer