-evaluation results, shown in Figure 5 Figure 4. 2022-2023: Histogram of scores for the assessment using a rubric. Figure 5. 2022-2023. Histogram of scores summarized from CATME.Note that CATME results are capped at 3, so for comparison with the results using the rubric wecounted scores of 3 and higher together.Based on this data we can conclude that: 1. Criterion A. Project planning is difficult for teams, especially given that we are using the Scrum framework which requires constant changes. Note, however, that these are sophomore students or transfer juniors, and we would expect their performance to be somewhat lower than proficient. 2. Criterion B. Project implementation is also difficult for teams to
templates for differentwriting materials. Further details about the GradTrack Scholars program, selection process,general structure, including information about the program modifications over the years have beendocumented previously [4], [5].MethodsEthics StatementMethods were approved by the Purdue Human Research Protection Program and InstitutionalReview Board (IRB), and all surveys and focus groups were completed in accordance with relevantguidelines and regulations. IRB: IRB‐2022‐503; Assessing the effectiveness of the GradTrackvirtual mentoring program.Participants and recruitment processThe participants in this study consist of GradTrack alumni who had completed undergraduatestudies and participated in one of the first two cohorts of the
school of UFSJ – Brazil. Her technical research experience focuses on water and wastewater treatment, statistical methods and biofilms applied to engineering. She also studies the application of SoTL to the chemical engineering curriculum. She is passionate about DEIB, outreach opportunities and mentoring. She has been awarded the 2022 Engaged advocate award. She has completed the Global Diplomacy Initiative course from UNITAR and she is a STEM PEER academy fellow 2023. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A course collaboration between chemical engineering and mechanical engineeringAbstractThe First Year Engineering (FYE) program at the University
from Industry and Academia.” Int. J. Engng. Ed. Vol 26, No. 3: 727-734.Meiksin, Peter, Claudia Vanessa Garcia, Natali Huggins. Maya Menon, and Olivia Ryan (2024).“Women in Engineering: A Review of the 2022.” SWE: Magazine of the Society of WomenEngineers Vol. 70, No. 1. https://magazine.swe.org/lit-review-23/.Patrick, Anita, Catherine Riegle-Crumb, and Maura Borrego (2021). “Examining the GenderGap in Engineering Professional Identification.” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng. Vol. 12, No. 1: 31-55. doi: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2020030909.Silbey, Susan S. (2016) “Why Do So Many Women Who Study Engineering Leave the Field?”Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/08/why-do-so-many-women-who-study-engineering-leave-the-field?r.Wang, Ming-Te and
number PRO-2022-237.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2221511. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] Nielsen, N., & National Research Council (U.S.). Planning Committee on Evidence onSelected Innovations in Undergraduate STEM Education. (2011). Promising practices inundergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: Summary of twoworkshops. National Academies Press.[2] National Research Council. (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation:America’s Science and Technology
fields, as we better understand, document, and celebrate how Black families’engineering practices are enacted.References[1] Kendricks, K. D., Arment, A. A., Nedunuri, K. V., & Lowell, C. A. (2019). Aligning Best Practices in Student Success and Career Preparedness: An Exploratory Study to Establish Pathways to STEM Careers for Undergraduate Minority Students. 3(1). https://typeset.io/papers/aligning-best-practices-in-student-success-and-career- 29sclhmzh2[2] Tolbert Smith, D., Jones, T., & Cardella, M. E. (2022). A Narrative Investigation of Black Familial Capital that Supports Engineering Engagement of Middle-School-Aged Youth. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 12(1). https
. Martin et al., “The climate is changing. Engineering education needs to change as well,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 740–746, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20485.[3] E. A. Cech, “Culture of disengagement in engineering education?,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0162243913504305.[4] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. E. Canney, “Changes in the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time,” Sci Eng Ethics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1535–1551, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9706-5.[5] J. A. Leydens and J. C. Lucena, Engineering justice: Transforming engineering education and practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.[6
2020), 2020.[10] Mo Zhang and Sandip Sinharay. Investigating the writing performance of educationally at-risk examinees using technology. International Journal of Testing, 2022.[11] Benamin Xie, Jared O. Lim, Paul K. D. Pham, Min Li, and Amy J. Ko. Developing novice programmers’ self-regulation skills with code replays. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 2023.
stratification of China’s higher educationsystem is the differentiation between elite and non-elite universities. Elite universities aregenerally sponsored and administered by the Ministry of Education (MoE) or the centralgovernment, while non-elite universities are under the provincial or municipal level ofadministration. The premier status of Chinese elite universities can be best illustrated bythe Double First-Class University (DFCU) Plan[9]. ‘Double’ refers to both university anddiscipline. ‘First-Class’ refers to the objective of reaching the WCU standard. In 2022,there are 301,3 universities in China with only 147 of them (around 4.5%) being includedin the DFCU Plan[10].Thus, the elite universities in this study referred to those in theDFCU plan
, no. 3, pp. 206–222, Jul. 2021.[24] V. K. Malaney-Brown, “The Influence of Familial Relationships: Multiracial Students’Experiences with Racism at a Historically White Institution,” Genealogy, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 64, Jul.2022.[25] M. Minniear and A. L. Atkin, “Exploring Multiracial identity, demographics, and the firstperiod identity crisis: the role of the 2020 United States Census in promoting monocentricnorms,” Journal of Applied Communication Research, pp. 1–18, Aug. 2022.[26] A. L. Atkin and H. C. Yoo, “Familial racial-ethnic socialization of Multiracial AmericanYouth: A systematic review of the literature with MultiCrit,” Developmental Review, vol. 53, p.100869, Sep. 2019.[27] R. S. Chang, “Toward an Asian American Legal Scholarship
Engineering," Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 13–19, 2017.[6] D. DeWeese et al., "The STEMentors Program: Promoting the Academic Readiness and Community Building of Students within General Chemistry," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 88-96, 2024. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01020.[7] E. R. Stuchiner et al., "Intentional mentoring should increase inclusivity in ecology," Ecosphere, vol. 13, no. 1, p. e3902, 2022. DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3902.[8] A. Villanueva, "Practical Strategies to Mentor around Hidden Curriculum Pathways in Engineering," in Proc. 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden, 2022, pp. 1-7. DOI: 10.1109
processes around EBIP-implementation. We hope that this model will facilitate moreeffective mentoring and training programs.References[1] A. Brooks, K. Heath, S. Brown, H. Dominguez, P. Shekhar, and J. Knowles, “One Size Does Not Fit All: Understanding how Faculty Implement Evidence-Based Instructional Practices in Their Engineering Courses,” presented at the IEEE Frontiers in Education (FIE), IEEE, 2022.[2] A. Brooks, J. Knowles, E. Clement, S. Prateek, and S. Brown, “Are All ‘EBIPs’ Created Equal? An Exploration of Engineering Faculty Adoption of Nine Evidence-Based Instructional Practices,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2023[3] J. Knowles, A. Brooks, E. Clement, P. Shekhar, S. Brown, and M. Aljabery, “A Qualitative Exploration of
. Nightingale, J. Swenson, A. Johnson. “Work-in-progress: Incorporating open-ended modeling problems into undergraduate introductory dynamics courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.
racial discrimina�on, withBlack women more likely to perceive correla�ons between gender and racial discrimina�on and theirmental health. Conversely, Black men may internalize violence and manifest it through mental healthissues, substance abuse, and risk-taking behaviors. These dispari�es underscore the complex interplaybetween race, gender, and mental health outcomes within the Black community.In essence, addressing the mental health impact of racial discrimina�on on Black individuals necessitatesa comprehensive approach that acknowledges the systemic and cyclic nature of these stressors. Deadyet al. (2022) iden�fied anxiety, depression, and comorbidity as predictors for work performance andabsenteeism among professionals of various ages and
scaffoldingapproaches in engineering and technology education: A clustering approach,” Comp Applic InEngineering, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1795–1812, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1002/cae.22556.[3] B. R. Belland, A. E. Walker, N. J. Kim, and M. Lefler, “Synthesizing Results From EmpiricalResearch on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education: A Meta-Analysis,” Review of EducationalResearch, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 309–344, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.3102/0034654316670999.[4] M. Borrego, J. Karlin, L. D. McNair, and K. Beddoes, “Team Effectiveness Theory from Industrialand Organizational Psychology Applied to Engineering Student Project Teams: A Research Review,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 472–512, 2013, doi: 10.1002/jee.20023.[5] J. Bransford, National
perspective challenges in big data,” in Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications: Proceedings of the Sixth Euro-China Conference on Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications, 15-18 October 2019 Arad, Romania. Springer Singapore, 2022, pp. 309–325.[4] Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Data Scientists,” Occupational Outlook Handbook. 2023. Accessed: Aug. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/math/data- scientists.htm[5] J. A. Rosendale, “Gauging the value of MOOCs,” Higher Education, Skills and Work- Based Learning, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 141–154, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-09-2016- 0065.[6] National Academies of Sciences, “Data science for undergraduates: Opportunities and
, problem based and service learning, and sustainability.Kyla Richardson, Michigan Technological University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Abstract [Blinded University] administers the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations (PSVT:R) to incomingFirst-Year engineering students at orientation. Students who score less than 60 percent on the PSVT:R are requiredto take a spatial visualization skills intervention course, ENG1002 Intro to Spatial Visualization. In the fall semesterof 2022, approximately 15 percent of students enrolled in the First-Year Engineering Program were required toenroll in ENG1002. This resulted in five class
. An equity-minded multi-dimensional framework for exploring the dynamics of sense of belonging in an introductory cs course. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, pages 131–137, 2023.[14] Narges Norouzi and Carmen Robinson. Evaluation of the impact of modality for equity program. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2, pages 1335–1335, 2022.
studentswith opportunities to apply their unique funds of knowledge which can also enhance theirlearning [10-12]. In this paper, we examined the effects of our participant teachers’community-based engineering lessons on their students’ attitudes and perceptions towardengineering during the 2022-2023 school year.Our research questions for this paper are:1. Do students' perceptions and attitudes toward engineering differ with theimplementation of community-based engineering lessons, and do these differences varyacross school context (reservation/rural vs small town/rural)?2. What are elementary teachers’ perspectives about their teaching and their students’learning of community-based engineering in their classrooms?MethodsThe current work is
Fall 2022, a year before thefunding from NSF-IUSE was obtained. Some concepts and lessons were developed in this initialyear of the program, but formal data collection for the study commenced with the Fall 2023cohort of students once funding was obtained. Pre-surveys were conducted in the first semesterof the yearlong introductory course which introduces students to 3D design, 3D printing, arduinoelectronics, robotics, and VR game design in a project-based curriculum, with studentscompleting one engineering capstone project in student teams. In the second semester, studentsfurther their skills in these areas while completing two engineering capstone projects in studentteams. Upon the completion of this second semester, post-survey data will be
ProjectThis project was developed by the author after attending a 2022 KEEN workshop: “EnhancingDiversity and Inclusion through EML”, led by Erin Henslee, Lauren Lowman, and MichaelGross from Wake Forest University. It was developed during the fall semester of 2022 and thefirst iteration was implemented in the spring semester of 2023.This project was made possible by a generous donation from an alumnus of the civil engineeringdepartment (The Finfrock Company). One instructor (the main author) developed this projectand implemented it over three semesters. During one of the semesters, another professor teachingan additional section of statics also implemented the same project without any modifications.As mentioned before, each section of statics
,vol. 13, pp. 193–210, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.28945/4005.[2]. Institute of International Education (IIE). "United States Hosts Over 1 Million InternationalStudents for the Fifth Consecutive Year." IIE - the Power of International Education.https://www.iie.org/news/2020-open-doors-report/#::text=WASHINGTON%2C%20D.C.%2C%20Nov. 11[3]. S. Park, “Academic acculturation of international doctoral students in the U.S.: A Qualitativeinquiry,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 23, p.16089, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316089.[4]. Y. K. Kim, A. Maleku, C. M. Lemieux, X. Du, and Z. Chen, “Behavioral Health Risk
–251, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1111/sipr.12085.[5] S. C. Davis, S. B. Nolen, N. Cheon, E. Moise, and E. W. Hamilton, “Engineering climate for marginalized groups: Connections to peer relations and engineering identity,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 284–315, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20515.[6] M. G. Eastman, M. L. Miles, and R. Yerrick, “Exploring the White and male culture: Investigating individual perspectives of equity and privilege in engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 459–480, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20290.
novel hands-on skill-building courses with a focus on design, manufacturing and clean energy technologies. He was also involved in creating a certificate program in Wind Turbine Technology at FSC and authored a paper on developing wind turbine educational programs on the east coast. (”Developing a Premier Wind Turbine Technology Programs in the East Coast: A Novus Industry and Academia Collaborative Approach” at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition) Prior to 2011, He served as an innovation consultant to turbine engineering and manufacturing companies where he provided and oversaw maintenance strategies for a variety of electro-mechanical and manufacturing equipment. Mr. Shirvani is a member-at-large of
pseudonymized. They will be analyzed through a narrativecoding approach, similar to Pawley and Phillips [43]. This consists of multiple readings throughvarious lenses in order to create an overarching narrative of what the participants’ experienceswere. A priori codes based on our theoretical frameworks (i.e. engineering identity [1]; socialcapital [38]; sense of belonging) will be created to analyze the interviews. We will read throughthe interviews multiple times highlighting instances where these codes occur. Peer debriefingwill be used to aid in the trustworthiness of the findings.Preliminary ResultsIn June 2022, in preparation for this project, we secured permission from our InstitutionalReview Board (IRB) to collect and analyze institutional
engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Michigan. Her research work aims to improve the learning experience for undergraduate students by examining conceptual knowledge gains, affect, identity development, engineering judgment, and problem solving. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Team Dynamics in Student Engineering Design Teams: Correlations to Women Retention and Careers in Mechanical and Motorsport ProfessionsIntroductionThis student-led research paper describes the social-cultural environment of a design and buildengineering club team.In 2022 the number of women employed as mechanical
Year 4 N for Year 5 ( start year) N for Year 1 (2019) (2020) (2021) (2022) (2023) Cohort 1 (2019) 9 8 7 4 3 Cohort 2 (2020) NA 6 5 4 4 Cohort 3 (2021) NA NA 11 8 6 Cohort 4 (2022) NA NA NA 5 4 Cohort 5 (2023) NA NA NA NA
, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2011.[6] J. B. Halkiyo, “Enhancing the Equity and Inclusivity of Engineering Education for Diverse Learners through an Innovative Instructional Design, Delivery, and Evaluation: International Students in Focus,” In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/41209[7] N. Dasgupta, M. M. Scircle, and M. Hunsinger, “Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering,” PNAS Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. Am., vol. 112, no. 16, pp. 4988–4993, 2015, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422822112.[8] S. J. Ceci, D. K. Ginther, S. Kahn, and W. M. Williams, “Women in Academic Science: A Changing
] Picardal, M.T., Sanchez, J.M.P. Effectiveness of Contextualization in ScienceInstruction to Enhance Science Literacy in the Philippines: A Meta-Analysis internationalJournal of Learning, Teaching and Educational ResearchVol. 21, No. 1, pp. 140-156,January 2022 Available: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.9 [Accessed Nov 22 2023].[15] Lopes, J. & Viegas, Clara & Cravino, José. Improving the Learning of Physics andDevelopment of Competences in Engineering Students. International Journal of EngineeringEducation. 26. 612-627 (2010).[16] Cutri, R.; Gil, H. A. C. ; Freitas, P. A. M. . Avaliação por competências? Uma propostade aplicação em disciplinas de engenharia. In: XLVII Congresso Brasileiro de Educação emEngenharia (COBENGE), 2020