undergraduate aerospace curriculum enables the fresh-out engineer to be moreeffective in the workforce. The benefits of this program extend beyond just graduates from theinstitution where the materials were first introduced, but help numerous graduates from otherinstitutions that adopt the systems engineering curriculum. Although it takes years of experienceand exposure to space missions and the relevant disciplines to truly be a competent systemsengineer, being aware of the discipline at the start in one’s career can only benefit the aerospaceworkforce in general. As the most recent NASA Administrator, Michael Griffin, stated in aspeech to engineering educators: “System engineering is a holistic, integrative discipline, wherein the
workshop.- Student topics. This activity was rated as highly rewarding by students. Most of the students (undergraduate and many graduate) had not yet had an opportunity in their academic career to organize and lead a classroom discussion. Feedback from students was overwhelmingly positive. Students appreciated the opportunity to work through the process of organizing and leading a facilitated discussion and noted the boost in confidence this activity provided them for general public speaking skills. Students also noted value in the expectation that they were to provide questions of other student presentations. Students liked having the limits of a 30- minute period for the presentation and Q&A with a buffer for the instructor to fill
studies have shown when undergraduate students are able to combine the fundamentaleducation they get in class with complemented research experience; students have flourished [2,3, 4]. The development of leaders follows the typical hierarchy; the upper classmen typically fillthe leadership positions, while the lower classmen and less experienced members are mentoredwhile working on the projects. This process provides opportunity to develop good leadershipskills and excellent communication skills, experiences that are required and strongly applicableto building a successful career in the aerospace industry [5].Mission of Rocket Propulsion LabSaint Louis University’s Rocket Propulsion Laboratory (RPL) is a Student Organizationinvolved in the
to guide student discussions on applications of CST in aviationand aerospace industries. Leading debriefings also helps students to be better prepared to besuccessful in aviation and aerospace careers. In the Moon Ball student leader report, a summaryof lessons learned illustrates the effectiveness of the activities as a way to learn CST: “The feedback from the participants indicated that many lessons were learned from the Moon Ball game. Routines and procedures are important so people know what to expect, and are therefore more likely to be successful. Good discussion and planning helps progress, and working with a group is helpful for new ideas. It is difficult to work within an interdependent system because
related challenges in a robust, reliable and comprehensive manner. 4. Encourage undergraduate and graduate students at U.S. colleges and universities to contribute innovative ideas and solutions to issues facing airports and the National Airspace System. 5. Provide a framework and incentives for quality educational experiences for university students. 6. Develop an awareness of and an interest in airports as vital and interesting areas for engineering and technology careers.” [4]Past winning teams have been comprised of students from engineering and technology programs[5]. From 2007 to 2017, sustainability was mentioned in twelve of the first-place designpackages of the ACRP
we analyze these five students’ thought processes as they completed theOEMPs [11]. Here, we examine only what they thought about the problems, and find fourthemes: 1) The OEMPs related to the real world, 2) the OEMPs helped to teach course concepts,3) the OEMPs were fun, and 4) the OEMPs made the students think.Two students discussed how they thought the OEMPs were a good addition to the coursebecause they showed how the material applied to the real world and required them to practiceskills they would need for their engineering careers. Broderick remarked twice that he “thoughtthese problems were really good real world applications.” Henry described how the OEMPsprovided more real world practice than a standard problem: You start out
that engineering students were interested and excited to learn more about thistechnology. The students also felt that they gained valuable knowledge that will help them inchosen career. Students would have liked the opportunity to learn at their own pace and to havetime to experiment with the technology. This could be fixed by giving students their ownlicenses to Fusion360 and the PocketNC simulator so they can work from home. Students foundit challenging to understand aerospace component machining issues while at the same timelearning the nuances of 5-axis CNC.References[1] National Tooling and Machining Association, “Main Strategies for Effective Implementationof 5-Axis in Different Industries”, https://www.canadianmetalworking.com
school’s UAS center has received high-quality UAS platforms toboth conduct future research and participate in public service operations. In addition, thecenter has benefitted directly from the student’s computer communications expertise as anintern and then as an employee on several important grants and other sponsored work.Clearly, this (now former) student has also benefitted personally and professionally fromparticipating in the aerospace opportunities afforded him at the school. He has gone on to apromising technical engineering career and I fully expect that his love for learning andteaching will eventually find its way back to some university in the future. Such skillsets canbe developed and nurtured through our programs, even when these are
, and K.A. Orvis, "Understanding how peer mentoring and capitalization link STEM students to their majors," The Career Development Quarterly, 2012. 60(4): p. 343-354.10. REDACTED.11. Brown, A.L. and R.A. Ferrara, "Diagnosing zones of proximal development," L. Vygotsky: Critical assessments: The zones of proximal development, 1999. 3: p. 225-256.12. Bruner, J.S., Toward a theory of instruction. Vol. 59. 1966: Harvard University Press.13. Akbulut, Y., S. Şendağ, G. Birinci, K. Kılıçer, M.C. Şahin, and H.F. Odabaşı, "Exploring the types and reasons of Internet-triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students: Development of Internet-Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (ITADS)," Computers
learning13. It is consequentlyimportant to give students the opportunity to study outside of the typical classroom setting whiletackling real-world problems. It becomes the student’s responsibility to conduct research,develop a plan of action, and collaborate within a team. This approach helps discover naturaltalent, applies and expands on classroom knowledge, and may help launch a career in aerospaceor engineering based on that discovery.MethodsStudents were initially surveyed solely to gauge project interest based on academic major andpersonal preference. The group was initially comprised of 16 students willing to devote three tofive hours of work per week, with four students dropping out during the first half of the projectdue to personal
interview transcripts. We present a representativequote and several similar, though truncated, quotes from other participants to illustrate thethemes. Each of these themes is an aspect of how the participants have constructed theirunderstanding of and managing uncertainty in design.Theme 1: Managing uncertainty can be learned, but none learned to do so in schoolA common conclusion from the participants is that the ability to manage uncertainty in designcan be learned. This was most succinctly stated by Stephen who responded to a question aboutwhether he approaches projects the same way at the beginning of his career versus where he wasnow by simply stating “No. Again it’s a learned experience.” The participants explained thatthere were five main
, and teaching- focused culture at our institution make it very challenging to perform fundamental research. Mentoring undergraduate students in research during the summers takes away a considerable amount of time that could have been used for fundamental research. On the other hand, undergraduate research is very valuable for improving one's teaching career. For example the undergraduate research activities allow the faculty to learn modern technology and modern problems that eventually trickle down into the classrooms. Being in the business of teaching, undergraduate research can be looked upon as teaching students the skills and knowledge on how to conduct research. These skills will most likely benefit
education. These undergraduate students also had an opportunity to formally present theirwork at a public forum, at the Undergraduate Research Day at the Capitol event in Charleston,West Virginia, which afforded them the experience of presenting technically advanced materialto West Virginia state legislators as they will often be required to do in their careers. Thegraduate students also presented their published work at several national and state conferencesincluding the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Guidance, Navigation,and Control Conference, the AIAA Young Professional and Student Educational Conference,and the West Virginia STAR Symposium. The presentation skills gained through theseopportunities undoubtedly
Paper ID #9767Aerospace Partners for the Advancement of Collaborative EngineeringDr. Steve Gorrell, Brigham Young University Dr. Steve Gorrell joined the BYU Mechanical Engineering Department in 2007 following an eighteen year career as an Aerospace Engineer at the Air Force Research Laboratory Propulsion Directorate. There Dr. Gorrell pioneered the use of high performance computing (HPC), hi-fidelity time-accurate CFD, and Particle Image Velocimetry to investigate and understand unsteady flow physics in high performance gas turbine engine fans and compressors. Dr. Gorrell has published 64 technical papers on unsteady
technology can provide a strong basis formotivating student interest in a course. Such a course, if based on military applications oftechnology, can also impart beneficial background to graduates who pursue careers in thedefense industry. Moreover, many of the topics are generally applicable, so even students whonever enter the defense sector can profit substantially from the experience.Electronic warfare (EW) is an activity the military uses in virtually all military operations. EWis using the electromagnetic (EM) spectrum for advantage, preserving its use for friendly forces, Page 24.176.2and preventing the enemy from doing the same.1 The
: Role of AE3xxx in the curriculum aerodynamics, structures, vehicle Page 23.25.2 dynamics and control, propulsion, andinterdisciplinary design to be well prepared for careers in aerospace and related engineeringfields. They will be well-trained to function as professionals who can formulate, analyze andsolve problems that may include economic, social and environmental constraints. And finally,they will be prepared to communicate well, function well in the global environment
that may confront students during their engineering career. Technicalrationality is inevitably entwined and complicated by social values and this engineeringstudies curriculum design is intended to facilitate the development of moral, ethical andsustainable integrity, where students are encouraged to explore possible alternatives beyondthe knowledge and constraints of the actual situation with an ability to make value-laden,ethical and sustainable judgement in the world of engineering industry and commerce. Mostimportantly, the curriculum needed to be accepted and embraced by the students, rather thanbe viewed as a soft subject or a waste of time.As developed, the curriculum is not rigidly or exclusively postmodern – a term with multipleand
, numerical modeling, electromagnetic compatibility and engineering education. During his career, Dr. Belu published several papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his areas of the research interests. He has also been PI or co-PI for various research projects United States and abroad in power systems analysis and protection, load and energy demand forecasting and analysis, renewable energy analysis, assessment and design, turbulence and wave propagation, radar and remote sensing, instrumentation, atmosphere physics, electromagnetic compatibility, and engineering education.Dr. Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University Dr. CiobanescuHusanu is Assistant Professor in Engineering Technology at Drexel
made without considering theoperational context of the vehicle system 1-5 . These decisions can have significant impacts on theoverall design, the subsequent life-cycle costs, and the safety of stakeholders. Thus, it is criticalto examine how to better incorporate stakeholder requirements and context considerations earlyand throughout the design process.In the final year of most undergraduate curriculum, aerospace engineering students participate ina senior (also known as capstone) design course, which aims to provide an authentic designexperience for the students and to prepare them to overcome design-related challenges duringtheir careers. This authentic experience must introduce students to not only the technical andperformance components
. Sometime during the mid- to late 1940’s the directorship ofthe tunnel transferred to James Dwinnell, a 1939 graduate of the department who had joined thefaculty in 1941, and who later went on to a distinguished career at Boeing.Kirsten, the Professor By the late 1930’s and early 1940’s Professor Fred Kirsten was known for his strongviews on education. On May 26, 1936 the school paper reported on Kirsten’s “Guess your gradeand take no exams” policy. The “student choice” grading system started in the fall of 1935 andworked by allowing students to guess their grade to opt out of the grueling three-hour final exam.If their own estimates agreed with Kirsten, they did not have to take the final. “So far”, Kristensaid, “I have agreed with one
industry in students’ projects present a win-winbenefits for all parties involved [3], [4], [5]. From experiential learning projects, students gethands-on experience working on a project and can exercise room for error with minimal risk totheir careers - a chance that might not be afforded in a work environment [4]. Both industry andschools could benefit from partnerships that allow students to exercise their creativity becausestudents may raise questions that might otherwise be missed by industry representatives andfaculty. Furthermore, the industry might benefit as there may be minimal capital investmentswhen students carry out a project [3], given that is properly scoped and managed.Another way for students to interact with experts is to