addressed student learning and exposure to re-search while concurrently addressing energy conservation. The collaborative project allowedthe expertise of University of Nebraska professors and students to be utilized in combinationwith the Omaha Public Power District’s (OPPD) financial and customer base support. Therelationships built enriched student learning by providing real world engineering experiences.The students refined their research, communication, and presentation skills by interactingwith and presenting engineering solutions to a wide range of professionals, engineering stu-dents, and the community. The students worked closely with professors to prepare profes-sional documents, analyze data, and develop future research plans. Student
case of testing models outdoor, wind, rain, continuously-moving sun, and continuously-moving clouds are detrimental factors that prevent any testing. Figure 6 b: Geodesic Dome (elevation)Figure 6 a: Geodesic Dome (plan) Figure 6 c: Laboratory setup, showing outer and inner concentric domes; and the heliodon.Figure 7: The tilting table heliodon. Figure 8: The star effect as seen in the daylighting lab in Cardiff University, UK
, design, construction and urban planning to, incrementally, revise thebuilding delivery system used for affordable housing and making it more efficient, sustainableand affordable. Through this prolonged address, these students were able to bring together theefficiencies and supports of traditional construction with those offered by emerging materials andprocesses, including digital fabrication and parametric data analysis. The first home,HOUSE01, will be completed in the spring of 2017. Although not yet complete, early evidencesare promising: the current bid for the construction cost of the kitchen and 1.5 baths forHOUSE01 is $10,000, roughly $17,000 less than the average cost of similarly scaled homes; thecurrent schedule of production indicates
architectural technology varies from the perfunctory to the pervasive. Nevertheless, it’s fair to suggest that each school of architecture in North America is defined by its choice among the variables of teaching architectural technology.”1This observation suggests that the issue of technology teaching for architecture students is notgiven significant weight in academic discourse. Further weight is leant to this argument by Cary’sreflection in a 2003 Design Intelligence article about that publication’s planned Skills Assessmentsurvey. He notes the relative paucity of longitudinal studies of architecture students’ professionalpreparedness. “If these were unprecedented findings or if individual schools, firms or our national
by instructor). - Grading of deliverables by the instructors (project plan, mid-term review, final report, exhibit (and abstract), oral presentation, team minutes, web site if applicable). - Teamwork survey. - Self-assessment. - Senior Design Symposium judging (with evaluation criteria explicitly indexed to the learning objectives and articulated via rubrics for all measures). Table 4: Results of Indirect Assessment for AREN 485 (twenty students in the course) Indirect AssessmentStudent Self-Assessment Number Number Number Number Number Equivalentof Course Learning of A’s of B’s of C’s of D’s of E’s GPA (4 toObjectives
concepts they have acquired. The goal of thelab is to reinforce the material covered in the classroom and to develop an understanding ofbuilding power system design and effective production and design methods. At the beginning ofthe semester, the class is presented with preliminary plans for a building previously designed bythe industry professional dictating the lab. Students are then asked to complete a series of designtasks each week in the order they would occur in a professional environment. Each week thestudents are issued a set of drawings and necessary information to complete the task. They areasked to analyze, design and document their results and show their designs on the drawingsproviding all information pertinent to a practical and
ten-day travel-study program in Spain. Furthermore, a briefdiscussion on plans for formal assessment of the travel-study workshop is provided, primarily inrelation to the ability of the students to function well in multi-disciplinary teams as both leadersand contributors.Early Development of the Bedford ProgramThe Bedford Program was established as the result of a gift to Rensselaer Polytechnic Instituteby Clay Patrick Bedford, a 1924 alumnus of Rensselaer. Clay Bedford had a distinguishedcareer with Kaiser Industries where he rose to become President of Kaiser Aerospace andElectronics Corporation. At Kaiser, he played major roles in a number of large-scaleconstruction projects including the Boulder, Grand Coulee, and Bonneville Dams. He
Engineering Technology Colleges.ASEE 2005 Edition, ASEE Publications, Washington D.C. 2006.2 Drexel University, Online Catalogue: Recommended Plan of Study, B.S. Architectural Engineering.http://coreapp1.drexel.edu/webplanofstudy/plan.asp?plan_id=127 Department of Civil, Architectural andEnvironmental Engineering, College of Engineering. Philadelphia,PA. accessed August 25, 2006.3 Kansas State University, Undergraduate Curriculum, B.S. in Architectural Engineering. http://www.k-state.edu/are-cns/arecurriculum.html Department of Architectural Engineering and Construction Science,Manhattan, KS. Accessed August 31, 2006.4 Illinois Institute of Technology, Architectural Engineering Curriculum, IIT Undergraduate Bulletin 2004-2007,http://www.iit.edu