Conference Session

Collaborative Projects in Architectural Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob Nathan Dunn, University of Idaho Integrated Design Lab; Kevin Van Den Wymelenberg; Sherry McKibben, IURDC, University of Idaho

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

semester longdesign studio. Extensive pre and post surveys were administered to the students toevaluate the course‟s effectiveness in using building performance simulation to teachhigh performance and integrated design. Insight was gained on how to introducecomprehensive simulation tools into the design studio, how to integrate mechanicalengineering students more effectively into architectural courses, and how architects andengineers can work together around an energy model.2. IntroductionIn contemporary practice, two factors have a substantial impact on the way that wedesign buildings. The first, integrated design, is an old concept that has seen newpopularity in light of the need for deep energy savings in new and existing buildings. The second

Conference Session

Collaborative Projects in Architectural Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Graham C. Archer P.Eng, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo; Cole C McDaniel, California Polytechnic State University; Pablo D. Ramos

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

theactual strructural respponse has beeen found to have h severall benefits. Students S not only sharpenntheir moddeling skills,, they can exxplore the acccuracy of thheir modelingg assumptionns and learnn ahealthy skepticism s fo or computatiional results.. 8,3 Figure 1: The T Bridge House HWhile sim mple, the strructure posseesses severall interesting structural feeatures, the

Conference Session

Instructional Innovations and Global Issues in Architectural Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Orla Smyth LoPiccolo, State University of New York, Farmingdale

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

Instructional Media; 2002; 29:4.2 Hofstein, A, Rosenfeld, S., Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Science Learning, Studies in Science Education, 1996,;28: 87-112.3 Tuthill, G., Klemm, E, Virtual Field Trips: Alternatives to Actual Field Trips, International Journal of Instructional Media; 2002;29:4.4 Ignatiuk, G., Influence of the Amount of Time Spent in Field Trip Activities on Student Attitude Toward Science and the Environment. S.S.T.A. Research Centre Report No. 49, Canada-Saskatchewan, 1-9. Page 23.1236.95 ABET – Assuring Quality in Technical Education, www.abet.org6 Krepel, W., & DuVall, C., Field Trips: A

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching in Architectural Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James P. Mwangi P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI’2006), 2006.9. Edward J. Coyle, Leah H. Jamieson and William C. Oakes, “Integrating Engineering Education and Community Service: Themes for the Future of Engineering Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2006, pp. 7-11.10. Bernard Amadei, “Engineering for the developing World”, http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/7126/7356.aspx.11. Russel C. Jones and Bethany S. Oberst, “Capacity Building – Engineers For Developing Countries”, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 200312. Smith, Anna Gabriela Richardson, “Building Blocks for Life: Improving the Quality of Concrete Masonry Units in

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching in Architectural Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allen C Estes, California Polytechnic State University; Brent Nuttall P.E., California Polytechnic State University; Jill Nelson P.E., California Polytechnic State University; Margot Kally McDonald AIA, NCARB, LEED BD+C, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo; Gregory F. Starzyk JD, Cal Poly at San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

building, renewable energy, and sustainability initiatives in architectural education and the built environment over the past 20 years during her tenure as an architecture department faculty member at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo. In the mid-1990’s, she was part of a design-engineering team that produced a feasibility study for a campus biological solid waste and wastewater treatment facility at Cal Poly, and worked as a consultant with Sasaki and Associates on a Sustainability Master Plan for California State University, Monterey Bay. She participated in the Vital Signs Building Case Study Project throughout its 10-year lifespan. This NSF and Energy Foundation funded curriculum project set standards and provided

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching in Architectural Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shahnaz J. Aly, Western Kentucky University; Laura Elizabeth Leach, Western Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

, M. G. (2006). Building School-Community Partnerships: Collaboration for Student Success. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.[8] Schuman, A. W. (2006). Introduction: The Pedagogy of Engagement. In Hardin, M.C, Eribes, C., Poster, C. (Volume Eds.), Zeisel, W.(Series Ed.). From the Studio to the Streets: Service-Learning in Planning and Archtiecture. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.[9] Rios, M. (2006). Where Do We Go from Here? An Evaluative Framework for Community-Based Design. In Hardin, M.C, Eribes, C., Poster, C. (Volume Eds.), Zeisel, W.(Series Ed.). From the Studio to the Streets: Service-Learning in Planning and Archtiecture. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.[10] Gaber, S., Bennett, D. (2006). Institutional

Conference Session

Collaborative Projects in Architectural Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Jan Cowan, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Kirsten Hill, IUPUI Student; Mary Ann Frank, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

and best use” (p 6)8.Container Architecture7 by Jure Kotnik is one of the frequently cited sources of information inthis field. Originating from the 1950’s, today’s shipping container began its adventure intoarchitecture through exploratory makeshift sheds or shops while others were created as moresculptural, statement pieces. The surplus of these containers pushed its design and repurposingevolution to move quickly. Sending an empty container back to be reused costs $900 (p 16)7,therefore it is often more economical for companies to purchase a new one. The growingknowledge of this abundance problem has helped shape the re-use of these structures intobuildings. By 1990, for example, James Palibroda submitted a patent application with the

Conference Session

Instructional Innovations and Global Issues in Architectural Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hollee Hitchcock Becker, The Catholic University of America

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

. William Braham5 places the establishment of discrete courses in structures forarchitecture students separate from studio as taking place in the 1940’s and 50’s. This impliesthat educators today were educated themselves in a curriculum that sequestered structures awayfrom the design studio.In the defense of the shift in design thinking, it is true that with an understanding of structuralconcepts, an architect may design a space without ever calculating a size. But, in reality, a spacedesigned without the ability to at least estimate component size will, in all likelihood, become avery different space once an engineer has finished the working drawings. Control of design isessential to the architect as is the ability to communicate with engineers

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching in Architectural Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill Nelson P.E., California Polytechnic State University; John W. Lawson, Architectural Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

based on those preferences.Figure 2 is a copy of the Learning Preference Assignment. Page 23.1137.5 Figure 2 Learning Preference Assignment Activity Assignment #1 LEARNING STYLESObjective: To determine your personal learning style(s) to help you get more out of this course and your other college coursework.Background: Every individual has a different learning style. Some students prefer to read the course material slowly instead of listening to a lecture. Some students can only understand lecture material when it is in their hands through a

Conference Session

Instructional Innovations and Global Issues in Architectural Engineering Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James P. Mwangi P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

cyclone resistanceEngineer’s name and signature: ___________________________________Date work completed: ___________________________________________ Page 23.1138.11Appendix B:BOS MASON TRAINING WORKSHOP EXIT QUIZLast Name: ______________________ First Name(s): _____________________NIF: __________________________ Telephone: _______________________Please answer all the questions to the best of your ability1. MaterialsSince attending the workshop from MCC what changes have you made in use of the followingmaterials? Sand Gravel Cement Water Blocks Steel reinforcement2. Column and beam steel