Asee peer logo
Displaying all 2 results
Conference Session
Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Darrell D. Nickolson, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Katie Pruitt
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering
, sharing they’redesign ideas, gaining feedback from on if the concept developed thus far had hit the “target” of the community issue. Our community partners made two visits to our studio on campus andspent individual time with each student, and then I conducted a group Q&A where we all haddiscussions about the project in general and long-term impacts we were trying to make. Partnersgot to see study models (ex.1g, 1h, 1i, 1j, 1k) each student hand built to explain their conceptsand ideas, and students got firsthand experience of how important a study model can be onprojects where clients are themselves still in the ideation phase of a project
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Piyush Pradhananga; Mohamed ElZomor, Florida International University; Gabriella Santi; Lu Zhang, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering
questions (Q), and 3% believed this activity did notimprove any skills. These results indicate a significant growth throughout the implementationof the VR activity, as 97% of the students demonstrate and improvement in their skills. Figure 10. Students’ Perception of Improvement of Skills, N=60Furthermore, 82% of students indicated they would continue to train their presentation skillsthrough the VR Simulations beyond this pilot study. Thus, offering alternative innovativelearning techniques is, in fact, an effective way to develop and nurture students’communication skills.Finally, the students’ feedback about the VR Presentation Simulation Training sessions wereobtained. Based on qualitative analysis, 88% of the students provided