novel curriculum based upon provenpedagogical approaches designed to engage the students and improve their mastery of concepts.This paper highlights two curriculum modules developed for a bioprocess engineering programas part of a larger curriculum improvement program.Project BackgroundIn 1999, the National Research Council published How People Learn: Mind, Brain, Experience,and School 2 as the summary of what we know from research about the first three words of thistitle. This document proposed four “centerednesses” that, taken together, optimize learning:knowledge-centeredness, student-centeredness, assessment-centeredness, and community-centeredness. When these four are in place, studies show that students increase both theircontent
whatour curriculum will be from a macro level perspective, we are in a good position to createcourses across and the breadth and depth of biological engineering content in a balanced,integrated manner. Even though discipline standards, department curriculum, and individualcourses may develop at different rates, and not in a linear fashion, our goal is to explicitly definethe relationships between each level early so that as the discipline standards take shape we canensure that our curriculum is updated, and focus our efforts in a continuous improvement processover time. Keeping the principle of alignment in mind, the next few sections of this paper willconsider some of the profits and pitfalls associated with our efforts at discipline, curriculum
AC 2012-2949: ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING USING FLEMING & MILLS’VARK LEARNING STYLESDr. Mysore Narayanan, Miami University Mysore Narayanan obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of electrical and electronic engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic, and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several ency- clopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national, and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized, and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a
2006-1656: EXPERIENCES WITH GROUP WORK AT THE UNIVERSITY OFMARYLANDAdel Shirmohammadi, University of Maryland-College Park Adel Shirmohammadi is Professor in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering at the University of Maryland. He joined the university in 1986 and is a Fellow of ASABE.Arthur Johnson, University of Maryland-College Park Arthur T. Johnson is Professor in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering at the University of Maryland. He came to the university in 1975, and is a Fellow of ASEE, AIMBE, BMES, AIHA, and ASABE. Page 11.617.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006
AC 2008-653: THE BIOMASS BANDWAGON: THREE IDEAS FORENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS TO GET ONBOARDKurt Rosentrater, USDA-ARS KURT A ROSENTRATER is a Lead Scientist with the United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, in Brookings, SD, where he is spearheading an initiative to develop value-added uses for residue streams resulting from biofuel manufacturing operations. He is formerly an assistant professor at Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, in the Department of Engineering and Industrial Technology.Jerry Visser, South Dakota State University JERRY VISSER is Operations Manager of the Product Development Center at South Dakota State University in
(April 5, 2015) at http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework15. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. National Academies Press. Washington DC.16. Palou, E., Gazca, L., Díaz García, J. A., Rojas Lobato, J. A., Guerrero Ojeda, L. G., Tamborero Arnal, J. F., Jiménez Munguía, M. T., López-Malo, A. and Garibay, J. M. 2012. High-Quality Learning Environments for Engineering Design: Using Tablet PCs and Guidelines from Research on “How People Learn”. International Journal of Food Studies. 1(1): 1-16.17. Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., and Rugarcia, A. 2000. The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods
AC 2011-1541: ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HOWPEOPLE LEARN FRAMEWORK THROUGH DIRECT CLASSROOM OB-SERVATION IN SELECTED FOOD ENGINEERING COURSESlourdes gazca, American University in Puebla, Mexico Lourdes Gazca is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches mathematics and statistics related courses. Her research inter- ests include faculty development, active and cooperative learning, and creating effective learning environ- ments.Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas PueblaEnrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Enrique Palou is Director, Center for Science, Engineering, and Technology Education; and Professor
the four modules and a voluntary in-class surveyconducted after all modules were performed. The overall student impression of the course was extremely favorable. The end of thesemester survey that is usually ran by the college of engineering yielded a 4.67/5.0 rating for thecourse. 64% of the students completed the end of semester course survey. Students enjoyed theflexibility of the hands-on modules and commented that the modules were very helpful inreinforcing specific concepts in their minds. The grading of the technical reports was performedaccording to a rubric. This rubric was shared with the students prior to report submission. Clearexpectations on what the report should include were as well given to the students. The reportswere
/195967/globalinitiative.pdf ).The efforts of the project team, not only support the UMES land grant mission, but also challengesrelated to managing nitrogen cycle, reducing carbon footprint, clean water, and engineering toolsfor scientific discovery, consistent with the twenty-first century grand challenges as outlined bythe National Academy of Engineering(NAE)(http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx).Traditional disciplinary boundaries in academia and engineering curricula that often createsartificial boundaries, will need to be diffused to sensitize young minds to effectively address thesechallenges that are at the interfaces of traditional disciplinary boundaries in academia. Facultymembers in engineering with expertise in
Paper ID #18947Educational Immersive Simulation Game Design to Enhance Understandingof Corn-Water-Ethanol-Beef System NexusDr. Deepak R. Keshwani, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Deepak Keshwani is an associate professor of Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. In addition to research in the area of bioprocess modeling, Dr. Keshwani is engaged in teaching and advising students across two academic colleges and is involved in numerous campus-wide student success initiatives.Mr. Ryan Drew Anderson, University of Nebraska, Lincoln I am a graduate student pursuing my Master’s degree in
AC 2009-2020: NETWORK PARTICLE TRACKING (NPT) FOR ECOSYSTEMTHERMODYNAMICS AND RISK ANALYSISErnest Tollner, University of Georgia, AthensJohn Schramski, University of Georgia Building on a distinguished and a uniquely diverse career in both public and private industry Dr. Schramski is a member of both the Environmental Engineering Faculty and the Systems & Engineering Ecology Research Program at the University of Georgia. Among other areas, his research and pedagogical pursuits include ecosystem energetics, industrial ecology, ecological network analysis, and engineering education curriculum. Currently, his engineering education research includes his restructuring of the traditional
I am a PhD student in Educational Leadership and policy studies with emphasis in higher education. I earned his Bachelor’s degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering and Master’s degree in Engineering Management both from Florida International University. I worked in companies such as CommerceBank, Johnson & Johnson, Electrolux and others as part of the operations, quality control, quality assurance and management teams. I started working at the office of Community College Research and Policy (OCCRP) as a Graduate Research Assistant in February 2009. I am currently working on a National Science Foundation funded project entitled the Pathway2STEM as Project Manager. I am also working in the Biomedical