- Conference Session
- Biology in Engineering
- Collection
- 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Mark McConkie, Utah State University; Timothy Taylor, Utah State University; David Britt, Utah State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Biological & Agricultural
whatour curriculum will be from a macro level perspective, we are in a good position to createcourses across and the breadth and depth of biological engineering content in a balanced,integrated manner. Even though discipline standards, department curriculum, and individualcourses may develop at different rates, and not in a linear fashion, our goal is to explicitly definethe relationships between each level early so that as the discipline standards take shape we canensure that our curriculum is updated, and focus our efforts in a continuous improvement processover time. Keeping the principle of alignment in mind, the next few sections of this paper willconsider some of the profits and pitfalls associated with our efforts at discipline, curriculum
- Conference Session
- Innovations in Biological and Agricultural Engineering
- Collection
- 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Adel Shirmohammadi, University of Maryland-College Park; Arthur Johnson, University of Maryland-College Park
- Tagged Divisions
-
Biological & Agricultural
2006-1656: EXPERIENCES WITH GROUP WORK AT THE UNIVERSITY OFMARYLANDAdel Shirmohammadi, University of Maryland-College Park Adel Shirmohammadi is Professor in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering at the University of Maryland. He joined the university in 1986 and is a Fellow of ASABE.Arthur Johnson, University of Maryland-College Park Arthur T. Johnson is Professor in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering at the University of Maryland. He came to the university in 1975, and is a Fellow of ASEE, AIMBE, BMES, AIHA, and ASABE. Page 11.617.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006