Conference Session

Design and Research in BME

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John P. Puccinelli, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Matthew S. Bollom

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Award in 2012.Mr. Matthew S Bollom Matthew Bollom is a 2013 graduate of the University of Wisconsin-Madison with a degree in Biomedical Engineering. He currently works for National Instruments in Austin, Texas. Page 26.457.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Design and Implementation of Web-based System for Client-based Design Project ManagementIntroductionBiomedical engineering (BME) students at the University of Wisconsin-Madison participate inhands-on, client-based, real-world, team-based design projects for six semesters (sophomore-senior year

Conference Session

Pipeline and Performance in BME Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric M. Brey, Illinois Institute of Technology; Megan F. Campanile, Illinois Institute of Technology; Norman G. Lederman, Illinois Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Brook, NY: State University of New York.2. Hancock, M. P., & Russel, S. H. (2008). Research experiences for undergraduates (REU) in the directorate for engineering (ENG) 2003–2006 participant survey. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.3. National Science Foundation (2013). Research experiences for undergraduate (REU) program solication (Document Number: NSF 12-569). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2012/nsf12569/nsf12569.htm4. Russell, S. H., Ailes, C.P, Hancock, M.P., McCullough, J., Rosesner, J.D., & Storey, C. (2004). Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate research opportunities: 2003 NSF-program participant survey. Menlo, CA: SRI International.5. Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

. Ramos, R. F., “Introduction of Active Learning Techniques Increases Student Learning in a Systems Physiology Laboratory Course,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.4. Sieving, A. L., M. Pool, S. A. Jewett, T. Eustaquio, R. Madangopal, A. Panitch, K. Stuart, A. E. Rundell, “Development of Verification and Validation Engineering Design Skills through a Multi-year Cognitive Apprenticeship Laboratory Experience,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.5. Kirschner, P. A. “The laboratory in higher science education, problems, premises, and objectives,” Higher Education, vol. 17, pp. 81-90, 1988.6. Litzinger, T., L. R. Lattuca, R. Hadgraft, W. Newstetter, “Engineering

Conference Session

Pipeline and Performance in BME Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Davide Piovesan, Gannon University; Karinna M. Vernaza, Gannon University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM and ADVANCE-PAID grants. Page 26.790.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Formative vs Summative ABET Assessment: A Comprehensive Graphic Representation for A New BME ProgramAbstractThis paper presents an innovative methodology for the assessment of a new BiomedicalEngineering (BME) program. Biomedical engineering programs are quite new in the engineeringeducational system. To date, in the state of Pennsylvania there are only six programs that havebeen accredited by ABET out of the 91 programs accredited nationwide1. While the guidelines ofABET

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leann Dourte Segan, University of Pennsylvania; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

were administered during the semester and incorporated “big-picture” conceptquestions in addition to traditional, numerical mechanics problems. Throughout the semester,instant feedback “clicker questions” in multiple choice or short answer format were utilized toreview material, assess student understanding and prepare for the concept questions on theexams. Because exam solutions are released each year, matched exam questions with previous,non-SAIL formatted years are not feasible. However, the topic(s) and goal for each problemalong with the average problem score will be tabulated and compared across years to identify ifany patterns exist.A variety of non-exam assessments were also administered in collaboration with the University’sCenter for

Conference Session

Using Technology and Research-based Instructional Practices in BME

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

C. randomize order of treatments D. all of the above8. A company wants to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between their new cholesterol drug and their old cholesterol drug. Which test should the company use to compare the sample means? A. ANOVA B. p-test C. t-test D. both B & C9. Which of the following is/are the correct test(s) to compare sample variances of two populations? A. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) B. t-test C. f-test D. both A & C10. A biomedical researcher has measured the strength of several different brands of coronary artery stents. Which of the following tests should he/she use to compare the data? A

Conference Session

Pipeline and Performance in BME Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington; Lucy L. Pick, University of Washington; Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

to the following for their contributions to the learning modules: KimWoodrow and members of the Woodrow lab, Suzie Pun, Barry Lutz, Rahil Jain, and IanAndrews.Bibliography1. Yilmaz, M., Garcia, C., Guillen, T. & Ramirez, D. (2011). A K-12 Advanced Research Camp for Engineeringand Science Disciplines. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference 2011, Vancouver, Page 26.283.14Canada, 2011.  2. Yilmaz, M., Ren, J., Ramirez, D., Custer, S. & Coleman, J. (2010). An Improved K-12 Outreach Camp

Conference Session

Innovations in Upper-level Biomedical Engineering Courses

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J. Rust, Western New England University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

, pp. 181-204, Summer 2013.[2] W. Karlen, Ed., Mobile Point-of-Care Monitors and Diagnostic Device Design, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2015.[3] G. J. Kost, N. K. Tran, M. Tuntideelert, S. Kulrattanamaneeporn, and N. Peungposop, “Katrina, the tsunami, and point-of-care testing: Optimizing rapid response diagnosis in disasters,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 513-520, 2006.[4] M. J. Rust, N. A. Carlson, and J. H. Nichols, “A thermo-modulating container for transport and storage of glucose meters in a cold weather environment,” Point of Care, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 157-160, September 2012.[5] S. K. Esche and H. A. Hadim, “Introduction of project-based learning into mechanical engineering courses

Conference Session

Using Technology and Research-based Instructional Practices in BME

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Sarah E. Stabenfeldt, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

instruction, students work in a self-directed manner to interpret outcomes based oninvestigation of their own question. Here, we describe a cost-effective, sustainable biomaterialslaboratory for juniors using inquiry-guided instruction at a large public university.The four laboratory components focused on key biomaterial topics and lasted for two-to-threeweeks. During the first week, students were provided with available materials pertaining to themodule and worked with group members and instructor(s) to devise and test a custom hypothesisinstead of using “cookie cutter” lab manuals. In the second week, students performedexperiments to test their hypotheses. During the last week, students either continued to performdata collection or complete

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Pulford, Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT); Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

challenges that mostengineers encounter in their professional careers.Bibliography[1] K. Topping, “Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 68. pp. 249–276, 1998.[2] K. Cho, C. D. Schunn, and R. W. Wilson, “Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives.,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 98. pp. 891–901, 2006.[3] N. Falchikov, “Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment,” Innovations in Education & Training International, vol. 32. pp. 175–187, 1995.[4] S. Pulford and A. C. Taylor, “Visual Communication Learning through Peer Design Critiques: Engineering Communication Across

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University; Tom Merrill, Rowan University; Robert Alan Hirsh, Cooper University Hospital; Sameer Sood, Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

-2975 Zenios S, Makower J, Yock P. (2010) Biodesign, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.6 https://www.citiprogram.org/index.cfm?pageID=265   Page 26.1762.5

Conference Session

Using Technology and Research-based Instructional Practices in BME

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renata Fortuna Ramos, Rice University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

classroom such as knowledgeprobe, minute paper, misconception check, attention quiz, etc. 7. One of the most widely knownclassroom assessment techniques is known as muddy points, in which the students are asked towrite down the concept(s) that they found most confusing during that class period.Many large lecture courses use muddy points as an instructional assessment technique that allowsthe instructor to gather information at the end of the class about the topics which are not clear tothe students. Using this information, the amount of lecture time allocated to a specific topic canbe increased or decreased to match students’ feedback and emphasize the areas where thestudents need more support 8. This technique offers a two-way feedback mechanism

Conference Session

Pipeline and Performance in BME Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Warnock, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

; instead all courses are pass/fail. Therationale for this is slightly different, as it is intended to let students acclimate to college lifewithout the stress of maintaining a GPA before they enter into the sophomore year where there ismore intelectual rigor.More research is necessary to determine how best to measure student academic success. Thisstudy merely indicates that what is currently accepted as an indicator for student ability mayhave limited utility and alternative options should be explored. Page 26.589.11 References1 Bloom, B. S., College, C. o. & Examiners, U. Taxonomy of educational

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rohit Bhargava, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Andrew Michael Smith, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; P. Scott Carney, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois; Dipanjan Pan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Page 26.1774.5used to document student experiences.References:[1] E. Litzler and J. Young, “Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering: Results from the project to assess climate in engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, issue 2, pp. 319–345, April 2012.[2] J. D. Karpicke, "Retrieval-based learning: Active retrieval promotes meaningful learning," Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 21, issue 3, pp. 157–163, 2012.[3] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, “Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study,” Science Education, vol. 88, issue 4, 493–534, July 2004.Acknowledgement

Conference Session

Design and Research in BME

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yawen Li, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

provides several possible subtopics toundertake as the senior design project. The faculty gives a list of journal articles (usuallybetween 3 and 6 total) related to one topic of the project (for example, ligament injurymechanism, biomechanical properties of ligament, cell-materials interaction, mechanicalstimulation, etc) to the team for review. Each student is also assigned one or two articles fromthe list, and is expected to thoroughly understand the assigned article(s). At the biweekly Page 26.672.6meeting, each student presents a summary of the assigned article(s), followed by discussion tocompare different studies and relate them to the

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Paper ID #12206Work in Progress: Redesign of Introductory Bioengineering Course to In-crease Student EngagementDr. Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University Ruth S. Ochia received the B.S. degree in biomedical engineering from The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, in 1992 and the Ph.D. degree in bioengineering from the University of Washington, Seat- tle, WA, in 2000. From 2000 to 2002, she was a Post-doctoral Fellow in the Center of Locomotion Studies, at The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA. From 2002 to 2006, she was a Post- doctoral Fellow and then Assistant Professor at Rush University Medical Center

Conference Session

Innovations in Upper-level Biomedical Engineering Courses

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anton E. Bowden, Brigham Young University; Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University; Dennis Lee Eggett, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Science Foundation CAREER Award. He is grateful to have been awarded the Weidman Pro- fessorship in Leadership and to have recently been recognized with BYU’s Technology Transfer Award.Dr. Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University Ruth S. Ochia received the B.S. degree in biomedical engineering from The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, in 1992 and the Ph.D. degree in bioengineering from the University of Washington, Seat- tle, WA, in 2000. From 2000 to 2002, she was a Post-doctoral Fellow in the Center of Locomotion Studies, at The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA. From 2002 to 2006, she was a Post- doctoral Fellow and then Assistant Professor at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. From 2006