includingbiomechanics, rehabilitation engineering, bionanomaterials and biomedical imaging, the firstyear of the Bioengineering Experience for Science Teachers (BEST) Program provided in-depthparticipant-tailored curricular mentoring via weekly workshops that focused on principles ofeffective planning, instruction, and assessment which will be directly connected to teachers’classroom curriculum. In addition to exposure to research in bioengineering labs, City PublicHigh School teachers from diverse schools across the district also translated their experience intocurriculum unit lesson plans being implemented the following academic year. 1. IntroductionIt has been well established that there is a shortage of STEM professionals [1]. While there are anumber of
there was any need for change, students modified the design andmanufactured a new prototype, and then performed the surgery again to validate if the newdesign worked better with the existing surgical procedure/tools.In final presentations, all groups presented problem definition, market analysis and potentialcustomer, project timeline, design input and output. Verification and validation plan, engineeringspecifications, and results were also included in the presentations. Especially the groups whowere introduced surgical procedure presented how the knowledge and experience of surgicalprocedure changed the final design outcomes compared to the original design.ResultsThis new approach was implemented to the capstone design course for the first
, fundamental understanding of the characteristics of a successfulprogram is lacking. In addition, longitudinal tracking of participants that evaluate the influenceof the experience on their long-term plans is lacking. In this paper we describe and evaluate our9-year experience with a 10-week summer undergraduate program.MethodsOverall Program Description Page 26.695.5 From 2006 - 2014, a research university in the U.S. Midwest (Illnois Institute ofTechnology) has delivered a 10-week, summer engineering Research Experience forUndergraduate (REU) program. The program focuses on engineering research in theunderstanding and treatment of diabetes and
clinical trials, economics, ethics, and regulatorystrategies. Throughout the second year, students will continue working on their research project,with the culmination of the second year being a summer clinical or industrial immersion relevantto the project. In addition to immersion experiences, we are planning tracks: research,entrepreneurship, professional school, and industry; while these are at early stages indevelopment, they are being developed to integrate with other campus activities.Beginning junior year, students will continue undergraduate research while being extensivelytrained in engineering design, in contrast to traditional education which focuses primarily ondesign in the senior capstone course. The coursework for this year is not
%); Undeclared Engineering (26%); Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering (14%); Engineering Mechanics/Astronautics (9%); Biological Systems Engineering(6%); Engineering Physics (6%); and Nuclear Engineering (5%)) agreed to participate and fund amulti-disciplinary hands-on design course. Last year, we analyzed student retention data overthe past three decades and correlated the data with the introduction to engineering course takenas freshmen. [1] Analysis of course-specific retention data did not clearly align with otherresearch suggesting a positive relationship between hands-on design and retention ofunderrepresented minorities. [2-5] Thus, we plan to implement and assess changes to coursestructure and curriculum to determine best practices to create a
studentswith BSAC members as mentees/mentors.Mentor matching was facilitated by surveys (one to the freshmen and the other to BSACmembers and the upper classes). Prior to the start of the semester, students in BME Design(sophomore-senior) were made of aware of this new program and the new role of the BSACrepresentative. Both groups were asked to indicate their intended track within BME, future plans,and the option to list other interests. We achieved a 100% response rate from the BSACmembers with an additional 13% of the remaining design students volunteering to be mentors forthe 91% of the freshman interested in having a mentor. This equated to two-three mentees permentor.Through integrating the mentorship program with the design curriculum and BSAC
change tracks”. Although several of the video lectures have been updated sincethe implementation of the course, we aim to continually improve these. The lower response tothe in-person lecture time as it relates to their future goals is difficult to interpret as the lecturesare designed to prepare the students for the following week’s lab. We plan to evaluate thisdifferently in the future and make adjustments accordingly.Figure 9. Survey responses indicating the effectiveness of each teaching tool used in BME 201related to their future goals: the design project, labs, video lectures and reflections, as well aslectures. Students had a more positive response toward the hands-on components.When given the opportunity to express open ended comments
section, 73% of the research section, and 46% of theclinical section explicitly indicating the benefit in the course evaluation. The main reason citedfor the lower result in the industry section was lack of physical interaction, since that group useda simulation.Challenges and Future DirectionsAlthough feedback was largely positive from both instructor and students, challenges arose andimprovements are planned for the next offering.One challenge encountered by the team was enrollment management. Although the overallnumber is limited to the class size of incoming freshmen, it was difficult to predict sectionenrollment. Some students were turned away from the research and clinical section due tolimited capacity for shadowing assignments for the
engineeringfaculty advisors. In the 1st semester, students learn and practice the design process, as well aslearn about commercial aspects of product development including entrepreneurship, intellectualproperty, FDA regulations, modes of reimbursement, and business plan development. Thestudents also perform early feasibility (proof of concept) tests and complete the initial stages ofprototyping. In the 2nd semester, students develop functional prototypes and quantify theperformance of their prototypes with respect to specifications. In each term, students areexpected to share their progress both in informal meetings with instructors and in formalpresentations. Concepts are taught via traditional lectures in the classroom and implemented viahands-on working
scholarship, a student’sfamily contacted the camp director with their request (formal documentation of financialinformation was not required).Only local students were selected for admission to the camp, as we plan to follow up with thesestudents in the future and desire to use the summer camp program to build relationships withlocal high schools for possible mentoring and outreach opportunities.InstructorsA core instructional group of the camp director (staff program coordinator) and two instructors(faculty lecturer and graduate student) gave introductory lectures and led activities throughoutthe camp. In addition to the core instructors, guest instructors (including faculty, undergraduateand graduate students, and research scientists) facilitated
the information chosen in the concept selection step to move towards generating novel ideas. Idea Generation Formally determining potential problem solutions. Idea Evaluation Determining the efficiency and appropriateness of the proposed solution. Implementation Planning Testing the chosen problem solution. Monitoring Searching for evidence to determine the problem solution’s level of success.By emphasizing the parallels between the creative process and the scientific method, faculty whohad previously thought of creativity as being outside the bounds of technical engineering maynow see how the
environment across theprogram.Future plans for BEPI include adding more options to the weekends for students who havealready selected a focus area. We are also currently developing advanced residency courses,which offer students the opportunity to learn the state-of-the art in a specific field taught byleading scientists and working biomedical engineers.BackgroundThe Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that biomedical engineering is expected to be one of thefastest growing occupations from 2014-2024[1]. With a 2015 median pay of almost $90,000 peryear and an expected job growth rate of 23% over the next decade, biomedical engineeringcareers will enjoy a growth rate well above the expected level of 7% for all occupations [2]. Thedata are summarized in
context.Previous studies have demonstrated that well-planned, student-centered, active, learning modulescan enhance problem-solving abilities, improve academic achievement and create more positiveattitudes toward learning.1-3 Many of these studies have focused on activities such as groupproblem solving, interpreting data or evidence, or engaging in practices of the field. Traditionallytopics in a mechanics/biomechanics course are introduced using derivations with subsequentassignments using the results of these often non-intuitive mathematical procedures. However,few studies have looked at the use of hands-on activities to replace or supplement mathematicalderivations in an effort to connect physical concepts with mathematical equations. Therefore
includes 4 phases: orienting, planning, executing, andchecking. The final round of coding collapsed these codes into the 5 Step Problem SolvingMethod similar to the MPSF but more consistent with the expert heat transfer solutions.However, the orienting category was maintained since it did not overlap with the 5 step method. 4ResultsUnexpected Theme: Professor Beliefs about Problem SolvingWhile solving these problems, many of the experts revealed their beliefs about what types ofproblems are developmentally appropriate for students. The experts were not prompted for thisinformation in either the think-aloud instructions or the subsequent structured interview.Unprompted, most of the experts freely