Paper ID #19985An Engineering Student Project: Microfluidic-based Head Trauma SensorsDr. Michael G. Mauk, Drexel University Michael Mauk is Assistant Professor in Drexel University’s Engineering Technology program.Dr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University Dr. Richard Chiou is Associate Professor within the Engineering Technology Department at Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He received his Ph.D. degree in the G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His educational background is in manufacturing with an emphasis on mechatronics. In addition to his many years of industrial
Paper ID #17673Effect of a Project-Based Learning Activity on Student Intrinsic Motivationin a Biomechanics ClassroomDr. Robert Matthew Miller, University of Pittsburgh B.S.E. and M.S. in Biomedial Engineering at Case Western Reserve University (2011) Ph.D. in Bioengi- neering at University of Pittsburgh (2016)Spandan Maiti, Department of Bioengineering, University of PittsburghDr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre is an Associate Professor and Fulton C. Noss Faculty Fellow in Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She is the Director for the Engineering Education
Paper ID #19633Canine hip forces: The ups and downs of project-based learning of staticequilibriumProf. Kristen Billiar, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kris Billiar is Professor and Head of Biomedical Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. He earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Cornell and an M.S.E. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering at the University of Pennsylvania. His current research interests are soft tissue mechanics and mechanobiology. Dr. Billiar is a Fellow of both ASME and AIMBE and a member of ASEE.Kaitlyn A Marengo, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kaitlyn Marengo is a graduate student pursuing
Paper ID #19889A Team Leader Model for Biomedical Engineering Design Team Project-Definition Training and Scalable Clinical Observation (Work in Progress)Dr. Elizabeth A. Logsdon, Johns Hopkins University Dr. Logsdon is a lecturer at Johns Hopkins University in the Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME) and Engineering for Professionals Applied Biomedical Engineering Program. She is also the Director of the BME Design Studio - a facility that supports design efforts in many bioengineering courses at the University and within the Center for Bioengineering Innovation and Design.Dr. Robert Allen P.E., Johns Hopkins
Paper ID #20106Development of a Graduate Project Management Course Where GraduateStudents Manage Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering Design Teams (Workin Progress)Dr. Joseph Towles, University of Wisconsin, Madison Joseph Towles is a faculty associate in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Joe completed his PhD in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University and a research post-doctoral fellowship in the Sensory Motor Performance Program at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago and in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Northwestern
- iting tissue degeneration and enhancing tissue regeneration and wound healing. We combine agent-based computational modeling, in vivo imaging, and new experimental approaches to examine and control the multi-cell interactions involved in microvascular network patterning. We are particularly interested in learning how diseases, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, affect angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in different tissues, such as skin, retina, and muscle. My research spans basic science discovery to the de- sign of therapies for regenerative medicine. Current projects seek to exploit perivascular cells (pericytes), inflammatory cells (e.g. monocytes and macrophages), and tissue-resident stem cells to invoke
Paper ID #19724Reflection Enhances Student Engagement and Team Service Project Imple-mentation in a Bioengineering Honors Program (Work in Progress)Dr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington Dr. Dianne G. Hendricks is a Lecturer in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Wash- ington, where she leads the Bioengineering Outreach Initiative, Bioengineering Honors Program, and the Bioengineering Summer Camp in Global Health. She holds a PhD in Genetics from Duke University, and BS in Molecular Biology and BA in Psychology from the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Hendricks’ teaching activities at
students is importantbecause it can help guide curriculum and course development toward more authentic engineeringpractices.In this paper, the factors bioengineering students considered in integrating complex objectives,concerns and data in decision-making were identified and characterized. The project wasdelivered in the first term of a three quarter, revitalized senior design sequence in a the OregonState University Bioengineering program that includes instruction in both biomedical andbioprocessing engineering. The course is required for the Bioengineering Bachelor of Sciencedegree. This first term is the bioprocessing course, which is followed by a bioproduct designcourse, and then a hands-on prototyping course.We believe the authenticity and
curriculumand shorten the amount of time given to each topic. When teaching the principles ofprogramming to non-computer science students, it is important to focus on broad, widelyapplicable concepts (i.e., computational thinking), rather than become mired in the applicationand syntax of one specific language.7Active learning shows demonstrable and widespread improvements in student achievement overpassive learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, allowingbetter retention of new concepts, more efficiently.8,9 In BME, active learning can consist ofproblem/project-based learning,10 which requires students to undergo the engineering designprocess on their own. These projects can be multidisciplinary, which improves
Biomedical Engineering Design and Bioinstrumentation and has taken initiative to develop hands-on blended learning based courses on the same topics. His research interest is on global health and engineering and had worked on projects in Honduras, Ethiopia, India and Vietnam. He has received the Recognition Award for Achievement in Global Engaged Scholarship in 2013 through the Wisconsin Without Borders at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the Professor of the Year Award in 2012, through the Biomedical Engineering Society at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a number of teaching awards.Dr. John P. Puccinelli, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Puccinelli is the Associate Chair of the Undergraduate Program in
spent six years with Boston Scientific Corporation. During this time, he progressed from a doctoral entry-level position to manage the day-to-day activities of five direct reports along with the operation of a corporate cell biology research laboratory staffed with ten scientists. He also worked with senior management to propose and develop a cross-Divisional collaboration network to improve communication and eliminate redundancies within the Company’s billion-dollar research and develop- ment (R&D) organization and drive the completion of cross-disciplinary medical device R&D projects critical to products’ commercialization. Prior to Boston Scientific, Garanich served as both Associate and Analyst with The
seniorcapstone projects [1-4], working with external clinical mentors [5], learning and applyingregulatory and intellectual property guidelines [6], conducting rapid design challenges [7,8], andmany more [9]. Furthermore, the design experience may be patient-oriented with studentsinteracting directly with patients [10].One very common aspect of biomedical engineering senior design experiences is the requirementthat students summarize the physiology and anatomy relevant to the specific clinical problem ofinterest. While this background research effort gives the students a baseline knowledge topropose potential design solutions, the students rarely understand the entire disease pathwayleading from the patient in a healthy state to the current diseased
’s, and use a case study from aspecific biomedical engineering capstone sequence to illustrate how the availability of rapidprototyping has impacted capstone projects and biomedical engineering education at theundergraduate level.The Early History of Rapid PrototypingRapid prototyping (RP) is the process by which a computer-aided design (CAD) file is used tocontrol an automated technology in order to produce a physical model.1 Its origin is often cited tobe with the release of the first technology by 3D Systems in 1987 and it was primarily used tocreate a first generation prototype to quickly verify a design.1 The first commercializedtechnologies in the 1990’s were based upon addition or removal of liquids, powders or solids(Table 1). Liquid
Medical Center, and Columbia Technology Ventures that facilitates commercialization of clinical solutions driven by teams of engineers, clinicians, scientists, students and others, with the end goal of moving promising biomedical technologies to clinical application and market-based healthcare solutions.Ms. Lorna Helen Begg, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health Ms. Lorna Begg is a MPH student at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. She works part-time as a Project Coordinator at the Columbia-Coulter Translational Research Partnership.John D. O’Neill, Columbia University, Department of Biomedical EngineeringAhmet-Hamdi Cavusoglu, Columbia University Ahmet-Hamdi Cavusoglu is a Chemical
Paper ID #19437Clinical Immersion and Team-Based Design: Into a Third YearDr. Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University Jennifer Kadlowec is Professor and Department Head of Mechanical Engineering in the Henry M. Rowan of College of Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ. She has been an active member of ASEE since 1998. She joined as a graduate student, after working on an engineering education project and pre- senting that work and student chapter activities at annual conference. As a faculty member, she regularly publishes and presents at the ASEE Annual Conference. Her interests are in design education and assess
students about their learning, these quizzes identify areasthat need extra emphasis in lecture 14,15. They are not intended to determine if students have metthe learning objectives of the course, so are not used in evaluating the course.Students perform a final project that focuses on synthesizing the material they learned in theclass and exploring their interests in this area more fully. These projects include definingengineering design criteria and constraints of current or proposed genetic sequencingtechnologies, or analysis of a chosen data set. Undergraduate students work in teams of 2-3 andgraduate students work alone. Graduate students present their project to the class. These projectsdemonstrate the skills gained by the students during the
initial ideationthrough the final project design3. In this study of teams working on different design projects,Design Heuristics were found to be applicable across a diverse range of problems. In sum, DesignHeuristics have been established as a beneficial tool to assist mechanical engineers in generatingdiverse and create ideas3,4,41,42,44,45. In the present study, we sought to determine whether thisinstructional method would also benefit students in the domain of biomedical engineering design.Research MethodsResearch QuestionsThe focus of this study was to investigate whether and how Design Heuristics may assist studentsin generating design ideas in the context of biomedical engineering problems. We were alsointerested in how students developed
project manager. He is Business Advisor and Speaker for the Wallace H. Coulter Foundation, Director of Duke NeuroInnovations, and on the planning team for BME IDEA. He holds a BS in Physics, English Literature, and Secondary Education from UNC Charlotte, an MS in BME from UNC Chapel Hill’s Medical School, and a Ph.D. from the UNC/NCSU BME Department. Andrew has two children, 15-year-old daughter Virginia Elaine and 13-year-old son Andrew, Jr. His wife, Abigail Kent, is a nurse at the NC State Highway Patrol.Dr. Hatice O. Ozturk, North Carolina State University Dr. Hatice Ozturk is a Teaching Associate Professor at North Carolina State University, Departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Biomedical
include primingstudents for subsequent ‘design spine’ courses and their final-year BME capstone experience, anddeveloping interactive project-based teaching at scale. The two faculty who teach this course(Frow, Smith) have co-developed the content over the past two years; we also meet biweeklyduring the academic year with faculty members teaching the other BME ‘design spine’ courses, tocoordinate program content and learning outcomes across courses.Our semester-long course focuses on global healthcare markets and device design for low-resourcesettings. The course revolves around an open-ended, team-based design project (Smith et al. 2005).A core aim is to foster curiosity and creativity1 in students’ first formal experience of engineeringdesign
sections; and inappropriate/poor design projects. These problems were directlyaddressed as we developed the new course, as outlined below.Implementation of Design PracticumThe new freshman engineering design course, Design Practicum, is a 2 credit hands-on, team-based introduction to engineering design. The class meets once per week for three hours, withlecture the first hour, and lab the second two hours. Students are introduced to design via theinvention, fabrication and testing of a device that solves a problem proposed by a real client.These projects cover a variety of engineering disciplines including bioinstrumentation,biomechanics, mechanical, and civil and environmental. Lectures address information retrievaltechniques, specification
skills with project work or case studies.The objective of conducting the survey were to gather information to help inform contentdecisions for the bioengineering curriculum and specifically the process design relevant coursesin the curriculum (i.e. bioprocess design, bioreactors, and bioseparations. In addition, we wantedto use the feedback from practicing engineers to educate current students on the impact of thematerial they learn in their course work and how to increase their competitiveness in the jobmarket. The results from this study informs and reinforces the emphasis we have seen in the pastdecade on developing professional skills in undergraduate programs, and indicates that we needto continue this effort. Insights from the technical
sequence. Given a one-credit allotment of instructor time towardthis capstone, peer review seemed a promising way to enrich students’ writing education in theircapstone project report. But moreover, we believed that senior-level students who have hadrepeated exposure to journal and conference articles have already acquired a degree of practicalexpertise in our disciplinary discourse; near the conclusion of their college education, we didn’tbelieve it appropriate or warranted to teach them writing skills from scratch. Rather, we felt thata better pedagogical approach was to help students discover and marshal their own expertise andthat of their peers. In this way we might scaffold students’ metacognitive use of their ownexperiences as readers, as
point-of-care diagnostic sensors, and she aims to continue this work during her time at Arizona State University. Her dissertation focuses on the development towards implantable cardiovascular sensors for continuous patient monitoring and reduced embolism formation at the site of implantation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Use of a Medical Device Surrogate for Cooperative Product Development Learning of Engineering DesignWhile many core engineering classes prepare students’ technical ability, there arefew classes that strictly enforce development of key concepts. The work presentedis a project-based learning experience that teaches and enforces three keyconcepts
connections to their classroom professional practice.Having teachers participate in research programs has been shown to improve studentperformance in science [4]. One shortcoming in similar existing programs is the lack of formalinstruction regarding the enhancement of high school science curricula following participation inthe summer experience. This program seeks to address this gap by partnering with faculty in theCollege of Education who have expertise in curriculum design and teaching in secondaryeducation, and in particular, teaching of secondary science in urban schools. 2. Program StructureAnnouncement of the program, descriptions of the available project focus areas, and applicationmaterial are available online at the UIC Bioengineering
measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Prof. Keefe B. Manning, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Margaret J. Slattery, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Margaret Slattery Ph.D., has been a faculty member at Penn State University in Biomedical Engineering since 2007 and her career has focused on undergraduate students and their academic experiences. She currently is directing a new office within
genotyped using 23andMe©. Students who participate inthis optional exercise are able the analyze their own genetic data using tools presented in agenetic tools workshop that could potentially be used to individualize treatments. Those studentswho do not choose to have their own DNA genotyped use de-identified data for this activity.For the team project, groups of three to five students are assigned to a disease at the beginning ofthe semester (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis). Each group learns about the disease, identifies one areaof unmet need, designs an approach to solving the problem (with special consideration of howthe patient would interface with the solution), and develops a brief marketing plan. Sampleprojects include a 4D MRI for hepatic
Figure 1 and Table 1. Figure 1: Projected ten-year job growth Biomedical Engineering 23% All Occupations 7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%Figure 1: Data from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics indicate that projected ten-year jobgrowth in biomedical engineering (23%) over a ten year period from 2014-2024 is significantlyhigher than the expected job growth for all occupations (7%) Table 1: Quick Facts: Biomedical Engineers 2015 Median Pay $86,220 per year; $41.45 per hour Typical Entry-Level Education Bachelor's degree
,2012; Tanner and Allen, 2007). There is ample evidence that engineering courses thatimplement evidence-based methods like active or project-based learning improve studentretention and performance (Bullard et al., 2008; Felder et al., 1998; Knight et al., 2007; Martin etal., 2007).Two beliefs limit education about teaching: First, many current STEM faculty members, at leastat the research institutions that are training all the future STEM faculty, do not view teaching assomething that can be learned. Second, teaching is not something that should be learned. Theyconsider time spent on teaching development to be detrimental to one’s productivity and futureprospects for jobs and funding. Neither of these is a valid argument. With the variety
powerful educational method for delivering engineering curricula [1, 2]while benefiting student retention, personal development, and community connections [3, 4].Furthermore, positive societal impact is especially important to underrepresented students incareer selection [5, 6] and classes or projects with clear engineering-service componentscommonly attract a higher percentage of students from underrepresented groups [7, 8]. In thiswork-in-progress, we examine our initial efforts in implementing toy adaptation to enhanceengineering education and to serve our broader community.What is an adapted toy?An adapted toy has modified activation, function, orother components to increase accessibility andenhance the user’s experience. Here, we use
Society for Engineering Education, 2017 #FunTimesWithTheTA – A Series of Fun, Supplementary Lessons for Introductory Level Biomedical Instrumentation Students (Work-in-Progress)Engineering is hallmarked by the process of assessing a need and implementing a design to meetthe need[1]. Over the years, universities have adopted the capstone Senior Design project inorder to provide students the opportunity to put their engineering skills to the test in real-worldprojects. However, educators agree that obtaining competency in engineering design requireshours of hands-on practice beyond the time and scope of a university course. As a result, we arepilot testing a series of supplementary active-learning