and a team project in which they design a scientific orengineering solution that promotes social justice.Learning ObjectivesWe explore social justice in a science and engineering context, with a focus on DEI(diversity, equity, and inclusion). We discover why scientists and engineers must practiceinclusive design and think broadly about the impact of their work on diverse populations,including ethical implications, potential inequities in access, and bias againstunderrepresented people.By the end of the course, students should be able to: 1. Identify how cultural concepts of race, gender, sexuality, and disability have shaped scientific thought and engineering practice (and vice versa) through history. 2. Conduct self-directed
] and health science funding agencies are placing a greater emphasis oncreating knowledge translation plans in grant applications [6–8]. One of the main reasons thatresearchers in biomedical engineering must begin addressing knowledge translation (at least inCanada) is that collaborative health research projects funded through the Natural Sciences andEngineering Research Council (NSERC) and CIHR that focus on interdisciplinary researchbetween engineering and any field of health science must submit applications that have: “… astrong focus on knowledge translation, and lead to health benefits for Canadians, more effectivehealth services and/or economic development in health-related areas [and] all applicant teamsare required to engage and
guiding questions tostructure the sessions; and (iv) including multiple sessions with the same clients over time toobserve changes that may result from the therapies.Capstone Projects: Future iterations of this program will task students with identifying clinicalneeds from their shadowing experiences, propose a possible solution, and encourage them topursue those solutions during their own Capstone Design courses. Capstone design projects areubiquitous in engineering education, aimed at promoting practical and real-world projects duringan undergraduate’s education [7], [8]. The pairing of this shadowing experience with CapstoneDesign is expected to increase student engagement and satisfaction; supported by results fromprevious clinical immersions
grant from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), an institute with the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Rylander’s research is focused on imaging in ophthalmology. He has conducted clinical trials on a polarization-sensitive OCT system to measure the changes that occur in the retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Other projects include a drug delivery device for the eye and measuring blood flow in the eye. He is collaborating with researchers at UTMB to identify biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease in the eye. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Influence of an Externship on BME Predoctoral Students’ Career
studies. [4] With the exception of ‘founder’, having an entrepreneurial parent had no effectas well. These results differ from Li et al., who stated that having close entrepreneurial relatives waspositively aligned with increases in entrepreneurial mindset. However, their definition of entrepreneurialmindset encompassed all of our EEI. There seems to be a movement of student interest from ‘inventor’ to‘developer’ in general as students work through innovative, open-ended projects, such as senior capstoneor our introductory bioengineering final project. Students who identified as having previousentrepreneurial experience demonstrated a greater affinity for ‘founder’ and ‘developer’ than studentswho did not claim this experience. The previous
-led UD’s Mandela Washington Fel- lowship Civic Leadership Institute as part of President Obama’s Young African Leaders Initiative. She advises the UD student chapter of Engineers Without Borders, which links student teams with community partners abroad to implement sustainable engineering projects. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work In Progress: Incorporating Global Context to a Biomechanics Course through Service-Learning CollaborationIntroductionABET, the accrediting body for engineering programs, expects undergraduate engineeringprograms to prepare students with “an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutionsthat meet specified needs with
Carnegie Mellon University’s Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation, where he consults with faculty, graduate students, and post-docs to design, implement, and assess research projects that relate to teaching and learning in their classrooms. He also contributes to a variety of program-level assessment projects on the CMU campus. Mike’s training includes an M.A. and Ph.D. in Social Psychology from the University of New Hampshire, as well as an M.Ed. in sport and performance psychology from Springfield College. His interests include the science of learning, research methodology, and data analysis. Prior to joining the Eberly Center in 2017, Mike worked as the Teaching and Learning Research
approach to give students the opportunity to apply engineering principles at the smallestscales of BME (Bioinformatics), at the tissue level (Biomaterials Design and QuantitativeHuman Physiology), at the macroscale (Biomechanics) and, finally, to integrate principles fromall scales into the design of medical devices (Medical Devices) [4]. The objective of thiscurriculum is to provide students with a toolkit of important BME skills to make themcompetitive for industry careers as well as graduate school. An emphasis on design and project-based learning will help our students develop their communication skills, critical thinking, andtheir ability to work in teams. We plan to weave in issues of social responsibility and ethics intoour BME curriculum
introduce BME applications to high school students,the authors developed a BME high school summer program that was piloted in the summer of2019. Aimed at introducing students to the BME field, the program focused on introducingneuroscience and neuroengineering principles using low-cost and open source materials.The California State Summer School for Mathematics and Science (COSMOS) program“BioEngineering Your Brain: Controlling the World with Your Brainwaves” introduced basicneuroscience and bioengineering concepts to 24 high school students through lecture basedmaterial, in class assignments and activities, and hands-on laboratory projects. Through the useof low-cost and open source electroencephalography (EEG) devices (OpenBCI, Brooklyn, NY
institutions, working together virtually and globally to innovate and create products formarket consumption. This model has been successful during its lifespan by preparing studentsfor the global workplace [5]. Another useful industrial model for creating an innovation-basedwork atmosphere is Lean Startup. A Lean Startup model includes quickly brainstormingsolutions, building prototypes, taking measurements, and learning what did and didn’t work forfuture project iterations. This model works by making ideas into products quickly and efficiently[6]. Finally, there are also academically focused innovation-based curricula that have been usedby initiatives such as the Biodesign Innovation Process. The Biodesign Innovation Process worksthrough three phases
ideas” and “ really respected my ideas and opinions, and was very encouraging”. In addition, the value of responsibility was not as highly ranked in the survey responses, but was revealed as important in individual comments such as “I felt a large sense of ownership of the project, and really think I did something valuable. He or she trusted me with completing my work…”. Overall, faculty perspectives also showed generally positive characterizations of these partnerships with respect to the values assessed. Although the faculty perspectives were more diverse than the student perspectives, the value of respect characterized these partnerships most significantly from a faculty point of view. In fact, four out of five faculty participants
application of Online Engineering (OE) technologies and its influence to the society. Furthermore Dr. May serves as Editor-in-Chief for the ’International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)’ with the aim to promote the inter- disciplinary discussion of engineers, educators and engineering education researchers around technology, instruction and research. At his former institution Dr. May was research scientist and project lead of numerous extra-mural funded research projects in the area of Engineering Education Research with focus on distance education as well as remote experimentation and with this he gained extensive experience in developing, integrating, and evaluating innovative learning experiences
a broad skillset. Prior to our program’s senior design course, students receive some general training inengineering design during the first and second year required classes, though specialized skillsoften needed are not formally introduced or practiced. In response, efforts are being made todevelop specific skills-building modules and opportunities for students to gain practicalexperience for application to their senior design project, but ultimately to improve the skillset ofgraduating students. These include the development of new hands-on curricular modules and asummer innovation internship, aimed to enhance students’ technical skills, professionaldevelopment skills, and entrepreneurship knowledge.This study is focused on our inaugural
traditional 3-credit hour courses. Biomedical Electronics, a 3-credit hourjunior level course, was already progressing toward a flip-classroom model on a 4-year timeline.The goal of this project is to determine if transition to a flipped learning model classroom and rearrangement of course After Flip materials would improve student Before Flip (2019- present) learning outcomes in a (2018) Course Learning Outcomes • 5 summative • 2 summative biomedical electronics course
students to cross institutionalsilos. Community creation contributes to program scalability. Example activities are shown inTable 1.Table 1: Example activities for industry/entrepreneurial, clinical or research career goals.Required related activity Examples Organization (at least 2)Additional course Entrepreneurial– Course in Business School regulatory affairs Clinical – Course in Veterinary School pharmacokineticsHonors credit Research – Academic based Arts and Sciences honors project in related course Entrepreneurial – Medical Business School
their lab that tied in directly with the learningobjectives of their module. Additional applications were presented at the end of the course in afew 30 min biomaterial presentations from the handful of graduate students in the course.Throughout the semester, the graduate students performed literature research projects which threecheck points in which specific parts of the project were assigned. These check-points coincidedwith the hands-on laboratories performed by the undergraduate students (the majority of the class).Hands-on ActivitiesThe content of each module ended with a hands-on laboratory for the undergraduates that was heldin our dedicated biomaterials and biomechanics teaching laboratory. The large class was split intotwo groups. One
withbioinstrumentation, these courses constitute the dedicated teaching spaces (Figure 2) andfundamental skills that students use later in their course sequence in junior design and seniordesign. The University of Florida undergraduate biomedical engineering program is capped atone-hundred and twenty students for each graduating cohort, resulting in two sections of ~thirty-two students enrolled in the cellular engineering laboratory course each semester. A BFigure 2: The Cellular Engineering Laboratory has 8 Biological Safety Cabinets, with 4 shown in (A) andthe remaining mirrored behind, and a discussion space (B) where all students can see projected images.For the majority of students enrolled in Cellular Engineering Laboratory
below-average students.Troubleshooting Skills in the Bioinstrumentation Laboratory CourseLaboratory courses play an important role in engineering education, providing the students withopportunities to develop proficiency in experimental design, data analysis, the use of relevantequipment and tools, team work, communication skills and other practical skills relevant to theengineering practice1-3. As design instruction has become more prevalent, engineering programshave incorporated design courses and embedded design projects at several stages of theundergraduate curriculum4, including instructional laboratories. However, most of these coursesfocus on the early stages of the design process (i.e. problem identification, design criteria,research
-based, inquiry-based, project-based, and problem-basedlearning”, the MUST students not only learned the course content, but enjoyed the process [9].MethodsOpening DayStudents were randomly assigned to teams of four students prior to the start of the course; thesame teams were maintained throughout the semester, although they had permission to request achange. Within five minutes of the very first class, the teams were given a hypothetical situationand a problem to solve. The hypothetical situation was that an unknown molecule was infectingstudents on campus with a deadly disease (which turned out to be eerily predictive of theCOVID-19 pandemic). Teams brainstormed methods to solve one of the following: (1) Diagnose/identify the
of topics such as regulatory affairs [1] and engineeringstandards [2]. Although the combination of technical and “soft skills” can be an importantdistinguishing characteristic of biomedical engineers in industry, it is challenging to effectivelyteach students professional topics in an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum thatalso attempts to cover the breadth of engineering and life science topics that is the hallmark ofthe discipline.Recognizing the importance of professional topics, students are often required to implementthem in their culminating capstone design project. A common approach is to teach the topics inthe capstone design courses themselves, often by providing didactic sessions covering each topicjust before students
efforts on Mathematics Socialization and identity amongst pre-service elementary teachers, an effort at understanding the reasons for lack of interest in the subject with a view to proffer solution and engender/motivate interest amongst this group that will eventually reflect in their classroom practices. She is currently a Graduate Assistant with UIC Engage, a commu- nity focused project that provides help for less-privileged students from K-8 in mathematics, reading and writing. She continues to work as a substitute teacher occasionally to keep abreast with current practices within the school system. Her work as a Research Assistant for the BEST program has turned out to be one of her best experiences as a
supportsmultiple training and education needs related to data analytics across biopharmaceuticalmanufacturing hubs. As a first-step, our project identified a subset of achievable near-term tasksand objectives needed to develop and pilot an introductory series of active-learning boot campsdesigned to upskill incumbent employees serving in established biomanufacturing scientific andengineering roles (e.g. not trained data scientists) to utilize multivariate analysis tools and extractvalue from complex data sets. Our proposed solution is differentiated by its active collaborationwith industry, and commitment to mentored employee knowledge integration into corporateworkflows.Objectives and Value PropositionsWe propose the development of a workforce
applicationsIntroductionMachining and manufacturing are essential skills that engineering students learn during theirundergraduate education to prepare them for their future careers in academia or industry.Because of the unique circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic, biomedical engineering(BME) educators have been challenged with developing modified curricula to accommodaterestrictions or prohibitions on in-person courses. The UC Davis BME introductory machiningand manufacturing course has traditionally employed a hands-on approach to teach students thenecessary skills needed to apply to the prototyping of their senior design projects. However, dueto prohibitions on in-person instruction, the BME machining course underwent significantredesign to enable an entirely
form theirideas and create effective proposals. The written responses from the focus groups were based ontwo questions: (1) describe the writing you did in the course and (2) what would you changeabout the writing process for this course? The responses were coded thematically by thoserelated to the scaffold structure of the assignments and those related to the writing process.Based on the 45 students’ written responses at the beginning of the focus groups, almost a third(29%; n=13) of the students felt that they either needed more time between drafts to be able todevelop quality writing or the writing process needed to start earlier in the course. Students saidthe turn around times for different iterations of the scaffolded project were too
Associate in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His teaching spe- cialty is on the topic of Biomedical Engineering Design and Bioinstrumentation and has taken initiative to develop hands-on blended learning based courses on the same topics. His research interest is on global health and engineering and currently working on projects in Honduras, Ethiopia, India and Vietnam. He has received the Recognition Award for Achievement in Global Engaged Scholarship in 2013 through the Wisconsin Without Borders at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the Professor of the Year Award in 2012, through the Biomedical Engineering Society at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a number of teaching awards
scalingdata. It is not expected that students can write a program to analyze data, but they should becomfortable using a command line programs whether in Java, Python, MatLab or R. As this is afast-changing field, we try to use the most current computational tools. Many of these arecurrently being developed in the programing language R. Therefore, students are introduced to Rand R Studio in the course. These freely available tools run on Mac and Linux environments.Students complete analysis-based reports at the end of each analytical module.Through a final project, students have the opportunity to explore and expand their interest ingenomics. Students have chosen a variety of topics including: defining the criteria for a new typeof sequencer
be obtained fromuniaxial tension tests, including: tensile strength, failure stress, regions of strain hardening, andregions of necking, 2) quantitatively assess the anisotropic properties of a material via uniaxialtensile testing, 3) experimentally demonstrate the time-dependent nature of a biomaterial’smechanical response, and 4) quantitatively assess the viscoelastic properties, such as creep andrelaxation, of a soft biomaterial via uniaxial tensile testing.In addition to the mechanical testing experiments for the laboratory course, we plan to let thestudents use these devices to complete projects and self-designed experiments related tobiomechanics at the end of the semester. We hope to explore the use of these devices to help inspirethe
been no attempt previously to understand whether there is anyagreement across BME about what type of computing is important. While many universitiesoffer elective courses in computer programming that can expand students’ knowledge, thepresent project was done to determine the frequency of requiring different types of programmingcourses, and whether generalizations can be made about the state of undergraduate BMEeducation in this respect. Required computer courses for BME students can be assigned toseveral categories: 1) MATLAB, 2) object-oriented programming (e.g. Python, C++), 3)programming of microcontrollers for on board sensing or control of electromechanical devices,4) computer-aided design (CAD), sometimes used in conjunction with
scientists and engineers, laboratory and design notebooksrecord a project from its start to completion. When done well, these notebooks are an inherentlyreflective practice on one’s own learning, understanding, and decision-making process [6]. Wehypothesize that reflection, especially if done while learning (e.g., lab notebooks) in addition toreflection after receiving SBG feedback, will improve student mastery in “problemidentification” and “interpretation”.This work-in-progress aims to determine if there are differences in mastery (quantified bystandards-based grading of lab reports) across different reflection implementations (post-assignment reflections, post-assignment reflections + reflection while doing with laboratorynotebook). In addition
evaluation of various biomedical samples and constructs, with an educational background in CT and MRI imaging. Mr. Caccese’s research interests include the anthropometry of device usage, computational modeling of different bodily systems, and statistical evaluation of varying data sets. As a consultant, Mr. Caccese applies his knowledge to assist with the analyses of injury causations and accident reconstructions for a variety of projects. He assesses whether motions, accelerations, and loads can cause injury, and his experience includes contributing to analyses and reconstructions of motor vehi- cle crashes; sports, and occupational injuries; and falls. He also contributes to biomechanical analyses of incidents involving