Asee peer logo
Displaying results 31 - 45 of 45 in total
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adel Alhalawani, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Renee D. Rogge, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Bill Weiner, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Alan Chiu, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
, Signals and Measurements with the PCB project. Overall, it helps with better understanding the design process as other skills like soldering, solidworks, and machining. 3. I learned a lot about the design process, which I feel will help me a lot in my career. 4. This is a class that really helped me connect the elements of design we learned last year with concepts of circuits and systems. 5. I feel like I have a good understanding of the FDA design controls process and can apply it to real world situations. 6. I think it was nice that this class matched up with what we were learning in Circuits, Signals and Measurements. 7. A strength of this course was being able to apply the design process to the PCB Project
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Janna Jobel, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
opportunities. References[1] American Society for Engineering Education, “Profiles of engineering and engineering technology, 2021,” 2022.[2] American Society for Engineering Education, “Engineering and engineering technology by the numbers 2019,” 2019.[3] E. Higginbotham and M. L. Dahlberg, The impact of COVID-19 on the careers of women in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. 2021. doi: 10.17226/26061.[4] A. Patrick, M. Borrego, and C. Riegle-Crumb, “Post-graduation plans of undergraduate BME students: Gender, self-efficacy, value, and identity beliefs,” Ann Biomed Eng, vol. 49, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02693-9.[5] A. E. Winkler, S. G. Levin
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED): Best of Works in Progress
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emily Abigail Schafer, Northwestern University; David P. O'Neill, Northwestern University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
comfortable workenvironment with lowered barriers to engagement in a large lecture course. However, lowattendance rates amongst students at office hours suggests that the increased anxiety around thecourse likely increased cognitive barriers to help-seeking and threshold to office hoursattendance despite high academic need. Combined with the observation that reasons that studentsin the study reported attending office hours and barriers to office hours are consistent withliterature, we posit that ideas about office hours are solidified early in students’ college careersand that these beliefs may affect students’ likelihood of accepting new strategies implemented incourses taken later in their college careers. Future work will focus on better
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Victoria Rose Garza, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Teja Guda, The University of Texas at San Antonio
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
engineering is what makes it smore difficult to understand.” As shown in the qualitative data, students mostly emphasized concern that it is not thecontent that is complex; instead, it is the amount of content relayed in the course and the limitedopportunities to engage in dialogue. The response from this survey further demonstrates thatthere is difficulty in translating academic concepts into practical problem-solving approachesrelevant to the complex challenges they may encounter in their future engineering careers if thereis not ample opportunity to apply and discuss conceptual knowledge. These insights provided bythe student comments highlight students’ perceived need to receive additional opportunities tocritically analyze the
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shannon Barker, University of Virginia; Brian P. Helmke, University of Virginia; Lynn Mandeltort, University of Virginia; Jessica Taggart, University of Virginia; Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
(2015). Engineering innovation in healthcare: technology, ethics, and persons. Hum Reprod & Gen Ethics 17(2) 3. D Leonard and JF Rayport (1997). Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec 1997 4. F.O. Karatas, G.M. Bodner, S. Unal, “First-year engineering students’ views of the nature of engineering: implications for engineering programmes,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 1, 2016. 5. National Academy of Engineering, “Major Findings & Recommendations. Understanding the Educational and Career Pathways of Engineers,” 2018. 6. Laverty JT, Tessmer S, Cooper MM, Caballero MD. “Engaging physics faculty in course transformation.” Physics
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 2: Experiential Learning in Biomedical Engineering
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Holly M. Golecki, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Joe Bradley, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
engineeringundergraduate training in a clinically relevant design experience. Students earn four credits forsuccessful completion of this course. This course prepares students for a real-world designproblem, with an emphasis on the development, evaluation, and recommendation of alternativesolutions subject to realistic constraints that include considerations of effective teamwork andtechnical communication, patents, quality controls, human factors, FDA regulation,professionalism, and ethics with an emphasis on preparing students for careers in bioengineering.Each year 85-95 students enroll in the course. Students assemble into project teams based ontechnical interests and skills.Capstone Design Course, Bioengineering 575 – Master of EngineeringThis capstone
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 3: Technology in Biomedical Engineering Education
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julie Leonard-Duke, University of Virginia; Shayn Peirce-Cottler, California State University, Channel Islands; Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
information I would have to present when it was mygroups turn.” Lastly, we looked at several metrics ofhow students valued the experience ofusing the different presentation modes.Results demonstrated that students feltthat in-person presentations hadsignificantly more impact on them as anaudience member and that the mode ofpresentation was a significant factor(Fig. 4A). When evaluating time inputrequired versus perceived long-termimpact students responded that pre-recorded presentations requiredsignificantly more time (Fig. 4B,p<0.05) to complete but that in-personpresentations were significantly morevaluable for career preparation (Fig. 4C, Figure 4. Impact of presentation mode A) on student asp < 0.0001). In the future, a more
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Callan E. Monette, Stanford University; Alexis Seymour, Stanford University; William T Yu, Stanford University; Leighton Terrance Wan, Stanford University; Andrew Sho Perley, Stanford University, Department of Bioengineering; Ross Daniel Venook, Stanford University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
skills that would properly equip graduate TAs for success in theclassroom and their future careers. The course filled an urgent need in the Bioengineeringgraduate curriculum while the design and content of this course empowered participants toachieve the course learning objectives. Through this course, participants developed an increasedmastery of pedagogical theory and practices, including active learning, inclusive teaching, andmore. Further, through the final project, participants solidified their knowledge by applyingcourse content to their own areas of interest. In the future, we plan to evaluate both the efficacy of the course and the longer-term impacts ofcourse participants as graduate TAs within the broader bioengineering community. We
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 3
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Deborah Sweet Goldberg, University of Maryland, College Park
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
Paper ID #41245Implementation and Evaluation of Experiential Learning to Reinforce Research& Development Skills in a Biopharmaceutical Process Development CourseDr. Deborah Sweet Goldberg, University of Maryland, College Park Deborah S. Goldberg is a full-time senior lecturer in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is passionate about teaching and mentoring students to prepare them for diverse careers in bioengineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Implementation and Evaluation of Experiential Learning to
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 1: Sense of Self in Biomedical Engineering Students
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nathan Zhang, Vanderbilt University; Stacy S. Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University; Michael I. Miga, Vanderbilt University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
success in academics and professions. While the results of this study maynot present a surprise, it does confirm that we have created a reliable and valid instrument thatcan correlate general engineering self-efficacy to useful skills necessary for biomedical engineersto succeed in clinical environments. Using this instrument periodically throughout the durationof special courses and programs may provide a general evaluation of how effective a particularimmersion program is.LimitationsAs both a survey and a cross-sectional study, our study serves to provide a snapshot of a singletime point in participants’ careers. While we can draw a correlation between IDENT, SOLVE,and WRITE skills and a participants general engineering self-efficacy, a
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christian Poblete Rivera, University of Texas at Dallas
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
, pp. 32-38, 2003.[6] T. A. Nocera, A. Ortiz-Rosario, A. Shermadou and D. A. Delaine, "How Do Biomedical Engineering Graduates Differ from Other Engineers? Bridging the Gap Between BME and Industry: a Case Study," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[7] C. P. Rivera, A. Haung-Saad, C. Wang and A. A. Wang, "Preparing early career biomedical undergraduates through investigations of stakeholder needs: A qualitative analysis," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020.[8] S. Higbee and S. Miller, "Work in Progress: Vertical Integration of Engineering Design in an Under-graduate BME Curriculum," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019.[9] J. Xue, T. Wu, Y. Dai and Y. Xia, "Electrospinning and
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 3: Technology in Biomedical Engineering Education
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paul David Gordon, University of Cincinnati; Mary Preston McDougall
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
students are brought up throughout theireducational careers in an ecosystem with mature, reliable tools in place to discover academicmisconduct, then a culture that such behavior is impermissible may root out all but the mostmalicious incidences.The time-log analysis tool does have potential drawbacks as well. Notably, its effectiveness in avariety of settings and compatibility with various classes and question types has not been studied.A larger-scale, diverse rollout of the method with relevant control data would be necessary tounderstand how its utility varies between application settings. Longitudinal monitoring ofdetection rates also may be merited, as students may adjust their behavior over time to simplyavoid the appearance of cheating to
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 2
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adel Alhalawani, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sophia Koop; Thomas Omwando, Simpson University; Lisa Bosman, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
Network (KEEN).References1 Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S.,Klaassen, R., and Boon, M.: ‘Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision,teaching, and support’, Journal of Engineering Education, 2020, 109, (3), pp. 508-5552 Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J.C., HernándezAlcántara, D., and Morales-Menendez, R.: ‘Active learning in engineering education. A reviewof fundamentals, best practices and experiences’, International Journal on Interactive Design andManufacturing (IJIDeM), 2019, 13, (3), pp. 909-9223 Makki, B.I., Feng, F., Waqar, M.A., and Adhikari, I.M.: ‘Work Readiness, Decision-Making Self-Efficacy, and Career Exploration among
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 2
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William D. Moscoso-Barrera, University of Texas at Austin; Huiliang Wang, University of Texas at Austin
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
understanding diseases, properties of new materials, manufacturing methods,bioinstrumentation, sensors, drug delivery, among others. All these concepts supported not only abetter understanding of requirements but also the development of more detailed solutionsregarding technical descriptions.Being a specialized course, most undergraduate students took it in their career final year. Forgraduate students, most took it as it was related to their current research topics. When comparingthe methodology of this course with others taken, most students compared it with Senior Designor Capstone design courses. Some of the most relevant comments were:"The iterative design process used in this course compared to the ones used in other courses isthat the iterative
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 3
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shivaun D Archer, Cornell University; Mridusmita Saikia, Cornell University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
choosing biomaterials to design a medical “Strengths of this course included the in- device. The course felt exceedingly relevant to person cytotoxicity lab we conducted. I my career as a biomedical engineer.” enjoyed the hands-on experience we got.” “Final project was really interesting, I wish we devoted more time to it. Maybe longer debates or debates across multiple days” Table 2. All student comments related to the active learning modules from end of year course evaluations.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONSIn conclusion, our study demonstrates the