challenging synchronizing the EEG, eye tracking, and video recordings as they operateindependently from one another. Moving forward we will be redesigning our data collection platform sothat they are more accurately synchronized for higher quality data in our continuing experimentation. References:[1] National Academy of Engineering. Grand Challenges for Engineering. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/learning.aspx. Accessed: 2020-10-22.[2] White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Draft national strategy on microelectronics research. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/SML-DRAFT-Microlectronics- Strategy-For-Public-Comment.pdf. Accessed: 2022-10-22.[3] A. Y. Kolb and D. A
-hour studio emphasized quantitative physiology taught in lecture, withstudents working in groups to address the engineering challenge presented. Appendix A describesthe design challenge presented while data was collected for this research. The goal of the studiosis for students to develop the design thinking process, consisting of identifying and rankingengineering and design goals/constraints; developing solutions that address these constraints;conceptualizing a technology that combines these solution elements; summarizing the technologyinto an engineering model; and communicating the technology. Students receive real-timefeedback in three studio phases: desk visits where instructors offer informal suggestions toindividual teams, pin up stage
student assessment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work In Progress: Factors Influencing Career Choice and Success in Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe field of biomedical engineering (BME) has witnessed significant growth in recent years,driven by advances in technology and a growing emphasis on healthcare innovation. This growthhas led to a large range of post-graduation career paths for BME undergraduates includingmedical and professional school, graduate school, and direct employment as engineers in themedtech, biotech, and healthcare industries [1]. Much of the literature on career choice andmotivations of these students focuses on their plans at
Paper ID #38280Work in Progress: Can In-Class Peer Reviews of Written AssignmentsImprove Problem Solving and Scientific Writing in a Standard-Based,Sophomore Laboratory Course?Dr. Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University Casey J. Ankeny, PhD is an Associate Professor of Instruction at Northwestern University. Casey received her bachelor’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia and her doctorate degree in Biomedical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University where she studied the role of shear stress in aortic valve disease. Currently, she is investigating equitable
on enhancing undergradu- ate and graduate student learning, engagement, and workforce development by transforming biomedical engineering education through scholarship and research of innovative teaching and learning practices and technologies. He has worked in higher education for more than 35 years at state and private universities and an NCI comprehensive cancer hospital. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Professional Development Through High- Impact ExperiencesIntroductionThe Department of Biomedical Engineering at Texas A&M University (TAMU)comprehensively redesigned its undergraduate curriculum in response to a host