EngineeringCapstone Design Project Dr. Alexis Ortiz-Rosario1 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH, USA AbstractThe traditional idea of capstone teams is assigning a project to a group of students which willbe tackled throughout an academic term. The team can comprise students from a single majoror multi-disciplinary (e.g., multiple majors). The project can span one or two semesters; in someexceptions, new teams are tasked with further project phases for the following years [1]. Thiswork aims to present a novel approach to structuring capstone teams. By deconstructing asingle project into multi-deliverable components (e.g., heart rate
several levels of design across different programs. This includes Capstone in theBachelors (BS) program, Professional Capstone in the Master of Engineering (MEng) program,and the Capstone Projects course in the College of Medicine. Having multiple disconnected levelsof design presents numerous challenges, such as sourcing projects, structuring the scope ofprojects, and sharing resources both physical and personnel related. As a result, we elected todevelop a shared resource model for projects across these programs to meet the needs of eachprogram and to enhance the learning experience and professional preparation for students. In thisnew model, medical students develop projects based on needs identified during clinical rotations.Medical students
. Washington, D.C: National AcademyPress, 2000.[4] N. Budwig, J. Ratliff-Crain, and M. Reder, “Student Preparation for and Engagement with SignatureWork,” AAC&U, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 15–20, Mar. 2018.[5] S. Chaiklin, “The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky’s Analysis of Learning andInstruction,” in Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context, A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, S. M. Miller,and V. S. Ageyev, Eds., in Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. ,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 39–64. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511840975.004.[6] ChatGPT, “‘define, “[term]”’.” OpenAI, Jan. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: chat.openai.com/chat[7] C. A. Cooper et al., “Mini-design projects in capstone: Initial design
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Engineering Design Integrated Tissue Engineering Course Module: Scleraxis Tendon Bioreactor Project Abstract Increased exposure to engineering design projects during undergraduate engineeringeducation has gained attraction over the past years. In addition to the capstone senior design courseofferings, Biomedical Engineering programs increasingly incorporate standalone engineeringdesign courses into the curriculum as early as freshman year. These promising attempts emphasizethe importance of reinforcing engineering design practices. However, it is still a challenge toaccommodate engineering design projects into field-specific courses
othersupporting scientific articles. Students defined design requirements, generated evolutionarysolutions through multiple iterations, and demonstrated the utility of scientific literature byapplying knowledge to enhance their designs. This approach facilitated a deeper exploration ofbiomedical technology, involving critical analysis and improvement of materials, methods, andmanufacturing techniques.Seventeen students participated in the project, divided into six groups, each assigned specifictopics related to wearable and implanted technologies. Over 14 weeks, students followed astructured process, making presentations associated with three design iterations, showcasing theirprogress, and receiving feedback from a teaching team consisting of the
. The first aim of this pipeline is to enhance senior design (SD) projectpreparedness by 1) introducing a new physical prototyping course to develop and practiceessential fabrications skills, and 2) revising CIP to better validate needs for the new pipeline’slongitudinal process. The second aim is to leverage interdisciplinary collaboration to enhancemedtech device design by 1) using CIP as a catalyst to identify and validate needs for use as SDprojects and 2) continuing longitudinal development beyond SD with medical student innovatorsfrom our four-year cocurricular Innovation Medicine (IMED) program for medical students.Transitioning projects from CIP to SD, by students with training in prototyping, and then tomedical capstone has substantial
feltthat it came at a cost of the project timeline: “It would be nice to do less team building in thebeginning and shift the timeline forward faster.”Figure 2. Comparison of mean CATME Peer Evaluation #1 ratings for BME capstone designcourse from course offerings before asset-based activities were included (Pre: No AssetActivities, n=364), after activities were included (Post: No Asset Activities, n=425), and duringthe two course offerings in which asset-based activities were implemented (Asset Activities,n=457). *Statistical significance (p<0.05, t-test).Importantly, asset-based activities were implemented for the first time during the first iteration ofa restructured senior design course, where the BME senior design course transitioned from a
led electrospinning to find applications in variousbiomedical applications such as tissue engineering and drug delivery [1, 2]. However, severalparameters can greatly affect the production quality of fibers, such as concentration of the polymersolution, voltage, feed rate, and ambient conditions [3]. Controlling the manufacturing ofelectrospun fibers presented a unique engineering problem that could integrate concepts frommultiple bioengineering courses including biomechanics, circuits, computer aided design (CAD),thermodynamics, and biomaterials into a single engineering design project with real-worldapplications. This project served as the basis for a new junior-level design course that will betterprepare students for their senior capstone
realistic medical device design in education and the quality assessment of educational design projects for between-project comparisons.Dylan Lynch, The University of Illinois at Chicago ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Development and Implementation of a Makerspace Class for BME Undergraduates to Enhance Skills in Senior DesignIntroduction:The undergraduate curriculum in biomedical engineering at the University of Illinois Chicagoemphasizes problem-based learning with a focus on as much hands-on project work as possible.To that end, our 100-level Introduction to BME course integrates CAD design, 3d printing andmicroprocessors to achieve learning outcomes. A 200-level course
curricular updates to BME305L & BME306L that reflectsstudents’ comments on better preparations for these area core classes, measuring BME studentsuccess in research and industry careers in this sector, and assess improvements in BiotechnologyDesign I/II projects and ventures as a capstone design course.References[1] R. A. Linsenmeier and A. Saterbak, "Fifty Years of Biomedical Engineering UndergraduateEducation," Ann Biomed Eng, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1590-1615, Jun 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02494-0.[2] D. Collias, R. Marshall, S. P. Collins, C. L. Beisel, and V. Noireaux, "An educational moduleto explore CRISPR technologies with a cell-free transcription-translation system," Synth Biol(Oxf), vol. 4, no. 1, p. ysz005, 2019, doi: 10.1093/synbio
Engineering DesignProgramConstanza Miranda, PhD 1*, Elizabeth Logsdon, PhD 1, Amadea Martino Smith 11 Johns Hopkins University, Biomedical Engineering DepartmentABSTRACTThis is a work in progress. To instruct design abilities in undergraduate engineering students, it iscommon for programs to engage in problem-based learning projects. In addition, project-based instructionis often done with students in teams and these teams have formal or informal leadership structures. In thiscontext, the success of the student project is usually attributed to the mindset of the leader, managementstyles, team dynamics that are cultivated by the leader, as well as a clear team structure and goals. Thisvertically operating leadership model is manifested as an
development duringsenior design (3) with projects being refined by medical students during their capstone projects(4). Continuation of projects through this pipeline defines a potential for longitudinal innovativedesign work across disciplines, addressing several of the challenges that are present in thecurrent process. Thus, the selection of an appropriate project in CIP for longitudinaldevelopment is paramount. The purpose of this report is to describe the structure of the revisedCIP, to assess its efficacy by student self-perception, and to reflect on its potential for supportinglongitudinal development. Specifically, to assess the efficacy of the revised CIP, we tested thehypothesis that participation in CIP would increase student’s confidence
Harding and McPherson suggested that over 80 percent ofemployers desire an applicant pool of engineers with fundamental knowledge of finding,applying, and developing standards [2].Our study design is functionally an approach to apply principles of Bloom’s Taxonomy to theeducation of consensus standards. All current standards curricula at the UIC, and most of thatidentified in biomedical engineering education literature [3, 4, 5] focuses on recognition andunderstanding (i.e., the lowest levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy). Capstone design courses mayrequire the incorporation of standards during the design process or verification testing butapproach and standard rigor can be widely varied. Recognition of appropriate standards is quitevaluable for engineers
the engineering profession, cultivating an innovative spirit from an early age can be aformidable task. Project Lead The Way (PLTW), a program dedicated to transformative STEMteaching for K-12 students, focuses on skills relevant to innovation and entrepreneurship such asproblem-solving and critical thinking. The PLTW program, however, has a limited focus on thehumanities which is presumed to turn women and minoritized populations away from STEM [2].In university-level engineering programs, with the heavy technical curricular demands, inclusionof coursework dedicated to innovation and creativity may not always be perceived as logisticallypossible. Allocating valuable course time that help engineers recognize opportunities and createvalue
implementations through the Massachusetts Health Information Exchange. At Wentworth, Dr. Feldman is focused on project-based instruction, hands-on simulations, experiential learning approaches, and first year curriculum. Dr. Feldman is one of the lead instructors for Introduction to Engineering courses, with enrollments in the hundreds each fall. His re- search and teaching interests, in addition to first year engineering, include telemedicine, health informat- ics, rehabilitation engineering, and medical robotics. Dr. Feldman has collaborated with researchers and engineers from organizations including Tufts School of Veterinary Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Vecnacares, and Restoreskills.Dr. George D. Ricco, University
Biomedical Engineering Curriculum AbstractIn response to the growing importance of ethical consciousness in the realm of biomedicalengineering, we present a comprehensive educational initiative designed to seamlessly integrateethics across the entire curriculum. This endeavor involved close collaboration with facultymembers and the provision of summer salary support to develop substantial ethical thinkingexercises within key technical courses, including Modeling Cells and Cellular Systems, ImagingSystems, Instrumentation, Biomaterials, and senior capstone design classes. This initiative, aptlynamed the "Snail Progression of Ethical Instruction," introduces a structured frameworkspanning four years, each
advancednature of senior capstone projects may lead to more difficulty in prototyping. A future studyshould include a series of follow-up questions for those students who gave a score of neutral orlower to better understand what factors contribute to their rating. This data will be useful inhelping instructors to better support students in prototyping these projects and to ensure teamsare extracting relevant and useful information from this process and the resulting prototype.Final student commentsIn the last open-ended question at the end of the survey, students were given the opportunity toshare what improvements they thought could be made to the Show and Tell session for futuresemesters. Of the 66 students who left a substantial comment
Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and M.S. and Ph.D. de- grees in Bioengineering at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Allen’s teaching activities include coordinating the undergraduate teaching labs and co-teaching the Capstone Design sequence in the BME department at the University of Virginia, and his research interests are in the fields of computational bi- ology and bioinformatics. He is also interested in evaluating the pedagogical approaches optimal for teaching lab concepts and skills, computational modeling approaches, and professionalism within design classes. He is active within the Biomedical Engineering Division of the American Society for Engineer- ing Education and previously served on the
Paper ID #43848Board 19: Work in Progress: Towards Self-reported Student Usage of AI toDirect Curriculum in Technical Communication CoursesKavon Karrobi, Boston University Kavon Karrobi is a Lecturer in the Department of Biomedical Engineering, as well as the Manager of the Bioengineering Technology & Entrepreneurship Center (BTEC) at Boston University. As a Lecturer in BME, Kavon teaches and mentors students in courses on biomedical measurements, analysis, and instrumentation. As Manager of BTEC, Kavon provides guidance, training, and mentorship of student projects that use BTEC ranging from student-initiated
ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2017, pp. 1–9.[19] A. Heimdal, R. T. Thorstensen, and P. Svennevig, “Investigations on the use of Student Peer Review to Improve Supervision of Capstone Courses in the Civil Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, The Design Society, 2020. doi: 10.35199/EPDE.2020.54.[20] R. A. Flores and F. Rios, “Incorporating peer review techniques to enhance students’ communication skills and team performance in engineering capstone projects,” he International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1969–1982, 2019.[21] M. Mandala et al., “Impact of collaborative team peer review on the
. Allen’s teaching activities include coordinating the undergraduate teaching labs and the Capstone Design sequence in the BME department at the University of Virginia, and his research interests are in the fields of computational biology and bioinformatics. He is also interested in evaluating the pedagogical approaches optimal for teaching lab concepts and skills, computational modeling approaches, and professionalism within design classes. He is active within the Biomedical Engineering Division of the American Society for Engineering Education and previously served on the executive committee of this division (Program Chair 2011, Division Chair 2012, and Nominating Committee Chair 2013). For the past seven years, he has
Work in Progress: Development of a Medical Devices Course for Sophomore Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate StudentsIntroductionThe biomedical engineering (BME) workforce requires competency in professional and technicalskills. BMEs often use knowledge in design, administration and management, and customerneeds assessment [1]. Typical work activities of a BME include analyzing data or information,organizing and planning work, determining compliance with standards, building teams, anddrafting and specifying technical device parts [1]. The undergraduate BME capstone designcourse is often used as a “catchall” to develop these critical professional skills; however, to buildcompetency, it is recommended that these skills be practiced
understand howBME students develop an entrepreneurial mindset (EM). These studies explore curricular EMinterventions designed to encourage development of EM skills such as curiosity about the coursetopics [22], reflective thinking [16], and designing for a certain customer base [17], [42]. In Kinget al.'s study [40], BME students participated in capstone design projects where they worked inteams to design prototypes based on existing patent applications of industry professionals. Thesestudents were able to learn about the engineering design process as well as the business side ofintellectual property development such as patents, customer discovery, budgeting, andcommunication of results [40].In several studies on EM development within a BME context